It could have saved thousands of dollars by taking the "slap on RFID and ship" route, but vitamin-maker Schiff thinks its full-blown RFID project will have a bigger payoff in the end.
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
If Rod Farrimond ever tires of his career in information technology, he should have no problem landing a job in sales—not after the coup he pulled off last spring. Farrimond works for Salt Lake City-based Schiff Nutrition International, a maker of vitamins and nutritional supplements, but his sales feat had nothing to do with multi-year contracts for Tiger's Milk bars or Glucosamine Gelcaps. What Farrimond pulled off was a feat of a whole other order of magnitude: He convinced management to sink nearly half a million dollars into a project that offered virtually no prospect of a conventional ROI.
The story began with a mandate from Wal-Mart. In March 2006, Schiff got word that if it wanted to continue doing business with the mega-retailer, it had until January 2007 to start putting RFID tags on the cases and pallets it ships to Wal-Mart's DCs. That created a dilemma for Schiff, which had yet to get started with RFID. It wasn't a question of whether or not to comply with the mandate (it would). It was a question of how deeply to get involved with RFID to accommodate a single customer whose business represented less than 1 percent of the company's total volume.
For many suppliers in Schiff 's position, the answer would have been obvious: slap and ship. They'd buy some tags, slap them on the shipments that required them, and hope for the best. But Farrimond, who is the company's manager of business analysis, rejected that idea from the start. Though slap and ship might be cheaper in the short term, he felt Schiff would be better off finding a scaleable solution that would allow it to meet similar requests from other customers down the road. (At press time, Schiff had been asked to start shipping RFID-tagged product to a Sam's Club DC in Desoto, Texas.)
As reasonable as that argument might sound, it would still be tough to sell to management. That main hurdle? Return on investment (ROI). Farrimond's back-of-an envelope calculations showed that only 180 of the 25,000 cases the company ships each week would require tags, which meant Schiff wouldn't see any operational savings right away. He'd have to persuade management that the payback would come elsewhere in the supply chain. As Farrimond puts it, "We're not going to see it come back in any hard form of ROI, but we believe it'll be there. RFID is a supply chain initiative, and ROI studies usually have a hard time dealing with the fact that the ROI may not come within your own four walls."
In meeting after meeting, Farrimond laid out his case. Schiff might not see savings in its operating costs for a while, but it would almost certainly see sales growth through a reduction in out-of-stocks and increased inventory turns at Wal-Mart. "When that occurs,"he notes,"then our top-line growth accelerates. It'll probably never be attributed directly to RFID, but it's good for the company. We had to talk long and hard to our executive team about why that's important."
The right stuff
In the end, Farrimond's arguments carried the day. Management gave the project the green light and approved a budget of $465,000 for the RFID initiative. But as the project got under way, Farrimond began to wonder whether pitching RFID to management might not have been the easy part. In a matter of months, he and his team would have to design a system from the ground up, choosing the tags, readers, and middleware that best met their requirements. There was the added pressure to get it right the first time because Schiff, a mid-sized company (it recorded $178 million in sales in 2006), didn't have the luxury of limitless funds.
Rather than try to design the system on his own, Farrimond decided to consult with the experts. Over the next few months, he made several trips to IBM's RFID testing lab in Raleigh, N.C., to get recommendations from the center's specialists and test different types of equipment. He wanted to find a solution that would work for both cases and pallets, including mixed pallets, and that wouldn't require wholesale changes to the DC's operations. For example, the system had to allow DC workers to stack cases on pallets the usual way without worrying about the orientation of the tags.
On top of that, the solution had to be fully scaleable. "Schiff wanted a solution that not only offered enhanced productivity, but was also interoperable with other supply chain partners, highly scaleable, and replicable for future customers and their unique specifications," says Scott Burroughs, middleware software solutions executive for IBM Software Group.
In just 12 weeks, specialists from IBM and systems integrator OATSystems helped Farrimond come up with a system that's able to read tags on mixed pallets containing over 100 cases with 100 percent accuracy. "We know that all the cases on that pallet actually belong there, and we are able to associate a certain pallet with a particular sales order, and we know everything about the sales order and all the EPC numbers that went with the sales order," says Farrimond. Eventually, Schiff will be able to use the data collected to create an electronic "pedigree" that can be used to document the products' movement throughout the supply chain, verifying their authenticity and deterring counterfeiters.
The company rolled out the RFID system in late October at its DC in Salt Lake City. After a two-week trial period, it shipped its first RFIDtagged pallet to Wal-Mart in mid-November. In January, it began shipping tagged cases (corrugated cases of plastic bottles containing tablets and capsules) to three RFID-enabled Wal-Mart DCs. Farrimond reports that Wal- Mart achieves read rates of about 96 percent at its DC, which is slightly better than the average read rates recorded by the retailer. Schiff currently tags six stock-keeping units (SKUs), but Farrimond expects to increase the number to 15 shortly.
As for the cost, the project came in 30 percent under budget. The company had allocated $465,000 for the RFID initiative; Farrimond and his team spent only $323,000.
The next act
Right now, Schiff is using its RFID system purely for compliance with Wal-Mart's mandate. But it soon will begin taking advantage of the technology in other ways. For example, the company plans to start attaching RFID tags to promotional displays bound for the sales floor at Sam's Club stores sometime this month. "We're talking about putting a 20-cent tag on a $1,000 display of products," says Farrimond, "and being able to make sure that pallet is out on the floor when it should be. That type of thing has an immediate payback."
In the meantime, Farrimond has begun to identify possible ways to integrate the technology into the company's internal operations as tag use becomes more widespread. For example, he foresees a day when Schiff will be able to use automatic RFID reads, rather than laborintensive bar-code scans, to collect data for advance ship notices (ASNs).
Eventually, Schiff will be able to use the data gleaned from RFID reads to trace inventory down to the store level. "That's where the real gold is, and we're helping them to mine that gold by capturing the data and analyzing it downstream," says Paul Cataldo, vice president of marketing at middleware provider OATSystems.
That tracing capability will enable Schiff to confirm that its deliveries have been received at customers' DCs, which will help resolve disputes in cases where, say, a retailer claims to have received only 58 of the 60 cases it ordered. "We can look at our information pOréal and start to look for those case reads if there is a discrepancy," says Farrimond."If we see all 60 case reads, we can tell them that either their hand count was wrong or something else happened. We'll have the ability to tell them what distribution center received them and which store they were shipped to."
An equal opportunity technology
Though small and mid-sized companies often assume that RFID is out of their reach, Schiff 's experience shows that it's not just for the giants, says Farrimond. "One reason we wanted to share this story," he says, "is to point out that if you are smart and do it well and get a good partner to implement with, then even small and medium-sized businesses can do this without damaging your profitability."
What they need to understand, he adds, is that the ROI is unlikely to come from the traditional sources (like operational savings) but rather, from increased revenues elsewhere in the supply chain. "You have to recognize that it's the supply chain that becomes more successful, and not necessarily [operations within] your four walls. The ROI will come when the supply chain is more efficient and you can sell more things or sell them faster. If people realize that this little company can do it for 1 percent of [its] volume, then maybe others will realize they can figure out how to do it as well."
"we've got it on tape"
Not so long ago, a company that took the RFID plunge— investing in the technology in hopes of streamlining its logistics operations—could expect to wait three to five years for a payback. But that's starting to change. Someday soon, the average payback period for RFID projects could drop into the range normally associated with warehouse management systems and other software.
In fact, reports are beginning to trickle in about companies whose innovative applications are paying for themselves in 12 months or less. Take electronics giant Sony, which has combined item-level RFID tagging and digital video at its distribution center in the Netherlands. Sony expects to see a return on its RFID investment in under a year, due to the products' high value (the facility handles digital cameras and camcorders) and the volume of orders shipped from the site. (Currently, the electronics giant is moving 60 pallets of item-level tagged goods through the DC every hour, with plans to increase the volume.) The payoff, it says, will come in the form of increased shipping efficiency, reduced shrinkage, and a streamlined claims process.
For the project, which went live at its primary European DC in Tilburg earlier this year, Sony is using RFID tags from UPM Raflatac and Reva Systems' Tag Acquisition Processor (TAP) system, which filters RFID data from networked RFID readers, manages those readers, and sends the data to back-end systems.
Sony tags products to be shipped with RFID labels and then records the items' IDs at each stage of the fulfillment process, as they are picked, stacked, and shrink-wrapped on pallets. An automated video system records the process, burns RFID data onto the video image, and indexes the MPEG4 video stream according to the RFID information. The system also logs pallet movement through dock doors and onto trailers, combining video and RFID to provide visual and electronic proof of delivery.
Among other benefits, the new system is expected to help Sony resolve difficulties confirming deliveries to major retailers during peak shipping periods. In the event of a dispute, Sony will be able to provide not just electronic shipment confirmation, but also video proof that the items have been loaded onto trucks and shipped.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."