One day workers were fumbling with tape measures; the next they were watching wide eyed as incoming cartons whizzed through high-tech scanners. How cubing equipment changed life at Ditan Distribution.
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
Matt Scanlan's operation has an image to uphold, and, frankly, there's no room for rulers and yardsticks in the picture. Scanlan is chief operating officer at Ditan Distribution, a third-party logistics provider that specializes in distributing time-sensitive products like videogames to retail stores. It's not some penny-ante regional outfit. With six distribution centers in North America, Sayreville, N.J.-based Ditan ships just over one-third of the nation's videogames to mega-retailers like Wal-Mart and Target each year.
In the past, when he conducted site tours for prospective customers, Scanlan would show off the facility's sophisticated in-line weighing systems and talk a lot about its failsafe quality control procedures. What he didn't show them was the back room where associates were busily gathering product dimensions with a tape measure and manually entering the data into a computer. "Our customers expect us to have sophisticated processes in place," says Scanlan. "We provide a world-class service and they expect us to have integrity in our processes. You can't bring in a Fortune 500 company and tell them we're measuring their boxes with a ruler."
Today that's no longer a problem. Scanlan now can proudly show off Ditan's state-of-the-art dimensioning technology to visitors. Early this year, the company installed cubing equipment at three of its DCs. The same equipment will be up and running at the other three centers sometime next spring.
What is cubing equipment? Also known as dimensioning equipment, cubing machines use sophisticated sensors to collect dimension data electronically.
Available both as stand-alone models or as devices installed in a conveyor system, cubing systems instantly calculate the length, width, height and weight of items ranging from books and eyebrow pencils to the largest pallets and crates. The data then can be transferred to a real-time host system or a warehouse management system (WMS) that manages the flow of goods within the distribution center.
Rapid receipt
Cubing systems do much more than solve their customers' image problems, however. They save a lot of money as well. By eliminating both the miscalculations that inevitably result from manual measurements and keystroke errors, they cut the risk of costly compliance charge-backs and even lost business. The equipment also saves users money on shipping costs and cardboard, since cartons are packed more efficiently.
Then there are the time savings. Almost to a one, users report that collecting dimensions electronically speeds up processing time on the receiving end. That's been a big plus for Ditan Distribution, which often has only three or four hours to break down an inbound shipment of, say, Grand Theft Auto into as many as 10,000 separate outbound orders. Scanlan estimates that installation of cubing equipment (in this case, Cubiscan units from Quantronix) has sped up Ditan's receiving process by 40 percent.
The availability of complete and accurate cube and weight information for each incoming product also takes storage decisions out of the realm of trial and error. Using the dimension information, a WMS can automatically decide where to put away items in the facility, explains Randy Neilson, director of sales and marketing for Quantronix, which markets several cubing products under the Cubiscan brand. "In order to determine optimal storage locations and to move items into storage and then out of the distribution center, the WMS uses cube information to make more efficient use of the real estate in the facility."
Weighty matters
Though it might not be the first thing you think of, cubing equipment can also bring quality control benefits. Since it installed the cubing equipment, Ditan, for example, has already found that fewer quality checks are needed on the outbound side. Today, exact product weights are captured when items first enter the DC. As the products move past an inline weigh station, they are kicked off only when a weight variation is detected. "Our quality control process is better because our weights going in are much more accurate—thus [the percentage of] boxes getting diverted on our QC line because of weight imbalances has dropped significantly," Scanlan reports. "It saves us an incredible amount of time in our QC process because far fewer boxes are diverted."
Not only that, but the cubing system functions as a sort of double-check mechanism as well. The inline quality scale isn't infallible; a carton of 500 videogames that's short by one unit, for example, would most likely pass through the scale undetected. But the new cubing equipment has enabled Ditan to track picking errors that go unnoticed in the normal quality process. Because the systems are integrated, associates can now cross check the expected weight versus the actual weight, and track down the carton affected by the mispick.
"That's a benefit that we didn't anticipate when we started out with this," says Scanlan. "If our inline scale fails to catch a picking error for some reason, we can identify the carton number in our system, go directly to the pallet and find the box and locate the picking error. We sure weren't able to do that before."
So what's holding him back? The unique nature of the products he's shipping. Obtaining cubing information for stackable products like picnic baskets and berry baskets is tricky business. "It can be very difficult to find a solution when you nest products during shipping," says Bob Babel, vice president of engineering at Forte, a consulting/systems integration firm specializing in DC layout design and equipment integration. "When you ship a waste basket, not only can you stack two or three inside each other, but you can also fit something else inside that space as well, and use only one box. It's a difficult issue to solve, and I'm not sure if there is a perfect solution."
For a company like Longaberger, Babel says, the challenge will be to decide just how many algorithms are enough. Because a big order containing a large number of items (especially stackable items) could result in an almost infinite number of packaging configurations, the company will need to limit the number of calculations performed. "You need to decide if it makes sense to run through three iterations and maybe get to 60 percent [efficiency], or run it through 10 times to get an even higher [level of efficiency]," he says. "You need to consider what kind of processing time it takes to do that versus what you gain."
But Beebe hasn't given up hope. Despite the obstacles, he remains optimistic that he'll soon be able to capitalize on cubing technology to boost customer service. If other online retailers' experiences are any indication, he's probably right. Cubing equipment's success in reducing the number of half-full cartons—or multiple cartons shipped to a single address—has been well documented.
Cubing equipment also holds great potential for damage control. Online retailers are notorious for shipping, say, expensive wine glasses in the same box as a heavy casserole dish, leaving the unhappy recipient holding a box of shards. "That's one place where you can gain some real advantages," says Babel. "The software would actually control that process and prohibit that from happening. When you pay order pickers based on how much they push through the system, [they have little incentive to use] the care you would want somebody to exhibit in that situation. So from a quality standpoint, you can probably see an improvement in the type of cartons packed out, how the product is mixed."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."