And the pouches, tubes and parcels while you're at it. DHL Express wants your domestic small package business. And it's willing to spend big bucks to get it.
"Would you DHL this for me?" The question doesn't quite roll off the tongue, but if DHL Express has its way, "DHL" will someday be shorthand for overnight delivery. As anyone with a television is aware, the carrier burst upon the scene last year with a land and air assault on the U.S. domestic package delivery business. Not only does the carrier seem unfazed by the prospect of taking on two titans, Federal Express and UPS, it appears to be enjoying the attack. DHL's TV ads depict FedEx and UPS drivers slack-jawed with amazement at their competitor's rapidity and omnipresence, even style. One print ad emblazoned in DHL's signature yellow and red proclaims: "Yellow. It's the new brown." Another screams: "The Roman Empire. The British Empire. The FedEx Empire. Nothing lasts forever. "Clearly, the gloves are off.
Challenging FedEx and UPS, which together own upwards of 75 percent of the domestic express delivery market, may sound like madness. But there's a method in it. DHL, which was founded in the United States but is now part of the Germany-based Deutsche Post group, has long been the market leader in international express shipping (and international air freight). But to achieve true world domination, it needs a strong presence in the United States, which is the world's busiest parcel market. And it's willing to spend well over a billion dollars in that quest.
DHL may actually have a shot at it. As Dick Metzler, DHL Americas' executive vice president of marketing, is fond of pointing out, the battle for package delivery dominance is about more than the United States alone. "We think it's not just a U.S. issue, it's a global issue," says Metzler, who was formerly CEO of APL Logistics. Though DHL casts itself in its ads as a cheeky upstart with something to prove ("Fat and happy. Meet lean and hungry"), the company, which dominates overnight package delivery everywhere else on the planet, is more Goliath than David. "We're the global player who's always been the UPS and FedEx to the rest of the world,"Metzler asserts. "I like the prospect of taking on one much more homogeneous market like the United States better than their prospects of taking on all the other countries in the world."
Gaining ground?
For all of Metzler's saber rattling, his new boss, John Mullen, who became DHL Americas' new chief executive officer Jan. 1, won't find this an easy market to crack. Not only does he face formidable competitors, but the domestic parcel delivery market itself is a market in transition. Over the past seven years, there's been a steady shift toward ground as opposed to air delivery for all but the most urgent packages. Figures from The Colography Group, an Atlanta-based transportation industry research firm, show that since UPS and FedEx introduced ground delivery guarantees in mid-1998, the proportion of U.S. expedited cargo moving via ground service has risen to just under 60 percent from 52 percent (and is expected to keep rising). Air, by contrast, has slid to 38 percent from 44 percent (and is expected to keep falling).
That's not the most auspicious of openings for DHL, which has always been firmly associated with air service in the public's mind. DHL's main bid to grab a bigger share of the U.S. parcel market, in fact, was the purchase, finalized in August 2003, of Airborne Express, which, as its name implies, largely gave DHL leverage in the air delivery market. And the markets where DHL dominates—Asia and Europe—are ones that remain largely geared toward air delivery of urgent packages (just try driving fast through rural China or urban England).
So, is DHL ready to be a ground delivery company? Absolutely, says Metzler. "To compete, we've just finished our 19-hub road network, and that gives us the ability to interconnect the continental United States by road."
DHL has publicly announced it's investing $1.2 billion in infrastructure over the next two years. October '05 should see the opening of its 300,000-square-foot West Coast air and ground hub in Riverside, Calif. Once that hub opens for business, says Fred Beljaars, executive vice president of operations for DHL Americas, the carrier will no longer have to route packages traveling from, say, San Francisco to Seattle through the company's hub in Wilmington, Ohio. "The ground network is completely built out. As a consequence, we can move 50 percent of all we do, whether 2nd day or conventional delivery, by ground, playing to the everincreasing demand for ground services," Beljaars says. DHL has recently opened seven new ground delivery sortation centers, bringing the U.S. total up to 19, if you include Wilmington.
But at least one stock analyst isn't so sure DHL can catch up with its well-entrenched rivals anytime soon. In its thirdquarter 2004 shippers survey, stock analyst Bear Stearns estimated that DHL had 10 percent of the U.S. domestic air market (by revenue), but only 1.5 to 2.0 percent of the ground market. And although analyst Ed Wolfe predicted in that report that DHL would be able to build up that share quickly by steep discounting, he cautioned that it would take "many years to implement the necessary ground infrastructure to compete and grow in order to take material market share."
Does size matter?
Naturally, DHL's much-vaunted expansion is a mere bagatelle if you listen to FedEx and UPS. "UPS isn't responding to competitors. Competitors respond to us. We lead the industry," says Steve Holmes, a UPS spokesman. "Compared to their $1.2 billion over the next two years, during that same period UPS will invest $4.8 billion in infrastructure, technology and operations."
FedEx Ground, too, downplays the threat, pointing out that though DHL may have 19 regional centers, it has 26 hubs and more than 500 local terminals in the United States and Canada. The company also notes that it's in the middle of a $1.8 billion expansion plan of its own, announced in October 2002, which involves building nine new hubs and expanding 22 others by the end of 2010.
Sheer physical size is one thing. End-to-end supply chain management capabilities are another. And just as Metzler insists the U.S. package delivery market can't be looked at in geographic isolation, so UPS's Holmes counters that you can't look at package delivery without considering other aspects of the supply chain.
"We at UPS try not to look at it in a fragmented way.We try to look at it holistically, especially in terms of what we're doing for customers through our supply chain solutions and technology, "Holmes says. "Those have all been successful and we're expanding our relationships with customers. For example, when we engaged with Home Shopping Network and Williams Sonoma, right from the start it was about much more than getting small packages to their customers."
Metzler, of course, counters that UPS isn't the only one with affiliate divisions, pointing to DHL's brotherhood of service providers under its owner, Deutsche Post AG—the old Danzas network, which the company bought in 1999—plus a newly grown DHL Logistics arm. But he's aware that becoming a major player in the United States means big changes for DHL.
"There's no doubt that to optimize our global position in the long run we needed a more scalable and robust infrastructure," Metzler says. The sheer size and scope of UPS's and FedEx's networks in the United States have driven their cost per package down "significantly below DHL's," Metzler admits. "Plus they were bundling their international services with domestic services and that was putting us in a difficult situation, much as we do with our services in Europe and Asia, which is difficult for them." So the only way to genuinely compete is to scale up too. And bundle up.With a $52 billion parent behind DHL, that's entirely possible.
Meanwhile, will DHL's market assault prove, as its ads suggest, not just bad for the competition, but great for you? "It's going to be much more apparent to people like distribution center managers that they have a choice," says Metzler. Within the 10 percent of shippers' supply chain spend that goes to ground parcel, express and export, they only have two choices, he says (though the U.S. Postal Service might take exception to that statement). If they're using truckers, they've got thousands of choices, he says. If they're shipping via LTL or air or ocean containers, they've got hundreds of choices, which gives them negotiating leverage. "So, the whole idea was to tell distribution center managers that they do have a choice," Metzler says. Market research has shown that shippers would welcome another player in the market, he notes. "They need a DHL in this market—is what one guy said—to keep the other two honest."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.