With millions of fans awaiting the release of the Madden videogame each August, game-maker Electronic Arts has invested in a state-of-the-art logistics system to ensure it doesn't drop the ball.
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
It's become an annual rite of summer, along with backyard barbecues, pennant fever and trips to the seashore. In fact, the annual release of the Madden NFL videogame every August has even spawned its own unofficial holiday—the "Madden sick day," taken by gaming devotees anxious to snatch up the new release the day it hits the stores.
This year marked the biggest Madden launch ever. The game's manufacturer, Electronic Arts, shipped 1.35 million units to retailers nationwide on Aug. 10.
But for the logistics team at Electronic Arts, the annual release is no day at the beach. A fumble anywhere in the supply chain could leave the company with thousands of unhappy customers—not just loyal gamers but also the retailers that sell Madden 05. Videogame prices typically drop a few months after the initial release. That means Electronic Arts has to go the extra mile—or should we say, the extra yard—to get Madden on the retailers' shelves right away.
"Missing an order and not getting something out to a customer would be huge, especially with a title like Madden," says Dave Niemann, director of supply chain systems at Electronic Arts, which has sold more than 37 million copies of Madden since 1989. "Madden was the best-selling football videogame last year, so having a successful launch for week one was pretty significant. But obviously, the distribution challenges of shipping 1.3 million units were pretty huge."
If volume alone weren't enough of a challenge, there's also the ultra-tight schedule.When it comes to a big release like Madden 05 (as well as releases like the new Harry Potter game), EA has a crucial three- to four-day window to download orders from its enterprise resource planning (ERP) system and then pick, pack and stage them in its DC. Complicating that is the company's commitment to releasing orders simultaneously to retailers. "We strive very hard to achieve a level playing field in terms of releasing our product and getting it out the door to our customers," says Niemann.
Fourth and long
It wasn't so long ago that just getting those orders out on time was a touch-and-go proposition. EA's logistics processes were bogged down by a manual system that taxed the company's ability to deliver its products on time. The old system printed pick tickets and batch-uploaded the order history twice a day. When the picker completed the picks, the order was sent to shipping for re-packing, manifesting and shipment.
Since a limited amount of transportation planning was done on the front end, operators had to carry out routing and customer-compliant labeling tasks after the order was packed and awaiting shipment. "We were operating in a vacuum," Niemann says. You could say EA was running its offense without a playbook.
That's when the company decided to trade in its homegrown warehouse management software for an integrated logistics solution from Irista, a division of HK Systems. Included as part of the update project was the installation of A-frame picking systems, in-line scales for carton validation and radio-frequency (RF) bar-code scanning technology.
The new WMS solution provided Electronic Arts with supply chain visibility for the first time. And the company saw results right away. Labor costs plummeted at Electronic Arts' 250,000-square-foot distribution center in Louisville, Ky. Throughput improved by approximately one-third, and EA saw an immediate drop in shipping costs. The elimination of nine steps in the fulfillment process resulted in new efficencies and allowed Electronic Arts to reduce order cycles by 24 hours.
Achieving those winning results was not easy. Like football teams that log endless hours of practice on the field before a big game, Niemann and his team logged endless hours preparing for the conversion to the new software and picking equipment. The most important issue was making sure the system would function under EA's highly seasonal business plan. The company ramps up twice a year—in August for the release of Madden and again in the fall for the crucial holiday selling season.
In preparation for the big event, Niemann's team ran through the playbook countless times to assure everything would go smoothly. They also spent hours putting together a contingency plan in case the system failed.With the install scheduled for July 2001, just weeks before the annual release of Madden, there was no room for error.
As the first step, EA's cross-functional team, with representatives from finance, IT, operations and training, met with the Irista project team to map out existing business process requirements with the proposed WMS solution. For practical reasons, the team focused on maintaining the existing operational methodology and process flows while requiring only minimal software modifications and facility design changes.
Later on, the team designed a tiered approach to acclimate warehouse workers to the new equipment and systems. Needed modifications to the conveyor system to accommodate the in-line scales and installation of the A-frames and pallet racks were completed prior to the system's going live, allowing associates to familiarize themselves with new locations and layouts. A dedicated training facilitator worked with Irista to develop a comprehensive training curriculum designed to help operators accustomed to working with a manual paper pick-ticket process learn to follow on-screen instructions.
The finance team got involved to verify inventory reporting and the integrity of the data to be shared between the new WMS and the company's Oracle ERP database. "It was very painful going through all those layers, and the challenge of the whole thing was involving the finance people," says Niemann. "But in the end, it was well worth it. The system go-live was so smooth that we had to request more orders to keep the operators busy.We have optimized our physical distribution to the level where I'm not sure if there is a lot of room for improvement."
Illegal procedure
Although there's no guarantee that the folks in finance would agree with that assessment (when are CFOs ever satisfied?), they certainly can't complain about a multimillion dollar reduction in chargeback costs. EA ships goods not only to distribution centers, but also directly to stores for customers like Wal-Mart. Before its new system went live, EA had no way to track orders. When a customer called to complain that an order wasn't packaged correctly, the company threw up its hands and paid the penalty.
Now, when a retailer claims a shipment didn't arrive on time or that the quantity was incorrect, EA can come back with data not only on who picked the product and when, but also with the weight of the box and the time it was loaded on the trailer at the dock. "Having that data is a pretty powerful tool when a proof of delivery is in question," says Niemann. The ability to harvest the data from the supply chain systems has pretty much eliminated costly chargebacks, he reports.
The software in place at the DC also allows EA to drill down deep when it comes to performance stats. For example, EA is able to determine who its most efficient pickers are, whether structured labor is in the right place at the right time, and if inventory is stored in the best location to drive the most efficient picking.
"We derive a lot of benefit from going back and analyzing historical data in our distribution center," says Niemann. "We're able to drill down to see how many seconds it takes for a particular person to complete a pick and move on to the next box. It all comes down to the bigger picture —we're always trying to decrease labor costs and increase productivity."
So far, that's proved to be a winning combination.
EA hopes to score big with RFID
Unlike many manufacturers, Electronic Arts has the option of remaining above the RFID fray. Because it's not a Top 100 supplier for either Wal-Mart or Target, it's exempt from RFID mandates both retailers imposed on their biggest suppliers last year. So why is the videogame maker moving full-speed ahead on the radio-frequency technology front?
For one thing, the company realizes that it won't be able to remain on the sidelines forever. The day will almost certainly come when it, too, will be required to use RFID tags to identify the products it ships to retailers. But more to the point, it's convinced that RFID could bring its operations to a whole new level.
That's not to say EA is unaware of the potential stumbling blocks. Like most manufacturers, Electronic Arts would like to see standards issues resolved before investing in RFID technology. And it's hoping tag prices will fall and read rates will rise in the interim. "Those challenges considered, we're pretty excited about the potential for what RFID could bring to EA," says Dave Niemann, EA's director of supply chain systems.
EA believes that at some point it will be drawn into the game. And because of the high value attached to videogames, it will probably end up tagging individual items, not pallets or cases. Though it would require a considerable investment, RFID would give EA increased visibility of its goods as they move through the supply chain, leading to better order validation as well as increased internal security. In addition, RFID tags could accomplish the same function as the weigh-in-motion scales currently used in the company's DC.
Another benefit? Better communication. "We're looking into what kind of benefits we can build into our supply chain and how we can transfer the information to our technology chain and process that information," says Niemann. He reports that the company expects to share the information not only across the supply chain, but with all divisions of EA and with suppliers and business partners as well.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."