For small truckers, an out-of-service rig means an out-of-work driver. One truckmaker is borrowing distribution techniques from the retail world to get repair parts right out to dealers and trucks back on the road.
If a kingdom can be lost for want of a nail, certainly a trucker's livelihood can be lost—or at least seriously compromised—by want of an axle housing. PACCAR Parts' end customers —drivers of the company's Kenworth and Peterbilt brand trucks—are mostly independents or small fleet owners who are scrambling to make ends meet (80 percent of truck owners in the United States are owner-operators or own fewer than 10 trucks). For these small players, which may haul anything from cantaloupes to flowerpots anywhere for whatever price they can negotiate, survival depends on staying out of the breakdown lane.
Darrin Siver, who is general operations manager for PACCAR Parts in Renton,Wash., is well aware that the company's ability to keep dealers nationwide stocked with parts for repairing (and maintaining) trucks is directly tied to the livelihood of their customers. And he's bent on making PACCAR's distribution system the most high-tech in the country—an extraordinary ambition in the notoriously low-tech business of parts supply. True to type, PACCAR Parts' suppliers are a pretty varied bunch. Many are real craftsmen, the only ones able to fit the spec for molding a particular bracket or machining a gasket, but few could be considered supply chain leaders. "We have 800 vendors that ship from 1,600 locations and many of those vendors are pretty small and the level of sophistication is not very high," says Siver. Some, for example, can't handle PACCAR Parts' electronic ordering system and must resort to fax communications. Others are still living in a pre-bar-code world: 60 percent of the parts Siver receives into PACCAR's five U.S.-based warehouses and six international facilities arrive without bar-code labels.
But Siver is pressing ahead with plans to push inventory handling into the 20th century—if not the 21st. While the company's distribution centers all have the capacity to print and stick bar codes on the parts that arrive unlabeled, he expects to persuade all of PACCAR Parts' suppliers to use bar-code printers and electronic order handling in the next few years. "We want to eliminate printing bar codes so we can carry the same bar code through from the supplier to the dealer to the final customer," Siver says. The success rate so far is impressive: last year alone, PACCAR Parts was able to drive the percentage of parts that arrived with bar codes to 60 percent from 30 percent.
That may not sound like a rapid ascent to the giddy heights of technology, but consider that a majority of PACCAR's suppliers are also now capable of sending an electronic advance ship notice (ASN) and have begun participating in a Webbased transport planning system from Manugistics. Through that system, suppliers go online and notify PACCAR of what they're sending to different facilities—the number of pallets and their weights and dimensions. Siver's team uses the system to select the most economical inbound transportation lane and carrier, and even to create multi-stop pickups. "Now we have trailers making three or four stops to bring the freight in to Atlanta," says Siver. "Where it was four shipments before, it's one trailer load now." Siver says outbound shipments from the distribution centers are also being consolidated in this way, when possible. The long, difficult haul toward electronic sophistication is already paying off in terms of lower freight costs.
But there's a long way to go. "We still receive packing slips from suppliers. We'd like to eliminate the paper and we're working on that," he says. At present, PACCAR Parts uses radio-frequency technology to read bar codes, but the company is looking into the possibility of having suppliers apply RFID tags to inbound freight.
Yet there's nothing heavy-handed about these efforts to bring technology to the parts distribution business. When asked how the company is broaching the subject with suppliers, Siver replies: "Very gently. We have good relationships with our suppliers, and we conduct a lot of meetings with them in order to get compliance."
Dealing and wheeling
Meanwhile, on the other side of PACCAR's business, the company has also been busy bringing demand and supply into more perfect alignment at the dealerships. This is where the crunch really comes, working with the 550 dealers in North America who look after the truck owners. "If a truck is down," says Siver, "getting a driver back on the road is priority number one, and if we don't have the right part in the right place, then it's going to take longer."
To help speed things along, PACCAR keeps an electronic parts catalog on the Web that allows dealers to go online, call up three-dimensional images of the parts they need and order them instantly, without having to fiddle with multidigit product codes. Electronic orders from the dealers come in via a private network, accessed through personal computers.
However, nothing beats having a part already on hand at the dealer when needed. With that in mind, PACCAR has taken the unusual step of managing its own dealers' inventory. "We take their sales data and their demand history and use a sophisticated forecasting system that does a much better job than a local dealer's demand forecasting system can," Siver says. After wrestling the data through the system, PACCAR recommends orders to its dealers. Though they have the option to decline or to change the quantities, Siver says it usually works best for everyone if they don't exercise that option. "What we've found is that the most successful dealers are not modifying our recommended orders because they're finding them more accurate and as a result, their on-shelf availability has gone up and their inventory turns have gone up."
PACCAR Parts now has 92- to 93-percent parts availability locally for delivery the next day; and 98-percent availability nationally for any part ordered, with a two- or threeday delivery time. "Support for the vehicle is something a customer considers when deciding what vehicle to drive," Siver says, "and the parts service is certainly a factor in that decision."
A place for everything
Whatever improvements are made at the supplier or dealership level, the heart of the operation remains the distribution center. In the end, Siver says, the operation's success depends on what he sees as the basics: "receiving the parts and putting them in the right place, processing sales orders and getting them shipped out and delivered on a timely basis, keeping track of inventory, getting orders shipped in one day or less delivery time and staying close to the customer." PACCAR Parts recently completed an overhaul of the distribution center that serves the Southeast, based in Atlanta. (Other DCs are located in Rockford, Ill.; Lancaster, Pa.; Las Vegas, Nev., and Seattle, Wash.—as well as in Canada, Mexico, the UK, the Netherlands, Spain and Australia.) The Atlanta warehouse's revamp, which was accomplished without closing the facility for a single day, has almost doubled its capacity and has driven up productivity 10 percent—measured by the number of order items received and shipped through the facility hourly.
PACCAR enlisted the help of Peach State, an Atlanta-based systems integrator, for input on changes to the racking and storage systems. Part of the challenge was dealing with an immense range of parts—around 20,000 SKUs, ranging from washers and fasteners to entire cabs with upholstery. "With the exception of tires, batteries and engines, you could just about build a truck from our inventory," Siver says. Part of the problem was simply finding parts—limited space meant some pieces were even stored outside, and in many cases, several kinds of parts had to be crammed into a single storage unit. Peach State helped PACCAR Parts position the fastest-moving parts in readily available spots and determine the right space cube for different parts. Now, all of the different parts have their own individual indoor storage spaces.
That's fine for storage, but the huge variety of parts also makes order fulfillment a bit tricky. "We don't have case picking. Most of our products are unsuitable for packaging because of their dimensions," Siver says. Suspension pieces, he points out, don't lend themselves to rolling down a gravity conveyor like a packet of shirts. The picking process is heavily manual, but PACCAR Parts uses radio-frequency bar-code reading technology to help make sure the right pieces are being pulled, and the greater elbow room at the expanded facility has made all of that easier, Siver says. On top of that, the facility has improved its regional fill rate from 92 to 93 percent because it now has the room to store all the parts that are in demand in the Southeast. "With additional space, we can expand our use of 'warehouse-within-warehouse' and slotting strategies," Siver says.
On the software front, PACCAR Parts' warehouse management system, designed in-house, is connected to the company's order management and accounting systems. PACCAR Parts now has automatic invoicing too—the moment a part's bar code is swiped at the shipping dock prior to loading, an invoice is automatically generated to send to the dealer. Once the invoice arrives, the dealer knows the part's not far behind—welcome news to a trucker anxious to peel out of the mechanic's bay and onto the open road.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."