James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
Congestion should ease up this summer at Tween Brands' high-volume DC in Columbus, Ohio. But not for any of the reasons you might expect. The facility isn't gearing up for an expansion or anticipating a seasonal slowdown. Rather, it's installing a highspeed sortation system that will rev up throughput in the DC's receiving operations and free up some space.
Though it was built just five years ago, the DC is already feeling the squeeze. The facility supplies all of the stores in the Tween Brands network—Limited Too and Justice stores that sell clothing for girls ages 7 to 14. The retailer (formerly known as Too Inc.) has been engaged in an aggressive store opening campaign in recent years. At the time of its opening, the 365,000-square-foot DC served about 450 stores. Today, it supports more than 730 stores located across the United States and overseas.
To understand how the new sorter—a Dematic sliding-shoe system—will free up space, you have to know something about the facility's receiving process. Right now, when DC associates unload trailers, they first place cartons on the floor so they can scan them and re-label them if necessary. Once they're finished, they place the items onto pallets and introduce them into the receiving system. With the new sortation system in place, they'll be able to shift to a fluid unloading process that eliminates the need for a staging area. As trucks arrive, associates will unload merchandise directly onto the conveyor system, where the sorter will take over.
Along with freeing up space, the retailer expects the new sorter to speed up its receiving operations and take throughput to a whole new level. "In the time it takes a human being to read a label on a carton and determine where it needs to go, a high-speed sorter can have read and acted on hundreds of cases," says Matthew Dippold, the facility's manager of technical services. That's a big plus for a DC that handles 1.5 million units a week on average during normal periods, and 3.6 million units a week during peak season. The facility, which holds between 25,000 and 30,000 SKUs, based its expectations on its previous experience with sorters. It has one in its packing area and one in its shipping area, both of which were installed at the time of construction.
A welcome diversion
Originally used mainly by parcel carriers to sort packages by destination, sortation systems are fast becoming a fixture in retail distribution centers, where much of the activity is centered on breaking down incoming loads of merchandise and reassembling the items into new loads bound for individual stores. "Today, retail is a big driver for sortation systems because they're dealing with such a high volume of small parcels," says Tom Carbott, managing director of the conveyor product section of the Material Handling Industry of America (MHIA).
Sortation systems today come in a variety of types. Retail distribution centers—like the one run by Tween Brands—frequently choose the type known as the sliding-shoe sorter, which is designed to handle high volumes and can accommodate a variety of package sizes. Sliding-shoe models feature a series of linked slats with shoes on the side that move along with the slats. The shoes, which are capable of independent lateral movement, divert items, cartons, or totes down a conveyor chute.
Also popular these days are pop-up and push diverter sorters. Pop-up sorters typically feature wheels embedded below the conveyor's surface at the point where two or more lines meet. When a carton needs to be directed to another line, the embedded wheels pop up to nudge the carton to the right line. A push diverter, by contrast, uses an arm or pusher panel that swings or pushes out as a carton approaches to direct it to a different line or sorting bin.
If they're not handling fragile items, DCs sometimes install what are known as bomb-bay sorters, which open up like the bomb-bay door on an airplane's belly and drop the product directly into a tote or carton stationed beneath. Bomb-bay units are often used for relatively small products, notes Samuel Flanders, president of 2wmc.com, a warehouse-consulting firm in Durham, N.H.
Operations that are looking for speed often choose tilt-tray sorters. Items are placed onto trays that move along a circular path until they reach their destination. At that point, the tray tilts and the item slides off into an order container or sorting chute.
Regardless of type, today's sorters all move at a pretty fast clip. MHIA's Carbott reports that the average sorter moves at 400 feet per minute, while some models operate at speeds of up to 600 feet per minute.
When Bubba isn't enough
Though sortation systems are sometimes installed during the construction phase, many DCs start out with what consultant Paul Faber of Tompkins Associates calls "Bubba sorters," workers who sort the merchandise by hand.
But as throughput volume grows, they sometimes reach a point where they either have to expand or automate. That's when many turn to sortation systems. "I can handle the same volume at a higher speed with less square footage by having a good sortation system," says Tom Freese of Freese and Associates, a management consulting firm in Chagrin Falls, Ohio. "Sortation systems enable a distribution center to handle high activity without a build-up of employees or enlarging the warehouse's footprint."
Sortation systems come at a price, however. Equipment costs alone can run into the thousands of dollars. Models at the lower end of the price range, like narrow-belt sortation systems, cost around $100,000, according to Flanders. More sophisticated sortation systems, like tilt-tray or sliding-shoe sorters, can run upwards of $1,000,000 once all the design, installation, and software costs are factored in.
Equipment and installation costs vary according to the complexity of the sorting application. For example, if a company simply wants to sort products by the first three digits of the destination ZIP code, it can get by with a simple bar code and lower-end bar-code readers, says Freese. But if the company wants to sort by both shipment date and destination, it will require a longer, more complicated bar code, making it necessary to use top-of-the-line readers and printers.
Companies that ship thousands of orders per day may be able to use their sortation systems to reduce their transportation bills. Freese explains that sortation systems make it possible for companies to take advantage of "zone skipping" programs. For example, they could sort out items bound for the West Coast, load them into a truck, and move them via truckload service to a parcel carrier's hub on the West Coast for local delivery, thereby getting a break on parcel shipping costs.
Labor-saving devices
Whatever additional savings they may achieve, DCs that install sortation systems almost universally report a jump in productivity and labor utilization. That prospect led e-commerce specialist GSI Commerce to install a sophisticated sortation system in the 540,000-square-foot distribution center it's building in northern Kentucky.
Business has been growing at a 30-percent annual rate for the King of Prussia, Pa.-based company, which handles order fulfillment for more than 60 online retailers. As is common in the retail business, volume swells around the holidays. During the peak shipping season, the company processes more than 100,000 orders a day, reports Paul Chisholm, vice president and general manager of GSI's Louisville and Richwood, Ky., fulfillment centers. In the past, GSI has hired up 1,200 workers to handle the seasonal uptick. GSI hopes that with the sortation system in place, it will be able to avoid that expense in the future.
The new facility, slated to open this month, will actually contain two sortation systems working in tandem: a combination packing/shipping tilt-tray sorter from FKI Logistex and a sliding-shoe sorter from TGW-ERMANCO. Incoming items will first go through the tilt-tray sorter, which will direct them down the appropriate chute to a packing station, where a packer will deposit them in a box. From there, the unsealed boxes will travel by conveyor onto a mezzanine, where they'll enter the sliding-shoe sorter.
Acting on instructions from a warehouse control system, the second sorter will direct the carton down one of five lanes. If no special handling is required, the box will be sent to the first lane, where the packing slip will be created, void fill added, and a shipping label printed and applied. Orders that require gift wrapping will be sent to the second lane; fragile items will be diverted to the third lane; and items that must be shipped in plastic bags will be sent to the fourth lane. The fifth lane will be reserved for orders requiring problem resolution.
More demands, more sorters
Vendors say they're hearing a lot of stories like GSI's these days, which makes them bullish on their future. Sales of all types of sortation systems in the United States totaled about $750 million last year, according to Ken Ruehrdanz, a market development manager at Grand Rapids, Mich.-based Dematic Corp., which manufactures sorters. He predicts the market will soar as more and more DCs turn to sortation to boost productivity and meet growing demands from customers.
"I expect sortation requirements to increase in retail and wholesale distribution since the distribution requirements are becoming more complex," says Ruehrdanz. "There will continue to be more growth in the requirements to process smaller, split case orders more often. This equates to more sortation systems in the distribution center."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."