Theodore R. Scherck is president of The Colography Group Inc., an Atlanta-based consultant that offers primary research, strategic planning and new program development services to businesses looking to identify and capitalize on growth opportunities in the global time-definite, or expedited, cargo market, as well as to governments worldwide.
If the price of what you've been buying is rising to the point where you can no longer afford it, you naturally look for a suitable replacement. If you can't find a replacement, you're stuck. Right?
Not anymore. Logistics professionals who need to move a high volume of small but time-definite shipments were once captives of expedited air freight service providers. But they're captives no more—at least not in the shorter-haul lanes. The burgeoning tim e-definite service sector has expanded to include a host of ground-based service providers. While these ground-based expedited carriers can't serve all needs, they have significantly improved their performance and expanded their coverage areas. The result: Many, many shipments that once had to travel by air are now remaining solidly on the ground.
For shippers, it's a wonderful thing. Their deadlines are being met. Their budgets are under control, and the increasing cost of expedited air has had only a limited impact on their bottom line.
This, of course, didn't happen overnight. Many inter-related aspects of the logistics business had to move into alignment to get to this point. But largely through the use of technology, the expedited transport industry has developed into an agile, customer-driven industry whose innovation and execution have permanently improved the way we live and do business. If they want to sustain the momentum, however, carriers must keep in mind four trends whose influence will continue to shape the market: the rising dominance of the t ransportation buyer, the decline in average shipment weight, the shift from mode-specific to time-based shipping, and the shortening of the average length of haul.
A buyer's market? It depends
Executives in the transportation industry have long lamented pricing they consider irrationally low given the quality and value of services rendered. That could change.
The empirical evidence, based on the Atlanta-based consultant The Colography Group's analysis of four primary categories of traffic—domestic air, ground parcel, air export and less-than-truckload (LTL)— tells us that, on balance, strong end-user demand will be met by firmer pricing on the supply side. Providers will obtain a reasonable return on their pricing initiatives as long as they're positioned to respond to their customers' dynamic distribution needs and can reliably execute on strictly established delivery requirements.
The pricing environment does vary by mode, based on analysis of industry yield per pound, which is the most accurate measure of pricing trends in the marketplace. Air freight pricing, for example, has grown slowly. From 1990 to 2002, the average yield on a pound of domestic air freight rose from $1.40 to $1.72, which translates to a compound annual growth rate of 1.7 percent. (See Exhibit 1.)
For this same time period, inflation compounded at 2.8 percent per year In addition, the growth in yield in recent years has come through fuel surcharges, which are essentially a direct cost pass through. In other words, domestic air yields have actually declined in constant dollar terms over the past 12 years. This is due in no small part to the increasing sophistication and successful use of information technology by the air freight buyer and the service provider to achieve operating efficiencies.
Projecting from 2003 to 2007, domestic air yields should show a bump from $1.77 to $1.97 per pound. Two factors contributing to that are the distance-based pricing programs adopted by virtually all of the leading U.S. domestic express carriers, raising yields on longer-haul freight, and the migration of short-haul traffic from air to ground, taking much of the lower-priced freight out of the mix.
The picture varies in other modes. Less-than-truckload carriers and air export car riers have had difficulty making gains. Yields per pound for LTL and U.S. air exports remain flat. Furthermore, per-pound yields for LTL will remain flat and air export yields will head downward in the next four years, according to our projections.
But ground parcel yields, which we started tracking in 1992, have shown a healthy percentage gain, with perpound prices rising from 41 cents in 1992 to 58 cents a pound in 2002, a 41-percent increase. The success of those ground carriers in delivering service that rivals air cargo, especially in short zone markets,has enabled a steady rise in prices. And that trend will likely continue: Ground parcel yields will demonstrate steady growth from 60 cents a pound in 2003 to 69 cents a pound in 2007.
Even with those increases, domestic shippers can expect to pay less overall for transportation than they do today. The reasons: the increasing substitution of ground for air in short-haul markets, the growing proportion of shorter haul shipments and the trend toward lighter average shipment weights.
One area that is likely to see significant change is the demand for medium hauls, those between 900 and 1,500 miles. Shipments in that range will be affected by the development of supply chain networks designed to distribute goods on shorter hauls and to move long-haul goods on more direct routings and away from consolidations. This strategy, which we term "disaggregation," is a prime example of the dramatic logistics reconfiguring now under way.
The disaggregation trend has also produced a "barbell" effect on U.S. transportation. At one end of the barbell, a growing percentage of all goods are moving in short lengths of haul, defined as less than 600 miles. At the other end, long-haul LTL services are gaining momentum as businesses opt for cheaper surface alternatives to have their disaggregated goods moved from point to point.Once the goods reach a distribution center near the point of destination, they are shipped out locally via a regional surface carrier.
As a result, rates for long-haul LTL services may escalate as point-to-point shipping increases and frugal shippers seek low-cost alternatives to air freight. But p ricing in the medium-haul LTL market will stagnate—a reflection of that segment's uninspiring prospects.
The incredible shrinking shipment
Shipments are not only moving shorter distances, they're getting smaller as well. After peaking in 1997 at 36.9 pounds, the industrywide average shipment weight for U.S. expedited cargo has been in steady decline, falling to 34.2 pounds in 2002 and projected to drop to 31.6 pounds by 2007. (See Exhibit 2.)
Most of the decline is skewed to the domestic air freight segment, where the weight of the average air shipment fell sharply in 1994 and has been dropping ever since. We expect air shipment weight to decline to 6.5 pounds by 2007, which would be the lowest in all the years we've been tracking these figures.
What's behind this decline? The prevalence of lighter high-tech shipments in the overall product mix and a shift to lighter-weighted plastics and alloys in the manufacturing process play key roles. Most notable, however, is the move to "disaggregation," which will continue to drive the migration to smaller and lighter consignments.
In years past, a company shipping from, say, Atlanta to Los Angeles would ship into a distribution center in Chicago. In Chicago, a distributor would aggregate the company's shipments with others and dispatch them via LTL to Los Angeles.
The creation of new distribution platforms, most notably e-business, has changed the equation. Today, goods ordered online can be sent directly to the consignee and are not subject to aggregation. As a result, shippers and their customers are abandoning their traditional centralized inventory models—which favor consolidations—and are opting for a decentralized infrastructure that pumps out goods with more frequency as individual consignments. The end result is growth in the number of smaller and lighter shipments.
The shifting sands of "time"
Perhaps the most durable and meaningful trend of the last 20 years has been the shift away from mode-specific to time-based shipping. Not only has this trend stood the test of "time," but it has also been the basis for the development and implementation of virtually every major transportation strategy over the last two decades.
More than ever, transport in the United States—and internationally as well—reflects modal neutrality and an emphasis on timedefinite services. What's most crucial is not speed, but reliability. Cost-conscious consignees are willing to trade down the speed of transit times as long as the freight will arrive at pre-determined intervals. How the freight moves has become less important. In our surveys, when we ask shippers to list the most important factor in choosing a carrier, 95 percent put "on-time delivery"at the top of the list.
The shift to modal neutrality, combined with the economic realities of the marketplace and the shrinking of lengths of haul, has benefited ground parcel carriers most. We trace this back to 1998, when UPS introduced a money-back guarantee on all its ground deliveries, which was soon matched by FedEx Ground. By the time Airborne Express (now part of DHL) rolled out its "Ground Delivery Service" in 2001, guaranteed delivery had become the ground parcel industry standard.
All three companies have built well-deserved reputations for delivery precision and reliability. As a result, shippers are gravitating toward these providers and away from traditional LTL services, where the reputation for reliability has not been as sterling. While traffic handled by other modes declined drastically since the economic down turn began in 2000, ground parcel shipments actually rose from 2000 to 2002.
Looking out five years, ground parcel will demonstrate the most robust growth in the transportation industry, cracking the four billion shipment barrier in 2007. Nearly 70 percent of all U.S.-originating traffic will move via ground parcel services by that time.
Shortening the hauls
Today, over two-thirds of all domestic air and ground shipments travel less than 700 miles to their final destination. We expect that percentage to grow in coming years, as average domestic length of haul continues to drop. (See Exhibit 3.)
The reduction in the average length of haul has triggered profound changes in the country's transportation system. It has driven the decline in average shipment weight, the rapid growth of ground parcel and regional LTL traffic, and the corresponding stagnation in the air freight category. It has reduced the U.S. combination airlines (airlines that carry passengers and freight), which once controlled virtually all of the country's domestic air freight and airmail, to nonplayers in today's U.S. market. At last count, combination airlines controlled approximately 0.8 percent of all U.S. air freight traffic. Those carriers have virtually abandoned the second-day delivery segment and are unlikely to return.
The trend toward shorter hauls has even affected air freight carried by dedicated carriers, a service traditionally used to move goods over longer distances. According to our latest research, even the average air freight consignment is moving less than 600 miles.
Our shipment projections through 2007 forecast only incremental growth in the air segment and declines in the LTL and air export categories. However, we would not be surprised to see a brighter traffic picture for the long-haul LTL segment given the trend toward disaggregation that we highlighted previously.
Today's supply chain (and tomorrow's as well) demands rapid, timely and economical product turns. The shipper doesn't want to invest the time and the expense to build consolidations, especially as end-user buying patterns migrate toward disaggregation. The ultimate customer wants goods pumped out fast, on time, as needed and without the consolidator- style middleman. And the provider market must respond with continuous development of richer, more robust services backed by such value-adds as moneyback guarantees.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.