John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
Don't expect to find Bruce Mantz tooling around Edison, N.J., in a battered 1978 Dodge Dart with a nonworking AM radio and rusty muffler dragging behind. Mantz is nothing if not finicky about his vehicles. At work, he drives only late models with all the bells and whistles, and he prides himself on the care he takes of them. Not a day passes when he doesn't check under the hood, and he has yet to miss a scheduled maintenance check.
But Mantz isn't some Hollywood celebrity with a passion for classic Corvettes or Aston Martins. The vehicles upon which Mantz lavishes so much attention are the 80 lift trucks used to shuttle pallets and cases around the distribution centers run by Automated Distribution Systems. ADS, as it's known, is a third-party logistics service provider that operates five distribution centers totaling 1.6 million square feet of space, and Mantz is the company's director of operations.
Though he may be fussy about the lift trucks' ergonomic features and options, he's downright finicky about the financing—the leasing and buying particulars. "We want to make sure we're getting machines that will not only serve us well from the standpoint of productivity and driver comfort," Mantz says, "but that will also serve us well financially."
With a fleet of 80 vehicles, Mantz has the kind of negotiating clout and buying power most managers can only dream of. And over the past 10 years, Mantz has purchased his share of lift trucks outright. But lately, leasing's been his option of choice. "When you couple [the convenience] with some very attractive promotions from the manufacturers and dealers, [and factor in] the very favorable interest rates," he says, "leasing has become a no-brainer for us."
High interest in low interest
Mantz isn't alone. Lift truck manufacturers like Raymond and Yale report a surge in leasing activity in the last several years. Part of it's the low interest rates, says Warren Eck, vice president of Yale Fleet and Yale Financial Services. "[A] lot of it has to do with the cost of money being as low as it has been the last couple years."
before you sign on the dotted line …
You've seen the demo model and kicked the tires, but do you really know what you'll be getting into when you sign that lift truck lease? To avoid unpleasant surprises, the Equipment Leasing Association recommends that you ask yourself the following 10 questions before you sign on the dotted line.
1. How am I planning to use this equipment?
2. Does the leasing representative understand my business and how this transaction helps me to do business?
3. What is the total lease payment and are there any other costs that I could incur before the lease ends?
4. What happens if I want to change this lease or end the lease early?
5. How am I responsible if the equipment is damaged or destroyed?
6. What are my obligations for the equipment (such as insurance, taxes and maintenance) during the lease?
7. Can I upgrade the equipment or add equipment under this lease?
8. What are my options at the end of the lease?
9. What are the procedures I must follow if I choose to return the equipment?
10. Are there any extra costs at the end of the lease?
Another part is that with leasing, customers don't have to scrape up cash for a deposit and all the incidental expenses surrounding a lift truck purchase. Banks normally won't allow customers to roll the incidental costs—freight charges, installation fees and maintenance costs—into an equipment purchase loan. But leasing terms aren't nearly so restrictive—customers can usually obtain 100-percent financing. Leasing can also cut down on record-keeping and paperwork. If the lease includes maintenance costs, for example, the lessor usually issues a single invoice each month that covers the entire fleet, instead of sending separate invoices for each truck. For large fleets, in particular, the savings can add up quickly.
"Leasing is clearly becoming more popular because it leaves cash in your company," says Loren G. Swakow, vice president at Scott Lift Truck Corp., a Komatsu dealer based in Chicago. "Cash is king with businesses, and leasing retains cash."
It hasn't hurt that lift truck manufacturers have been out on the road educating the industry about the advantages of leasing. In the past, many customers shied away from leasing, bewildered by the many options and intimidated by the financial, legal and tax terminology. Now there's help. Kevin Trenga, director of marketing for Raymond Corp., says almost all major manufacturers and dealers have Internet tools on their Web sites to help customers determine if leasing is the right choice for them. Truck buyers are proving to be willing students. "Customers are a lot smarter," says Eck. "They're thinking … more about planned replacement programs so they can structure their lease for the right period of time and replace their machines when they need to."
Not my problem
Low interest rates may attract customers to leasing in the first place, but once they try it, they often discover a host of other benefits. One is insurance against obsolescence. Managers like Mantz who run third-party DCs tend to place a high premium on using the latest technology. By leasing its trucks, ADS can operate them for a specified term—say, five years—and then upgrade its fleet at the lease's conclusion.
Another advantage is that reselling the equipment becomes someone else's problem. That's also a big plus for Mantz, who says it can be difficult to recoup his investment when it comes time to sell his highly specialized trucks. To operate in ADS's highly automated centers (which feature pick and put to light systems, bar-code tracking and wire guidance systems), lift trucks must be outfitted with expensive RF devices and equipped with wire guided technology for picking in very narrow aisle (VNA) applications. All those costly extras tend to limit the pool of potential buyers when the equipment comes up for resale. "It's hard to get those dollars back,"Mantz admits. "We're running some very specialized machines, and after you've run them for a few years, it can be tough to sell them in the aftermarket. Not everyone has those kinds of applications."
These days, ADS leases its trucks from Raymond, Crown and Sweden-based Atlet, typically for a five-year term, then exchanges them for an upgrade at the conclusion of the lease. That works out well for a company like ADS that's scrupulous about maintaining its equipment and runs a clean facility. At the end of the term, the vehicles are still in excellent condition and have a high residual value.
But that's not true for everyone. Companies that operate their trucks for multiple shifts or use them in harsh environments may well find that their trucks have a pretty low residual value at the end of a lease. For them, purchasing might be a better option. "A real dirty application like a steel mill or a foundry is probably not the best candidate for leasing," says Eck. "The same holds true for somebody running a lot of hours, maybe 3,000-plus hours a year."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."