Many supply chain managers think their forecasting problems would be solved if they could only get good point-of-sale (POS) data. But it's not that simple.
The plight of today's supply chain manager could be fairly compared to that of Tantalus from Greek mythology. Trapped in the underworld and parked by a pool overhung with boughs laden with luscious fruit, Tantalus was doomed to spend eternity tortured by hunger and thirst in the midst of plenty. Each time he tried to drink, the pool drained away; each time he reached for a pomegranate or fig, the boughs receded. So it is for the average supply chain or distribution center manager yearning not for a sip of water or a pear, but for accurate data on the actual demand for the goods in his warehouse.
In theory, gathering demand data should be a matter of feeding all sales, tracking and inventory information gathered throughout the supply chain into a great ravening machine that links every party in the supply chain to every other party. But right now, there's a piece missing—the point of sale (POS) information gathered in retail outlets is almost never fed into that machine.
Why not? The main problem is that POS information is some of the least accurate you're likely to come across in the supply chain, answers Mark Johnson, vice president of marketing at G-Log, a vendor of supply chain management software in Shelton, Conn. "It's very nervous data, which is not very good for supply chain operations," he says. "The raw POS data still requires a lot of manual intervention before it can be digested into the supply chain."
Johnson gives this example: If a customer gets to the checkout counter and notices a defect in an item, often the clerk will swipe only the replacement item's bar code, although both items have come off the shelf. Multiply that over thousands of retail outlets over 90 days, and the result is a heavily distorted picture of stock on hand.
The other problem is that even perfect POS data will never be an absolute predictor of future demand. "Customers are notoriously fickle and their past demand patterns are less valuable in an era of rapid change in products, distribution and sales strategies," says John Fontanella, vice president of research at AMR Research in Boston, in a report titled The Demand Driven Supply Network: Striving for Supply Chain Transparency. For that reason, the data gathered as bar-coded items are swiped through the cashier's station will never be more than a part of the picture.
As good as it gets
Yet the fallibility of POS data hasn't discouraged Al Giunchi, director of distribution logistics at pet products manufacturer Hartz Mountain Group in Secaucus, N.J. For 10 years now, he's been extracting sales information from his company's main customer—Wal-Mart—and feeding it back into his own supply chain.
Every day, through the Internet, Hartz receives POS information on its products from thousands of Wal-Mart stores around the country and the 36 distribution centers that serve them. Through that mechanism,Hartz Mountain learns which products are selling, how much inventory is on hand in the individual stores, and what's available to top up the stock from nearby DCs. "We see inventory levels in stores and in the 36 DCs. We see what product needs replenishing and where that product is—on the East Coast or the West Coast.And it's in real time.You're looking at the product come off the shelf and out the store instead of out the DC," says Giunchi.
The Wal-Mart POS information isn't monitored directly by the logistics division. It's in the hands of a customer service team consisting of three people in Secaucus, and three in Bentonville, Ark., where Wal-Mart is headquartered. They, in turn, feed information about fluctuations in inventory levels and demand to the logistics group. When Giunchi wants to look at the data, he goes through a password-protected part of the World Wide Web (a step up from the early days when he used an EDI system).
Wal-Mart's sales forecasts tend to be almost uncannily accurate, says Giunchi. "Their computer system is second only to the government's. They know that a Wal-Mart in the Northeast is not going to need the same items as one in Arkansas. When 9/11 hit, they knew they'd sell more guns in Bentonville, Ark., than in Secaucus, N.J. Plus all of a sudden, there was a spike in gas can sales because people were hoarding gas.Wal-Mart knew all that. All that information started flowing through the system very quickly."
Responding to Wal-Mart's rapidly changing forecasts and constantly monitoring in-store inventory requires a lot of hard work, Giunchi says. "It takes a lot of maintenance, because there might be discontinued items or special promotions or delays for items coming in from, say, Asia or Brazil," he says. Returns, alone, occupy two members of the six-person team monitoring POS information. "The data does need scrutinizing and that's why you need six people looking at screens every day."
Aside from dirty data and shipment delays, the sheer size and nature of the consumer market means POS information is never going to allow anyone to stay exactly abreast of demand. "The problem is the vast number of variables in the system," says Giunchi. "You may think that a particular dog chew is going to knock people's socks off, but it doesn't. Or one product will unexpectedly take off and Wal-Mart will say 'I ordered 5,000 originally, but now I need 45,000 on the same day I wanted the 5,000'—and then the panic starts to set in. Or they order something in September and need it in time for Christmas," Giunchi continues. "So POS information helps maintain the flow to the stores of items that are already there. But it still doesn't help you if you're trying to push an item and you don't know if the customer is going to want it or not. There's no software in the world that's going to smooth that out."
All the same, Giunchi would welcome the opportunity to work with POS information from other major customers, instead of relying on vendor-managed inventory techniques, as Hartz Mountain does with Kmart,Walgreens and Winn-Dixie. Though popular, vendor-managed inventory programs, in which the products' supplier decides how much stock to put in the customer's distribution centers, don't get into the same detail as POS data. "VMI stops at the warehouse," says Giunchi.
Not imPOSsible
Given the number of kinks that have yet to be worked out, it's no surprise that G-Log's Johnson says few companies are currently using POS data well. The ones that have mastered it include computer company Dell Inc. and Tesco, the British supermarket chain. Dell's selling structure, where customers order direct, typing their own information into a Web site, means its POS data are clean. Matters get a bit trickier when it comes to supermarket retail, where there are hundreds of thousands of SKUs to keep track of and more opportunities for mistakes. And it will be tougher yet to attain that level of sophistication in the retail sector.
Johnson says it's clear that feeding POS data into sales and manufacturing decisions works, because it's happening in industries like computer supply. But, in consumer retail, you're talking about adding an extra couple of zeros to the number of transactions, he says. "When you add dirty data, the complexity just takes off," Johnson says. "Transferring that into clean data and then translating it into orders that are digestible in the supply chain is a challenge, but it's not impossible. Absolutely not."
Despite the difficulties, there's still a lot to be said for feeding POS data into the system, Johnson adds. "The better the data you have, spanning the entire supply chain from factory to point of sale, the better you're able to reduce inventory and exposure to damage."
For Giunchi, the benefits of using POS information far outweigh the tribulations. "It gives us more intelligence. Whether we're able to perform with that intelligence is the key, and that's when we come into the real world," he says. "Planning and forecasting is so difficult. The weatherman doesn't get fired if he gets the weather wrong—it's Mother Nature's fault. But we don't have Mother Nature to blame in the world of business."
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.