Free land! Tax incentives! Payroll assistance! Companies out scouting for DC sites are demanding and getting all this and more. But there's more to finding the right site than squeezing breaks from the locals.
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
It's a deal that would quicken the pulse of even the most jaded real estate broker. To get Todd A. Noethen and Hal Wilson to sign on the dotted line—thus committing their company, Big Lots, to build its fifth distribution center in Durant, Okla.—economic development officials offered them the sun, the moon and the stars—or at least their site selection equivalents. In exchange for locating their new $70 million distribution center on Durant's fertile soil, Big Lots was promised free land—137 acres' worth, to be exact—and a host of infrastructure improvements. What's more, the county would throw in some needed road work and foot the bill for the construction of a one-million gallon water tower.
And that was not all. The city of Durant and Bryan County sweetened the pot with tax incentives. For example, Big Lots gets a five-year property tax abatement, sales tax exemptions on construction materials used at the site, a land tax credit that allows Big Lots to accelerate the depreciation on its investment by 40 percent, and a sales tax exemption on utilities. There's also an annual inventory tax exemption, meaning Big Lots won't be taxed on the products stored in the DC at the end of each year.
But wait, there's more: Big Lots' new employees will be trained at no cost to the company. Its new hosts will pick up the tab. In addition, the city of Durant took the highly unusual step of agreeing to a "quality jobs cash payment." Under the rare agreement, the city will reimburse Big Lots for 5 percent of the DC's total payroll on a quarterly basis for 10 years.
All told, the incentive package from Bryan County and the city of Durant totaled $13.3 million for the sprawling 1.2 million-square-foot DC that opened three months ago. And the tab's still running. Durant officials expect the total incentive package to reach $20 million when the costs for all of the infrastructure improvements are tallied.
Welcome to the world of economic development incentives. In what amounts to a war between the states, counties, cities and even rural hamlets, local economic development authorities are vying with one another to create the most lavish incentive packages. And the breaks aren't just offered to small players and startups, which might actually need the assistance. They're going to the big players, like Big Lots and Wal-Mart, as well. In fact, a recent study estimates that Wal-Mart—the king of retailers—has received more than $624 million in economic development subsidies to build 91 distribution centers, including a whopping $48 million for one facility. The study, conducted by non-profit research center Good Jobs First, states that 90 percent of Wal-Mart's DCs have received government funding of some kind.
Competition is particularly intense for DCs. Unlike retail stores, distribution centers require highly skilled workers, which means the jobs they bring to a community pay higher wages. Big Lots, for example, guaranteed the Durant community a starting wage of $10 an hour, including benefits.
Get the big picture
It's easy to see the appeal of all those handouts to Big Lots, purveyor of everything from cut-price fruit cocktail and tortilla chips to living room furniture. To compete in the white-hot deep-discounter market, the Columbus, Ohio based retailer, which operates 1,400 stores in 46 states and reports annual revenues that exceed $4 billion, has to land not only the best deals on the products it sells—everything from packaged food to sofas to row boats—but the best deals on building new distribution centers as well.
That's not to say that Big Lots made its decision based solely on incentives. Before selecting the Durant location, Noethen, who is vice president of distribution support services, and Wilson, who is senior vice president of logistics, conducted a rigorous search, investigating dozens of sites in several states and analyzing a detailed transportation model. In the end, "Durant met our strategic plan for our existing store base and future growth," says Noethen.
In fact, Noethen cautions that as enticing as they may be, incentives are only part of the site selection picture. "People tend to focus on the multi-million dollar incentive package but overlook the bad news—you need to spend $3 million to make the site usable," he says. "The incentive package can't be the single deciding factor. You need to understand the entire site development impact, and consider how much site work will be involved." A $15 million incentive package might not be such a great deal if excessive infrastructure work is required on the site, resulting in increased construction costs and delays in completing the facility.
For example, almost all sites require soil grading, and it's imperative to rule out sub-soil issues. Noethen suggests hiring geotechnical professionals to assure the site is DC-worthy, with no hidden rock ledges that could require costly blasting. In addition, you need to make sure there are no drainage issues or even protected wildlife in the area that could lead to a costly battle with environmentalists.
Another potential hitch is the availability of labor. In the end, no matter how highly automated the facility, it takes people to make a DC run. And unlike the Field of Dreams, you can't assume that if you build it, they will come. Therefore, it's important to research the potential labor pool before deciding on a location for your next DC.
Big Lots, for example, wasn't content to simply accept verbal assurances concerning the Durant area's labor pool. Because it's so dependent on labor availability (as the chain continues its expansion, the workforce in Durant is expected to double from its current 250 associates to nearly 500), the company contracted with Kurt Salmon Associates to conduct a thorough examination of the employee base in Durant and the surrounding communities. The company contacted 15 other employers and inquired about average wages, the presence of unions, insurance claims, how long it takes to fill job openings, and the overall work ethic of employees. "A dependable labor pool is one of the top issues," says Noethen. "You need a good employee base; it's one of the top decision factors."
A well-educated workforce is essential for operating some of the state-of-the-art material handling equipment installed at the Big Lots facility. Big Lots expects the Durant facility to become the most efficient of the company's five DCs, based largely on the sortation conveyor system from Intelligrated Inc. The system operates at a rate of 630 feet per minute, which Noethen claims is the fastest of its kind when it comes to a carton sortation operation. With 40 shipping lanes, the facility can process 235 cases per minute, or 14,000 cartons per hour. "Nobody is running that fast," says Noethen. "Others will be soon, but nobody is right now."
Despite the rapid throughput that many DCs achieve, site selection experts emphasize that it's important to choose a site that will allow you to expand. Quite often, it's economically advantageous to add on to an existing facility, as opposed to opening a satellite operation. All too often, however, companies purchase sites with existing requirements in mind, only to find they've become land-locked when it comes time to expand a few years later.
2010's closer than it may appear
Stuart Rosenfeld may not own a crystal ball, but he does have an unusually clear vision of the future. Even though automotive parts retailer Pep Boys just broke ground for its fifth distribution center in San Bernardino, Calif., Rosenfeld, the company's vice president of distribution, is already at work determining when another DC will be needed and where that facility should be located.
"When it comes to building a new distribution center, you need to be two to two and a half years ahead of the curve, including construction time," says Rosenfeld. "I'm already looking out as far as 2010."
Rosenfeld is in the process of analyzing Pep Boys' current distribution network, which also includes sites in Atlanta, Dallas, Indianapolis and Chester, N.Y. Aside from factoring in future store expansions, Rosenfeld runs several models to predict how growth at existing stores will affect square footage at distribution centers.
In doing so, Rosenfeld will need to take into account the efficiency gains expected from the DC now under construction in San Bernardino. The 600,240-square-foot leased facility will consolidate three separate sites in the Los Angeles area and provide nearly 175,000 square feet of additional warehouse space. The additional height of the new DC (30 feet versus 24) will equate to a 63-percent increase in cubic capacity. The facility will also have 25 additional loading docks, allowing for a substantial increase in throughput—meaning the facility will service 165 stores, 151 in its existing service area and 14 additional stores in the Phoenix market.
"I factor all of that into my forecast," says Rosenfeld. "You've got to have a clear understanding of where and when you need to expand. To me that's critical."
According to FedEx, the proposed breakup will create flexibility for the two companies to handle the separate demands of the global parcel and the LTL markets. That approach will enable FedEx and FedEx Freight to deploy more customized operational execution, along with more tailored investment and capital allocation strategies. At the same time, the two companies will continue to cooperate on commercial, operational, and technology initiatives.
Following the split, FedEx Freight will become the industry’s largest LTL carrier, with revenue of $9.4 billion in fiscal 2024. The company also boasts the broadest network and fastest transit times in its industry, the company said.
After spinning of that business, the remaining FedEx units will have a combined revenue of $78.3 billion based on fiscal year 2024 results for its range of time- and day-definite delivery and related supply chain technology services to more than 220 countries and territories through an integrated air-ground express network.
The move comes after FedEx has operated its freight unit for decades. After launching in 1971 as an overnight air courier service, FedEx grew quickly and in 1998 acquired Caliber System inc., creating a transportation “powerhouse” comprising the traditional FedEx distribution service and small-package ground carrier RPS, LTL carrier Viking Freight, Caliber Logistics, Caliber Technology, and Roberts Express. And in 2006, FedEx acquires Watkins Motor Lines, enhancing FedEx Freight’s ability to serve customers in the long-haul LTL freight market.
FedEx share prices rose after the announcement, as investors cheered a resolution to the debate that had lingered since June about whether the event would happen, according to a statement from Bascome Majors, a market analyst with Susquehanna Financial Group. And FedEx Freight will become a major player in the sector, based on its 16% share of industry revenue in 2023, well above Old Dominion Freight Lines (ODFL)’s 10% and SAIA’s 5%, he said.
Likewise, TD Cowen issued a “buy” rating for FedEx based on the long-awaited move, according to Jason Seidl, senior analyst focused on rail, trucking and logistics. That came as investors were soothed about their worries of potential “dis-synergies” from the split by the detail that FedEx Freight and legacy FDX have signed agreements that will continue the connectivity of the two networks.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.