Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
When you look at the truckload portion of the motor carrier industry as a single entity, you see the segment—the word segment hardly does it justice—that handles the vast majority of for-hire tonnage in the United States. According to the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA), the major trade association for the industry, truckload carriers handled 97 percent of the for-hire tonnage in 2002—the latest numbers available. That makes the truckload business, as fragmented as it is, a substantial part of the nation's economy.
But examine just a bit further, and you see one of the most fragmented portions of the industry, with thousands of carriers, big and small, and where even the giants, the best-known names, control only a small portion of the overall market. Thus, generalizations about the industry can be misleading. What is almost universally true, though, for truckload carriers big and small, is that business has been tough, but it is getting better.
Over the last four years, the industry has gone through substantial turmoil. Chris Burruss, president of TCA, describes it as a "perfect storm."
"The industry will face cost pressures at any time," he says. "It might be fuel or insurance, or new engines, or you might have to deal with drivers. Over the last four years, all of those have come to bear at once."
Lately, though, as the economy has recovered and trucking volumes have risen— and truckload rates along with them—truckload carriers, or at least the larger carriers, have shown strong signs of recovery. J.B. Hunt, for instance, the largest publicly traded truckload carrier, reported both record revenues and earnings in the first quarter of this year. Werner Enterprises, another large truckload carrier, reported its first-quarter revenues increased by 11 percent and profits by 31 percent over 2003's first quarter. (Schneider National, the nation's largest truckload carrier, is privately held and does not break out its financial results. However, for all of 2003, the company said its truckload services revenue grew by 6 percent.)
Rates on the rebound
For shippers, that opens several issues. First, rates are up and certain to rise. Carriers have had to absorb substantial increases in insurance and fuel costs; increase driver compensation; and take on the higher acquisition and maintenance costs of new cleaner-burning engines.With capacity tight, carriers will pass those costs on to customers and attempt to improve their margins as well. But with costs being particularly volatile, getting a grip on exactly how far rates will rise is difficult.
William Rennicke, a managing partner with Mercer Management Consulting's transportation practice, says, "While rates have gone up—most carriers have seen much higher rates and the rates are sticking—there's a built-in uncertainty in the cost structure. It gets hard for the carriers to find out if they are pricing the right way, or you end up with contingency-based pricing. "Many carriers have been successful in passing on at least a portion of the steep run-up in diesel fuel prices, but constant changes in rates can also cause tensions between shippers and carriers. Rennicke describes the pricing environment as "crazy and unsettled." (An example of the cost issues: Diesel fuel in early May averaged $1.71 a gallon across the country, 23 cents a gallon higher than a year earlier.)
Even with tight capacity, Rennicke believes that shippers still have most of the leverage because of the number of competing carriers in the truckload market.
The driver dilemma
Attracting and retaining drivers has long been an issue for truckload carriers, and the pool of available drivers may be as great or greater a restraint on capacity as equipment. "Drivers are as big a problem as before the downturn," Rennicke says. "The ability to serve the market is capped by the ability to attract drivers."
Speaking to the International Association of Refrigerated Warehouses conference in April, Lance Craig, chairman of TCA and president of Craig Transportation in Perrysburg, Ohio, said,"By every standard measurable, the issue of drivers is particularly worrisome."
Tight capacity and the issue of driver retention have led more carriers than ever to consider using rail intermodal services for linehauls. J.B. Hunt and Schneider National, the largest truckload carriers, have used intermodal for portions of their business for several years, but Rennicke says that even relatively small carriers are considering that option. But even intermodal capacity is getting tight, Craig warns.
Another factor whose consequences are still imperfectly understood: Carriers are also continuing to learn how the new driver hours-of-service rules that took effect in January will affect productivity. Already, major carriers have gotten more serious about imposing detention charges on shippers or receivers that tie up equipment.
Be late, get detention
Craig says detention billings by his company are more than double what they were before the rules came into effect.
"This is not a 'hurrah' thing," he says,"but it highlights for shippers and receivers that there is a cost to inefficiency."
Perhaps even more important heading into the peak shipping season is that capacity is getting tight. "There's definitely going to be a problem as we wind into the busy season," Craig says. Shippers without contracts with carriers may find trucks difficult to find as volume picks up—especially those shippers who carriers perceive as operating inefficient docks.
Craig says, "It's not a secret that it's swung back the other way. There's a much higher demand for trucking. It is more of a carrier's market now."
But the pain inflicted on the industry over the last four years—plus questions about driver availability—has caused many carriers to invest in new capacity cautiously, which suggests that capacity is not likely to expand in step with demand. "Expansion has to be done in a careful manner," Craig says. He says his own company could move as much as 50 percent more freight every day, based on the demand he's seeing. Yet major investments won't come quickly.
"Trucking companies have learned from the last recession what it takes to be a profitable company," Craig says. "They are going to be cautious about who they deal with and how they do business. A lot of carriers now have tools that tell them who their good customers are and who the bad customers are."
Shippers aware of the coming tight capacity have been making efforts to expand their base of contracted carriers. Craig reports a sharp increase in requests for bids from shippers. "They are trying to gain specific commitments knowing that things are ready to bust loose," he says. "The only way to gain capacity is to roll out those bids and issue awards for traffic."
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.