James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
If you've ever wished you could make a few minor adjustments to the software you use, you'll appreciate Stuart Koehler's position. Koehler is the operations manager for First Supply LLC, a Madison,Wis.-based plumbing, heating, and kitchen supply wholesaler that uses Infor's warehouse management system in its distribution operations. Though the software does what it's designed to do, Koehler nonetheless wanted to have a modification made.What he hoped to address was a limitation in the software's label-printing capability—the system was unable to include as much product information as First Supply wanted on the labels it generated.
In the overall scheme of things, that was a minor concern. Still, it was something Koehler wanted to pursue. Although he could have gone directly to the vendor to have the modification made, Koehler chose a different route: He took the matter up with his software user group.
If that strikes you as a roundabout way to solve a software problem, you're probably not a member of a software user group. User groups—organizations made up of customers of a particular software supplier—have come a long way from their origins as forums for sharing war stories and swapping tips. These days, they're also an important communication channel between the users and the vendor. And in many cases, the groups have a great deal of influence on product development.
In fact, Koehler says that recommending upgrades and enhancements is one of his user group's main functions. "We come up with a 'top five' list of things we'd like to see improved," he explains. The group then presents its list to Infor, which oftentimes follows through and makes those changes.
That's exactly what happened in Koehler's case. The group recommended that the vendor modify the software's label-printing function. And sure enough, when Infor designed the next version of its warehousing system, it expanded the label's product information field.
Feedback from the front lines
Though they saw their heyday in the '80s, software user groups are still going strong today. They've undergone some changes in the intervening years, however. Nowadays, for example, user groups draw their members from all areas of the organization, not just from information technology (IT). Members may include warehouse managers, logistics managers, and operations managers like Koehler, as well as IT specialists, chief information officers, and even CEOs.
In the supply chain arena, user groups come in two types: "independent" groups that are run by members and have a loose affiliation with the vendor, and "dependent" groups that are formed by a software vendor that also provides financial support for the group.
Members of independent user groups tend to be customers of the big enterprise resource planning (ERP) software vendors, whose worldwide customer bases are large enough to support and sustain these groups. One such group is the Americas' SAP Users Group (ASUG). Formed in 1990, ASUG currently has 1,700 member companies and 50,000 individual members. It has 46 subgroups, called "influence councils," that focus on specific applications like warehouse management systems, advance planning and optimization systems, and supply chain execution systems.
ASUG uses its "collective voice" to make recommendations on ways in which SAP can change its products and services to meet customer requirements, explains ASUG President Rod Masney. He notes that the group's influence with the vendor has expanded over the years. "What's interesting is that 10 years ago, influence was at the operational level," Masney says. "Today, the user group influences the strategic level [of SAP]."
Another big independent group is the Oracle Applications User Group (OAUG), which counts about 2,000 companies among its members. This global organization has more than 100 subgroups, some of which deal strictly with supply chain applications. "OAUG is the voice of users that Oracle listens to," says Basheer Khan, president of systems integrator Innowave Technology and a member of OAUG's board of directors.
Members of dependent user groups, by contrast, are usually customers of best-of-breed software makers, which serve as the groups' sponsors. Supply chain planning and execution software specialist Manhattan Associates, for example, actively solicits members for its user groups from its customer base. Manhattan says that about 1,000 of its customers participate in 15 "product councils," which are organized around specific applications. "The councils get together at least once a year for a face-to-face meeting, and they do regular teleconferencing," says Manhattan's Eddie Capel, senior vice president of product management and customer relations. "We ask for participation in the design phase for the next release of a product. They get to vote on the features and functionality of the product."
HK Systems also invites user groups to suggest software modifications. Most of these groups meet on an ad hoc basis and hold frequent telephone conference calls. "A lot of our functionality is based on customer direction," says Dave Adams, vice president of product development. For instance, when the company upgraded its warehouse management system three years ago, it worked with a user group to improve the advance shipment notice (ASN) functionality in that release.
Other vendors organize conferences for their customers. For instance, AL Systems holds seminars several times a year that feature user presentations and small-group discussions. HighJump Software has been holding annual user conferences since 1988. These conferences provide another avenue for communication between vendor and user."We encourage regular feedback from the 'front lines' to ensure our products fit most effectively with the clients' requirements," says Chad Collins, HighJump's vice president of global strategy.
A little help from their friends
The benefits for vendors are obvious, but why do logistics professionals take time out from their busy schedules to attend user group meetings or take part in conference calls? It turns out that they see a host of advantages in joining these groups.
Ellen Martin, a vice president of supply chain business systems at Greensboro, N.C.-based apparel maker VF Corp., says she likes the fact that user groups offer a way for companies to ensure that software evolves along with users' changing needs. "When you buy a piece of software, it is what it is," says Martin, who serves on the board of directors for i2's user group. "Business conditions change, and software must change to be responsive. The user group gives you a manner in which you can work for change."
Influencing the development of new features, moreover, can save shippers a bundle: If a desired enhancement is included in the next version of an application, then users can get it for the cost of the upgrade—and that beats the cost of customization any day. "We get something we see as a needed change," says Koehler of First Supply, "but we don't get charged a modification price for the change."
But logistics professionals see user groups as more than just a way to get the vendor's ear. For many, the primary draw is the opportunity to meet and learn from their fellow users. "If you're having a problem, you get a chance to collaborate with others on it," explains software consultant Phil Obal, who helped start a user group several years ago.
User groups aren't just for advanced "power users," however. Users at all levels can benefit from participation. "User groups are especially beneficial for companies that are experiencing the initial startup with an application," says Greg Vandergriff, a DC manager for Beauty Brands in Kansas City, Mo., who helped his software vendor launch a user group. In fact, when it comes to instruction, many find that the best tutors are their fellow users. "You're able to get more good information and more utility by being able to exchange notes with other people using the system," says J. Kevin Michel, manager of logistics operations at Cowan Logistics in Aberdeen, Md., who has participated in three user groups.
But for many participants, the relationship building facilitated by software user groups is the most important benefit of all. In a recent survey of DC VELOCITY readers, fully half of the respondents cited the opportunity to exchange knowledge and network with their peers as their primary reason for joining a user group (see the accompanying sidebar).
"It's a way to make friends," says Obal. "You build a relationship. You become a resource for them, and they become a resource for you."
software users like to talk shop
It's not just about the technical details. The chance to share knowledge and network with fellow software users is what motivates many DC VELOCITY readers to join software user groups.
And join they do. Forty-two percent of the survey takers (which included manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and service providers) said they take part in vendor-sponsored user groups, while 36 percent belong to independent organizations. Another 22 percent participate in both types of groups. When asked which vendors' groups they had joined, the respondents listed a number of suppliers, but the most common responses were SAP (25 percent), Oracle (14 percent), and Manhattan Associates (11 percent).
Though many said they had joined a user group for the chance to talk shop (see chart), a sizable percentage of the respondents said they had signed on in hopes of influencing software development. And it appears that they've achieved some success in that regard. The vast majority (94 percent) of survey respondents said that input from their user groups had led vendors to make refinements to their software. One respondent, for example, reported that his group had persuaded its vendor to enhance its system so that it could automatically calculate freight charges when an order was entered. Another said he and his fellow group members had convinced the software maker to add a feature that determined whether orders should be shipped as individual pieces or grouped together.
social networking
Why do logistics professionals join user groups? Half of the respondents to a recent survey said it was for the chance to exchange information and network with their peers.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."