the view from C level: interview with D. Beatty D'Alessandro
The question of how logistics is viewed in the boardroom has been the subject of endless speculation.We asked one prominent CFO, and what he told us may surprise you.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Even D. Beatty D'Alessandro admits that the prevailing view in boardrooms across America is that logistics just happens. But D'Alessandro, who is CFO of $5 billion industrial distributor Graybar, knows better. Although he has never worked in logistics, he became intimately familiar with the workings of the company's supply chain a few years back while heading up a major IT initiative. Over a three-year period, D'Alessandro (who was then CIO) oversaw the company's transition from a hodgepodge of legacy systems to an enterprise-wide SAP platform. During one stage of the project, D'Alessandro and his team re-engineered the company's logistics planning and forecasting processes—an experience that left him with a whole new respect for the discipline.
Today, D'Alessandro is senior vice president and chief financial officer of Graybar, a Fortune 500 distributor of components, equipment and materials for the electrical and telecommunications industries. As CFO, he is responsible for the treasury, accounting, technology, tax and internal audit operations. During his two-year tenure as CFO, Graybar has increased its revenues by over 20 percent, cut its debt in half and nearly doubled its earnings, largely through use of technology.
D'Alessandro, who has a bachelor of science degree as well as an MBA from the University of South Florida in Tampa, is also a veteran of numerous executive education training programs. Today, he serves not only on Graybar's board of directors but also on the boards of Junior Achievement's Mississippi Valley Chapter and the United Missouri Bank of St. Louis. He has served as chairman of the National Association of Wholesalers' Large Distributor CIO Committee and as a member of the advisory boards for SAP and SBC. He has also published several articles on the role of technology in distribution.
D'Alessandro met recently with DC VELOCITY Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald to offer his take on the logistics and supply chain operations at Graybar.
Q: Tell us a little about Graybar.
A: Graybar is a multi-billion dollar distributor of products that are used primarily by companies in the construction industry as well as by electrical and data communications contractors. These products end up installed in new construction and remodeled industrial plants and other types of facilities around the country. We are primarily a North American distributor. We have been in the business over 100 years and are one of the largest employee-owned companies in the United States.
Q: You said billion with a "B," right?
A: Yes. Five billion dollars. We should finish 2006 at just about five billion dollars in sales.
Q: Are you one of the largest companies in your marketplace?
A: We would be number one, two or three—certainly somewhere in the top three.
Q: Tell us about your background. How did you come to be where you are today?
A: Well, I'll tell you, it has been an interesting route. I started with Graybar over 20 years ago in their financial manager training program down in Florida. I spent 10 years bouncing between the company's locations in Florida with essentially commercial credit functional responsibility—making sure that Graybar's interests were covered and that our sales grew and grew profitably over time. Then about 13 years ago, I had the opportunity to come up to our corporate office in St. Louis, where I spent some time managing the company's national account and banking relationships, then went out and spent some time in one of our business units as the CFO for the Midwest division. I came back into the corporate office to run strategy in mergers and acquisitions. One of the projects I was very involved in dealt with our information technology systems. The systems we had in place were custom built back in the 1980s. The CEO and the board of directors wanted us to take the company to a much higher level in terms of IT.
Q: This was roughly four years ago?
A: It started in 2001. It was quite a project. The question seemed simple enough: "What should we do about systems?" We came up with a recommendation, and the board said, "You guys are so smart, why don't you go do it?" So I ended up running what was at the time the largest acknowledged project of its kind in the distributor marketplace, I think maybe globally, but certainly in North America.
Q: How big was it?
A: Well, we spent about $100 million over a three-year period to totally reprocess and re-engineer the company, using software as the catalyst for that process. Ultimately after 1,375 days, we finished with our project on Oct. 11, 2004. Shortly after that, our CEO called to tell me that the CFO was planning to retire and asked me to assume that role. So today, technology reports through my office as does the treasury group, which handles all of our lending and borrowing; the accounting group; the audit group; and the tax group.
Q: Among logistics and supply chain professionals, a topic of endless speculation is how their function is viewed in the boardroom. Drawing on your perspective as a former CIO, a current CFO and a current member of the board, how do you see Graybar's logistics operation?
A: I think it is a key and critical element of what we offer in the market. The ability to determine what products to stock, where and in what quantities, and how to get those products to those places so they land on the shelf just days before, or even seconds before, they're handed off to the customer—it's fundamental to what we do and who we are. In my mind, the guys who do logistics right are the winners. The ones who do it wrong are absolutely going to lose. They are not going to be able to grow their sales without controlling the tremendous capital requirements necessary in the holding of inventory. The two biggest assets a company can have are not things like factories, patents, distribution centers and power plants. They are receivables and inventory. If we don't manage those correctly, we are not going to win in our marketplace.
Q: Do you see it as a competitive differentiator—at least in the sense that you endeavor to do it better than your competitors do?
A: Three words: Absolutely. Absolutely. Absolutely.
Q: How do you measure that?
A: What we measure—on a monthly basis, and often on a daily basis—is the movement in our sales as compared to the movement in our inventory and other working capital assets, like our receivables. So as we see sales go up by 10 percent, we would be displeased to see that our inventory went up by 20 percent—that would indicate we were overinvesting in inventory. The measurement is the relationship, in my mind, of the growth of the business with the growth of working capital assets. What we have been able to enjoy this year and last year, quite frankly, is significant growth in sales and a less than percent for percent increase in working capital assets and particularly in our inventory. I think it is because we have better tools deployed and better methods deployed, and because our folks have really absorbed and begun to understand and use those tools better than ever.
Q: What is the title, if you know it, of the highest-ranking logistics or supply chain executive at Graybar?
A: Well, I would hope I would know, because I am a peer. We have a senior vice president of operations, who is responsible for the inventory of the company, the placement of the inventory, and the placement of the facility that owns the inventory and all the transportation pieces of getting that product out to the customers.
Q: Do you interact with that person on a regular basis?
A: Daily, sometimes hourly. He's a great guy and he's got a very tough job.
Q: How many distribution centers does Graybar operate?
A: We have about 220 branch locations. We have, I think at last count, eight zoned mega-distribution centers. A typical branch is typically 30,000 to 40,000 square feet of warehouse with delivery capabilities, customer service capabilities, and a small business support office. On top of that, we have these national zones that are really for our "C" and "D" types of items that wouldn't make sense for us to stock at the local branches. With a product set like ours—wire and conduit and other electrical and networking types of products—your pounds-per-dollar costs are quite high. That is, you might have 20 pounds worth of product that costs four dollars, so it's key and critical that you flow the material as close to the customer as you can on the first pass. You can't do this all out of Omaha, Neb. You've got to do it in St. Petersburg, Fla., as well as Orlando, Fla., as well as Fresno, Calif. You've got to flow the products from the factory right down to almost the final spot of consumption so the weight-to-dollar ratio is not out of whack. If you don't do that, you end up with transportation costs that will totally negate your profitability on the orders. In our business, having local presences is totally critical. The backup piece, the national zone, is really for the oddball items, the items that are not demanded in large quantities or are not demanded very often. So the model really is a branch-based model with support from zones.
Q: When you say "C" and "D" products, you mean what?
A: Those would be products that sell once a month in a location or once every other month in a location or once every six months in a location vs. every day and every week, which would be your "As" and "Bs."
Q: It sounds like you're shipping everything from heavy freight to small electrical parts. I assume you use a variety of transportation modes?
A: Yes, we rely on a combination of transportation resources. For our inbound freight, the factories that we buy our products from—our suppliers—typically pick the mode of shipping to our locations, be they branches or zones. With very few exceptions, it is their decision as to who they are going to use and how it comes in. It comes in by truckload, it comes in by LTL, and it comes in by parcel carrier in some cases, but that is their determination. Once the merchandise arrives at one of our locations, it goes back out the door in one of four ways: The customer can come and pick it up from us. We can ship it out to the customer on our own truck. We can ship it to the customer by lessthan-truckload carrier. Or we can ship it out by UPS, FedEx or one of the other expedited service providers. We base that decision on what the customer needs.
Q: Let's talk a bit about technology. Can you point to any emerging technologies that you think might change the game as it relates to logistics and supply chain?
A: We certainly think that RFID has had a significant and very beneficial effect on our business. I guess my overall comment would be that we see non-integrative planning and forecasting methodologies as technologies of the past, and fully integrative planning and forecasting systems as technologies of the future. We certainly went from a stand-alone forecasting module into a suddenly integrated world. We think it has paid dividends and continues to pay dividends. Ultimately, large successful distributors are going to make those kinds of investments. We believe this. And we put our money where our mouth is and did it.
Q: A $100 million investment certainly does say a lot.
A: We spent a lot. We knew from the outset that technology was going to be the secret sauce.
Q: Any closing thoughts to share with the logistics and supply chain professionals who read DC VELOCITY?
A: They have one of the hardest jobs in America. I think that from the viewpoint of the executive suite and certainly from the financial suite, logistics just happens. When something's needed, these people make some decisions and the material arrives at the right place at the right time. There isn't much understanding there. I can tell you from my point of view, having had the opportunity to work as we built the logistics planning and forecasting mechanisms that this company runs, logistics doesn't just happen. There are a million decisions. There is a ton of hard work. Logistics is a lot of blood, sweat and tears, and when you get it wrong, it kills the company.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."