All jokes aside, you have to marvel at a meal in a bag that can be stored for three years and tossed from a helicopter ... and still beats airline food any day.
Steve Geary is adjunct faculty at the University of Tennessee's Haaslam College of Business and is a lecturer at The Gordon Institute at Tufts University. He is the President of the Supply Chain Visions family of companies, consultancies that work across the government sector. Steve is a contributing editor at DC Velocity, and editor-at-large for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
It's well after noon and our Land Rover is bumping along what used to be a highway, bouncing us against the truck's side walls whenever it hits a deep rut. We're rolling past Iraqi oil fields somewhere near Basra, and it's been a quiet day, insh'allah. The corporal in charge of the squad is doing his best to alleviate the boredom, leading the boys in one country-western song after another, but it's not really working. Part of the problem is that this squad of Scotsmen really can't sing; the other part is that the rumblings in my stomach are getting louder by the minute.
Then I notice a movement that brightens my mood. The private in the corner, Roger, has pulled out his bag of rations, also known as an MRE. (Leave it to the military to never use a word when you can use an acronym. In this case, MRE stands for Meals, Ready to Eat.)
Wedging himself in place, rifle jammed between his arm and the back hatch to keep his hands free, Roger begins laying out the contents of his bag, which is a plastic version of the brown lunch bag you carried to school. It's a typical MRE menu: there's a main course; a starch; crackers with a spread (in this case, peanut butter); a dessert; and a powdered beverage mix.
Roger's mother would be proud: Once he's laid out his food, using his knees as a food prep bench, he offers to share his peanut butter on a biscuit all around. Despite some trepidations, I take the private up on his offer, and nibble on a cracker smeared with peanut butter. To my surprise, I find it really isn't bad.
As I'm discovering, the modern MRE is no longer an assault on the taste buds or an insult to the palate. Introduced in the early '80s as a replacement for the universally reviled C-rations, MREs didn't fare well at first, quickly acquiring the nickname "Meals, Rejected by Everyone." But two decades of product development and field testing have brought about big changes. Mystery meat has given way to chicken fajitas, New England clam chowder, and mango peach applesauce. The menus have been expanded from 12 to 24, and now include kosher and vegetarian selections. Today's versions even come with a cleverly designed "flameless ration heater" to heat up the food.
what's in and what's out
It's time for them to go: Based on warfighter surveys, Natick Labs will be
tweaking its MRE menus this year and next. Don't tell the boys from New
Orleans, but the jambalaya and cajun rice with sausage are out.
Year
Items In
Items Out
MRE XXVII
(24 Menus)
2007 Production
Meatballs w/marinara sauce
Chicken and dumplings
Cornbread stuffing
Fried rice
Skittles: Wild Berry, Tropical
Marble pound cake
Green pepper hot sauce
Seasoning packets (BBQ, pizza)
Apple butter
Chunky peanut butter
Reese's Pieces
Jambalaya
Cajun rice w/sausage
Yellow & wild rice
MRE XXVIII
(24 Menus)
2008 Production
Chicken Pesto Pasta
Lasagna w/vegetables
Granola w/milk & blueberries
Instant vanilla or chocolate pudding
Toaster pastries, chocolate chip & French toast
Chipotle snack bread
Choclettos candy
Twizzler Nibs
Chocolate-covered coffee beans
Patriot cookies
Cheez-Its, hot & spicy
Coffee, Irish cream
Dairy shake, banana/strawberry
Salsa verde
Butter Buds
Splenda packet
Chicken w/cavatelli
Vegetable manicotti
SOURCE: U.S. ARMY SOLDIER RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERING CENTER
Calorie counters
The challenge of feeding troops on the march (or in the field) is as old as war itself. But modern military food science dates back to 1800, when Napoleon Bonaparte offered a 12,000 franc reward to anyone who could devise an effective method of preserving food from spoilage. The winner of Napoleon's prize was Nicholas Appert, who pioneered the use of sealed, airtight bottles. Appert used the money to found the first commercial cannery, the House of Appert.
The U.S. military's modern-day equivalent to the House of Appert is the Combat Feeding Directorate of the U.S. Army's Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center located in Natick, Mass. At the center, commonly known as Natick Labs, food scientists are following in the best Appert traditions, developing non-perishable field rations that will keep warfighters going under heavy physical exertion.
A big part of their challenge is figuring out ways to pack a lot of calories—but not empty calories—into a lightweight package. A full day's ration provides close to 4,000 calories, well above the caloric requirement of the average adult who's not running around a battle zone. (There's a lot of salt and fat in some meals—which is not a problem if you're active, but if you're a sluggish middle-aged guy with a weight problem, you'll want to go easy on the spreads and desserts.) One MRE meal bag provides an average of 1,250 calories. It also provides one-third of the Military Recommended Daily Allowance of protein, carbohydrates, fat, vitamins, and minerals.
The recipes concocted by the Natick staff are executed by suppliers around the United States. Nothing but American cooking for our troops … AmeriQual Packaging in Indiana, SOPAKCO in South Carolina, and the Wornick Co. in Texas. The food is pumped or placed into flexible bags, vacuum sealed, and cooked in large pressure-cookers called retorts. Because it's fully cooked, the food can be eaten straight out of the bag—heated or unheated.
Eat and run …
The challenges of developing MREs go well beyond finding the right recipes. There's also the matter of packaging. As is so often the case, packaging design is heavily dictated by supply chain requirements, which in this instance include the ability to withstand long journeys, extended storage periods, and extreme temperatures. The packages, for example, must weigh less than two pounds, be impervious to insects and rodents, and be able to withstand aerial drops. The food within those packages must be edible for a minimum of three years at 80 degrees Fahrenheit or six months at 100 F (the products' shelf life can be extended through the use of cold storage facilities prior to distribution).
If that sounds like a classic case of military over-specification, consider the conditions under which a shipment of MREs travels to Iraq. The MREs first move halfway around the world in cargo containers. Upon arrival in the Mideast, they may be stockpiled in the desert before being hauled by flatbed truck up the Main Supply Route into Iraq's interior. Combat rations are unlikely to be hauled in reefers, and climate-controlled storage facilities aren't widely available in the battlespace, which explains why the MREs must be able to withstand short-term temperatures of up to 120 F. (They're also designed to remain stable at temperatures as low as -60 F.)
When they arrive at a break-bulk point, the container loads are broken down into pallets, which are forwarded to consuming units. Each shipping pallet contains 48 cases, 12 different meals to a case. If you're moving out on patrol, you just rip open a case, grab an MRE, and drop it into a pouch on your fatigue pants. (MREs are designed to fit in the pockets of military field clothing.)
From the container on down to the individual ration, the product is designed to break down without ever requiring repackaging. The goal is to make sure that the rations can move to the point of consumption with a minimum of friction.
Then there's the "last mile challenge," which takes on new meaning in the military supply chain. When it comes to MREs, final delivery isn't always a matter of rolling up in a truck. Sometimes, troops are operating beyond the lines—think Navy Seals, Army Special Forces, or Marine Recon—which means the last mile may be vertical. For that reason, MREs must be able to withstand aerial delivery. Check the specifications yourself: MREs must be capable of surviving parachute drops from 1,250 feet, and non-parachute drops of 100 feet.
But how does it taste?
Given the depth of the design challenges, it seems downright frivolous to ask whether MREs taste good. But it turns out that the military takes that question very seriously. It has even established a program with a polysyllabic name—the Fielded Individual Ration Improvement Program—whose goal is to make combat food more palatable. The program's mission, according to Natick Labs, is "to improve variety, acceptability, consumption, and nutritional intake of individual combat rations to enhance performance on the battlefield." It carries out that mission through extensive testing and surveys aimed at developing menus that appeal to a warfighter's palate.
Since the program's inception, hundreds of new items have cycled through the MRE menu. Some are "keepers" and remain on the menu to this day. Others have been dropped from the rotation and replaced by more appetizing alternatives. (See sidebar for a look at what's in and out for this year and next.) According to the Natick Labs Web site, "The decisions are based on Warfighter survey results. All changes are 'Warfighter recommended, Warfighter tested, and Warfighter approved.'" This is consumer product development with a vengeance, with all of it tempered by supply chain constraints.
I decide to conduct a focus group of my own: I ask my Scottish friends in the back of the Land Rover what they thought of the MREs. While they all were able to name meals they didn't like, they all could point to some favorites as well. They pronounced MREs as a whole to be "all right." Then again, these guys are from a country that considers haggis to be good food, so I'm not sure how much weight to give their opinion.
But to a supply chain practitioner, the proof isn't really in the pudding; it's in the pudding's arrival at a dusty oil field near Basra in good condition. And by that measure, MREs are a supply chain marvel—particularly when you consider that the folks in Natick have figured out how to do it for around $7.25 a meal, Made in America.
If you want to see for yourself, go to eBay. You're not supposed to be able to, but you'll find them there. Buy a case and take some on your local Boy Scout troop's next camping trip. I guarantee they'll be a big hit.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.