Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
Once regarded as a souless back-office function, supply chain management has emerged as one of the hottest fields in American busi- ness. Thought leaders and industry gurus point to the supply chain as a pow- erful competitive differentiator, while corporate titans like Wal-Mart, Dell, and Toyota brandish their supply chain capabilities like swords. Given the climate of the times, it's no wonder the executive suite has finally woken up to the value of the supply chain.
For evidence of the profession's growing stature, you need look no farther than DC VELOCITY's 2007 Salary Survey. The median salary for the 876 survey respon- dents was $90,000, with the mode (or most frequent response) being $100,000.
The mean or average salary came in even higher at $140,533. This number, however, may be skewed by the 11 people who reported earning over $1 million. All of these millionaires were senior vice presidents, corporate officers, or presidents at companies with more than 5,000 employees.
Given DC VELOCITY's diverse readership, it's no surprise the responses ran the gamut, ranging from over $4 million to $23,000. But there were plenty of responses that fell between these two extremes—a little more than half of all respondents earn between $75,000 and $149,000.
Logistics and supply chain professionals' salaries appear to be on a par with those of their peers in other parts of the organization. Purchasing professionals, for example, earn $78,470 a year, according to a recent survey by the Institute for Supply Management (a similar survey conducted by Purchasing magazine put the number at $83,205). IT professionals and accountants earn salaries in that range as well. Janco Associates Inc.'s 2007 IT Salary Survey reports a median salary of $78,652 for IT professionals. The Institute of Management Accountants' 2005 salary survey put its members' median salary at $91,823.
DC VELOCITY readers also indicated that their salaries have, for the most part, increased from last year, although not significantly. According to the results, 78 percent of survey respondents saw their salary increase. (Another 17 percent say their salary remained the same, and 5 percent say it decreased.) Of that 78 percent, however, 66 percent say that their salary increased by 5 percent or less.
Other signs of respect
Salary size is not the only indicator of logistics and supply chain management's growing stature. Some 69 percent of respondents say that over the past three years, the number of functions that they manage has increased, while only 5 percent say it has decreased. The remaining 26 percent say there has been no change.
Furthermore, 54 percent report that they have direct or indirect management control or influence over the typically broad and strategic area of supply chain management. With this broad reach comes more money. The survey results show that those who have control or influence over supply chain management earned more than those who did not. Those in supply chain management had a median salary of $100,000 and an average salary of $183,026. Those not involved in supply chain management had a median salary of $80,000 and an average salary of $90,197.
That's not to say that DC VELOCITY readers have abandoned their traditional distribution focus; 61 percent of readers have influence or control over logistics management, and 69 percent have influence or control over warehouse/distribution center management.
Of course, what they're called has a lot to do with what respondents earn as well. Exhibit 1 shows median and average salaries salary by number of years at companyby title. As the table illustrates, when it comes to median salaries, the average senior vice president earns more than 2.5 times the salary of the average supervisor.
Does experience count?
The fast-changing nature of supply chain management—and the information technology that supports it—would seem to favor younger managers. The survey results, however, indicate that the picture is slightly more complex.
If you look at median salary by age (see Exhibit 2), the results indicate that after 45, the median salary increases only gradually with age. (There does seem to be a leap in salary after the age of 60, but the sample size for this group is small, with only 38 respondents.) Even this slight age advantage disappears if you adjust for title. Exhibit 2 also shows the median salary for managers (who represent the largest group of respondents). As the table shows, there's little correlation between the age of a manager and median pay. Likewise companies seem to value an employee's experience in a logistics-related job only up to a point. After 15 years of experience in logistics-related jobs, median salaries rise only slightly for all respondents and actually drop for those whose title is manager (see Exhibit 3).
However, if you look at average salary, it's a different story. Across all titles, average salary grows significantly as the age of the respondents goes up. The significant difference between median and average salaries after the age of 56 indicates that there may be a few people in these age groups in high-level positions who are earning very large salaries. In fact, nine of the top 10 earners are over the age of 56 and all are over the age of 45. This discrepancy is not seen with managers. Just as with the median salaries, average salary drops after age 45, until respondents reach the age of 60, when the average rises to $93,182. (The sample size for this age category, however, is only 11 respondents.)
Average salaries for all respondents also continue to grow substantially as the employee's number of years in logistics increases. Again of the top 10 earners, all had more than 15 years of experience. Salaries for managers also rose steadily until they reached around 20 years of experience. Then the rate of increase levels out, rising only 1.2 percent from the average for those with 16-20 years of experience to the average for those with more than 25 years of experience.
In short, title is much more important than experience when it comes to salary. However, a high percentage of those perched on the top rungs of the corporate ladder are in their 50s and early 60s and have over 15 years of experience in logistics. This result implies that experience is a factor in who gets promoted or hired to those highly compensated upper management positions.
What about number of years at the current company? The survey results showed no clear connection between loyalty to the company and salary. Across all titles, average salary rises steadily as the years of service at the company increase—or at least up to 25 years (see Exhibit 4). Median salary, however, shows no predictable pattern, with salaries rising for the first 15 years of service, holding steady from years 16-20, then jumping up at year 21, only to fall back down again after 25 years of service. Similarly, there seems to be no clear correlation between number of years of service at the current company and the average or median salaries for managers.
What accounts for higher pay?
We also took a look at some other key factors with the potential to affect pay—education level, location, size of the company, and gender—to see how they correlated with salary. The clearest results are for education level. As the level of education increases, so do the average and median levels of pay (see Exhibit 5). Interestingly, even those readers whose education ended with a high school diploma (26 percent of all survey respondents) are still earning high salaries, with a median salary of $72,000 and an average salary of $86,597.
Working in New England can also bump up the pay you receive. Based on both median and average salary, DC VELOCITY readers in New England earn more, on average, than their peers in other regions of the continental United States (see Exhibit 6). This proves true even if you hold the position constant, as is seen by looking at the median or average salaries for managers. In most other regions of the continental United States—the West, Middle Atlantic, South, and Midwest— salaries remained pretty much consistent, although average salaries in the Southeast lagged slightly behind the rest.
Size of company can also have an impact on pay. Average and median salaries generally tended to rise by number of total employees both for all respondents and for managers (Exhibit 7). The one exception is companies with 501-1,000 employees, where median salaries for managers dipped.
A look at the results broken down by gender yielded some interesting findings (see Exhibit 8). Women make up roughly 10 percent of all survey respondents; yet they earned five of the top 10 salaries reported in the survey. As a result, when you look at average salary, women seem to be earning significantly more than men— $303,695 vs. $112,691. Median salary, however, tends to be less susceptible to outliers. These figures show women earning significantly less than men—$70,000 vs. $91,500. In fact, if you look only at the manager level, it's clear that the average female manager doesn't earn as much as her male counterpart. Female managers earn a median salary of $60,000 and an average salary of $65,774, while male managers earn a median salary of $75,104 and an average salary of $80,225.
No matter what your gender, education level, location, or level of experience, one thing remains consistent: Logistics is a lucrative field. And as recognition of the strategic role of logistics and the supply chain grows, compensation is likely to follow suit.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.