After a harrowing 18-month pilot project marked by painful setbacks and burgeoning expenses, you'd think Ed Matthews might be disillusioned with RFID. But actually, he's already making big plans for expansion.
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
They say good things come to those who wait. Ed Matthews had better hope so. His company has already spent $250K on RFID equipment with no prospect of payback for another year—or two—or three.
When Matthews accepted the information systems director's post at Pacific Cycle, he undoubtedly assumed he'd spend his days untangling knotty systems integration problems. What he had no way of knowing was that he'd soon be spending most of his time immersed in the murky world of radio-frequency identification. Or that the skill he'd find most valuable would not be his wide-ranging systems expertise but a hitherto undiscovered ability to "sell" management on pilot programs that would burn through hundreds of thousands of dollars with only the remotest prospects of returns.
It all started in June 2003, when Wal-Mart issued its now infamous mandate requiring its top 100 suppliers to be RFID-ready by January 2005. Pacific Cycle, which supplies the mega-retailer with Schwinn, Mongoose, Murray and other brands of bicycles, was one of those top 100 suppliers. Though no one had any clue how the company would meet this demand, at least three things were clear: They would need to come up with a compliance plan quickly. They would need time and resources to test whatever system was chosen. And they would need funds.
It fell to Matthews, the company's director of information systems, to go before the company's CFO to petition for funds to cover startup costs for an RFID pilot. As if begging for thousands of unbudgeted dollars wasn't bad enough, things only got tenser when the CFO asked about the expected payback time. Hemming and hawing, Matthews had to admit that it would be two, three,maybe four years. He also felt it was only fair to warn him that until Pacific Cycle figured out the best location for the RFID tags, it would be throwing away tags—worth an estimated 50 or 60 cents apiece—by the thousands.
In the end, of course, he got the OK—what vendor wants to risk losing Wal-Mart as a customer? But a few months later he was back in the CFO's office. The testing team had run up against a stumbling block and it was a big one. He was going to need more money.
The team had known from the start that reading accuracy would be a problem—Pacific Cycle ships mainly metal products, and metal is known to interfere with radio waves and compromise reading accuracy. Sure enough, during the first goround of tests, read accuracy rates were only in the 70-percent range. Matthews and his staff tinkered with tag and reader locations, but nothing worked. Finally, they decided to try tags from a different manufacturer—Matrics, a tag maker now owned by Symbol Technologies. Trouble was, Pacific Cycle had already sunk $100,000 or so into the original tags and hardware. Now Matthews had to go back to the CFO to get approval to purchase not only new tags, but new hardware as well—and with no guarantees that this would work either.
The tide turns
It was here that the team finally got its first break. They switched over to the new tags and equipment, and read rates immediately soared to near 95 percent, where they currently stand. (Matthews believes that as bigger players enter the tag market and the technology matures, read rates will inch even higher.)
Flush with success, Pacific Cycle's RFID pilot team went on to meet its first objective, shipping four pallets of bikes with RFID tags to Wal-Mart's Dallas DC in September, nearly four months ahead of schedule. "We're proud to be one of the first Wal-Mart suppliers to demonstrate the ability to meet the retailer's requirements," says Matthews. He admits, however, that questions about what information Wal-Mart will exchange with its suppliers still need to be worked out. For example, the first data Pacific Cycle received back from the retailer's DC did not include initial reads for bikes like the 24- and 26-inch models that are too large to be moved by conveyor. Matthews says that Wal-Mart is aware of the problem, and he expects a solution soon.
Still, this progress has come at a price. In late 2004, Matthews estimated that Pacific Cycle's RFID expenditures would reach $250,000 for equipment alone by year's end. Then there are the labor costs.When a shipment arrives at Pacific Cycle's 800,000-square-foot DC in Olney, Ill., workers have to identify the boxes of bikes headed for Wal-Mart, open them, and affix an RFID tag (usually to the owner's manual), and then reseal them. Why can't the workers simply slap a tag on the box? Matthews explains that won't work because the bicycles are taken out of the boxes for assembly once they arrive at Wal-Mart, and Pacific Cycle would lose its tracking ability at that point.
Despite Wal-Mart's assurances that its suppliers will benefit from installing RFID systems (increased supply chain visibility and a reduction in stockouts are the benefits most frequently mentioned), Matthews has no illusions about seeing a return on investment anytime soon. "There is not a clear return on investment out there at this point in time," he reports. "Right now, I don't think [we'll see] a full ROI until mid 2006 or 2007."
High hopes
Given Matthews' experiences, no one would blame him if he felt he had been taken for a ride. Yet he remains surprisingly optimistic. He rationalizes that the technology is still in its infancy—still on training wheels, if you will. And he remains convinced that when it matures—that is, when it's finally ready for the Tour de France—the returns will be well worth the wait.
In fact, Matthews is already thinking ahead to the next step. Though he has no timetable yet, he's already planning for the day when Pacific Cycle begins tagging not just pallets and cases, but all of its individual items. The ability to track bikes from the DC to Wal-Mart's back room and eventually to the retail floor will revolutionize the business, he says. Pacific Cycle will finally have reliable data on exactly which items are out on the retail floor and which lines need replenishing, allowing it to act on that information without delay. "If we see a lot of product in the back room at a particular store," Matthews explains, "we can send someone over to find out what the problem is and fix it."
And he can't help thinking about the labor savings the company will realize once he's able to push the RFID tagging process downstream to the manufacturing plants in China, relieving DC workers of the time-consuming work. That capability is still at least two years away, however. Right now, two obstacles stand in the way: First, China has not yet set standards that will allow RFID tags to be encoded in that country. Second, despite ramped-up RFID demands from customers like Wal-Mart and Target, Pacific Cycle's RFID volume is nowhere near high enough to justify the cost of shifting the tagging process to overseas plants. While he waits for the retailers to catch up, Matthews says, "we're pretty much doing a slap and ship because it's just not cost effective to do otherwise."
Just what exactly is Matthews hoping to achieve with RFID? Lower labor costs, a reduction in inventory and higher shipment accuracy, for starters. Once the company's operations are fully RFID-enabled, DC workers will no longer have to spend long hours filling out paper forms to receive, put away, pick and ship goods. Transactions will be instantly updated on Pacific Cycle's ERP system, eliminating the delays associated with manual entry. Access to location information on every item in its DC will allow the company to cut safety stocks and reduce back-orders. And the near-perfect accuracy provided by RFID technology should reduce time spent searching for product and virtually eliminate charge-backs from retailers.
But a lot of things have to happen first. Pacific Cycle can't expect to see any kind of return on its investment until it begins using RFID in its internal operations.And that won't happen until it's able to tag the majority of incoming products, says Matthews. That alone could take years. "We won't be able to justify that until tag prices drop and we come up with an inexpensive way to integrate the technology with our back-end SAP system," he says. "We also need our retailers and suppliers to fully utilize this technology so that we can leverage it over the entire supply chain and not just make this a retail or internal technology."
These are formidable challenges, to be sure, but Matthews is convinced Pacific Cycle will overcome them. The company has already solved tougher problems, he says, and besides, it has no choice. "RFID," says Matthews, "is clearly a technology that is here to stay."
taming the beast
Has the Behemoth of Bentonville been tamed? Declawed, defanged and transformed into a Gentle Giant?
Ever since it issued its RFID decree, Wal-Mart has been the target of complaints from consultants, systems integrators and vendors. The mega-retailer's often characterized as a big bully—one that's completely insensitive to the needs of the suppliers that are struggling to meet its ruinously costly RFID mandate.
Ed Matthews had heard all the stories, so when he went before his customer to beg a favor, he wasn't terribly optimistic. Matthews, who is director of information systems for one of Wal-Mart's top 100 suppliers, bicycle company Pacific Cycle, had been one of the first to hear of the mandate. And he had wasted no time creating a plan for meeting the January 2005 compliance deadline. But shortly after he drafted that plan, a corporate acquisition turned his plans upside down.
Last January, Pacific Cycle was acquired by Dorel Industries. Suddenly Pacific Cycle was part of a public company (Montreal-based Dorel is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and on NASDAQ), and Matthews found himself responsible for RFID pilots for two other Dorel divisions as well. One of those divisions is currently installing a new ERP system and won't be able to go live until later this year. It fell to Matthews to go before Bentonville and plead for an extension.
To his surprise, Wal-Mart proved to be understanding about the delay. "To be honest, I can say a lot of positive things about Wal-Mart in this project," says Matthews. "They are definitely willing to work with people. When I get mandates from our customers, it's usually pretty much do or die, but Wal-Mart has been very good to work with on the switchover to RFID."
Oh, you work in logistics, too? Then you’ve probably met my friends Truedi, Lumi, and Roger.
No, you haven’t swapped business cards with those guys or eaten appetizers together at a trade-show social hour. But the chances are good that you’ve had conversations with them. That’s because they’re the online chatbots “employed” by three companies operating in the supply chain arena—TrueCommerce,Blue Yonder, and Truckstop. And there’s more where they came from. A number of other logistics-focused companies—like ChargePoint,Packsize,FedEx, and Inspectorio—have also jumped in the game.
While chatbots are actually highly technical applications, most of us know them as the small text boxes that pop up whenever you visit a company’s home page, eagerly asking questions like:
“I’m Truedi, the virtual assistant for TrueCommerce. Can I help you find what you need?”
“Hey! Want to connect with a rep from our team now?”
“Hi there. Can I ask you a quick question?”
Chatbots have proved particularly popular among retailers—an October survey by artificial intelligence (AI) specialist NLX found that a full 92% of U.S. merchants planned to have generative AI (GenAI) chatbots in place for the holiday shopping season. The companies said they planned to use those bots for both consumer-facing applications—like conversation-based product recommendations and customer service automation—and for employee-facing applications like automating business processes in buying and merchandising.
But how smart are these chatbots really? It varies. At the high end of the scale, there’s “Rufus,” Amazon’s GenAI-powered shopping assistant. Amazon says millions of consumers have used Rufus over the past year, asking it questions either by typing or speaking. The tool then searches Amazon’s product listings, customer reviews, and community Q&A forums to come up with answers. The bot can also compare different products, make product recommendations based on the weather where a consumer lives, and provide info on the latest fashion trends, according to the retailer.
Another top-shelf chatbot is “Manhattan Active Maven,” a GenAI-powered tool from supply chain software developer Manhattan Associates that was recently adopted by the Army and Air Force Exchange Service. The Exchange Service, which is the 54th-largest retailer in the U.S., is using Maven to answer inquiries from customers—largely U.S. soldiers, airmen, and their families—including requests for information related to order status, order changes, shipping, and returns.
However, not all chatbots are that sophisticated, and not all are equipped with AI, according to IBM. The earliest generation—known as “FAQ chatbots”—are only clever enough to recognize certain keywords in a list of known questions and then respond with preprogrammed answers. In contrast, modern chatbots increasingly use conversational AI techniques such as natural language processing to “understand” users’ questions, IBM said. It added that the next generation of chatbots with GenAI capabilities will be able to grasp and respond to increasingly complex queries and even adapt to a user’s style of conversation.
Given their wide range of capabilities, it’s not always easy to know just how “smart” the chatbot you’re talking to is. But come to think of it, maybe that’s also true of the live workers we come in contact with each day. Depending on who picks up the phone, you might find yourself speaking with an intern who’s still learning the ropes or a seasoned professional who can handle most any challenge. Either way, the best way to interact with our new chatbot colleagues is probably to take the same approach you would with their human counterparts: Start out simple, and be respectful; you never know what you’ll learn.
With the hourglass dwindling before steep tariffs threatened by the new Trump Administration will impose new taxes on U.S. companies importing goods from abroad, organizations need to deploy strategies to handle those spiraling costs.
American companies with far-flung supply chains have been hanging for weeks in a “wait-and-see” situation to learn if they will have to pay increased fees to U.S. Customs and Border Enforcement agents for every container they import from certain nations. After paying those levies, companies face the stark choice of either cutting their own profit margins or passing the increased cost on to U.S. consumers in the form of higher prices.
The impact could be particularly harsh for American manufacturers, according to Kerrie Jordan, Group Vice President, Product Management at supply chain software vendor Epicor. “If higher tariffs go into effect, imported goods will cost more,” Jordan said in a statement. “Companies must assess the impact of higher prices and create resilient strategies to absorb, offset, or reduce the impact of higher costs. For companies that import foreign goods, they will have to find alternatives or pay the tariffs and somehow offset the cost to the business. This can take the form of building up inventory before tariffs go into effect or finding an equivalent domestic alternative if they don’t want to pay the tariff.”
Tariffs could be particularly painful for U.S. manufacturers that import raw materials—such as steel, aluminum, or rare earth minerals—since the impact would have a domino effect throughout their operations, according to a statement from Matt Lekstutis, Director at consulting firm Efficio. “Based on the industry, there could be a large detrimental impact on a company's operations. If there is an increase in raw materials or a delay in those shipments, as being the first step in materials / supply chain process, there is the possibility of a ripple down effect into the rest of the supply chain operations,” Lekstutis said.
New tariffs could also hurt consumer packaged goods (CPG) retailers, which are already being hit by the mere threat of tariffs in the form of inventory fluctuations seen as companies have rushed many imports into the country before the new administration began, according to a report from Iowa-based third party logistics provider (3PL) JT Logistics. That jump in imported goods has quickly led to escalating demands for expanded warehousing, since CPG companies need a place to store all that material, Jamie Cord, president and CEO of JT Logistics, said in a release
Immediate strategies to cope with that disruption include adopting strategies that prioritize agility, including capacity planning and risk diversification by leveraging multiple fulfillment partners, and strategic inventory positioning across regional warehouses to bypass bottlenecks caused by trade restrictions, JT Logistics said. And long-term resilience recommendations include scenario-based planning, expanded supplier networks, inventory buffering, multimodal transportation solutions, and investment in automation and AI for insights and smarter operations, the firm said.
“Navigating the complexities of tariff-driven disruptions requires forward-thinking strategies,” Cord said. “By leveraging predictive modeling, diversifying warehouse networks, and strategically positioning inventory, JT Logistics is empowering CPG brands to remain adaptive, minimize risks, and remain competitive in the current dynamic market."
With so many variables at play, no company can predict the final impact of the potential Trump tariffs, so American companies should start planning for all potential outcomes at once, according to a statement from Nari Viswanathan, senior director of supply chain strategy at Coupa Software. Faced with layers of disruption—with the possible tariffs coming on top of pre-existing geopolitical conflicts and security risks—logistics hubs and businesses must prepare for any what-if scenario. In fact, the strongest companies will have scenarios planned as far out as the next three to five years, Viswanathan said.
Grocery shoppers at select IGA, Price Less, and Food Giant stores will soon be able to use an upgraded in-store digital commerce experience, since store chain operator Houchens Food Group said it would deploy technology from eGrowcery, provider of a retail food industry white-label digital commerce platform.
Kentucky-based Houchens Food Group, which owns and operates more than 400 grocery, convenience, hardware/DIY, and foodservice locations in 15 states, said the move would empower retailers to rethink how and when to engage their shoppers best.
“At HFG we are focused on technology vendors that allow for highly targeted and personalized customer experiences, data-driven decision making, and e-commerce capabilities that do not interrupt day to day customer service at store level. We are thrilled to partner with eGrowcery to assist us in targeting the right audience with the right message at the right time,” Craig Knies, Chief Marketing Officer of Houchens Food Group, said in a release.
Michigan-based eGrowcery, which operates both in the United States and abroad, says it gives retail groups like Houchens Food Group the ability to provide a white-label e-commerce platform to the retailers it supplies, and integrate the program into the company’s overall technology offering. “Houchens Food Group is a great example of an organization that is working hard to simultaneously enhance its technology offering, engage shoppers through more channels and alleviate some of the administrative burden for its staff,” Patrick Hughes, CEO of eGrowcery, said.
The 40-acre solar facility in Gentry, Arkansas, includes nearly 18,000 solar panels and 10,000-plus bi-facial solar modules to capture sunlight, which is then converted to electricity and transmitted to a nearby electric grid for Carroll County Electric. The facility will produce approximately 9.3M kWh annually and utilize net metering, which helps transfer surplus power onto the power grid.
Construction of the facility began in 2024. The project was managed by NextEra Energy and completed by Verogy. Both Trio (formerly Edison Energy) and Carroll Electric Cooperative Corporation provided ongoing consultation throughout planning and development.
“By commissioning this solar facility, J.B. Hunt is demonstrating our commitment to enhancing the communities we serve and to investing in economically viable practices aimed at creating a more sustainable supply chain,” Greer Woodruff, executive vice president of safety, sustainability and maintenance at J.B. Hunt, said in a release. “The annual amount of clean energy generated by the J.B. Hunt Solar Facility will be equivalent to that used by nearly 1,200 homes. And, by drawing power from the sun and not a carbon-based source, the carbon dioxide kept from entering the atmosphere will be equivalent to eliminating 1,400 passenger vehicles from the road each year.”
As a contract provider of warehousing, logistics, and supply chain solutions, Geodis often has to provide customized services for clients.
That was the case recently when one of its customers asked Geodis to up its inventory monitoring game—specifically, to begin conducting quarterly cycle counts of the goods it stored at a Geodis site. Trouble was, performing more frequent counts would be something of a burden for the facility, which still conducted inventory counts manually—a process that was tedious and, depending on what else the team needed to accomplish, sometimes required overtime.
So Levallois, France-based Geodis launched a search for a technology solution that would both meet the customer’s demand and make its inventory monitoring more efficient overall, hoping to save time, labor, and money in the process.
SCAN AND DELIVER
Geodis found a solution with Gather AI, a Pittsburgh-based firm that automates inventory monitoring by deploying small drones to fly through a warehouse autonomously scanning pallets and cases. The system’s machine learning (ML) algorithm analyzes the resulting inventory pictures to identify barcodes, lot codes, text, and expiration dates; count boxes; and estimate occupancy, gathering information that warehouse operators need and comparing it with what’s in the warehouse management system (WMS).
Among other benefits, this means employees no longer have to spend long hours doing manual inventory counts with order-picker forklifts. On top of that, the warehouse manager is able to view inventory data in real time from a web dashboard and identify and address inventory exceptions.
But perhaps the biggest benefit of all is the speed at which it all happens. Gather AI’s drones perform those scans up to 15 times faster than traditional methods, the company says. To that point, it notes that before the drones were deployed at the Geodis site, four manual counters could complete approximately 800 counts in a day. By contrast, the drones are able to scan 1,200 locations per day.
FLEXIBLE FLYERS
Although Geodis had a number of options when it came to tech vendors, there were a couple of factors that tipped the odds in Gather AI’s favor, the partners said. One was its close cultural fit with Geodis. “Probably most important during that vetting process was understanding the cultural fit between Geodis and that vendor. We truly wanted to form a relationship with the company we selected,” Geodis Senior Director of Innovation Andy Johnston said in a release.
Speaking to this cultural fit, Johnston added, “Gather AI understood our business, our challenges, and the course of business throughout our day. They trained our personnel to get them comfortable with the technology and provided them with a tool that would truly make their job easier. This is pretty advanced technology, but the Gather AI user interface allowed our staff to see inventory variances intuitively, and they picked it up quickly. This shows me that Gather AI understood what we needed.”
Another factor in Gather AI’s favor was the prospect of a quick and easy deployment: Because the drones can conduct their missions without GPS or Wi-Fi, the supplier would be able to get its solution up and running quickly. In the words of Geodis Industrial Engineer Trent McDermott, “The Gather AI implementation process was efficient. There were no IT infrastructure or layout changes needed, and Gather AI was flexible with the installation to not disrupt peak hours for the operations team.”
QUICK RESULTS
Once the drones were in the air, Geodis saw immediate improvements in cycle counting speed, according to Gather AI. But that wasn’t the only benefit: Geodis was also able to more easily find misplaced pallets.
“Previously, we would research the inventory’s systemic license plate number (LPN),” McDermott explained. “We could narrow it down to a portion or a section of the warehouse where we thought that LPN was, but there was still a lot of ambiguity. So we would send an operator out on a mission to go hunt and find that LPN,” a process that could take a day or two to complete. But the days of scouring the facility for lost pallets are over. With Gather AI, the team can simply search in the dashboard to find the last location where the pallet was scanned.
And about that customer who wanted more frequent inventory counts? Geodis reports that it completed its first quarterly count for the client in half the time it had previously taken, with no overtime needed. “It’s a huge win for us to trim that time down,” McDermott said. “Just two weeks into the new quarter, we were able to have 40% of the warehouse completed.”