It's Murphy's Law your equipment's going to break down just when you're in the midst of processing your biggest customer's order. But it doesn't have to be that way.
As any homeowner or car owner will tell you, equipment breakdowns have joined death and taxes on the list of life's certainties. Hoping to forestall the inevitable, smart car owners get regular oil changes and smart homeowners schedule tuneups for their furnaces or washing machines.
It's no different for America's distribution centers. Smart managers who want to keep their lift trucks lifting, conveyors conveying, and AS/RS systems storing and retrieving have progressive preventative maintenance (PM) programs in place for all of their equipment. These routine checkups can extend the life of equipment and help avert the chances of a catastrophic breakdown just when your biggest customer's order is being filled.
What many don't realize, however, is that the upkeep plan itself requires upkeep. It's important not to just set up a maintenance schedule and walk away. Managers should plan to audit the program's effectiveness on a regular basis—measuring performance against key metrics (see below) and setting goals for improvement. And it goes without saying, these should not be vague goals like "minimizing breakdowns," but specific objectives such as reducing the amount of maintenance-related overtime paid by X percent or cutting parts inventories by Y percent.
One manager who has a solid grip on how effective his company's PM program has proven to be is Bryan Eccard, director of facility services for Limited Brands, parent company of national retail chains like Victoria's Secret, Express and The Limited. Ask Eccard what Limited Brands' PM program has accomplished, and he'll give you specifics: The company's equipment breakdown time has shrunk by 15 percent, he reports, and equipment spare parts inventory is down by a quarter of a million dollars.What's more, the equipment is lasting much longer. "We have some equipment that's been around for 18 years and is still running today," he says.
Achieving this level of performance was neither easy nor quick. Managers at Limited Brands have been fine-tuning the enterprisewide progressive preventative maintenance program since 1997, when the company consolidated all seven of its Columbus, Ohio-based DCs under Limited Logistics Services. Although the company already had a PM program in place at each of the DCs, management decided to standardize the procedures in order to take things to the next level.
the metrics of maintenance
You can't audit a preventative maintenance program without a set of metrics to measure performance against. But what should you measure? Kate Vitasek and Mike McHale, partners at Supply Chain Visions in Bellevue, Wash., recommend the following:
Availability. Is the equipment available when it's supposed to be?
Efficiency. Is the equipment performing at the expected speed/throughput?
Quality/reliability. Is the equipment producing/doing the right things?
Inventory optimization. Are your inventory projections accurate? To find out, measure the percentage of inventory/parts on hand when needed.
Maintenance department productivity. Are there enough people assigned to maintenance tasks? Too few? Too many? Measure the percentage of maintenance work planned and the percentage of overtime labor required for the maintenance department
The first step was consolidating computer systems: "We had various versions of MP2 by Data Stream and we had to come up with one program that would help us develop one standardized set of procedures," says Eccard. As part of that effort, managers examined the PM practices in use at the different facilities and distilled them into a set of best practices for use across the enterprise.
Once data on all of the material handling equipment were entered into the system, Eccard and his crew wrote step-by-step instructions for maintaining each piece of equipment, including a list of parts and tools needed for each. "This process gave us a way to track the costs of materials for all of our equipment," explains Eccard. "Then we tackled the process of determining the number of FTE (full-time employee) hours required to maintain each piece of equipment. Combined, those numbers gave us the true costs of equipment and labor." Limited then established a baseline for budgeting time for maintenance as well as for labor and parts.
With this solid set of baseline information, Limited Brands is able to plan the work a month in advance. This allows the company to schedule the right number of people at the right time to keep each piece of equipment in working order.Work is carried out in order of importance—the equipment that would have the biggest impact on operations if it broke down is tended to first, and then on down the line.
Making a case
Not all preventative maintenance programs succeed as spectacularly as Limited Brands' program has, of course. Eccard believes that a big part of the success can be traced to corporate support for the program. "Our management is behind this program 110 percent," he says.
That's important, says Bruce Tompkins, principal at Tompkins Associates. "The commitment to a preventative maintenance program must come from the top because often, you're going to have to get mindsets to change," he says. "It's important to have the whole organization believe in this and understand that it's your best shot for preventing failure down the road."
For those who are forced to take their case to management in order to get funding for a PM program, the best course is to show them the numbers. "Look at your historical data to see how often equipment is down and how often you get customer complaints—figure out the cost of downtime," says Kate Vitasek, partner at the Bellevue, Wash.-based consultant Supply Chain Visions.
Yet even full management support is no guarantee of success. Far too many companies end up disappointed by the mediocre results they get. This happens for a variety of reasons. Some companies lose sight of their goals; others get overwhelmed by the size of the task.What follows are some tips for avoiding some common pitfalls:
Set priorities. It's important to prioritize where a PM program can have the greatest impact. "Too often, companies make the mistake of going out and trying to do it all at once," says Tompkins. "You have to start with the equipment that has the biggest impact on your operations."
Develop a schedule. Consider how often you need to conduct maintenance, who will need to conduct it, and exactly what needs to be done to each piece of equipment. You can make up the schedule manually, but software like that used by Limited Brands can make the job much easier.
As for when to schedule maintenance, look for the slowest shift or off-shift, if there is one. Some companies perform maintenance in small doses on a daily basis; others shut the whole facility down at specified intervals to do a complete overhaul. "The beauty of planning," says Vitasek, "is that you can schedule maintenance to avoid busy times. The interruption of a breakdown is much worse."
Keep up with the paperwork. "You have to track what you're doing and make sure you don't let maintenance slide," says Dick Bonsall, manager at Sedlak Management Consultants in Richfield, Ohio.
Set goals for continuous improvement. "Your plan needs to be subjected to an audit, either by a third party or by a good internal group," says Vitasek."People can easily get into the habit of treating maintenance as an afterthought without goals for improvement." Says Eccard: "You need to measure your system; otherwise it's not worth the effort. We set new goals each year to ensure continuous improvement."
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.