Theodore R. Scherck is president of The Colography Group Inc., an Atlanta-based consultant that offers primary research, strategic planning and new program development services to businesses looking to identify and capitalize on growth opportunities in the global time-definite, or expedited, cargo market, as well as to governments worldwide.
If the price of what you've been buying is rising to the point where you can no longer afford it, you naturally look for a suitable replacement. If you can't find a replacement, you're stuck. Right?
Not anymore. Logistics professionals who need to move a high volume of small but time-definite shipments were once captives of expedited air freight service providers. But they're captives no more—at least not in the shorter-haul lanes. The burgeoning tim e-definite service sector has expanded to include a host of ground-based service providers. While these ground-based expedited carriers can't serve all needs, they have significantly improved their performance and expanded their coverage areas. The result: Many, many shipments that once had to travel by air are now remaining solidly on the ground.
For shippers, it's a wonderful thing. Their deadlines are being met. Their budgets are under control, and the increasing cost of expedited air has had only a limited impact on their bottom line.
This, of course, didn't happen overnight. Many inter-related aspects of the logistics business had to move into alignment to get to this point. But largely through the use of technology, the expedited transport industry has developed into an agile, customer-driven industry whose innovation and execution have permanently improved the way we live and do business. If they want to sustain the momentum, however, carriers must keep in mind four trends whose influence will continue to shape the market: the rising dominance of the t ransportation buyer, the decline in average shipment weight, the shift from mode-specific to time-based shipping, and the shortening of the average length of haul.
A buyer's market? It depends
Executives in the transportation industry have long lamented pricing they consider irrationally low given the quality and value of services rendered. That could change.
The empirical evidence, based on the Atlanta-based consultant The Colography Group's analysis of four primary categories of traffic—domestic air, ground parcel, air export and less-than-truckload (LTL)— tells us that, on balance, strong end-user demand will be met by firmer pricing on the supply side. Providers will obtain a reasonable return on their pricing initiatives as long as they're positioned to respond to their customers' dynamic distribution needs and can reliably execute on strictly established delivery requirements.
The pricing environment does vary by mode, based on analysis of industry yield per pound, which is the most accurate measure of pricing trends in the marketplace. Air freight pricing, for example, has grown slowly. From 1990 to 2002, the average yield on a pound of domestic air freight rose from $1.40 to $1.72, which translates to a compound annual growth rate of 1.7 percent. (See Exhibit 1.)
For this same time period, inflation compounded at 2.8 percent per year In addition, the growth in yield in recent years has come through fuel surcharges, which are essentially a direct cost pass through. In other words, domestic air yields have actually declined in constant dollar terms over the past 12 years. This is due in no small part to the increasing sophistication and successful use of information technology by the air freight buyer and the service provider to achieve operating efficiencies.
Projecting from 2003 to 2007, domestic air yields should show a bump from $1.77 to $1.97 per pound. Two factors contributing to that are the distance-based pricing programs adopted by virtually all of the leading U.S. domestic express carriers, raising yields on longer-haul freight, and the migration of short-haul traffic from air to ground, taking much of the lower-priced freight out of the mix.
The picture varies in other modes. Less-than-truckload carriers and air export car riers have had difficulty making gains. Yields per pound for LTL and U.S. air exports remain flat. Furthermore, per-pound yields for LTL will remain flat and air export yields will head downward in the next four years, according to our projections.
But ground parcel yields, which we started tracking in 1992, have shown a healthy percentage gain, with perpound prices rising from 41 cents in 1992 to 58 cents a pound in 2002, a 41-percent increase. The success of those ground carriers in delivering service that rivals air cargo, especially in short zone markets,has enabled a steady rise in prices. And that trend will likely continue: Ground parcel yields will demonstrate steady growth from 60 cents a pound in 2003 to 69 cents a pound in 2007.
Even with those increases, domestic shippers can expect to pay less overall for transportation than they do today. The reasons: the increasing substitution of ground for air in short-haul markets, the growing proportion of shorter haul shipments and the trend toward lighter average shipment weights.
One area that is likely to see significant change is the demand for medium hauls, those between 900 and 1,500 miles. Shipments in that range will be affected by the development of supply chain networks designed to distribute goods on shorter hauls and to move long-haul goods on more direct routings and away from consolidations. This strategy, which we term "disaggregation," is a prime example of the dramatic logistics reconfiguring now under way.
The disaggregation trend has also produced a "barbell" effect on U.S. transportation. At one end of the barbell, a growing percentage of all goods are moving in short lengths of haul, defined as less than 600 miles. At the other end, long-haul LTL services are gaining momentum as businesses opt for cheaper surface alternatives to have their disaggregated goods moved from point to point.Once the goods reach a distribution center near the point of destination, they are shipped out locally via a regional surface carrier.
As a result, rates for long-haul LTL services may escalate as point-to-point shipping increases and frugal shippers seek low-cost alternatives to air freight. But p ricing in the medium-haul LTL market will stagnate—a reflection of that segment's uninspiring prospects.
The incredible shrinking shipment
Shipments are not only moving shorter distances, they're getting smaller as well. After peaking in 1997 at 36.9 pounds, the industrywide average shipment weight for U.S. expedited cargo has been in steady decline, falling to 34.2 pounds in 2002 and projected to drop to 31.6 pounds by 2007. (See Exhibit 2.)
Most of the decline is skewed to the domestic air freight segment, where the weight of the average air shipment fell sharply in 1994 and has been dropping ever since. We expect air shipment weight to decline to 6.5 pounds by 2007, which would be the lowest in all the years we've been tracking these figures.
What's behind this decline? The prevalence of lighter high-tech shipments in the overall product mix and a shift to lighter-weighted plastics and alloys in the manufacturing process play key roles. Most notable, however, is the move to "disaggregation," which will continue to drive the migration to smaller and lighter consignments.
In years past, a company shipping from, say, Atlanta to Los Angeles would ship into a distribution center in Chicago. In Chicago, a distributor would aggregate the company's shipments with others and dispatch them via LTL to Los Angeles.
The creation of new distribution platforms, most notably e-business, has changed the equation. Today, goods ordered online can be sent directly to the consignee and are not subject to aggregation. As a result, shippers and their customers are abandoning their traditional centralized inventory models—which favor consolidations—and are opting for a decentralized infrastructure that pumps out goods with more frequency as individual consignments. The end result is growth in the number of smaller and lighter shipments.
The shifting sands of "time"
Perhaps the most durable and meaningful trend of the last 20 years has been the shift away from mode-specific to time-based shipping. Not only has this trend stood the test of "time," but it has also been the basis for the development and implementation of virtually every major transportation strategy over the last two decades.
More than ever, transport in the United States—and internationally as well—reflects modal neutrality and an emphasis on timedefinite services. What's most crucial is not speed, but reliability. Cost-conscious consignees are willing to trade down the speed of transit times as long as the freight will arrive at pre-determined intervals. How the freight moves has become less important. In our surveys, when we ask shippers to list the most important factor in choosing a carrier, 95 percent put "on-time delivery"at the top of the list.
The shift to modal neutrality, combined with the economic realities of the marketplace and the shrinking of lengths of haul, has benefited ground parcel carriers most. We trace this back to 1998, when UPS introduced a money-back guarantee on all its ground deliveries, which was soon matched by FedEx Ground. By the time Airborne Express (now part of DHL) rolled out its "Ground Delivery Service" in 2001, guaranteed delivery had become the ground parcel industry standard.
All three companies have built well-deserved reputations for delivery precision and reliability. As a result, shippers are gravitating toward these providers and away from traditional LTL services, where the reputation for reliability has not been as sterling. While traffic handled by other modes declined drastically since the economic down turn began in 2000, ground parcel shipments actually rose from 2000 to 2002.
Looking out five years, ground parcel will demonstrate the most robust growth in the transportation industry, cracking the four billion shipment barrier in 2007. Nearly 70 percent of all U.S.-originating traffic will move via ground parcel services by that time.
Shortening the hauls
Today, over two-thirds of all domestic air and ground shipments travel less than 700 miles to their final destination. We expect that percentage to grow in coming years, as average domestic length of haul continues to drop. (See Exhibit 3.)
The reduction in the average length of haul has triggered profound changes in the country's transportation system. It has driven the decline in average shipment weight, the rapid growth of ground parcel and regional LTL traffic, and the corresponding stagnation in the air freight category. It has reduced the U.S. combination airlines (airlines that carry passengers and freight), which once controlled virtually all of the country's domestic air freight and airmail, to nonplayers in today's U.S. market. At last count, combination airlines controlled approximately 0.8 percent of all U.S. air freight traffic. Those carriers have virtually abandoned the second-day delivery segment and are unlikely to return.
The trend toward shorter hauls has even affected air freight carried by dedicated carriers, a service traditionally used to move goods over longer distances. According to our latest research, even the average air freight consignment is moving less than 600 miles.
Our shipment projections through 2007 forecast only incremental growth in the air segment and declines in the LTL and air export categories. However, we would not be surprised to see a brighter traffic picture for the long-haul LTL segment given the trend toward disaggregation that we highlighted previously.
Today's supply chain (and tomorrow's as well) demands rapid, timely and economical product turns. The shipper doesn't want to invest the time and the expense to build consolidations, especially as end-user buying patterns migrate toward disaggregation. The ultimate customer wants goods pumped out fast, on time, as needed and without the consolidator- style middleman. And the provider market must respond with continuous development of richer, more robust services backed by such value-adds as moneyback guarantees.
Seventeen innovative products and solutions from eleven providers have reached the nomination round of the IFOY Award 2025, an international competition that brings together the best new material handling products for warehouses and distribution center operations.
The nominees this year come from six different countries and will compete head-to-head during a Test Camp that will be held March 26 and 27 in Dortmund, Germany. The Test Camp allows hands-on evaluation and testing of products based on engineering and operational design. In contrast to the usual display of products at a trade show, The Test Camp also allows end-users and visitors to the event the opportunity to experience these technologies hands-on as they would operate in a facility.
Award categories include integrated solutions, counter-balanced forklifts, warehouse forklifts, mobile robotic solutions, other warehouse robotics, intralogistics software, and specialized solutions for controlling operations. A startup of the year is also recognized.
The finalists include entries from aluco, EP Equipment Germany, Exotec, Geekplus Europe, HUBTEX, Interroll, Jungheinrich, Logitrans, PLANCISE, STILL and Verity.
In the “IFOY Start-up of the Year” spin-off award, Blickfeld, ecoro, enabl and Filics are in the running. These finalists were selected from all entries following six weeks of intensive work by the IFOY organization, test teams, and a jury composed of journalists who cover the logistics market. DC Velocity’s David Maloney is one of the jurors, representing the United States. Winners will be recognized at a gala to be held July 3 in Dortmund's Phoenix des Lumières.
While Christmas is always my favorite time of the year, I have always been something of a Scrooge when it comes to celebrating the New Year. It is traditionally a time of reflection, where we take stock of our lives and make resolutions to do better. I’ve always felt that I really didn’t need a calendar to remind me to kick my bad habits in favor of healthier routines. If I was not already doing something that was good for me, then making promises I probably won’t keep after a few weeks is not really helpful.
But as we turn the calendar to 2025, there is a lot to consider this new year. The election is behind us, and it will be interesting to see how supply chains react to the new administration. We’ve been told to expect sharp increases in tariffs, like those the president-elect issued in his first term. Will these cause the desired shift away from goods made in China?
What we have actually seen so far is a temporary surge in imports that began in late fall in anticipation of higher tariffs. This bump will be short-lived, however, unless consumer confidence remains unusually high.
Of course, the new administration’s aim with tariffs is to encourage companies to bring production back to America. Will we see manufacturing surge at home? Probably not. It took us decades to send our manufacturing to parts of the world where production was cheaper. I imagine it will take decades to bring it back, if it can ever really be fully brought back. We’ve become accustomed to those lower labor costs. So take your pick—higher tariffs or higher labor costs. Regardless of which route businesses choose, it will probably drive prices higher.
Labor itself will be interesting to watch this year. As I write this, the three-month extension of the master agreement between dock workers and East and Gulf Coast ports is due to expire in a few weeks—on Jan. 15, to be precise. While the two sides have resolved their wage disputes, the issue of automation remains a major sticking point, with the workers resisting the widescale implementation of automated systems.
And of course, we still have two wars raging overseas that have disrupted supply chains. Will we see peace this year, or will other trouble spots flare up?
And here at home, we’ve now been in a trucking recession for two years. What will happen in that sector in 2025? Hopefully, better days are ahead, but only ifconsumers keep spending, demand increases, fuel prices continue to drop, and capacity levels out. That’s a lot to ask.
Whatever this year holds for our supply chains, it is definitely setting up to be very interesting, to say the least.
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: Consumers are clamoring for innovation in the food supply chain sphere in 2025. From a greater emphasis on convenience to a renewed desire for operational efficiency and security, new preferences call for a shift from tried-and-true procedures to innovative business models that champion modernization—the adoption of which can help organizations stand out as technological and cultural leaders in the new year and beyond.
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: I think it is still a strong and viable market—[there are] always new opportunities. When the new additional tariffs come in, we shall see how that affects the total market. I think the demand for used equipment will go up. Users will have X amount of dollars to invest in equipment, and if the Chinese, Canadian, and/or Mexican product [costs] gets pushed higher, the user does not necessarily have more money available. I am not sure sales of American-made lift trucks will increase.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: It’s safe to say the industrial lift truck market has been somewhat volatile the last five years, with the market reaching all-time highs during the pandemic years, [then experiencing] massive swings downward these past two. While most lift truck OEMs enjoyed the spike in sales, the enormous demand put a significant strain on the supply chain, pushing leadtimes out to unprecedented levels while simultaneously driving up costs. The significant market decline is something no CEO in this industry would boast about. The fall we are experiencing today is better viewed as a normalization or correction to a market that was way overinflated.
With all the pent-up demand from the excessive orders due to the elongated pandemic leadtimes, we are now experiencing an abundance of stock on hand at both the OEM and distribution levels. On the surface, a market that’s quickly becoming half of what it was two years ago looks catastrophic. However, when you compare it to what’s happened over the past 15 years, today’s market still looks relatively healthy.
Q: WILL 2025 AND THE HOPES OF LOWER INTEREST RATES SPUR INVESTMENTS IN NEW INDUSTRIAL TRUCKS?
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: It will not hurt, but I do not think interest rates hinder sales. One point [in the interest rate] in either direction has a small impact on the payment. A rate reduction can be used as a marketing tool, though. If rates decline, dealers can go back over their outstanding quotes, refigure the payments, and present a new monthly cost to the user.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: There are many factors, including interest rates, that play a role in the level of investment in industrial truck fleets. Most significant of those factors is consumer confidence. Logically, when consumers are confident, they buy more, which means manufacturers will have to make more and lift trucks will have to move more.
While inflation and high interest rates have surely stifled consumer confidence these past four years, there are signs that a new, more business-friendly administration will work in conjunction with lower interest rates to help drive up consumer confidence. Lower interest rates will work hand in hand with that resurgence in consumer confidence to help drive more investment in industrial equipment.
Q: WILL THE NEW ADMINISTRATION’S PROPOSED TARIFFS HURT OR HELP YOUR BRANDS?
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: The industrial lift truck market is one that is very global in nature, with a complex supply chain and operations scattered throughout the world. The tariffs that are being proposed on countries like Canada, Mexico, and China will undoubtedly have an impact on the industrial market, depending on the manufacturer. All lift truck manufacturers will experience varying levels of impact due to the tariffs, but tariffs are designed to incentivize companies to re-evaluate their supply chains and bring more manufacturing capacity back to the United States, which is a good thing.
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: As we represent a Chinese manufacturer, the tariff increase will have an effect. We are currently paying 25%. An additional 10% (as of the last reports) is manageable. It is a world economy. Adding the tariff just adds cost to the product here in the U.S. China does not pay it; the dealers do. We have no choice but to pass on this added cost. To reduce the costs of tariffs, manufacturers will move production to a country that does not have a tariff. Even though labor costs will be higher, it will not add more than the proposed tariff to the cost of the machine.
The factory will look for new countries to manufacture in as well. If tariffs had come in at 60% per campaign promises, it would have been disastrous. We probably would have moved manufacturing to Vietnam or another Asian country immediately.
Q: THE MARKET HAS BEEN MOVING TO ELECTRIC VEHICLES IN RECENT YEARS. DO YOU THINK THIS WILL CONTINUE, OR WILL THE ADVENT OF A MORE FOSSIL FUEL-FRIENDLY ADMINISTRATION DRIVE MORE DEMAND FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION (IC) TRUCKS?
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: The states have a bigger say in this than the federal government. Look at California as an example. With the advent of lithium as a safe and effective power solution, and with the price of lithium batteries coming down, I think [the use of] electric vehicles will continue to expand. Total cost of ownership is already much lower on electric when compared to IC product.
We continue to see electric product increasing every year. It is more sustainable, and it has now reached a point where cost is not a barrier to entry. Power and force have been overcome; we produce an electric rough-terrain lift truck that has a 50-degree gradeability.
Users will look at their own requirements, costs, etc., before deciding on IC or electric. I do not think the new administration will be able to justify the additional cost needed to use IC products. Electric is the future of material handling.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: As anyone involved with the industrial lift truck market knows, California has been the driving force behind the electrification of the market, forcing organizations that operate in that state away from lift trucks that run on fossil fuels. While there have been no changes in the stringent regulations being imposed by the California Zero Emission Forklift Initiative, which essentially prohibits the sale of most spark-ignited internal combustion forklifts starting in 2026, there are many that expect an easing of such regulations.
Yet, aside from the legislative pressures, there continues to be a strong value proposition for making the switch to electric. Technological advancements in lift truck systems, battery technology, and charging platforms have all combined to make moving to electric more feasible than ever before; we are one of the only westernized nations who still use combustion engine equipment indoors. This is a welcome change for both warehouse employees and the environment.
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: The industry is embracing alternative fuel and energy sources. One viable option is lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) with certification from Underwriters Laboratories. While lithium-ion technology is already a proven solution in the industry, offering superior performance and longer life spans than traditional lead-acid batteries, The Raymond Corporation sees UL-compliant LIBs playing a pivotal role in meeting new regulatory standards. These batteries not only help reduce emissions but also improve the operational efficiency of the material handling, manufacturing, and warehousing industries.
Q: LIFT TRUCKS ARE USED FOR MANY TASKS, BUT ARE THERE ANY APPLICATIONS THAT ARE OF PARTICULAR INTEREST TO CUSTOMERS?
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: Today, organizations are aiming innovations in lift truck technologies to increase uptime, improve speed and mobility, streamline diagnostic procedures, and lower operating and energy costs—dramatically cutting consumption without reducing productivity. And it’s not just the forklift technologies that are evolving. The systems that warehouse managers rely on to manage and maintain their trucks—including operator-assist and data collection technologies—are also growing increasingly advanced.
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: E-commerce has fueled growth in the last few years. I believe it is here to stay. If anything, it will expand. All these products come from warehouses that need material handling machines. Every product we touch, including food, is probably moved at one point by a lift truck. We need to move products from one location to another, and trucks must be loaded and then unloaded at their destination. Lift trucks perform this function.
We are seeing continued expansion of Class III product [electric hand trucks and hand/rider trucks]. Walkie products move material but cannot stack it. Companies are realizing most of their need is for movement. For example, [a company may] have always used three lift trucks [that can both move and stack product] in its warehouse, when it only needs to have one truck [that’s capable of both moving and stacking product] along with two trucks [that just] move material, which includes loading and unloading at the dock.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: Labor constraints today have been a significant challenge for operations that require the use of lift trucks. With the massive movement to e-commerce, there is a much higher need for lift truck operators in warehousing and distribution environments. The lack of skilled labor has really pressured companies to invest in technologies that help operations accomplish more with less. As a result, more and more operations are looking to [incorporate] various levels of automation into their industrial lift truck fleets.
Q: DO YOU SEE ROBOTICS SOLUTIONS AS COMPETITIVE WITH FORKLIFTS OR COMPLEMENTARY TO THEM?
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: For many years, the industrial lift truck manufacturers viewed automation and AGV [automatic guided vehicle] companies as competitors, but we’ve experienced a significant change in thinking over the past decade. What was a threat has now become a strength for the lift truck manufacturers. Almost all lift truck manufacturers today have expanded their technology capabilities to such a level that they are now able to offer automated versions of their standard equipment with improved ROI [return on investment] calculations.
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: They are complementary. Most AGV solutions are based on a forklift of some type. We will just be building different types of forklifts. The goal of robotics is to take out the labor cost of the driver. The operator is by far the most expensive component of material handling.
Support of your AGV will determine the success of the project. Dealer networks will be the key here. There are more and more companies getting into the AGV market, but can they support it after the sale?
Repetitive moves or long distances are the easiest [places] to remove the driver from the equation. If the unit goes down because of programming or mechanics, you must be able to get it back up operating as soon as possible. Dealer network and aftersales support should be a major component of the decision to take advantage of the benefits of AGV material handling.
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: Robots have been used in warehouses for decades, but in recent years, “cobots” have become even more complementary in the warehouse and instrumental in providing great levels of efficiency. From improved security and increased productivity to increased accuracy and lower costs, cobots are becoming an increasingly important part of warehouse operations.
Q: TODAY’S INDUSTRIAL TRUCKS OFFER MORE SAFETY FEATURES THAN EVER BEFORE. WHAT DO YOU SEE AS THE MOST SIGNIFICANT SAFETY DEVELOPMENTS OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS?
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: One of the most significant advancements in warehouse operations involves the implementation of virtual reality (VR) simulators. The technology can help new forklift operators develop the skills they need to succeed on the warehouse floor without impacting day-to-day operations, while also serving as a reinforcement tool for experienced operators. VR simulators serve as flexible, scalable teaching tools that rely on advanced technology to help workforces become more efficient and expand operator skills, creating optimized conditions for all employees.
In addition, training reinforcement offerings—like integrated equipment detection and notification systems and operator tether systems—can similarly help warehouse operators improve their work environment. Systems like these use intelligent speed limitations, real-time object detection, operator notifications, and more to improve employee awareness of their environment even in high-traffic areas.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: With advancements in technology, all lift truck manufacturers are playing their part in developing new technologies that allow for the safe operation of their equipment. While there are various means in which manufacturers have applied these technologies, there is no substitute for a sound operator safety training program. [Ensuring that your operators receive the proper training] will always be the number-one way to reduce the likelihood of workplace incidents involving lift trucks. In addition to having fully trained operators, many manufacturers offer optional operator-assistance systems that may improve workplace safety for both the operator and those working around lift trucks.
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: When I started in this business, we were selling used trucks without overhead guards. They were produced without them. The load backrest was not a given. Seat belts were nonexistent.
There have been so many great advancements in safety, it is hard to pick just one. We are incorporating AI [artificial intelligence] into our equipment now. This will recognize a person in the area and warn the driver. Besides changing the physical attributes of the lift truck to make it safer for the operator, we will see more and more technology and AI in the pursuit of making it safer for the pedestrian.
Q: WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES OF LEASING VERSUS BUYING FOR COMPANIES LOOKING TO ACQUIRE NEW TRUCKS?
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: This is an age-old question. It really depends on the user. It is a function of cash flow and cash balances in each company. Leases can be expensed, while purchases need to be capitalized. Not only are we looking at the cash position, but we also now need to review our profit position. The user needs a lift truck, but does he need to capitalize it because profit is low, or does he need to expense it to decrease his profit and reduce the taxes on the company?
Every company is different, [but either way,] you will have outflow of cash and a new lift truck on the floor producing for you. The question is which method benefits the organization the most.
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: Today’s electric forklifts offer performance that meets the needs of the most common lift truck applications, but with dramatically reduced maintenance requirements and with data collection capabilities that are quickly becoming essential to facility and resource optimization. Although the total cost of ownership of electric products is typically lower than for internal combustion products, the higher upfront initial purchase cost of switching to electric-powered equipment may have been a barrier in the past. Currently available governmental incentives and supplier programs, like leasing, make battery power—specifically, the traditionally more expensive lithium-ion power—even easier to justify.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: When it comes to the lease vs. buy decision, each organization needs to evaluate several factors when considering what’s right for their application and company.
In leasing, you enjoy a lower cost per month and can be flexible on the terms of the lease. If you have a high-use environment, where you may need to renew equipment more often, leasing clearly has its advantages. In addition, a lease is often treated as an operating expense on the income statement, while a financed forklift is considered an asset on the balance sheet with depreciation expense recorded each period.
On the other hand, if you are using the asset less often and plan to keep it over the life of a typical lease (five years), then the benefits of a straight purchase or finance would outweigh those of a lease.
That is important because the increased use of robots has the potential to significantly reduce the impact of labor shortages in manufacturing, IFR said. That will happen when robots automate dirty, dull, dangerous or delicate tasks – such as visual quality inspection, hazardous painting, or heavy lifting—thus freeing up human workers to focus on more interesting and higher-value tasks.
To reach those goals, robots will grow through five trends in the new year, the report said:
1 – Artificial Intelligence. By leveraging diverse AI technologies, such as physical, analytical, and generative, robotics can perform a wide range of tasks more efficiently. Analytical AI enables robots to process and analyze the large amounts of data collected by their sensors. This helps to manage variability and unpredictability in the external environment, in “high mix/low-volume” production, and in public environments. Physical AI, which is created through the development of dedicated hardware and software that simulate real-world environments, allows robots to train themselves in virtual environments and operate by experience, rather than programming. And Generative AI projects aim to create a “ChatGPT moment” for Physical AI, allowing this AI-driven robotics simulation technology to advance in traditional industrial environments as well as in service robotics applications.
2 – Humanoids.
Robots in the shape of human bodies have received a lot of media attention, due to their vision where robots will become general-purpose tools that can load a dishwasher on their own and work on an assembly line elsewhere. Start-ups today are working on these humanoid general-purpose robots, with an eye toward new applications in logistics and warehousing. However, it remains to be seen whether humanoid robots can represent an economically viable and scalable business case for industrial applications, especially when compared to existing solutions. So for the time being, industrial manufacturers are still focused on humanoids performing single-purpose tasks only, with a focus on the automotive industry.
3 – Sustainability – Energy Efficiency.
Compliance with the UN's environmental sustainability goals and corresponding regulations around the world is becoming an important requirement for inclusion on supplier whitelists, and robots play a key role in helping manufacturers achieve these goals. In general, their ability to perform tasks with high precision reduces material waste and improves the output-input ratio of a manufacturing process. These automated systems ensure consistent quality, which is essential for products designed to have long lifespans and minimal maintenance. In the production of green energy technologies such as solar panels, batteries for electric cars or recycling equipment, robots are critical to cost-effective production. At the same time, robot technology is being improved to make the robots themselves more energy-efficient. For example, the lightweight construction of moving robot components reduces their energy consumption. Different levels of sleep mode put the hardware in an energy saving parking position. Advances in gripper technology use bionics to achieve high grip strength with almost no energy consumption.
4 – New Fields of Business.
The general manufacturing industry still has a lot of potential for robotic automation. But most manufacturing companies are small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which means the adoption of industrial robots by SMEs is still hampered by high initial investment and total cost of ownership. To address that hurdle, Robot-as-a-Service (RaaS) business models allow enterprises to benefit from robotic automation with no fixed capital involved. Another option is using low-cost robotics to provide a “good enough” product for applications that have low requirements in terms of precision, payload, and service life. Powered by the those approaches, new customer segments beyond manufacturing include construction, laboratory automation, and warehousing.
5 – Addressing Labor Shortage.
The global manufacturing sector continues to suffer from labor shortages, according to the International Labour Organisation (ILO). One of the main drivers is demographic change, which is already burdening labor markets in leading economies such as the United States, Japan, China, the Republic of Korea, or Germany. Although the impact varies from country to country, the cumulative effect on the supply chain is a concern almost everywhere.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.