Blindsided by Wal-Mart's aggressive push into their market, grocers find themselves fighting for survival. Maybe they can't compete on price but they can cut the fat from their supply chains.
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
You can't turn around in a supermarket these days without bumping up against evidence of America's latest obsession: dieting. Books about the Zone Diet and the South Beach Diet dominate store-front kiosks. The latest diet products, the low-fat, the no-fat and the lowcarb, line the shelves.
Behind the scenes, logisticians within the grocery industry are waging their own war on fat, one that has nothing to do with losing 10 pounds. No, the battle they fight is the one to trim fat from the supply chain and increase productivity at grocery stores, where minuscule margins translate to major challenges.
And the margins are minuscule. The average American household spends about $100 on groceries each week.What most consumers don't realize is that traditional grocery stores typically make only a buck or so from an order of that size—a slim 1 percent profit margin.
That's nothing new, of course. Grocers have survived for years on these margins.What is new is the emergence of the Behemoth of Bentonville on the scene. Dismissed as only a marginal player in the grocery business as recently as the late '90s, Wal-Mart launched its attack on the grocery business a few years back, marshalling its legendary supply chain efficiencies in a bid to dominate the industry. The strike proved both swift and successful. Today, Wal-Mart has taken over the top spot as the nation's leading grocer.
Traditional grocers' attempts to fight back have met with limited success. Their first response was to bulk up: Three of the biggest players—Safeway, Albertson's and Kroger—have all gone the acquisition route, gobbling up other chains in the last few years in order to gain Wal-Mart-like economies of scale. But in the end, it appears that their attempts to stave off Wal-Mart's threat only bought them time. Nor does it appear that price cutting will be the answer. Given Wal-Mart's reputation for squeezing suppliers for the lowest possible prices, it seems clear that efforts to compete head to head with Wal-Mart on pricing would be tantamount to a suicide mission.
But what grocers can do—and are doing—is to get out their cleavers and start trimming the supply chain fat. Leading grocers like Stop & Shop, Meijer and Kroger all announced major undertakings in the last six weeks to boost productivity. "Grocery chains can't compete strictly on price anymore, so that's serving as a driving force for some of these initiatives," confirms Adrian Gonzalez, part of the supply chain consulting team at ARC Advisory Group and an expert in grocery distribution. "With the emergence of Wal-Mart in that sector over the past few years, many grocery retailers have been forced to take a closer look at their processes."
Grocers fight back
In fact, many of those grocers are taking their cues from the enemy. Like Wal-Mart, they're putting pressure on their supplier partners, as well as their own distribution centers, to put an end to stockouts. That means having product on the shelf at all times. (Wal-Mart's RFID mandate—which requires its top 100 suppliers to place RFID tags on selected goods sent to its distribution centers by yearend —is designed in part to reduce stockouts.) In the retail world, stockouts equate to lost sales, which equate to reduced revenue.
It doesn't stop there. Grocers are becoming particular about how and when they receive products. Like retailers in other industries, grocery chains prefer to receive smaller shipments on a more frequent basis. That strategy saves the retailer on warehouse space.
"It's a thin-margin business and people are very energetic about cutting costs and reducing inventory," says Geoff Davis, executive vice president at Keene, N.H.-based ES3, a third-party provider for the grocery industry. "It's a new game, that's for sure."
At least one grocer has chosen to fight back with technology. Stop & Shop is building the largest automated storage and retrieval system in North America—and quite possibly the world—at its 1.3 million-square-foot distribution center in Freetown, Mass. The largest grocery chain in New England and a unit of global grocery giant Ahold, Stop & Shop is employing 77 rotating-fork automated storage and retrieval machines at the DC, which will supply 350 stores and allow Stop & Shop to consolidate several distribution centers on the Atlantic Seaboard. The DC is expected to be fully operational by October.
Stop & Shop realizes that customers will, in fact, stop shopping at its stores if they cannot find the products they want on its shelves. That's a big part of the reason why the company decided on the AS/RS system from HK Systems. The solution allows for high-storage capability for dry goods. The DC, which HK Systems claims is the nation's largest and most advanced in the grocery trade, will store more than 64,000 pallets. The 77 cranes will each have access to more than 11,500 pick slots serviced by 90 pick aisles.
"Stop & Shop was looking to significantly improve throughput productivity for all of [its] operations," says John W. Splude, chairman and chief executive officer of HK Systems. "This is a unique approach that gives [it] a high level of picking with significant storage capabilities."
The new DC allows Stop & Shop to eliminate much of its outside storage and consolidate materials in one location. "By bringing everything together, you control inventory much better and avoid stock outages, which [translate] into lost sales," says Splude. "So you get those kinds of soft gains, and from an efficiencies point of view, this was significant for them."
New moves
Stop & Shop isn't the only large retail chain making waves. Kroger, one of the nation's biggest retail grocery chains with more than 2,500 supermarkets and multi-department stores in 32 states, just implemented a system to achieve tighter supply chain collaboration for electronic commerce transactions with its trading partners—resulting in increased accuracy, timeliness and operating efficiencies.
Food fight: Third-party suppliers like ES3 are helping clients find new ways to compete in the grocery wars …
Not to be outdone, grocery chain Meijer turned to a Web-based private transportation network to electronically execute inbound truckload and LTL shipments. The system extends planned load data from the company's transportation management system, increasing event visibility and load execution control beyond the boundaries of Meijer's DC network.
Grocery retailers are also looking at ways to revamp their DC receiving processes. Retailers like Giant Foods are starting to inquire about having product delivered in customized sequences, such as in the order that they appear in a certain aisle of the grocery store. The theory goes that after a truck is unloaded, workers can simply wheel pallets of health and beauty aid items, for example, to their designated aisle and complete the re-stock process much more quickly. This strategy avoids "around the world pallets," grocery industry lingo for pallets that get wheeled up and down every aisle in the store several times during the restock process.
"Grocers can save a ton on inventory carry costs," says ES3's Davis. "They gain a lot more velocity and have a much more efficient warehouse so that "A" movers—things like bottled water and soda—move much more efficiently."
ES3 plans to unveil a pilot program this fall that will allow grocery stores to receive pallets that are packed in a mirror image of the way items appear in the store aisles. Once the pilot is competed, ES3 hopes to roll out the system in early 2006. Davis says that ES3 is attempting to redesign the consumer packaged-goods supply chain by fundamentally changing the way that products move from manufacturer to market.
ES3 seeks to provide the industry with the scale, technology and expertise necessary to realize savings from a collaborative, just-in-time distribution solution. The firm claims that its state-of-the-art automated facility in York, Pa., will deliver multi-manufacturer consolidated orders to customers throughout the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions within 24 hours, instead of the normal three to five days required through traditional shipping processes.
How's it done? ES3 uses electronic information exchange (EDI, XML or direct machine-to-machine communications) and automation.Manufacturers and their customers have real-time visibility of inventory and are able to monitor shipments from end to end through ES3's Web-based reporting and supply chain systems.
New theater of operations
Yet even as the grocers secure their flanks, Wal-Mart is readying for its next assault. Though it continues to open more of its highly efficient super-centers in suburban locales, the mega-chain is also expanding its push into urban centers with its smaller Neighborhood Markets. Wal- Mart hopes to open 30 to 40 of the 40,000-square-foot stores each year. Margins are believed to be just under 2.5 percent—lower than at its super-centers, but still well above typical grocery store margins.
"Wal-Mart basically went from nothing to being the market leader in the grocery industry, and of course Wal-Mart has a strong focus on processes," says Gonzalez. "That puts pressure on grocery chains.When you can't move on price, the only way to keep whatever margins you have to begin with is to do more with less. That's where automation and technology comes into play."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."