the top of the food chain: interview with William B. Day
It's already North America's largest foodservice distributor. Now Sysco wants to make its supply chain the best food chain on the planet. And it's William B. Day's job to see that it happens.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
The usual complaint among supply chain executives is that the supply chain is all but invisible to the CEO. But you won't hear that from William B. Day. Day is a senior supply chain executive at food-distributor Sysco, which supplies fresh and frozen food, china and silverware, and kitchen equipment to nearly 400,000 restaurant and institutional food-service customers. Sysco's CEO, Richard J. Schnieders, has made it clear that he sees the supply chain as the industry's new competitive battleground. In a November 2005 address to shareholders, Schnieders announced his intent to make Sysco the global leader in "multi-temperature food product supply chains." And he left no doubt as to his expectations: "We will be able to move a case—or multiple cases—of food and related products from points anywhere in the world more effectively than any other company."
It's now up to Day to deliver on that very public promise. But at least the groundwork is in place. Since 2001, he has been immersed in a wide-ranging supply chain overhaul that will leave virtually no aspect of the operation untouched. Among other goals, the project seeks to improve the company's forecasting, use technology to cut operating and delivery costs, and open as many as nine new distribution centers (or as Sysco calls them, "redistribution" centers) throughout the United States. And according to Day, it's beginning to see results.
A 24-year Sysco veteran, Day began his career as a staff accountant at the company's Memphis, Tenn., office. Since that time, he has transferred to corporate headquarters in Houston, where he progressed through a variety of technology and finance positions, becoming vice president of supply chain management in 2003. In February, the company announced his promotion to senior vice president, supply chain, effective next month.
Day met recently with DC VELOCITY Group Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald to discuss how he moved from staff accountant to senior vice president, the study that prompted Sysco's supply chain overhaul, and what he sees lacking in supply chain management in most industries in the United States.
Q: Would you tell us a little about Sysco?
A: We are the nation's largest foodservice distributor. For fiscal 2007, sales are projected to be around $34 billion. We have about 53,000 employees nationwide, supplying our customers with 300,000 different products.We have somewhere around 10,000 salespeople out on the street calling on restaurants, hospitals, schools, nursing homes, and so forth. Our customers are any institutional user of food products.
We also have the largest private truck fleet in the United States, with over 9,000 delivery vehicles on the road.
Q: Do you strictly serve the U.S. market or does your scope extend beyond that?
A: We are primarily North American, but we do have a division called International Food Group that exports food to about 70 different countries. It doesn't account for a large percentage of our sales right now, but we are certainly planning to grow that part of our business.
Q: As Sysco's senior vice president of supply chain, what are your responsibilities?
A: I'm responsible for what we call supply chain management and redistribution. That encompasses a network of redistribution centers that we're building across the country that makes our supply chain a lot more efficient and cost-effective than our previous system. I am also responsible for the national inbound transportation of all the products flowing into the redistribution centers and into our operating companies. I am responsible for demand planning and inventory management, which is primarily management of the redistribution centers. I also have responsibility for the inventory systems that are used by our other business divisions. I have a very substantial analysis team that is responsible for supply chain planning and optimization as well as supplier compliance and a few other little things. The big pieces are the redistribution centers, inbound transportation management, demand planning and inventory management, and planning and optimization.
Q: What are "redistribution centers"? I've never heard that term before.
A: A redistribution center is basically an aggregation point for product that doesn't go directly from the manufacturer to our operating companies. Our analysis and supply chain planning team spends a great deal of time looking at the transportation costs, inventory costs, handling costs, transaction costs—essentially all supply chain costs—for our various products. If they determine it would be less expensive to move a product through the redistribution center than to go directly to our operating company, that's how we flow the product.
We're in the process of building several redistribution centers across the country. Our first is in Front Royal, Va. It services our 14 operating companies in the Northeast.
Q: How long have you been with Sysco?
A: I've been with Sysco for 24 years, though not always in a supply chain capacity. I started out in the financial area and came up through the ranks. I was a financial officer with the company at one time, but I also have a strong systems background here. I was the director of applications development for the company and actually led the development of the systems that the company runs on today.
About six years ago, we initiated a study to weigh the merits of shifting from a system in which each individual location managed its own supply chain (we have 172 locations around the country) to a model in which we would centralize certain aspects of the operation where it made sense to do so.What we've done as a result of that analysis is to centralize execution of carrier management functions, especially as it relates to the flow of inbound inventory. We've also implemented a new demand planning and inventory management system that will help with the transition to our new processes using the redistribution centers. The new system is allowing us to dramatically reduce our safety stock and cycle times at our operating companies.
Q: The holy grail of inventory management, right?
A: Yes, that's right.We have had really fantastic results in that regard.
Q: I would guess that your IT background made your shift to this side of the business a fairly natural transition?
A: Yes, it actually was a pretty easy transition for me. Of course, there were a lot of nuances about the logistics field, especially as it relates to managing relationships with the railroads and motor carriers.
Q: What are some of the biggest challenges you face when it comes to optimizing Sysco's logistics operations?
A: The biggest challenge for me is continuing to lead the transformation that we're going through right now. It's a big cultural change for the company. So far it has required the integration of five new best-of-breed supply chain systems into our existing ERP [enterprise resource planning] system.
Q: What prompted Sysco to overhaul its supply chain?
A: Sometimes a company looks at its position in the market and realizes that it needs to transform its business processes if it wants to stay competitive in the long run. That's what we saw when we did our analysis. It is a big adjustment for the company, but it is needed. Changes like these affect almost every area of a company—no one goes untouched.
Q: When did Sysco begin the transformation process?
A: We began in 2001.We've now got our first redistribution center up and running in Virginia. A second redistribution center is under construction in Alachua, Fla., and will begin shipping in April 2008. The site for a third redistribution center has been secured; we plan to begin construction next month. It should be operational by October 2008. Then we have three or four other sites that we are working on.
Q: It's not uncommon for corporations to encounter some pretty serious resistance when they ask employees to change the way they do their jobs. Are you taking any steps to help them understand why it's so important to embrace these changes?
A: That is a very big and very important part of the transformation. Certainly, education must be a big part of the process when you're asking people to begin looking at costs differently than they've looked at them in the past. You're asking them to make decisions differently. You're changing the standards against which success is measured. All of that change is always difficult to introduce and manage in a company.
Q: You mentioned earlier that Sysco has the largest private truck fleet in the United States.What do you use the fleet for?
A: We use dedicated private carriage for outbound deliveries of goods from the redistribution centers to the operating companies. Those operating companies then distribute the supplies directly to customers in their regions.
Q: What will be the next big breakthrough in supply chain management?
A: Full integration of the entire business process.We talk about it all the time, but when I look at supply chain management across most industries in the United States, I see a lot of room for improvement. One of the biggest problems I see is the disconnect that exists between sales and supply chain planning, and then even among various supply chain activities.
We have to get to the point where we have full integration across all those business processes and where we have an optimized planning layer that really enables us to understand our capacity needs, our constraints, and what we need to do to optimize the supply chain.
Q: What will it take to get there?
A: I think a big part of the answer will be technology that helps with demand planning and inventory management and sharing of information with your suppliers so that production can be planned and shipments can be predicted. The effort to integrate business processes will always be ongoing, but I do think there are tools that can move things forward quickly. There are enough people in the software development world who understand the need, that I think the tools are going to get even better over time.
Q: Speaking of tools, if you had to identify the one tool in your personal skill set that's most useful in the dayto-day management of your company's supply chain, what would it be?
A: In the context of this large-scale transformation we've been working on, I would say strategic thinking and decision-making ability. I've been out there on the front lines throughout the process, presenting the business case, organizing the projects, and making really most of the decisions. I think my leadership skills are good, and I have the ability to really help people bridge the gap between strategy and execution—that is, taking the strategy and then figuring out what steps are required in order to realize it.
Q: It brings to mind the old adage that a really good idea is a job half done.
A: Exactly.
Q: A few years down the road when your supply chain overhaul is complete, what do you hope to point to as testimony to the project's success?
A: Well, actually it already exists. In the Northeast, with our first redistribution center online, our inventory levels are lower than they were in 2004. The operating benefits that we expected to achieve and that we built into the business case are being realized. I think that we have our proof of concept. In the end, what we will have will be a network that will be able to significantly increase our capacity to grow because our supply chain is going to be lower cost and more efficient. We are going to have a capacity to move more product at a lower cost than anybody else can.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."