John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
We've all heard about the pressure Wal-Mart and other retailers are putting on distribution centers when it comes to RFID capabilities. However, that's not the only request savvy retailers are dumping on DC managers.
DC executives have come to dread retailers' requests to perform a myriad of value-added services, many of which take hours of extra labor to complete. Tasks like ticketing items, packaging, assembling displays, providing special labeling, and putting apparel onto hangers for customers commonly occur at the DC level nowadays. It's clearly a no-win situation for DC managers who have made great strides in minimizing labor expenses for picking operations, but must now increase labor to deal with requests for often complicated and laborious hands-on value-added services.
"We're definitely seeing a trend toward more value-added services occurring in the DC," says Patti Satterfield, business development manager for Q4 Logistics, a systems integrator based in Santa Ana, Calif. "Many retailers don't have as much backroom space these days, so as items come off the truck they are literally flowed onto the floor as quickly as possible.
"For retailers, it's a resources issue as well as a space issue. They don't want people in the backroom putting items on hangers, so they are pushing that back to the DC. Value-added services are becoming part of day-to-day pick/pack operations, and many DCs have had to create extra steps to accommodate that, like adding a value-add services function to their WMS software."
The folks at Columbia Sportswear are an exception. Columbia's distribution center in Portland, Ore., performs value-added services on almost 20 percent of the products that move through its DC, but that percentage is much lower than it was three years ago.
"When you look at it on a productivity basis for units per hour, value-added services is the least productive area in our building by far," says Dave Carlson, who heads up Columbia Sportswear's distribution activities. "There's not too much we can do about it.We can automate getting the goods there [to the value-added services area] and taking the goods away, but what happens during the value-added process is very manual … it's customized and it changes with each pick and each order."
It's not unheard of, for example, for some of Columbia Sportswear's European customers to request that product be steamed and delivered on hangers. Columbia outsources that request, which delays the shipment to the customer and increases Columbia's lead time for getting product to the customer.
Just say no
Carlson reports that Columbia is making some progress in having value-added services take place at the manufacturer's factory. That's crucial in a distribution center where nearly 70 percent of products are less-than-case quantities, meaning those SKUs must be picked and packed manually before they leave the DC.
"It's taken a number of years," says Carlson, "but factories are getting more and more used to having these value-added requests pushed back to them. We've been able to move some of it upstream. That's the whole idea of the supply chain—trying to get everything done on the first touch."
Columbia Sportswear often refuses to perform certain value-added tasks that will consume too much labor and result in far too low payback. The firm also takes a consultative approach with its customers, letting them know when a value-added service request just doesn't make economic sense—for either Columbia Sportswear or the customer.
In one case, a retail customer requested a customized shipping label containing special shipping information.
Columbia's policy is to print a standard shipping form and content label from its warehouse management system for outbound freight. Carlson pointed out to the customer that the information it asked for in its special request was already included on the two labels Columbia produces. Suffice it to say, the customer backed off from the request.
The simple truth is when you are shipping 2,500 cartons an hour and filling five to seven trailer loads per hour during peak season, there isn't a lot of time for value-added services that don't provide a real benefit.
"We have a process to approve a customer for valueadded services," says Carlson. "In the end it's a commercial decision. We tell the customer we can do anything but it's not free. The customer needs to gauge how important it is to its business. Sometimes retailers are surprised that their requests don't add any value."
So before you spend all kinds of time and energy (and money) reconfiguring pick/pack operations to accommodate value-added requests, first make sure it's worthwhile for both sides.
picking options
Logistics professionals struggle every day to make picking operations more efficient. Why the attention to picking? Because up to 60 percent of all DC labor costs are related to picking and packing, and both of those activities are directly linked to customer satisfaction. At a User Conference held by Manhattan Associates last month, a panel on picking operations summarized the pros and cons of the various picking options as shown below:
Paper Picking
Benefits
Simple and common in distribution centers
Low support structure and hardware requirements
Pick list can be used as packing list
Ideal for smaller facilities with low orders per day
Generally used for picking one order at a time
Challenges
Distribution of paper to picker (lack of controls)
No real-time updating of transactions (pick verification)
Manual update to pick list for shortages (data entry)
Hard to reprioritize orders
Printing optimal pick path is difficult if used as packing slip
Voice Picking
Benefits
Frees hands for picking by use of a headset
Real-time updating of transactions
Provides pick verification (correct location and quantity)
Provides easy method for productivity tracking
Can provide extra information (special handling) to picker
Proper application can lead to higher productivity vs. RF
Challenges
Processes requiring large amount of license plate scanning can become tedious (scanning vs. verbal)
Additional step of creating packing slip
Radio Frequency (RF) Picking
Benefits
Real-time updating of transactions
Provides pick verification (correct location and quantity)
Allows for greater material handling complexity to assign tasks, license plates, split orders, cartonization, etc.
Provides easy method for productivity tracking
Can provide extra information (special handling) to picker
Challenges
All pickers require an RF terminal (initial cost/maintenance)
Another piece of hardware a picker must carry
Can lead to a decrease in productivity – requires training
Additional step of creating packing slip
Pick to Light
Benefits
High pick productivity with good accuracy
Real-time updating of transactions
Provides pick verification (correct location and quantity)
Provides easy method for productivity tracking
Challenges
Initial capital costs high, depending on number of SKUs
Typically used for high-volume broken case picking
May require additional controls & order management system
Operations requiring licenses plates will require a scanner for each picker
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."