In European DCs, bags of coffee and sugar are whipping out of highly automated storage and retrieval systems at a rate of 3,000 cases per hour. Is America next?
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
For most of the last 50 years, the grocery industry's war on labor costs has been waged at the checkout counter. The opening salvos came in the '70s, when grocers seized on the newly introduced bar codes and scanners to replace the labor-intensive process of ringing up purchases on a cash register. Next came self-checkout lanes, installed to encourage consumers accustomed to doing their own banking at ATMs and pumping their own gas to scan and bag their own groceries. Today grocers are racing to find ways to use radio-frequency identification technology to end the traditional checkout process once and for all.
But the money saved by eliminating all those checker positions over the years is just pennies compared to the savings grocers can realize by automating what goes on in their back rooms and DCs. Right now, order picking accounts for a whopping 70 percent of the average grocery distribution center's payroll. Automate that function, and a company could save serious money.
In fact, grocers are already doing just that—particularly in Europe. Dutch grocery retailer Albert Heijn, for instance, recently celebrated the first anniversary of its revolutionary DLS order release module (made by Nedcon). The system, which is currently installed in one-quarter of the grocer's 900,000-square-foot distribution center near Rotterdam, can ship up to 3,000 cases per hour. Late last year, the grocer announced that it would install a second module at the DC, which stores and ships about 2,000 fast-moving products like sugar and coffee. Once the DC is fully automated, it's expected to ship up to 6,300 cases per hour, or about one million cases of perishable and dry grocery products each week. "We are certain that this is a system for the future," Mels Koster, the company's vice president of supply chain development, told DC VELOCITY in the first interview the retailer has granted about the highly automated system.
It's automatic
So what does the future look like? Big, shiny and complex, if Heijn's system is any indication. Its automated picking module is seven levels high,with 72 conveyor lanes on each level, for a total of 504 lanes. Each level has an inbound conveyor and an outbound conveyor running along the front and back.
The system performs its complicated ballet hundreds of times each day with virtually no human intervention. For example, on each inbound conveyor a pusher device rides up and down the lane. Upon receiving an order command from the warehouse management system (WMS), the pusher device moves to the correct lane and pushes a batch of the required product into the lane. After guiding a batch into a lane, the pusher sends a message to the WMS that it's moved a certain number of cases. (Bar codes are not used on full cases; the system relies on the WMS's information in combination with a counting photo sensor to ensure the number of cases entered into a lane is correct.)
Products ready to be picked are automatically fed from bulk storage to depalletizing machines. Once they're depalletized, the packaged items are transported via conveyor to one of the DLS module's seven-level input roller tracks.
As products are carried along on the input lane, an input trolley at each level sees to it that the items are routed into the correct storage lane. The storage lanes are typically 40 feet long, which not only allows for a large area of entry for each product, but assures timely replenishment. The system is designed to handle items of all sizes, weights, and packaging types, including fragile products. (Fast-moving items are assigned to more than one storage lane.)
Each storage lane is fitted with a universal computer-controlled dispenser, creating enormous release capacity, especially for fast-moving items. All items destined for a particular store are released in a predetermined sequence so that, say, bags of coffee beans come out before potato chips, ensuring the bags of chips don't arrive at the store as bags of crumbs.
Numbers game
Although officials at Royal Ahold, Albert Heijn's Dutch parent company, won't discuss specific productivity gains until later this year, their comments hint at the magnitude of the savings they're realizing. "What we have created is a system where you can turn out several thousand cases per hour," says Han Willemse, chief supply chain officer for Ahold, "not the 100 to 150 cases per hour that you see with normal order picking processes in conventional warehouses."
As the number of cases shipped per hour soars, labor needs will plummet. Once the DC is fully automated (the plan is to install a total of four order picking modules), the grocer will need roughly 100 associates spread over two shifts—a huge drop over the approximately 350 order pickers currently needed.
A 70-percent cut in workforce is staggering by any measure, but it's particularly significant in Holland, where (as in many parts of Europe) DC workers command $50 an hour or more. And that's assuming grocers are lucky enough to find workers willing to work in their DCs. During peak picking seasons like the Christmas and Easter holidays, Albert Heijn has been forced to bus in workers from Poland and East Germany.
What's not yet clear is whether a system that's all the rage in Europe will catch on in America. Unlike Europe, where land and labor are in short supply, America still boasts an abundance of both. And outside of the Northeast and the West Coast, land is still relatively cheap—particularly in Oklahoma and Texas.
Labor, too, remains readily available in the vast majority of markets across North America, says Marc Wulfraat, a senior partner at consulting firm KOM International Inc. who specializes in the grocery supply chain. In contrast to Europe's $50 an hour, the going rate for DC workers in most parts of the United States is somewhere around $15 to $20 an hour, says Wulfraat, who points out that it would take an extraordinarily expensive labor market to justify a full-blown automated storage/retrieval system (AS/RS).
Certainly, automation doesn't come cheap. Though prices have dropped—an AS/RS that once cost as much as $750,000 per crane can now be had for as little as $200,000 per crane—one of these systems still represents a hefty investment. And enormous labor savings are by no means guaranteed. True, grocers may be able to get by with fewer manual laborers and forklift drivers. But cranes, like forklifts, require upkeep. Most facilities eventually find themselves hiring highly specialized—and highly compensated —technicians to maintain the cranes.
Still, a couple of grocers have taken the plunge. Stop & Shop has installed an AS/RS system (made by HK Systems) that uses 77 rotating fork cranes to perform put-away and replenishment functions in place of forklifts at its 1.3-million- square-foot facility in Freetown, Mass. And Kroger has installed a dynamic picking system (DPS) that integrates storage and picking into one module at a new distribution center in the Southeast. The first phase of the "goods to person" picking system engineered by Witron Integrated Logistics includes installation of an integrated conveyor network, 16 stacker cranes, 70 picking workstations, two order consolidation buffers and 175,000 tote locations.
Yet grocers lag well behind their counterparts in electronics and apparel. "When you take a good hard look at who has invested in automation in North America, the list is pretty short when it comes to food retailers and wholesalers," says Wulfraat."This stuff is so expensive that it's very difficult to make a business case for it."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."