Barry Brandman is president of Danbee Investigations, a Midland Park, N.J., company that provides investigative, loss prevention and security consulting services to many of the top names in the logistics industry. He has been a guest speaker for the Department of Homeland Security, CSCMP, and WERC, and is the author of Security Best Practices: Protecting Your Distribution Center From Inventory Theft, Fraud, Substance Abuse, Cybercrime and Terrorism. You can reach him via e-mail at
or (201) 652-5500.
It had never experienced cargo theft, so the California distributor was shocked when two loaded containers vanished in broad daylight while parked in its yard. But to the outside team that was called in to investigate, things looked suspicious from the start. To begin with, the thieves knew which two trailers were fully loaded, even though 95 percent of the trailers stored in the yard were empty on the day in question. For another, the trailers stolen were only vulnerable for 90 minutes—they had been placed in the yard at approximately 2: 00 p.m. and were scheduled to be picked up between 3: 15 and 3: 30 p.m. Skeptical that outsiders with two available tractors had randomly stumbled across the two loaded containers within that small window of opportunity, the investigators were eventually able to persuade the company that it was the victim of an inside job. Subsequent investigations showed the theft had indeed been orchestrated by one of the company's own supervisors.
The distributor probably shouldn't have been surprised. Cargo theft—whether it's an inside job or a heist engineered by outsiders—has become one of the new growth industries. Industry experts now put the cost of cargo theft at $10 billion to $20 billion annually in the United States, up from an estimated $1 billion in the late '70s. As more trucks travel the nation's highways, criminals have discovered there's a fortune to be made by stealing what are essentially "warehouses on wheels." Lax security at many warehousing and transportation outfits means there's a low probability of being caught, and criminal penalties for cargo crime are extremely light. Small wonder so many criminals have realized it's far less risky to get caught with a truckload of stolen goods than a shipment of cocaine or heroin.
As the crooks become more organized and entrepreneurial, it's not unusual for product to be negotiated and sold before it's ever stolen. We've even seen cases in which shady dealers provide detailed shopping lists of what they want their operatives to steal. One day the list might include electronics, cosmetics, computers, fragrances and home entertainment equipment. On another, it might be cigarettes, jewelry, pharmaceuticals and food.
Though cargo theft was once the exclusive domain of established organized crime families, dozens of new cargo theft rings have sprung up across the United States in the past decade. Some steal unmanned trucks. Others go in for armed hijacking. Yet others devise sophisticated deception schemes. A trucker with bogus identification and paperwork recently showed up at a distribution center and picked up a container loaded with $80,000 worth of product. Neither the gate guard nor the dispatch office had any indication that they had been scammed until the real trucker showed up for the container later that day.
Of course, outsiders are not always to blame. Disappearances of trucks parked at storage facilities or diners (or even as the result of armed hijackings) are not always the outside jobs they appear to be. As the California distributor learned, many times these thefts are either set up or personally committed by employees (typically drivers working in collusion with shipping or receiving staff) or even by vendors or contractors.
Seven ways to play it safe
Whether they ship high-value goods or modestly priced commodities, companies understandably feel besieged from both without and within. I'm frequently asked to recommend steps they can take to protect their cargo.What follows is a list of some of the more effective safeguards:
Don't react passively to a loss! Once you've discovered a theft, have it thoroughly investigated rather than simply filing a police report or insurance claim. The knowledge that many victimized companies do not aggressively investigate has made cargo thieves increasingly brazen.
If you do business in states with high rates of cargo theft (such as New York, California and Florida), install global positioning system (GPS) technology in your vehicles. Newer versions of GPS will allow you to track your trucks to within 100 feet, provide two-way communication if a driver suspects he's being stalked, let drivers activate concealed duress buttons in armed hijackings, and provide geo-fencing notification if a vehicle detours off the assigned route.
Number the tops of trailers so that law enforcement can identify stolen containers via aerial surveillance.
Set up a toll-free tip-line program throughout your company.We've received dozens of calls on our anonymous hotline number that were instrumental not only in preventing theft, but also in apprehending the miscreants after cargo vanished.
Always stage high-value loaded containers in secured storage facilities.You can enhance security by installing digital camera systems that record activity 24 hours a day. Sophisticated video technology can also be interfaced with intrusion detection systems, allowing you to view the site from thousands of miles away.
If you direct ship from one facility to another, always use pre-numbered security seals to protect against the trucker's stealing product while in transit. However, it's important to remember that unless you consistently follow strict seal procedures, security seals can be circumvented by devious workers.
If you work with an outside trucking firm, establish minimum security standards. You want to be sure that they're doing enough proactively and that they will do the right thing if a theft occurs. Many companies assume that once they turn the goods over to an outside carrier, they no longer have to be concerned about cargo theft. That could be a costly assumption: As many shippers have learned to their sorrow, a carrier's certificate of insurance is no guarantee that their cargo is protected from theft. All too often, these policies contain exclusions that cover them for every contingency except the one that actually occurs.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."