You're in good company. Even the leading-edge DCs are shying away from the revolutionary in favor of more traditional equipment that's better, cheaper and faster and increasingly controlled by computers.
When it comes to creative robotics, material handling engineers, not action picture screenwriters, are the true visionaries. At the latest Council of Logistics Management conference in Chicago, attendees were wowed by brightly colored animations of robotic inventory handling systems that would make a James Bond movie villain green with envy. But the visioneering aside, there have been few revolutionary developments in DC technology in recent years. Despite the hype surrounding the potential benefits of radio-frequency identification tags, for example, the chips have had limited acceptance as an inventory handling device.And advanced robotic systems, while impressive, are still beyond the budget of all but the largest manufacturers.
What's generally happening in leading-edge DCs is the same as always—only better, cheaper and faster. And increasingly controlled by computers. "The whole material handling industry is evolving," says Don Derewecki, a consultant with Gross & Associates in Woodbridge, N.J. "RFID has been around for a while but hasn't gained critical mass because of the costs and lack of … standards. Robotics able to handle materials automatically have been around since the '60s.What has actually happened is the controls for them have become more flexible, sophisticated and cost-effective. It's the same thing with automatically guided vehicles. They've become more flexible, with a broader range of applications and better integration with software to enhance their range of use."
Not many companies are going over to fully automated warehousing, Derewecki says. If you were to go to an industrial park in search of a totally automated system, you'd have to walk through the whole park to find one. "It's still very rare," he says, "except in specific cases based on requirements for control, high throughput, limited time frames or harsh environments like freezers."
Derewecki adds that most of the automation projects he has seen have been prompted by mass merchant retailers, such as Wal-Mart and Target. "They have these massive conveyor systems for both full-case and loose piece operations. And they in turn drive technology down through their suppliers, because once they have it, they want their suppliers to have technology that is, if not parallel, at least compatible with their systems,"Derewecki says. "They want their goods to arrive a particular way."
Semiautomatic pilots
But tough economic times mean companies are cautious about adopting new technology. "The economy has caused them to be frugal and look very carefully at appropriate technology rather than wanting cutting-edge equipment," says Mike Kotecki, senior vice president of HK Systems in New Berlin, Wis., which sells both hardware and software for DCs. Consequently, Kotecki says, the line between automated and non-automated warehousing is blurring. "There used to be a clear line between automated and conventional, but now it's not the decision it used to be. There's a lot of semi-automation, or leveraging the advantages of automation," he says. For example, HK Systems markets an automated forklift truck with a 40-foot reach that performs the same functions as an automatic storage/retrieval system (AS/RS), but using existing storage designed for driveroperated trucks. "It fully automates a conventional rack without the expense," Kotecki says. Another powered cart capable of reaching into stacks eight pallets deep can be operated either automatically or by a driver. "In the past, a 110-foot tall, lights-out automated system was required to do the same thing, which is extremely expensive. We're taking the fundamentals of AS/RS and applying them to conventional warehousing.
"Automation is still very critical, but the clients' thinking is that I'm going to customize and throttle my automation to what's exactly appropriate," Kotecki says. "Clients are coming to us now with problems rather than requests for quotes (RFQs). It used to be they'd decide before they ever came to us that they needed an automatic vehicle system. Now they come in and ask, for example, 'I need to speed up my conveyor system, how can I do that?'We play a more consultative role now. It means people are getting appropriate solutions, and that often means hybrid automation."
Bob Ouellette, general manager for the logistics and technology division at consulting firm The Progress Group in Atlanta, says most of his clients are not pushing at the edges of DC technology. "Clients typically will go for leadingedge technology rather than bleeding-edge technology. To turn on something radically new in a distribution center or warehouse, you run the risk of shutting things down or missing key shipment dates," says Ouellette. That explains why RFID technology has yet to unseat the bar code as the identification technology of choice in America's DCs. He does note, however, that radio-frequency voice technology, where order pickers wear wireless headphones that guide them to picking bins and tell them how many items to pick, is becoming popular.
All systems go
All in all, the most popular new technology to install in a DC seems to be software. Some companies put software to work even before a new distribution center is built. When Emile Lemay was brought in as senior vice president of operations at Lantis Eyewear, he installed enterprise resource planning (ERP) software from J.D. Edwards and used it to run through the various options for consolidating the eyewear company's manufacturing and distribution operations. The company had three different warehouses spread across New Jersey, and used five to seven public warehouses, depending on seasonal demand. Lantis's business is highly complex: It offers private labeling for retailers plus a lot of value-added services such as putting sunglasses on a rotating rack, ready to be placed in a store, and shipping it complete with swing tickets and bar-code labels. This last service was beyond the company's capability, and it had to outsource the job.
Lemay guided the company into building a single facility in Secaucus, N.J., where all of Lantis's value-added services can be performed in house. Having the ERP system up and running well in advance of the move in October 2001 made it easier, Lemay says. "ERP played a significant role in allowing us to bring other technology in on the floor." The warehouse management software even hooks into a company intranet, allowing outside sales reps to dial in on the Web and find out where a specific customer's order is as it moves through the distribution process. Paperwork is a thing of the past. "It's really transformed the company," says Lemay. "Prior to this we were dragging our knuckles."
A typical manufacturer these days has been using ERP software for a while and has gradually been adding other computer controls to his warehousing operations—for example, an order management system from Manugistics or i2, load tendering and shipping status software from Nistevo or Descartes, and warehouse management software from Manhattan Associates or SwissLog. One level down, there's increasing use of warehouse control software, which takes the planning commands from the WMS and interprets them to manage automated functions such as conveyor or sortation systems or storage and retrieval systems.
Five years ago, it would have been hard to juggle all those different software systems, but Ouellette says one of the greatest advances in recent years is that warehouse management software vendors, such as Manhattan, Provia, RedPrairie and Catalyst, are making their different systems more compatible with others. "The available technology from the manufacturers, the operating systems, and the communications and messaging protocols are all getting to be non-proprietary," says Ouellette. "It's not quite plug and play yet, but we're getting much closer to that ability to integrate different systems."
That trend toward getting diverse software programs on speaking terms is even taking hold outside the distribution center's four walls, Ouellette says. "Application technology is having the biggest impact on distribution today. If you can bridge the gap between your WMS and your suppliers' systems, you have a much better view of what's been ordered, what's expected to come in and how you're going to manage the resources within your four walls," Oullette says.
Hooking up warehouse management software with transportation management systems is next, Ouellette says. "We're at a place in logistics where people are finding opportunities to reduce transport costs through better negotiation with suppliers or the better planning that transportation management software supplies. The impact on the DC is you could significantly reduce shipping costs depending on how you ship during the course of the day, how you provide and plan loads. It goes all the way back to the picking activity.Warehouse management and transport management software need to work hand in hand and the suppliers have responded to that, just as clients have recognized the need to do it."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."