All jokes aside, you have to marvel at a meal in a bag that can be stored for three years and tossed from a helicopter ... and still beats airline food any day.
Steve Geary is adjunct faculty at the University of Tennessee's Haaslam College of Business and is a lecturer at The Gordon Institute at Tufts University. He is the President of the Supply Chain Visions family of companies, consultancies that work across the government sector. Steve is a contributing editor at DC Velocity, and editor-at-large for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
It's well after noon and our Land Rover is bumping along what used to be a highway, bouncing us against the truck's side walls whenever it hits a deep rut. We're rolling past Iraqi oil fields somewhere near Basra, and it's been a quiet day, insh'allah. The corporal in charge of the squad is doing his best to alleviate the boredom, leading the boys in one country-western song after another, but it's not really working. Part of the problem is that this squad of Scotsmen really can't sing; the other part is that the rumblings in my stomach are getting louder by the minute.
Then I notice a movement that brightens my mood. The private in the corner, Roger, has pulled out his bag of rations, also known as an MRE. (Leave it to the military to never use a word when you can use an acronym. In this case, MRE stands for Meals, Ready to Eat.)
Wedging himself in place, rifle jammed between his arm and the back hatch to keep his hands free, Roger begins laying out the contents of his bag, which is a plastic version of the brown lunch bag you carried to school. It's a typical MRE menu: there's a main course; a starch; crackers with a spread (in this case, peanut butter); a dessert; and a powdered beverage mix.
Roger's mother would be proud: Once he's laid out his food, using his knees as a food prep bench, he offers to share his peanut butter on a biscuit all around. Despite some trepidations, I take the private up on his offer, and nibble on a cracker smeared with peanut butter. To my surprise, I find it really isn't bad.
As I'm discovering, the modern MRE is no longer an assault on the taste buds or an insult to the palate. Introduced in the early '80s as a replacement for the universally reviled C-rations, MREs didn't fare well at first, quickly acquiring the nickname "Meals, Rejected by Everyone." But two decades of product development and field testing have brought about big changes. Mystery meat has given way to chicken fajitas, New England clam chowder, and mango peach applesauce. The menus have been expanded from 12 to 24, and now include kosher and vegetarian selections. Today's versions even come with a cleverly designed "flameless ration heater" to heat up the food.
what's in and what's out
It's time for them to go: Based on warfighter surveys, Natick Labs will be
tweaking its MRE menus this year and next. Don't tell the boys from New
Orleans, but the jambalaya and cajun rice with sausage are out.
Year
Items In
Items Out
MRE XXVII
(24 Menus)
2007 Production
Meatballs w/marinara sauce
Chicken and dumplings
Cornbread stuffing
Fried rice
Skittles: Wild Berry, Tropical
Marble pound cake
Green pepper hot sauce
Seasoning packets (BBQ, pizza)
Apple butter
Chunky peanut butter
Reese's Pieces
Jambalaya
Cajun rice w/sausage
Yellow & wild rice
MRE XXVIII
(24 Menus)
2008 Production
Chicken Pesto Pasta
Lasagna w/vegetables
Granola w/milk & blueberries
Instant vanilla or chocolate pudding
Toaster pastries, chocolate chip & French toast
Chipotle snack bread
Choclettos candy
Twizzler Nibs
Chocolate-covered coffee beans
Patriot cookies
Cheez-Its, hot & spicy
Coffee, Irish cream
Dairy shake, banana/strawberry
Salsa verde
Butter Buds
Splenda packet
Chicken w/cavatelli
Vegetable manicotti
SOURCE: U.S. ARMY SOLDIER RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERING CENTER
Calorie counters
The challenge of feeding troops on the march (or in the field) is as old as war itself. But modern military food science dates back to 1800, when Napoleon Bonaparte offered a 12,000 franc reward to anyone who could devise an effective method of preserving food from spoilage. The winner of Napoleon's prize was Nicholas Appert, who pioneered the use of sealed, airtight bottles. Appert used the money to found the first commercial cannery, the House of Appert.
The U.S. military's modern-day equivalent to the House of Appert is the Combat Feeding Directorate of the U.S. Army's Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center located in Natick, Mass. At the center, commonly known as Natick Labs, food scientists are following in the best Appert traditions, developing non-perishable field rations that will keep warfighters going under heavy physical exertion.
A big part of their challenge is figuring out ways to pack a lot of calories—but not empty calories—into a lightweight package. A full day's ration provides close to 4,000 calories, well above the caloric requirement of the average adult who's not running around a battle zone. (There's a lot of salt and fat in some meals—which is not a problem if you're active, but if you're a sluggish middle-aged guy with a weight problem, you'll want to go easy on the spreads and desserts.) One MRE meal bag provides an average of 1,250 calories. It also provides one-third of the Military Recommended Daily Allowance of protein, carbohydrates, fat, vitamins, and minerals.
The recipes concocted by the Natick staff are executed by suppliers around the United States. Nothing but American cooking for our troops … AmeriQual Packaging in Indiana, SOPAKCO in South Carolina, and the Wornick Co. in Texas. The food is pumped or placed into flexible bags, vacuum sealed, and cooked in large pressure-cookers called retorts. Because it's fully cooked, the food can be eaten straight out of the bag—heated or unheated.
Eat and run …
The challenges of developing MREs go well beyond finding the right recipes. There's also the matter of packaging. As is so often the case, packaging design is heavily dictated by supply chain requirements, which in this instance include the ability to withstand long journeys, extended storage periods, and extreme temperatures. The packages, for example, must weigh less than two pounds, be impervious to insects and rodents, and be able to withstand aerial drops. The food within those packages must be edible for a minimum of three years at 80 degrees Fahrenheit or six months at 100 F (the products' shelf life can be extended through the use of cold storage facilities prior to distribution).
If that sounds like a classic case of military over-specification, consider the conditions under which a shipment of MREs travels to Iraq. The MREs first move halfway around the world in cargo containers. Upon arrival in the Mideast, they may be stockpiled in the desert before being hauled by flatbed truck up the Main Supply Route into Iraq's interior. Combat rations are unlikely to be hauled in reefers, and climate-controlled storage facilities aren't widely available in the battlespace, which explains why the MREs must be able to withstand short-term temperatures of up to 120 F. (They're also designed to remain stable at temperatures as low as -60 F.)
When they arrive at a break-bulk point, the container loads are broken down into pallets, which are forwarded to consuming units. Each shipping pallet contains 48 cases, 12 different meals to a case. If you're moving out on patrol, you just rip open a case, grab an MRE, and drop it into a pouch on your fatigue pants. (MREs are designed to fit in the pockets of military field clothing.)
From the container on down to the individual ration, the product is designed to break down without ever requiring repackaging. The goal is to make sure that the rations can move to the point of consumption with a minimum of friction.
Then there's the "last mile challenge," which takes on new meaning in the military supply chain. When it comes to MREs, final delivery isn't always a matter of rolling up in a truck. Sometimes, troops are operating beyond the lines—think Navy Seals, Army Special Forces, or Marine Recon—which means the last mile may be vertical. For that reason, MREs must be able to withstand aerial delivery. Check the specifications yourself: MREs must be capable of surviving parachute drops from 1,250 feet, and non-parachute drops of 100 feet.
But how does it taste?
Given the depth of the design challenges, it seems downright frivolous to ask whether MREs taste good. But it turns out that the military takes that question very seriously. It has even established a program with a polysyllabic name—the Fielded Individual Ration Improvement Program—whose goal is to make combat food more palatable. The program's mission, according to Natick Labs, is "to improve variety, acceptability, consumption, and nutritional intake of individual combat rations to enhance performance on the battlefield." It carries out that mission through extensive testing and surveys aimed at developing menus that appeal to a warfighter's palate.
Since the program's inception, hundreds of new items have cycled through the MRE menu. Some are "keepers" and remain on the menu to this day. Others have been dropped from the rotation and replaced by more appetizing alternatives. (See sidebar for a look at what's in and out for this year and next.) According to the Natick Labs Web site, "The decisions are based on Warfighter survey results. All changes are 'Warfighter recommended, Warfighter tested, and Warfighter approved.'" This is consumer product development with a vengeance, with all of it tempered by supply chain constraints.
I decide to conduct a focus group of my own: I ask my Scottish friends in the back of the Land Rover what they thought of the MREs. While they all were able to name meals they didn't like, they all could point to some favorites as well. They pronounced MREs as a whole to be "all right." Then again, these guys are from a country that considers haggis to be good food, so I'm not sure how much weight to give their opinion.
But to a supply chain practitioner, the proof isn't really in the pudding; it's in the pudding's arrival at a dusty oil field near Basra in good condition. And by that measure, MREs are a supply chain marvel—particularly when you consider that the folks in Natick have figured out how to do it for around $7.25 a meal, Made in America.
If you want to see for yourself, go to eBay. You're not supposed to be able to, but you'll find them there. Buy a case and take some on your local Boy Scout troop's next camping trip. I guarantee they'll be a big hit.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
DAT Freight & Analytics has acquired Trucker Tools, calling the deal a strategic move designed to combine Trucker Tools' approach to load tracking and carrier sourcing with DAT’s experience providing freight solutions.
Beaverton, Oregon-based DAT operates what it calls the largest truckload freight marketplace and truckload freight data analytics service in North America. Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but DAT is a business unit of the publicly traded, Fortune 1000-company Roper Technologies.
Following the deal, DAT said that brokers will continue to get load visibility and capacity tools for every load they manage, but now with greater resources for an enhanced suite of broker tools. And in turn, carriers will get the same lifestyle features as before—like weigh scales and fuel optimizers—but will also gain access to one of the largest networks of loads, making it easier for carriers to find the loads they want.
Trucker Tools CEO Kary Jablonski praised the deal, saying the firms are aligned in their goals to simplify and enhance the lives of brokers and carriers. “Through our strategic partnership with DAT, we are amplifying this mission on a greater scale, delivering enhanced solutions and transformative insights to our customers. This collaboration unlocks opportunities for speed, efficiency, and innovation for the freight industry. We are thrilled to align with DAT to advance their vision of eliminating uncertainty in the freight industry,” Jablonski said.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.
Declaring that it is furthering its mission to advance supply chain excellence across the globe, the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) today announced the launch of seven new International Roundtables.
The new groups have been established in Mexico City, Monterrey, Guadalajara, Toronto, Panama City, Lisbon, and Sao Paulo. They join CSCMP’s 40 existing roundtables across the U.S. and worldwide, with each one offering a way for members to grow their knowledge and practice professional networking within their state or region. Overall, CSCMP roundtables produce over 200 events per year—such as educational events, networking events, or facility tours—attracting over 6,000 attendees from 3,000 companies worldwide, the group says.
“The launch of these seven Roundtables is a testament to CSCMP’s commitment to advancing supply chain innovation and fostering professional growth globally,” Mark Baxa, President and CEO of CSCMP, said in a release. “By extending our reach into Latin America, Canada and enhancing our European Union presence, and beyond, we’re not just growing our community—we’re strengthening the global supply chain network. This is how we equip the next generation of leaders and continue shaping the future of our industry.”
The new roundtables in Mexico City and Monterrey will be inaugurated in early 2025, following the launch of the Guadalajara Roundtable in 2024, said Javier Zarazua, a leader in CSCMP’s Latin America initiatives.
“As part of our growth strategy, we have signed strategic agreements with The Logistics World, the largest logistics publishing company in Latin America; Tec Monterrey, one of the largest universities in Latin America; and Conalog, the association for Logistics Executives in Mexico,” Zarazua said. “Not only will supply chain and logistics professionals benefit from these strategic agreements, but CSCMP, with our wealth of content, research, and network, will contribute to enhancing the industry not only in Mexico but across Latin America.”
Likewse, the Lisbon Roundtable marks the first such group in Portugal and the 10th in Europe, noted Miguel Serracanta, a CSCMP global ambassador from that nation.