Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
When you look at the truckload portion of the motor carrier industry as a single entity, you see the segment—the word segment hardly does it justice—that handles the vast majority of for-hire tonnage in the United States. According to the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA), the major trade association for the industry, truckload carriers handled 97 percent of the for-hire tonnage in 2002—the latest numbers available. That makes the truckload business, as fragmented as it is, a substantial part of the nation's economy.
But examine just a bit further, and you see one of the most fragmented portions of the industry, with thousands of carriers, big and small, and where even the giants, the best-known names, control only a small portion of the overall market. Thus, generalizations about the industry can be misleading. What is almost universally true, though, for truckload carriers big and small, is that business has been tough, but it is getting better.
Over the last four years, the industry has gone through substantial turmoil. Chris Burruss, president of TCA, describes it as a "perfect storm."
"The industry will face cost pressures at any time," he says. "It might be fuel or insurance, or new engines, or you might have to deal with drivers. Over the last four years, all of those have come to bear at once."
Lately, though, as the economy has recovered and trucking volumes have risen— and truckload rates along with them—truckload carriers, or at least the larger carriers, have shown strong signs of recovery. J.B. Hunt, for instance, the largest publicly traded truckload carrier, reported both record revenues and earnings in the first quarter of this year. Werner Enterprises, another large truckload carrier, reported its first-quarter revenues increased by 11 percent and profits by 31 percent over 2003's first quarter. (Schneider National, the nation's largest truckload carrier, is privately held and does not break out its financial results. However, for all of 2003, the company said its truckload services revenue grew by 6 percent.)
Rates on the rebound
For shippers, that opens several issues. First, rates are up and certain to rise. Carriers have had to absorb substantial increases in insurance and fuel costs; increase driver compensation; and take on the higher acquisition and maintenance costs of new cleaner-burning engines.With capacity tight, carriers will pass those costs on to customers and attempt to improve their margins as well. But with costs being particularly volatile, getting a grip on exactly how far rates will rise is difficult.
William Rennicke, a managing partner with Mercer Management Consulting's transportation practice, says, "While rates have gone up—most carriers have seen much higher rates and the rates are sticking—there's a built-in uncertainty in the cost structure. It gets hard for the carriers to find out if they are pricing the right way, or you end up with contingency-based pricing. "Many carriers have been successful in passing on at least a portion of the steep run-up in diesel fuel prices, but constant changes in rates can also cause tensions between shippers and carriers. Rennicke describes the pricing environment as "crazy and unsettled." (An example of the cost issues: Diesel fuel in early May averaged $1.71 a gallon across the country, 23 cents a gallon higher than a year earlier.)
Even with tight capacity, Rennicke believes that shippers still have most of the leverage because of the number of competing carriers in the truckload market.
The driver dilemma
Attracting and retaining drivers has long been an issue for truckload carriers, and the pool of available drivers may be as great or greater a restraint on capacity as equipment. "Drivers are as big a problem as before the downturn," Rennicke says. "The ability to serve the market is capped by the ability to attract drivers."
Speaking to the International Association of Refrigerated Warehouses conference in April, Lance Craig, chairman of TCA and president of Craig Transportation in Perrysburg, Ohio, said,"By every standard measurable, the issue of drivers is particularly worrisome."
Tight capacity and the issue of driver retention have led more carriers than ever to consider using rail intermodal services for linehauls. J.B. Hunt and Schneider National, the largest truckload carriers, have used intermodal for portions of their business for several years, but Rennicke says that even relatively small carriers are considering that option. But even intermodal capacity is getting tight, Craig warns.
Another factor whose consequences are still imperfectly understood: Carriers are also continuing to learn how the new driver hours-of-service rules that took effect in January will affect productivity. Already, major carriers have gotten more serious about imposing detention charges on shippers or receivers that tie up equipment.
Be late, get detention
Craig says detention billings by his company are more than double what they were before the rules came into effect.
"This is not a 'hurrah' thing," he says,"but it highlights for shippers and receivers that there is a cost to inefficiency."
Perhaps even more important heading into the peak shipping season is that capacity is getting tight. "There's definitely going to be a problem as we wind into the busy season," Craig says. Shippers without contracts with carriers may find trucks difficult to find as volume picks up—especially those shippers who carriers perceive as operating inefficient docks.
Craig says, "It's not a secret that it's swung back the other way. There's a much higher demand for trucking. It is more of a carrier's market now."
But the pain inflicted on the industry over the last four years—plus questions about driver availability—has caused many carriers to invest in new capacity cautiously, which suggests that capacity is not likely to expand in step with demand. "Expansion has to be done in a careful manner," Craig says. He says his own company could move as much as 50 percent more freight every day, based on the demand he's seeing. Yet major investments won't come quickly.
"Trucking companies have learned from the last recession what it takes to be a profitable company," Craig says. "They are going to be cautious about who they deal with and how they do business. A lot of carriers now have tools that tell them who their good customers are and who the bad customers are."
Shippers aware of the coming tight capacity have been making efforts to expand their base of contracted carriers. Craig reports a sharp increase in requests for bids from shippers. "They are trying to gain specific commitments knowing that things are ready to bust loose," he says. "The only way to gain capacity is to roll out those bids and issue awards for traffic."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."