Need to get RFID-ready in a hurry? Hiring someone to set up a "slap and ship" operation may sound like a good idea. But it's probably not good business.
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
Chris Shult shudders when customers approach him looking for a quick money's-no-object fix for their radio-frequency technology needs. Though he's sometimes tempted to take the easy money, Shult, who is president of Babush Material Handling Systems, says he can't do that in good conscience. He knows that's not in his customers' best interests. They may not want to hear it, he says, but what customers need to do is step back to assess their long-term RFID and material handling needs before they decide on a solution.
"We're seeing people starting to realize that they can't just slap and ship," says Shult, referring to the practice of applying RFID tags to goods just prior to shipping (as opposed to integrating them into an earlier stage of the order fulfillment process). "It's just not a good long-term solution. You'll regret it down the road."
The reason Shult can even make that statement today is that the worlds of everyday material handling and RFID technology are already beginning to converge. In an effort to integrate RFID deeper into their distribution center operations, manufacturers are starting to outfit conveyors, sortation equipment, printers and even forklift trucks with RFID scanners and antennae. The idea is that instead of simply slapping tags on outbound shipments to meet a retailer's mandate, shippers can use the data harvested by the systems to streamline their own operations.
"At the case level what you'll see in 2005 is companies starting to incorporate higher levels of automation in applying RFID tags," says Matt Ream, senior manager of RFID Systems at Zebra Technologies. "In the long term I fully believe that RFID as an enabling technology will impact the way distribution centers operate and how things move through the supply chain. We'll start to see higher levels of automation, with more use of equipment like automatic storage and retrieval solutions. You'll never extract all the value out of RFID without fundamental process changes."
Ream reports that he's starting to see Zebra's customers move beyond slap and ship as they shift to automated print and apply solutions. Automated print and apply solutions allow shippers to meet mandates from Wal-Mart and other retailers without the added labor that manual slap and ship operations require.
Pimp my ride!
In the end, however, it may be the humble lift truck that provides the long-awaited RFID breakthrough, offering users a way to achieve that legendarily elusive return on their RFID investments. That's because the hottest ride on the DC floor these days isn't a forklift tricked out with a shiny new shock impact monitor—it's the truck outfitted with its own RFID tag reader. If that sounds like science fiction, it's not. These trucks are already in use in pilot programs; and they're already saving their users money.
Genco Supply Chain Solutions, for example, has been using RFID-enabled lift trucks as part of a pilot program for some months now. In a partnership with Sears and Intermec, Genco has shipped more than 35,000 pallets with near-perfect read rates. Buoyed by the pilot's success, Genco, which provides third-party logistics services, is preparing for a full rollout of the technology at its 208,000-square-foot distribution center in McDonough, Ga., later this year.
"We've totally abandoned pOréals," says Pete Rector, senior vice president of strategic initiatives for Genco, referring to dock door stations equipped with scanners that read RFID tags as outbound shipments pass through. "We'll only put in a pOréal if we have to." Rector says the mobile RFID system has the advantage over the traditional pOréal in several ways. For one thing, it promotes accuracy—RFID-enabled forklifts alert their drivers if they attempt to load an item onto the wrong truck. For another, it's cheaper— Genco believes that outfitting a one-million-square-foot facility with mobile RFID equipment will cost some $250,000 less than setting up pOréals. With pOréals, Genco estimates, it would pay about $6,000 per door to RFID-enable 160 dock doors. By contrast, outfitting approximately 60 lift trucks will only cost it about $8,000 per truck. Furthermore, Rector believes Genco will need fewer forklift trucks at each DC.
Given the potential savings, it's no surprise that mobile RFID has caught Wal-Mart's eye. At its test lab in Bentonville, Ark., the mega-retailer is currently testing an RFID-enabled forklift that would read tags on pallets and transmit data through a wireless network to a warehouse management system, which sends data on inventory to other business applications.
Others are likely to follow suit. Several top 100 Wal-Mart suppliers are said to be considering dismantling their dock door pOréals in favor of mobile solutions. And Dick Sorenson, director of product management for LXE, reports that his customers are starting to ask for forklift based solutions. LXE has partnered with Intel and Sirit to produce forklift-mounted RFID data collection solutions for use in warehousing and distribution. The company expects to begin marketing these solutions during the fourth quarter.
"A lot of these companies are starting to look beyond slap and ship for a way to take advantage of RFID in their internal operations," says Sorenson. "Not surprisingly, as soon as you push back from the dock door, most everything gets moved on forklifts, so we've had lots of interest from our customers in finding a forklift solution. The real goal is to get the operator out of the business of data collection. The real potential of RFID ... is to automate the data collection process and [free up] the forklift driver to [concentrate on moving] products."
Going mobile
The folks at International Paper certainly hope the RFID-enabled forklift trend catches on. The company has developed and rolled out what it says is the first commercially available radio-frequency identification forklift through its Smart Packaging business unit. "We now offer the forklift as a product line extension for use with palletized products. The forklift reads electronic product code (EPC) pallet tags and tracks every warehouse product movement," says Scott Andersen, technical director for International Paper's Smart Packaging business. "Our forklift solution combines the use of RFID to identify the pallet's contents with the use of RFID and other proprietary technologies to monitor and report the location and condition of the forklift in real time."
The company says the solution will work for any customer and offers a cheaper alternative to warehouse RFID deployments. The mobile forklift solutions, it says, will help customers increase their inventory accuracy, reduce lost shipments and improve their overall supply chain operations. Mobile RFID will also eliminate the need for RFID pOréals at every dock door, saving thousands of dollars. The solution is able to identify and track products on board the forklift from loading to unloading. With an automated shipping and receiving process, forklift operators can focus on driving the trucks instead of manually scanning bar codes. And despite early doubts about the accuracy of RFID read rates, that apparently hasn't been a problem here. IP reports that its RFID lift-truck solution has successfully captured 5 million EPC reads in its nearly two-year commercial existence.
Will RFID-equipped forklifts someday become mainstream? LXE's Sorenson believes they will, assuming companies can be weaned from slap and ship. "As companies move beyond pure compliance operations," he says, "it becomes evident that a robust, reliable implementation for forklift-based operations is required."
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."