Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Superficially, the less-than-truckload business looks much the same as it always has. Trucks back up to shippers' or receivers' docks each day and load or unload goods. But look deeper and what you'll see is an industry that has undergone radical change—all because its customers, the nation's shippers, have changed.
It's been a long time since it was enough for a trucker merely to move goods from Poughkeepsie to Kalamazoo. Bob Davidson, president and CEO of ABF Freight System, says, "Our customers would laugh at us if we held ourselves out as being able to deliver from point A to point B in X days with one plain vanilla service. They demand a broad array of logistics functions."
Indeed, in an era when lean inventories and short cycle times are driving much of the logistics decision making, LTL carriers have no choice but to offer much more than just fast and reliable over-the-road transport. They have to offer clear visibility into their networks. They have to be flexible. And they have to have a service mix that extends beyond the highways and shipping docks.
Doug Duncan, president and chief executive officer of FedEx Freight, argues that the transportation industry overall is being shaped by the pressures brought to bear on the industry's customers. "It's all about how people manage supply chains and attack logistics costs," he contends.
Historically, at least, that's been true. As distribution became more regional in nature and the demand for overnight service exploded, the regional LTL carriers that specialized in that type of service thrived. As customers demanded inventory visibility, carriers developed the tools to provide it. As shippers consolidated their freight volume with fewer carriers in return for better service, carriers responded with improvements in core services while extending their reach into once unfamiliar areas. So it's no surprise, then, that as businesses grapple with the seemingly contradictory demands to increase their international sourcing while maintaining lean inventories and slashing cycle times, LTL carriers have tried to develop ways to help their customers—and expand their own businesses as well.
Need for speed
What will it take to compete in this new marketplace? Sophisticated technology and the ability to respond quickly to changing requirements, says Bill Zollars, chairman, president and CEO of Yellow-Roadway Corp. "Companies are … looking for [carriers] that can help with supply issues, not for the lowest rates," he says. And that means carriers should expect to make major investments in the months ahead to meet shippers' demands for broad capabilities.
This thinking explains in part the rationale behind Yellow Corp.'s acquisition of Roadway Corp. to create Yellow-Roadway Corp. That deal, completed late last year, brought two of the biggest national LTL carriers—Yellow Transportation and Roadway Express—under one corporate roof. "This offers us the opportunity to change the competitive landscape in the transportation industry," Zollars says. "It puts us in a position just behind UPS and FedEx in market reach. We can do a lot more investing and make service improvements across a $6 billion base."
Duncan, who oversaw his own mega-merger a few years ago when Viking Freight and American Freightways were combined to create FedEx Freight, agrees that shippers are demanding much more from their carriers than ever before. In Duncan's view, economics are driving the trend. Manufacturers today are operating on thin margins, he says. Durable-goods manufacturers, for example, have seen the prices they're able to charge decline steadily since 1996, he says. "They have no pricing power in the marketplace."
Although manufacturing productivity has improved markedly, he says, the gains haven't been enough to offset rising costs. That has led to a focus on the supply chain. "In the last four or five years, logistics professionals have been taking inventories out and speeding operations up. Whenever they've done that, the demands on the carriers have increased. Speed and reliability have taken on an extraordinary measure [of importance]."
Zero tolerance
Not surprisingly, the mounting pressure to reduce inventory and speed up deliveries has altered some shippers' relationships with their carriers. "What we're seeing more and more is a lower tolerance for failure, even in the unexpected," Davidson says. "You can't just notify your customer when something has gone wrong; you also have to tell it how you're going to make things right."
Their desire for leverage is also leading more shippers to consolidate their business with fewer carriers—typically carriers that have broader capabilities. David Congdon, president and COO of Old Dominion Freight Line Inc., a successful regional carrier that operates in 38 states, says, "More and more, shippers are looking at reducing the number of carriers they use. They're looking to work with fewer carriers that can do more for them."
Gerald Detter, president and CEO of Con-Way Transportation Services, says his company has invested considerable time and money to develop additional offerings that meet customers' demands for speed, efficiency, and broader services from LTL carriers. "The Con-Way organization has evolved, with regional, long-haul and international services, because of customer demand," he reports. "We want [customers] to think of Con- Way as an enterprise, not as the back of a truck."
As shippers turn up the pressure, many carriers have responded by implementing strict performance standards. "We've changed the entire way we do business," says Duncan. FedEx Freight used to look at ontime shipment percentages as a measure of its success, he says. "That doesn't work today. Most nights we handle 60,000 shipments. If 99 percent of our deliveries are on time, that means I have 600 unhappy customers. We track every failure every night and trace it back to the root causes."
Spreading the risk
The demand for quick response over the last decade has also led to the regionalization of distribution, which has spurred growth among regional LTL carriers in particular.
"The way [shippers] choose to manage strategically is to place inventory in two, three or four places so they can fulfill orders the next day by truck," says Duncan. "They're getting better at choosing those facilities. Next-day service is what they want. The only reason they accept second-day service is that they can't find anyone to deliver their freight the next day."
Then there's the trend toward what Ted Scherck, president of the market research firm The Colography Group, calls "continental distribution." "If you operate with an extended supply chain and lean inventories, you put yourself at substantial risk of interruptions," he argues. Those might range from bad weather on the high seas to labor disputes like the one that shut down West Coast ports in 2002 to strains on freight capacity. "You name it, we've seen it," Scherck says. "Shippers have come to realize that global supply chains and lean inventory policies make them vulnerable to disruptions."
As a result, he says, some shippers are adjusting their distribution networks, placing critical imported goods in a limited number of strategically located DCs within U.S. borders. That allows the shipper to choose the mode—air, road or rail—that best fits the company's needs and reduces the risk substantially. That's where truckers come in. "If you're a North American carrier that supports continental distribution, you stand to benefit in a big way if your customers are abandoning the global model in favor of a surface distribution model," Scherck says.
No problem's too tough
Indeed, the continental distribution trend is already benefiting some LTL carriers. Scherck contends that because shippers and receivers have become conditioned to expect short transit times, businesses are trying to locate their continental distribution centers within 1,000 miles of most of their customers. Within that range, they can make deliveries in two days at the outside.
But he adds that this growth is not necessarily coming at the long-haul carriers' expense. "There are some goods that have to be manufactured in a single location and aren't suitable for high-end transportation," he says. He cites building materials such as doors and windows as an example."You're not going to move those by air," he says, "and you're not going to manufacture them in Malaysia."
Zollars has a slightly different take on the situation. "Today, we're seeing global networks become more important," he says. "That goes back to the idea that customers want companies with broad capabilities. They need companies with global networks."
Duncan believes truckers have no choice but to add services that cater to their customers' increasingly global operations. For example, he says, FedEx Freight is currently testing a program under which it's deconsolidating shipments in ocean containers from Asia for local distribution.
ABF Freight System is also expanding its scope in ways that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago. "We have a project going with a company that wants us to buy their product in the Pacific Rim, move it across the ocean to our warehouse in the United States and then, as they need product, pick the product and sell it back to them," says Davidson. "That's an example of our willingness to look at any logistics product," he adds.
For its part, Con-Way has set up what it calls a "solutions desk" under the auspices of Con-Way Air, the carrier's airfreight forwarding arm."The philosophy in the Con-Way companies is that we never say no," Detter says. "Whatever the issue, we'll relay it to the solutions desk and we'll find a solution. The customer may not be happy with the price, but we will come up with a solution."
The price of progress
And what about price? All of the investments LTL carriers have made carry a substantial cost. In the last few years, they've sunk money into technology, equipment, networks and more with no guarantee that they'd recoup those expenses. Indeed, hampered by stiff competition, carriers have been spectacularly unsuccessful in raising their rates in the last few years.
That may be changing. Although the competition has yet to abate, rates may finally be heading up. "Shippers have to recognize that the days of excess capacity are over," says Scherck. "Capacity is tightening. If we get the kind of bump in manufacturing that everyone says is coming, shippers will find themselves locked in a tight struggle for capacity, and trucking companies are expecting a return."
In fact, this may already be happening. Detter reports that the average weight per shipment in the Con-Way network increased significantly in November and December—up almost 40 pounds per shipment over prior months. If that's a true indication of what's happening in the market, it's likely that LTL rates will soon head up and stay up.
Meanwhile, a look at their balance sheets has only stiffened trucking executives' resolve to resist rate erosion. Carriers have been hit with double-digit increases in insurance costs. Labor costs for drivers have inched up. And carriers are finding that it's costing them more to run new trucks equipped with engines that meet the stringent emissions standards imposed last year than it did to run older models.
And when it comes to operating costs, truckers say there's nothing left to cut. "We're a very efficient industry," Detter says. "We use technology efficiently; we use our assets efficiently.We've cut out all the fat."
If nothing else, Detter adds, carriers will be forced to raise rates simply to ensure there's someone available to drive the trucks. "We need livable wages and benefits to attract people to a relatively unattractive industry," he says. "That's not going to go away."
As a contract provider of warehousing, logistics, and supply chain solutions, Geodis often has to provide customized services for clients.
That was the case recently when one of its customers asked Geodis to up its inventory monitoring game—specifically, to begin conducting quarterly cycle counts of the goods it stored at a Geodis site. Trouble was, performing more frequent counts would be something of a burden for the facility, which still conducted inventory counts manually—a process that was tedious and, depending on what else the team needed to accomplish, sometimes required overtime.
So Levallois, France-based Geodis launched a search for a technology solution that would both meet the customer’s demand and make its inventory monitoring more efficient overall, hoping to save time, labor, and money in the process.
SCAN AND DELIVER
Geodis found a solution with Gather AI, a Pittsburgh-based firm that automates inventory monitoring by deploying small drones to fly through a warehouse autonomously scanning pallets and cases. The system’s machine learning (ML) algorithm analyzes the resulting inventory pictures to identify barcodes, lot codes, text, and expiration dates; count boxes; and estimate occupancy, gathering information that warehouse operators need and comparing it with what’s in the warehouse management system (WMS).
Among other benefits, this means employees no longer have to spend long hours doing manual inventory counts with order-picker forklifts. On top of that, the warehouse manager is able to view inventory data in real time from a web dashboard and identify and address inventory exceptions.
But perhaps the biggest benefit of all is the speed at which it all happens. Gather AI’s drones perform those scans up to 15 times faster than traditional methods, the company says. To that point, it notes that before the drones were deployed at the Geodis site, four manual counters could complete approximately 800 counts in a day. By contrast, the drones are able to scan 1,200 locations per day.
FLEXIBLE FLYERS
Although Geodis had a number of options when it came to tech vendors, there were a couple of factors that tipped the odds in Gather AI’s favor, the partners said. One was its close cultural fit with Geodis. “Probably most important during that vetting process was understanding the cultural fit between Geodis and that vendor. We truly wanted to form a relationship with the company we selected,” Geodis Senior Director of Innovation Andy Johnston said in a release.
Speaking to this cultural fit, Johnston added, “Gather AI understood our business, our challenges, and the course of business throughout our day. They trained our personnel to get them comfortable with the technology and provided them with a tool that would truly make their job easier. This is pretty advanced technology, but the Gather AI user interface allowed our staff to see inventory variances intuitively, and they picked it up quickly. This shows me that Gather AI understood what we needed.”
Another factor in Gather AI’s favor was the prospect of a quick and easy deployment: Because the drones can conduct their missions without GPS or Wi-Fi, the supplier would be able to get its solution up and running quickly. In the words of Geodis Industrial Engineer Trent McDermott, “The Gather AI implementation process was efficient. There were no IT infrastructure or layout changes needed, and Gather AI was flexible with the installation to not disrupt peak hours for the operations team.”
QUICK RESULTS
Once the drones were in the air, Geodis saw immediate improvements in cycle counting speed, according to Gather AI. But that wasn’t the only benefit: Geodis was also able to more easily find misplaced pallets.
“Previously, we would research the inventory’s systemic license plate number (LPN),” McDermott explained. “We could narrow it down to a portion or a section of the warehouse where we thought that LPN was, but there was still a lot of ambiguity. So we would send an operator out on a mission to go hunt and find that LPN,” a process that could take a day or two to complete. But the days of scouring the facility for lost pallets are over. With Gather AI, the team can simply search in the dashboard to find the last location where the pallet was scanned.
And about that customer who wanted more frequent inventory counts? Geodis reports that it completed its first quarterly count for the client in half the time it had previously taken, with no overtime needed. “It’s a huge win for us to trim that time down,” McDermott said. “Just two weeks into the new quarter, we were able to have 40% of the warehouse completed.”
The less-than-truckload (LTL) industry moved closer to a revamped freight classification system this week, as the National Motor Freight Traffic Association (NMFTA) continued to spread the word about upcoming changes to the way it helps shippers and carriers determine delivery rates. The NMFTA will publish proposed changes to its National Motor Freight Classification (NMFC) system Thursday, a transition announced last year, and that the organization has termed its “classification reimagination” process.
Businesses throughout the LTL industry will be affected by the changes, as the NMFC is a tool for setting prices that is used daily by transportation providers, trucking fleets, third party logistics service providers (3PLs), and freight brokers.
Representatives from NMFTA were on hand to discuss the changes at the LTL-focused supply chain conference Jump Start 25 in Atlanta this week. The project’s goal is to make what is currently a complex freight classification system easier to understand and “to make the logistics process as frictionless as possible,” NMFTA’s Director of Operations Keith Peterson told attendees during a presentation about the project.
The changes seek to simplify classification by grouping similar items together and assigning most classes based solely on density. Exceptions will be handled separately, adding other characteristics when density alone is not enough to determine an accurate class.
When the updates take effect later this year, shippers may see shifts in the LTL prices they pay to move freight—because the way their freight is classified, and subsequently billed, could change as a result.
NMFTA will publish the proposed changes this Thursday, January 30, in a document called Docket 2025-1. The docket will include more than 90 proposed changes and is open to industry feedback through February 25. NMFTA will follow with a public meeting to review and discuss feedback on March 3. The changes will take effect July 19.
NMFTA has a dedicated website detailing the changes, where industry stakeholders can register to receive bi-weekly updates: https://info.nmfta.org/2025-nmfc-changes.
Trade and transportation groups are congratulating Sean Duffy today for winning confirmation in a U.S. Senate vote to become the country’s next Secretary of Transportation.
Once he’s sworn in, Duffy will become the nation’s 20th person to hold that post, succeeding the recently departed Pete Buttigieg.
Transportation groups quickly called on Duffy to work on continuing the burst of long-overdue infrastructure spending that was a hallmark of the Biden Administration’s passing of the bipartisan infrastructure law, known formally as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA).
But according to industry associations such as the Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors (CAGTC), federal spending is critical for funding large freight projects that sustain U.S. supply chains. “[Duffy] will direct the Department at an important time, implementing the remaining two years of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and charting a course for the next surface transportation reauthorization,” CAGTC Executive Director Elaine Nessle said in a release. “During his confirmation hearing, Secretary Duffy shared the new Administration’s goal to invest in large, durable projects that connect the nation and commerce. CAGTC shares this goal and is eager to work with Secretary Duffy to ensure that nationally and regionally significant freight projects are advanced swiftly and funded robustly.”
A similar message came from the International Foodservice Distributors Association (IFDA). “A safe, efficient, and reliable transportation network is essential to our industry, enabling 33 million cases of food and related products to reach professional kitchens every day. We look forward to working with Secretary Duffy to strengthen America’s transportation infrastructure and workforce to support the safe and seamless movement of ingredients that make meals away from home possible,” IFDA President and CEO Mark S. Allen said in a release.
And the truck drivers’ group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) likewise called for continued investment in projects like creating new parking spaces for Class 8 trucks. “OOIDA and the 150,000 small business truckers we represent congratulate Secretary Sean Duffy on his confirmation to lead the U.S. Department of Transportation,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a release. “We look forward to continue working with him in advancing the priorities of small business truckers across America, including expanding truck parking, fighting freight fraud, and rolling back burdensome, unnecessary regulations.”
With the new Trump Administration continuing to threaten steep tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China as early as February 1, supply chain organizations preparing for that economic shock must be prepared to make strategic responses that go beyond either absorbing new costs or passing them on to customers, according to Gartner Inc.
But even as they face what would be the most significant tariff changes proposed in the past 50 years, some enterprises could use the potential market volatility to drive a competitive advantage against their rivals, the analyst group said.
Gartner experts said the risks of acting too early to proposed tariffs—and anticipated countermeasures by trading partners—are as acute as acting too late. Chief supply chain officers (CSCOs) should be projecting ahead to potential countermeasures, escalations and de-escalations as part of their current scenario planning activities.
“CSCOs who anticipate that current tariff volatility will persist for years, rather than months, should also recognize that their business operations will not emerge successful by remaining static or purely on the defensive,” Brian Whitlock, Senior Research Director in Gartner’s supply chain practice, said in a release.
“The long-term winners will reinvent or reinvigorate their business strategies, developing new capabilities that drive competitive advantage. In almost all cases, this will require material business investment and should be a focal point of current scenario planning,” Whitlock said.
Gartner listed five possible pathways for CSCOs and other leaders to consider when faced with new tariff policy changes:
Retire certain products: Tariff volatility will stress some specific products, or even organizations, to a breaking point, so some enterprises may have to accept that worsening geopolitical conditions should force the retirement of that product.
Renovate products to adjust: New tariffs could prompt renovations (adjustments) to products that were overdue, as businesses will need to take a hard look at the viability of raising or absorbing costs in a still price-sensitive environment.
Rebalance: Additional volatility should be factored into future demand planning, as early winners and losers from initial tariff policies must both be prepared for potential countermeasures, policy escalations and de-escalations, and competitor responses.
Reinvent: As tariff volatility persists, some companies should consider investing in new projects in markets that are not impacted or that align with new geopolitical incentives. Others may pivot and repurpose existing facilities to serve local markets.
Reinvigorate: Early winners of announced tariffs should seek opportunities to extend competitive advantages. For example, they could look to expand existing US-based or domestic manufacturing capacity or reposition themselves within the market by lowering their prices to take market share and drive business growth.
By the numbers, global logistics real estate rents declined by 5% last year as market conditions “normalized” after historic growth during the pandemic. After more than a decade overall of consistent growth, the change was driven by rising real estate vacancy rates up in most markets, Prologis said. The three causes for that condition included an influx of new building supply, coupled with positive but subdued demand, and uncertainty about conditions in the economic, financial market, and supply chain sectors.
Together, those factors triggered negative annual rent growth in the U.S. and Europe for the first time since the global financial crisis of 2007-2009, the “Prologis Rent Index Report” said. Still, that dip was smaller than pandemic-driven outperformance, so year-end 2024 market rents were 59% higher in the U.S. and 33% higher in Europe than year-end 2019.
Looking into coming months, Prologis expects moderate recovery in market rents in 2025 and stronger gains in 2026. That eventual recovery in market rents will require constrained supply, high replacement cost rents, and demand for Class A properties, Prologis said. In addition, a stronger demand resurgence—whether prompted by the need to navigate supply chain disruptions or meet the needs of end consumers—should put upward pressure on a broad range of locations and building types.