Deliver customized orders to retail stores worldwide from a single DC on a Pacific island? With its Direct Ship program, Timex does just that and much faster than you might imagine.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Watches aren't inherently perishable, but fashion is. Fads come and go with astonishing speed, and he who makes it into the store last loses.
For fashion-dependent companies that manufacture in Asia, time constraints make life doubly difficult: Not only must they contend with the complexities of overseas manufacturing, but they also must figure out how to get their products to consumers halfway around the world before the fad fizzles out.
That was the dilemma facing Timex Corp., the Middlebury, Conn.-based company best known for its inexpensive, reliable wristwatches. Timex, which sources most of its products and components in Asia, needed to speed up deliveries to retail stores around the world. It wasn't easy, but through a combination of creative process engineering, wise use of technology, and improvements in transportation services, Timex has managed to slash average order-to-delivery time from four or five weeks to just seven days.
Born in the U.S.A.
Timex Corp. is hardly a newcomer to the manufacturing game. The storied company got its start in the 1850s as Waterbury Clock Co. A spin-off, Waterbury Watch, sold tens of millions of affordable pocket watches, including the "Yankee" model, at one time the world's best-selling watch.
A U.S. Army contract during World War I sparked the development of the wristwatch. Civilians liked them, too, and began buying them in large numbers in the 1920s. In the 1930s, Waterbury Watch created a children's market when it teamed up with Walt Disney to produce the iconic Mickey Mouse wristwatch. In the 1950s, the company (then called U.S. Time) launched the memorable "torture test" ad campaign for its popular "Timex" wristwatch. (See sidebar.) A few years later, the renamed Timex Corp. began marketing the wristwatch as a fashion accessory. Later innovations, like the Indiglo illuminated watch face, the IronMan sports watch, and the new iControl watchmounted wireless controller for iPods, have kept Timex a household name.
This tradition of first-to-market product design has helped Timex survive competition from Asian manufacturers. According to the company, it is the only U.S.-based watchmaker still in business.
Although Timex has been able to keep its roots firmly planted in the United States—a market that still accounts for 80 percent of annual sales—it no longer makes watches in this country. Competitive pressures have led the company to move most of its sourcing, manufacturing, and assembly to Asia.
A long, costly process
Even as it shifted its manufacturing operations to overseas locations, Timex continued to follow its long-established distribution model for a number of years. Watches were preassembled based on sales projections and then shipped in bulk by ocean to Timex's distribution centers in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Europe, and Asia. At those centers, they were repackaged, labeled, and shipped to customers' warehouses.
Over time, a couple of problems began to develop. One was cost—this approach often led to overstocking of components and unsold watches. The other was speed. The time required to pick orders, pack them for transportation, ship them, warehouse them, repackage and label them for specific customers and countries, and ship them to customers' warehouses—not to mention the time required for the customers themselves to sort, pack, and ship the watches to individual stores—significantly lengthened the order-to-delivery cycle.
For a company with a history of being first to market with innovative products, that simply didn't fly. Competitive pressures added to the sense that it was time for a quicker, cheaper, and more efficient way of filling orders and moving product onto retail shelves.
Timex hired consultants and systems integrators to take a hard look at the whole shebang—manufacturing, storage, picking, assembly, packing, and shipping. The goal: to slash order-to-delivery time while keeping costs under control.
Together, Timex's project team, systems integrator The Numina Group, and the St. Onge supply chain engineering firm came to the conclusion that the far-flung global distribution network wasn't necessary, or even desirable. The company could assemble virtually all of its orders on a justin-time (JIT) basis at a single production and distribution center. By streamlining assembly and order fulfillment and by consolidating production and distribution in one location, Timex could save itself millions of dollars in inventory costs. What's more, it could pick and package individual stock-keeping units (SKUs) for direct-to-store delivery, saving retailers the time and expense of warehousing, repackaging, and reshipping the goods themselves.
Once everyone had signed off on the plan, Timex began working out the details of the Direct Ship program, as the initiative is known. One of the first steps was to decide where to locate the global DC that would house the operations. Eventually, the company chose Cebu in the Philippines. Why Cebu? There were a number of reasons, says Andrew Ledesma, Timex's director of distribution engineering, packaging, and transportation. To begin with, the company has been successfully manufacturing in Cebu for 27 or 28 years, says Ledesma, a Filipino who has been with the company nearly that long himself. Another factor was the availability of transportation. Air transportation service from the area has improved in recent years, with both FedEx and UPS increasing their capacity and service frequency. "We can now ship on one flight the same amount that used to take five flights," Ledesma says. "This allowed transportation to become a tool rather than an obstacle."
Sale-ready in record time
In 2005, Timex opened a $13 million, 46,000-square-foot distribution center that is attached to the Cebu manufacturing facility. The new DC is capable of shipping about 170,000 watches in 16 airline containers each day. It features state-of-the-art material handling equipment and software that is tightly integrated with an i2 supply chain planning system and an Infor Viaware warehouse management system (WMS). A pick-to-light system from Numina directs batch picking of product for induction into an Interroll cross-belt order-fulfillment sorter (OFS). That sorter and conveyors supplied by FKI Logistex and TGW-Ermanco transport and route built-to-order product from manufacturing through picking and shipping operations, where print-and-apply label applicators from Panther Industries prepare shipments for direct-to-store delivery. Tying it all together is Numina's Real-time Distribution Software (RDS), which handles control and execution.
The cycle begins when an order arrives and the required watch heads are assembled in a clean-room environment from parts and components made in the Philippines or imported from Timex-owned factories elsewhere in Asia. Straps and bands are added, the watches are placed in country- and order-specific retail packaging, and the packages are placed in totes.
As the totes leave the manufacturing areas on conveyors, the RDS system receives data on their contents. The conveyor moves the totes through a cutout in the wall and into the DC; a bar-code scanner reads the totes' "license plates" as they arrive. RDS dynamically assigns a forward- or reserve-pick location in the second or third level of the pick module (the first level is for bulk orders) and directs operators using radio-frequency (RF) terminals to slot the product in the assigned locations. The space-saving pick module is located on a mezzanine above the shipping area, a design that allowed Timex to pack a lot of activity into a relatively small space.
Next, the WMS sends orders containing the SKUs, serial numbers, and quantities assigned to each carton to the RDS system. Based on that information, the RDS transmits instructions to the customized pick-to-light system, which directs picking activity in the module.Workers there batchpick items for multiple orders into totes, selecting items from over 3,500 individual storage locations. The software manages the batch picking to make the most efficient use of the 116-destination order-fulfillment sorter, explains Dan Hanrahan, business development manager for The Numina Group. Meanwhile, inventory is automatically replenished from reserve locations as needed.
A conveyor routes the totes to the OFS induction area, where operators unload the watches and scan the bar codes on the bottom of each package. RDS looks up each SKU; based on that information, a retail price label is automatically printed and applied if required by the customer. When orders are complete, station displays at the head of the diversion chutes indicate what size cartons will be needed for each order. After they pack the cartons, operators then attach license plate bar codes to the cartons and use RF terminals to "marry" the cartons to the diverter locations.
The cartons leave the order-fulfillment sorter and travel by conveyor to a combination packing and shipping sorter. At the induction point, they pass through a scan-weigh station for in-line weight verification combined with a digital photo, which provides a visual record of the contents. If all is well, the cartons are sorted to the pack-and-seal lanes. If a shortage or other anomaly is detected, cartons are diverted for inspection.
At the pack-and-seal area, operators insert packing lists and any special export documentation, and then send the cartons through void-fill stations and variable-height tape sealers. After a final trip through the sorter, the cartons move out to the labeling stations, which automatically print and apply customer-specific compliance and shipping labels, Hanrahan explains. One more audit, and the packed cartons head on down the shipping lanes for pickup by UPS, FedEx, and other air carriers.
The cartons fly in "igloos"—large air-freight containers—to the carriers' hubs, where sorting takes place. UPS, for example, breaks down U.S.-bound containers in Alaska and combines Timex's shipments with other shipments going to the same retailer. The combined loads then head to additional destinations in the United States, where they are delivered by truck to individual stores.
Not all orders, by the way, move by parcel carrier, and not all go directly to the stores. Some bulk orders, for example, are stored and shipped in full cases to customers' DCs, says Ledesma. These and other, more complex shipments typically are handled by Timex's freight forwarder, Agility (formerly GeoLogistics).
Regardless of how the orders are shipped, though, Timex's customers can count on their speedy arrival. The timing of every one of the steps involved is governed by two requirements: All orders must be filled within 48 hours from the time they are received (most are now filled the same day), and most shipments must arrive at their destinations within seven days after the order's release. That's a far cry from the four or five weeks customers had to wait under the old system.
Transportation trade-off
You might think that the cost of shipping hundreds of thousands of wristwatches from an island on the far side of the Pacific Ocean would be prohibitive. And in fact, Ledesma says, Timex's transportation costs have increased. There are several reasons for that, he says. One factor, of course, is the DC's location. Another is that the products' time-sensitivity mandates the use of air express; ocean freight is simply not an option.
What's more, direct-to-store delivery by definition means smaller, more frequent orders. Though smaller orders help Timex minimize inventory, they also push up per-piece transportation costs. "You might ship five pieces in a package that weighs about one pound, but because of minimums, the rate is the same as it is for up to five pounds. If you could ship four pounds, then the per-piece cost would be less," Ledesma explains.
The higher transportation costs, however, have been more than offset by the savings afforded by Cebu's assemble-toorder capability and greater efficiency in production, order fulfillment, packaging, labeling, and shipping, Ledesma says. Timex also has gained better visibility of product, from planning to delivery, with much less inventory.
Timex isn't the only winner here. Retailers benefit as well. Timex's ability to ship orders with sale-ready packaging and customized labels to individual stores saves them both time and money while ensuring that merchandise is ready when shoppers want it.
The fact that Timex found a way to take weeks out of the order-to-delivery cycle while improving compliance with its customers' requirements should come as no surprise. After all, when timing becomes a problem, who better to solve it than a watchmaker?
withstanding the tests of Timex
If you're old enough to remember the days of blackand-white television, a certain rhyming phrase probably popped into your head when you first looked at this article.
In 1950, U.S. Time Corp. introduced the inexpensive but extremely reliable Timex wristwatch. Print advertisements featured the watch that "takes a licking and keeps on ticking" being strapped to Mickey Mantle's bat, frozen in an ice cube tray, spun inside a vacuum cleaner, taped to a lobster's claw, and more.
Sales really took off, however, when newsman John Cameron Swayze began showcasing the Timex watch in "torture test" commercials on television. Watches were taped to the propeller of an outboard motor, sent tumbling over the Grand Coulee Dam, and held by a diver jumping into the ocean from the Acapulco cliffs. According to the company, thousands of viewers suggested other tests—including an Air Force sergeant who offered to crash a plane while wearing a Timex.
The unique ad campaign had the desired effect: By the end of the decade, one out of every three watches sold in the United States was a Timex, and the company had changed its name to match that of one of the best-known consumer products in U.S. history.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."