the top of the food chain: interview with William B. Day
It's already North America's largest foodservice distributor. Now Sysco wants to make its supply chain the best food chain on the planet. And it's William B. Day's job to see that it happens.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
The usual complaint among supply chain executives is that the supply chain is all but invisible to the CEO. But you won't hear that from William B. Day. Day is a senior supply chain executive at food-distributor Sysco, which supplies fresh and frozen food, china and silverware, and kitchen equipment to nearly 400,000 restaurant and institutional food-service customers. Sysco's CEO, Richard J. Schnieders, has made it clear that he sees the supply chain as the industry's new competitive battleground. In a November 2005 address to shareholders, Schnieders announced his intent to make Sysco the global leader in "multi-temperature food product supply chains." And he left no doubt as to his expectations: "We will be able to move a case—or multiple cases—of food and related products from points anywhere in the world more effectively than any other company."
It's now up to Day to deliver on that very public promise. But at least the groundwork is in place. Since 2001, he has been immersed in a wide-ranging supply chain overhaul that will leave virtually no aspect of the operation untouched. Among other goals, the project seeks to improve the company's forecasting, use technology to cut operating and delivery costs, and open as many as nine new distribution centers (or as Sysco calls them, "redistribution" centers) throughout the United States. And according to Day, it's beginning to see results.
A 24-year Sysco veteran, Day began his career as a staff accountant at the company's Memphis, Tenn., office. Since that time, he has transferred to corporate headquarters in Houston, where he progressed through a variety of technology and finance positions, becoming vice president of supply chain management in 2003. In February, the company announced his promotion to senior vice president, supply chain, effective next month.
Day met recently with DC VELOCITY Group Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald to discuss how he moved from staff accountant to senior vice president, the study that prompted Sysco's supply chain overhaul, and what he sees lacking in supply chain management in most industries in the United States.
Q: Would you tell us a little about Sysco?
A: We are the nation's largest foodservice distributor. For fiscal 2007, sales are projected to be around $34 billion. We have about 53,000 employees nationwide, supplying our customers with 300,000 different products.We have somewhere around 10,000 salespeople out on the street calling on restaurants, hospitals, schools, nursing homes, and so forth. Our customers are any institutional user of food products.
We also have the largest private truck fleet in the United States, with over 9,000 delivery vehicles on the road.
Q: Do you strictly serve the U.S. market or does your scope extend beyond that?
A: We are primarily North American, but we do have a division called International Food Group that exports food to about 70 different countries. It doesn't account for a large percentage of our sales right now, but we are certainly planning to grow that part of our business.
Q: As Sysco's senior vice president of supply chain, what are your responsibilities?
A: I'm responsible for what we call supply chain management and redistribution. That encompasses a network of redistribution centers that we're building across the country that makes our supply chain a lot more efficient and cost-effective than our previous system. I am also responsible for the national inbound transportation of all the products flowing into the redistribution centers and into our operating companies. I am responsible for demand planning and inventory management, which is primarily management of the redistribution centers. I also have responsibility for the inventory systems that are used by our other business divisions. I have a very substantial analysis team that is responsible for supply chain planning and optimization as well as supplier compliance and a few other little things. The big pieces are the redistribution centers, inbound transportation management, demand planning and inventory management, and planning and optimization.
Q: What are "redistribution centers"? I've never heard that term before.
A: A redistribution center is basically an aggregation point for product that doesn't go directly from the manufacturer to our operating companies. Our analysis and supply chain planning team spends a great deal of time looking at the transportation costs, inventory costs, handling costs, transaction costs—essentially all supply chain costs—for our various products. If they determine it would be less expensive to move a product through the redistribution center than to go directly to our operating company, that's how we flow the product.
We're in the process of building several redistribution centers across the country. Our first is in Front Royal, Va. It services our 14 operating companies in the Northeast.
Q: How long have you been with Sysco?
A: I've been with Sysco for 24 years, though not always in a supply chain capacity. I started out in the financial area and came up through the ranks. I was a financial officer with the company at one time, but I also have a strong systems background here. I was the director of applications development for the company and actually led the development of the systems that the company runs on today.
About six years ago, we initiated a study to weigh the merits of shifting from a system in which each individual location managed its own supply chain (we have 172 locations around the country) to a model in which we would centralize certain aspects of the operation where it made sense to do so.What we've done as a result of that analysis is to centralize execution of carrier management functions, especially as it relates to the flow of inbound inventory. We've also implemented a new demand planning and inventory management system that will help with the transition to our new processes using the redistribution centers. The new system is allowing us to dramatically reduce our safety stock and cycle times at our operating companies.
Q: The holy grail of inventory management, right?
A: Yes, that's right.We have had really fantastic results in that regard.
Q: I would guess that your IT background made your shift to this side of the business a fairly natural transition?
A: Yes, it actually was a pretty easy transition for me. Of course, there were a lot of nuances about the logistics field, especially as it relates to managing relationships with the railroads and motor carriers.
Q: What are some of the biggest challenges you face when it comes to optimizing Sysco's logistics operations?
A: The biggest challenge for me is continuing to lead the transformation that we're going through right now. It's a big cultural change for the company. So far it has required the integration of five new best-of-breed supply chain systems into our existing ERP [enterprise resource planning] system.
Q: What prompted Sysco to overhaul its supply chain?
A: Sometimes a company looks at its position in the market and realizes that it needs to transform its business processes if it wants to stay competitive in the long run. That's what we saw when we did our analysis. It is a big adjustment for the company, but it is needed. Changes like these affect almost every area of a company—no one goes untouched.
Q: When did Sysco begin the transformation process?
A: We began in 2001.We've now got our first redistribution center up and running in Virginia. A second redistribution center is under construction in Alachua, Fla., and will begin shipping in April 2008. The site for a third redistribution center has been secured; we plan to begin construction next month. It should be operational by October 2008. Then we have three or four other sites that we are working on.
Q: It's not uncommon for corporations to encounter some pretty serious resistance when they ask employees to change the way they do their jobs. Are you taking any steps to help them understand why it's so important to embrace these changes?
A: That is a very big and very important part of the transformation. Certainly, education must be a big part of the process when you're asking people to begin looking at costs differently than they've looked at them in the past. You're asking them to make decisions differently. You're changing the standards against which success is measured. All of that change is always difficult to introduce and manage in a company.
Q: You mentioned earlier that Sysco has the largest private truck fleet in the United States.What do you use the fleet for?
A: We use dedicated private carriage for outbound deliveries of goods from the redistribution centers to the operating companies. Those operating companies then distribute the supplies directly to customers in their regions.
Q: What will be the next big breakthrough in supply chain management?
A: Full integration of the entire business process.We talk about it all the time, but when I look at supply chain management across most industries in the United States, I see a lot of room for improvement. One of the biggest problems I see is the disconnect that exists between sales and supply chain planning, and then even among various supply chain activities.
We have to get to the point where we have full integration across all those business processes and where we have an optimized planning layer that really enables us to understand our capacity needs, our constraints, and what we need to do to optimize the supply chain.
Q: What will it take to get there?
A: I think a big part of the answer will be technology that helps with demand planning and inventory management and sharing of information with your suppliers so that production can be planned and shipments can be predicted. The effort to integrate business processes will always be ongoing, but I do think there are tools that can move things forward quickly. There are enough people in the software development world who understand the need, that I think the tools are going to get even better over time.
Q: Speaking of tools, if you had to identify the one tool in your personal skill set that's most useful in the dayto-day management of your company's supply chain, what would it be?
A: In the context of this large-scale transformation we've been working on, I would say strategic thinking and decision-making ability. I've been out there on the front lines throughout the process, presenting the business case, organizing the projects, and making really most of the decisions. I think my leadership skills are good, and I have the ability to really help people bridge the gap between strategy and execution—that is, taking the strategy and then figuring out what steps are required in order to realize it.
Q: It brings to mind the old adage that a really good idea is a job half done.
A: Exactly.
Q: A few years down the road when your supply chain overhaul is complete, what do you hope to point to as testimony to the project's success?
A: Well, actually it already exists. In the Northeast, with our first redistribution center online, our inventory levels are lower than they were in 2004. The operating benefits that we expected to achieve and that we built into the business case are being realized. I think that we have our proof of concept. In the end, what we will have will be a network that will be able to significantly increase our capacity to grow because our supply chain is going to be lower cost and more efficient. We are going to have a capacity to move more product at a lower cost than anybody else can.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.
That challenge is one of the reasons that fewer shoppers overall are satisfied with their shopping experiences lately, Lincolnshire, Illinois-based Zebra said in its “17th Annual Global Shopper Study.”th Annual Global Shopper Study.” While 85% of shoppers last year were satisfied with both the in-store and online experiences, only 81% in 2024 are satisfied with the in-store experience and just 79% with online shopping.
In response, most retailers (78%) say they are investing in technology tools that can help both frontline workers and those watching operations from behind the scenes to minimize theft and loss, Zebra said.
Just 38% of retailers currently use AI-based prescriptive analytics for loss prevention, but a much larger 50% say they plan to use it in the next 1-3 years. That was followed by self-checkout cameras and sensors (45%), computer vision (46%), and RFID tags and readers (42%) that are planned for use within the next three years, specifically for loss prevention.
Those strategies could help improve the brick and mortar shopping experience, since 78% of shoppers say it’s annoying when products are locked up or secured within cases. Adding to that frustration is that it’s hard to find an associate while shopping in stores these days, according to 70% of consumers. In response, some just walk out; one in five shoppers has left a store without getting what they needed because a retail associate wasn’t available to help, an increase over the past two years.
The survey also identified additional frustrations faced by retailers and associates:
challenges with offering easy options for click-and-collect or returns, despite high shopper demand for them
the struggle to confirm current inventory and pricing
lingering labor shortages and increasing loss incidents, even as shoppers return to stores
“Many retailers are laying the groundwork to build a modern store experience,” Matt Guiste, Global Retail Technology Strategist, Zebra Technologies, said in a release. “They are investing in mobile and intelligent automation technologies to help inform operational decisions and enable associates to do the things that keep shoppers happy.”
The survey was administered online by Azure Knowledge Corporation and included 4,200 adult shoppers (age 18+), decision-makers, and associates, who replied to questions about the topics of shopper experience, device and technology usage, and delivery and fulfillment in store and online.