John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
If you build it, they will come. The developers of the AllianceTexas distribution hub in North Fort Worth have already proved that. Since its founding in 1989, the 17,000-acre logistics complex has attracted more than 140 corporate tenants, including such heavy hitters as General Mills, Ford Motor Co., and Home Depot. Now, economic development officials in places like Dallas/Fort Worth and Kansas City are hoping that the Field of Dreams theory will hold up in their regions as well.
The "you" in this case are local development authorities and real estate developers—not just in Dallas and Kansas City, but also in San Antonio, Texas; Columbus, Ohio; and Nashville, Tenn. The "it," of course, are the vast logistics parks springing up in the nation's mid-section. And "they" are importers—manufacturers and big box retailers that are displaying an apparently limitless appetite for distribution space.
What's fueling the developers' dreams is the booming U.S.-Asian trade, which has altered the traditional economics of importing. In an earlier era, the notion of "inland ports"would have seemed almost preposterous. The majority of Asian imports were handled at the vast distribution centers that grew up around the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, through which most Asian goods entered the country. But mounting congestion problems at those ports have led big importers to seek alternatives. And more and more often, those alternatives include distribution hubs that are located far from any coast.
"The real driver is Asian trade," says Rob Harrison, deputy director at the University of Texas's Center for Transportation Research in Arlington. "As soon as that container growth started to occur, that offered the opportunity to develop a rail network of inland-based ports. We're seeing them in all shapes and sizes."
Texas two-step
Historically, North American logistics complexes have grown up around commercial airports. AllianceTexas, for example, sprang up on the acreage surrounding the all-cargo Fort Worth Alliance Airport, which opened in 1989. As global trade boomed, however, it became clear that the real draw was not easy air access, but the complex's considerable intermodal handling capabilities. Along with the industrial airport, the site today boasts access to two rail lines, an intermodal terminal, a Foreign Trade Zone, and an on-site customs station.
Taken together, AllianceTexas's facilities and its proximity to exploding population centers in the South and East proved irresistible to a number of national players. "The thing that really helped Alliance take off was when the boxes started to arrive from Asia and were processed at that site for a very large metropolitan area," says Harrison.
Most of the goods arriving at AllianceTexas today originate in Asia and enter the United States through Los Angeles-Long Beach, where they move by rail (via the Burlington Northern Santa Fe) to the intermodal yard at Alliance. From there, imports can be whisked to nearby DCs, many of which are located right on site. The intermodal yard currently handles about 600,000 lifts per year, but its capacity will be expanded to 1 million lifts within three years.
There were some growing pains in the early years. For example, as business boomed, a labor shortage developed. The complex's developer, Hillman, expanded the development to include affordable housing for workers employed at the site as well as retail stores to serve them. Today, AllianceTexas employs 24,000 full-time workers, and construction of additional housing is under way. The complex is currently only 40 percent built out, leaving plenty of room for expansion.
Cross-town rival
AllianceTexas is about to get some competition from the Dallas Logistics Hub, a 6,000-acre industrial park being developed by the Allen Group. The Dallas Logistics Hub, whose grand opening took place in April, touts itself as the newest and largest industrial logistics park in North America. It is situated adjacent to I-20, the major east-west trucking corridor in the southern United States.
Right now, the centerpiece of the hub is the Union Pacific's 360-acre intermodal facility. Opened in the fall of 2005, the yard currently has a capacity of 360,000 lifts per year, with plans for more. The facility expects to boost capacity to 600,000 lifts per year by the end of 2007.
But the UP may not have the business all to itself for long. Allen Group spokesman Jim Cross says that the Burlington Northern Santa Fe is evaluating the possibility of building an intermodal facility on the west side of the park, which would make the Dallas Logistics Hub the first logistics park in the world to boast two intermodal facilities.
Currently, the complex has just two spec buildings, which it hopes to have leased by the end of the year. At full buildout in 10 to 15 years, the complex is expected to swell to 60 million square feet of distribution, manufacturing, office, and retail space. Up to two-thirds of that total could be distribution centers.
Up to date
Meanwhile to the north,Kansas City is pushing ahead with plans to position itself as a distribution hub. The corridor between Houston and Kansas City is expected to see a population boom of nearly 40 percent in the coming years, which makes it a likely focus for companies seeking to establish DCs close to their customer base.
As with Dallas and Fort Worth, the booming U.S.-Asia trade is contributing to the area's growth. Kansas City officials estimate that more than $9 billion in foreign imports clear U.S. Customs in specialreport Kansas City each year.
The drive to make Kansas City a distribution mecca is already under way. For example, the Allen Group, developer of the Dallas Logistics Hub, has announced plans to build a similar complex in Gardner, Kan., 25 miles southwest of Kansas City. The 1,000-acre logistics complex, to be known as Logistics Park- Kansas City,will be located adjacent to the BNSF intermodal facility.
And KC SmartPort, a six-year-old economic development agency, seems to have been working overtime to attract big box retailers and consumer goods makers to the area. The agency's recent wins include Pacific Sunwear, which is building a 400,000-square-foot facility in Olathe, Kan., and Musician's Friend, which has signed a 10-year lease for a 702,000- square-foot DC in Kansas City. Kimberly Clark is also negotiating to lease a half-million- square-foot facility in the region.
In addition, at least one area developer is taking the "build it and they will come" route. Kessinger/Hunter will build the region's first spec distribution facility, which will measure just under 600,000 square feet, in nearby Olathe.
Shortage on the shores
For all the attention paid to the booming Asian trade, in the end, rising import volumes are only one factor in the growth of inland ports. A severe shortage of land near seaports is also contributing to the trend. In fact, none of the import warehouses being built today are closer than 150 miles to any seaport, according to Arnold Maltz of Arizona State University and Thomas Speh of Miami University in Ohio. Maltz and Speh are the authors of a new research report titled "Import-Driven Warehousing in North America: Challenges and Opportunities." They presented the results of their research at the Warehousing Education and Research Council's annual meeting in April.
Maltz and Speh interviewed managers of 19 warehouses located at 10 of the largest U.S. ports for their study. They found that the steady rise in import volumes has created a critical need for more warehouses at the nation's ports, but that harborside property is hard to come by.
"There's not a port [in the U.S.] with significant space on the waterfront for warehouse development," says Maltz.
Besides serving as storage centers, import warehouses play a vital role in transloading and in breaking down ocean-container loads for redistribution, usually by truck or rail. In some cases, port warehouses also provide value-added services, including repacking and labeling merchandise for final sale.
The researchers also reported that cargo handling efficiency varied dramatically from port to port. The process of offloading ocean cargo and transporting it to a warehouse involves multiple participants: steamship lines, stevedoring companies, freight forwarders, customs brokers, port authorities, terminal operators, longshoremen, drayage companies, warehouses, and rail and highway carriers. Import warehouses are highly dependent on the success of those relationships, all of which affect their ability to conduct business, the study noted. But communications often leave a lot to be desired. "Steamship lines often won't tell them what's coming into a warehouse until after it's off-loaded," says Maltz.
Sorting things out
Right now, the "inland ports" movement is still in the early stages. But if demand for their services starts to grow, importers are likely to begin calling for some changes to current operating procedures. In particular, they might start demanding adjustments in the way in which ships are loaded overseas, says Sara Clark, who wrote a thesis paper on inland ports and is now multimodal transportation planning team leader at Kansas City-based TranSystems, a transportation consulting company.
Today, products are typically loaded onto ships as quickly as possible and in no particular order. But if companies want to offload containers at the port of entry directly onto trains bound for Kansas City or Dallas, that practice will no longer suffice. Instead, the goods will have to be pre-sorted by geographic destination far back in the manufacturing stream.
"I don't know of any ocean liners doing that [pre-sorting] right now, but I think there could be a trend toward that in the future," says Clark. She notes that promoting the practice will be more a question of weaning service providers from entrenched habits than of resources. Labor is both inexpensive and plentiful in foreign ports, and the space is available to expand forwarding operations if pre-sorting becomes commonplace. What's needed now, she says, is for major shippers to step up their demands that products be staged to move directly to their DCs.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."