It's hard enough to manage a private fleet these days, with fuel costs soaring and drivers in short supply. Now private fleet managers are being asked to take on an additional task: orchestrating complex transportation solutions involving company-owned fleets, third-party contract carriage, and for-hire carriers.
Called "collaborative logistics," these initiatives are designed to provide companies with the best overall mix of cost effectiveness and customer service. And they go well beyond the traditional search for backhauls, says Garry Petty, president and CEO of the National Private Truck Council (NPTC). Petty describes collaborative logistics as more of a matrix that integrates the various components of transportation into an integrated whole.
What does that mean for fleet managers? The short answer is additional responsibility. Under a collaborative logistics strategy, the fleet manager is responsible for developing the right mix, making the company's equipment and service requirements clear to third parties, and monitoring the performance of contract and for-hire carriers to make sure they adhere to the private fleet's standards. "It's almost like fleet managers are symphony conductors, orchestrating the best transportation solution," notes Tom Moore, NPTC's vice president of public affairs.
The NPTC is doing a couple of things to help its members cope with the new demands. First, it has organized an educational session that will address some of the challenges involved. Titled "Collaborative Logistics and the Private Fleet— It's Not Just About Backhaul Anymore!," the program will be presented at the group's annual meeting, which takes place from April 29 to May 1 at the Indiana Convention Center in Indianapolis.
The NPTC is also launching a new service for members seeking outside partners for some of their transportation needs or looking to offer their own services to others. Called Member Match, it is essentially an online clearinghouse to help members match available capacity with other members' transportation requirements. Petty expects that private fleet managers will embrace the service because of the confidence they have in their peers' high standards for drivers, equipment, and customer service. And there should be ample capacity: The group's most recent benchmarking survey shows that fleets average about 25 percent of their miles running empty.
The fleet's growing reach
In fact, Petty says that kind of collaboration is already starting to happen. He estimates that 40 percent of NPTC members make use of dedicated contract carriage to some extent.
Dave Belter, group director of transportation management for Ryder, confirms that his company is seeing more requests for dedicated contract carriage and says it stands ready to meet those demands. "It all starts with logistics engineering," he says. "When we look at transportation management, we look across a customer's portfolio—his DCs, private fleet, contract carriage, maybe a combination of both."
Moore believes the new emphasis on outside service is partly a reflection of a changing business environment. "In the past, there used to be more competition," he says. "Now, there's more synergy. You walk into a fleet operation, and the dispatcher for the dedicated carrier sits next to the dispatcher for the private fleet. It is critical to their success that they blend in the different elements."
Still, that's not to suggest that private fleets are being phased out. Petty reports that as a result of a capacity crunch in the truckload sector in recent years (capacity did loosen up a bit last year), some companies that had been considering abandoning their private fleets have instead strengthened them. In many cases, he says, the crisis made them realize how heavily they rely on fast, dependable transportation service. "Getting product to market is as important to shareholder value as the product itself," he says.
All things to all people
Results of the group's most recent benchmarking survey bear Petty's observations out. In fact, a full 85 percent of the respondents to the NPTC's 2006 benchmarking survey say they expect their private fleets to handle more freight—not less—in coming years.
At the same time, it appears they're expanding their activities well beyond their traditional function of hauling outbound freight. The benchmarking survey indicates that while moving outbound freight remains the fleets' primary role, a majority of respondents also use their fleets for interplant movements and to move goods from plant to DC.
But they aren't necessarily doing it alone, says Olen Hunter, director of sales for Paccar Leasing Co., which operates 30,000 vehicles—primarily for private fleets—in the United States and Canada. Though he acknowledges that plenty of companies expanded their private fleets during the capacity crunch, he says the trend has started to taper off. "We're seeing a little bit of a change in the business right now while trucking tonnage is down," he says. With for-hire carriers willing to take on more business, he adds, private fleet managers are not making significant expansions to their fleets.
Hunter also notes that recent regulatory changes have given Paccar's business a boost. He points to new environmental rules affecting truck engines (which took effect in January) as an example."Our customers are saying they need to have truck fleets to serve internal or external functions, but they do not want to be in the business of hiring and training technicians, buying tools, or EPA compliance," he says. Belter sees another explanation as well.With a private fleet, he says, "you want to drive utilization to 85 percent if you can.Where you cannot get that, you can start to balance the cost and service tradeoff with a for-hire solution."
Belter notes that in some cases, these collaborative solutions go well beyond filling the transportation gaps to include areas like reverse logistics and even network design. He cites the case of a consumer products company that developed a solution that involved for-hire inbound transportation, a DC with a cross dock operation, and dedicated carriage for delivery to customers. The key to the arrangement was the establishment of the DC, he says."The enabling component was being able to establish a physical facility to flow product across."
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."