Although they had been kicking around in research and development labs for years, it wasn't until the summer of 1974 that the bar code was unveiled to the public.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Do you remember your first time? For most of us, it was in a supermarket, and it was a strange and somewhat unsettling experience.
You gazed around and there were little black and white stickers on everything: milk jugs, packages of Oreos, boxes of laundry detergent. The stickers all looked similar, yet slightly different. But those differences that were so imperceptible to our untrained eyes apparently meant a whole lot to the Star Trek-esque laser things at the checkout counter.
We speak, of course, of the bar code. This summer marks the 30th birthday of the iconic symbol that has changed our lives, not to mention the logistics profession. Although they had been kicking around in research and development labs for years, it wasn't until the summer of 1974 that the bar code was unveiled to the public. On June 26, 1974, to be exact, a cashier at an Ohio grocery store scanned a customer's 10-pack of Juicy Fruit gum, and the price magically appeared on the cash register screen. BINGO! The rules had just changed, and we had no idea how much.
In the 30 years since, the ubiquitous black and white striped symbols have infiltrated their way into our daily lives. By some estimates, over 5 billion bar codes are scanned each day. Not counting the occasional yard sale or flea market purchase, try to remember the last time you bought something and a bar code wasn't part of the transaction.
It's been estimated that bar-code technology saves the nation's retail sector something on the order of $30 billion a year in operating costs. Not bad for something that looks more like abstract art than a revolutionary business tool. But beyond that, the codes have forever altered logistics operations. Because they carry so much information that can be captured, reported, analyzed and (we hope) acted upon, bar codes have allowed companies to move their goods through the supply chain at ever-increasing speeds. And therein lies perhaps the bar code's most important contribution to the business world: an exponential increase in velocity in back-room logistics operations.
Still, most of us go about our daily lives unaware of what happens in warehouses and manufacturing plants and distribution centers. To us, bar codes are what allows us to sweep through retail and grocery store checkout lines way faster than we could back in the days of manual cash registers.
I was reminded of that as I stood at the checkout counter one Saturday morning last month at the only full-service grocery store on the outer reaches of Cape Cod. The young woman in front of me was having a monumentally bad day. She'd arrived at the supermarket with what looked to be a five-year-old, a three-yearold and an infant in tow, which meant the deck was already stacked against her. She found herself (as did I) in a sea of shoppers, all elbowing past each other in hopes of getting in and out of the store quickly with the groceries they needed to stock the cupboards at their rented cottages. Alas, as she stood there, with a carriage heaped high with everything from hot dogs to sunscreen to cheddar cheese, the line only inched forward. In fact, it probably didn't seem to her that the checkout line was moving at all.
As I waited patiently for my turn at the counter, it dawned on me that things could be much worse. I imagined the same circumstance 30 years earlier. I imagined how much slower things would be if the heavily pierced and tattooed teenage girl swiping merchandise across the scanner had to pause and find the price tag on every bottle of shampoo and pound of coffee, read the price and then enter each digit into a cash register.
This little daydream brought a smile to my face, but it didn't help the young mother. She knew nothing of that 10-pack of Juicy Fruit gum out in Ohio 361 months earlier. If she had, she probably wouldn't have much cared. And that's a shame. If it weren't for the bar code, she might still be in line.
David Scheffrahn is the North American vice president of sales at Ocado Intelligent Automation, a part of the technology specialist Ocado Group. Although he began his career focusing on robotic solutions for semiconductor, electronics, and automotive manufacturers, Scheffrahn eventually moved on to the logistics sector, where he worked at Rethink Robotics, Seegrid, Plus One Robotics, and Dexterity before joining Ocado in 2023. He holds a degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas.
Q: How would you describe the current state of the automation industry?
A: Today, automation is available for nearly every task in the supply chain. Yet we know from industry analysts that only one-fourth of warehouses are “automated.” [The market research firm] Interact Analysis predicts that 27% of warehouses will be automated by 2027.So many warehouse operators still have the opportunity to embrace and benefit from automation.
Whether companies are just getting started with automation and could benefit from swapping out manual carts for automated ones or are looking for an end-to-end omnichannel fulfillment solution, there will be options available.
Q: You’ve worked in the robotics industry for the past 25 years. What changes have you seen in robotic design and applications during that time?
A: Believe it or not, robots pre-date me! I fell in love with robots right out of college. When I graduated in 1994, I was hired by a local robotics company, and one of my early jobs was to program robots to cut circuit boards into the correct shape to fit into cellphone housings. I was hooked for life. Back then, robots did exactly what you programmed them to do, very precisely, over and over.
In the mid-2000s, an explosion of software and sensor-based technologies started to give robots the capability to operate in environments that are much less structured, such as warehouses and fulfillment centers. Nowadays, robots can perform a wide range of tasks and movements, seemingly on the fly. They can interact with the world around them—and even people—because they can safely operate and adapt to changes in the environment.
Q: How are artificial intelligence and machine learning being applied to robotics?
A: Think of a robotic pick arm. Traditionally, it was trained and tested to always pick the same—or very similar—object or item set. Now, when we apply artificial intelligence, vision systems, and sensors to the same robotic arm, it can teach itself to handle new items without previous training or testing. Vision systems and sensors scan shapes and identify items to direct the arm on how to handle fragile products without damaging them or how to grasp an item with a new and different shape.
Q: Automation used to be a major investment. Has it become any easier for smaller companies to get started with automation?
A: A few years ago, automating was a choice. In 2024, the question isn’t whether you should automate, but rather what’s the right automation solution for your operations. Automated solutions can be big or they can be small, but they should always improve warehouse operations and be “right-sized” for the application.
Autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) are some of the most approachable automated solutions available for 3PLs or small and mid-sized warehouses. AMRs can be deployed quickly one at a time or by the dozen. They can integrate seamlessly with existing warehouse systems and infrastructure, and work safely alongside human pickers. Customers we have worked with report that deploying automated carts based on AMRs has doubled their productivity, improved accuracy by 40%, and reduced employee training time by 80%.
Q: What is the next frontier in robotic design and applications?
A: The use of 3D printing is opening up new opportunities in robotic design. I think we’ll see that technique used more because of the resulting benefits.
Robots made via 3D printing are lighter, which, in turn, means the grids used in automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS)—like the Ocado Storage & Retrieval System (OSRS)—can be lighter. Lighter grids are easier and quicker to assemble. But more importantly, in Ocado Intelligent Automation’s solution, they can provide 33% more vertical storage capacity within the OSRS than heavier grids. The more cubic density in an AS/RS, the more warehouse operators can conserve footprint, lower real-estate costs, and scale inventory.
Q: How is Ocado Intelligent Automation expanding its offerings for the supply chain industry?
A: Ocado Group has been developing automated technology for more than 20 years. In 2023, it formed Ocado Intelligent Automation (OIA), the division I work in, to bring automation solutions to intralogistics (supply chain activities that take place within a warehouse) and to sectors beyond online grocery, which is where the company got its start.
Online grocery is one of the most demanding e-commerce environments—with needs that are very analogous to the fulfillment and logistics requirements of the health-care, retail, consumer packaged goods, and third-party logistics sectors. I can’t wait to see how these sectors benefit from OIA technology and robotics in the coming years. It’s going to be impressive!
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.