A firm delivery date isn't enough anymore. Today's customers also want their orders delivered at a specified time. Here are 10 tips for meeting their demands without breaking the bank.
Martha Spizziri has been a writer and editor for more than 30 years. She spent 11 years at Logistics Management and was web editor at Modern Materials Handling magazine for five years, starting with the website's launch in 1996. She has long experience in developing and managing Web-based products.
It's every distribution manager's nightmare: A man escorting an urgent international shipment boards a FedEx plane on Christmas Eve. Somewhere over the Pacific, the plane crashes, and the packages are delivered late. Four years late.
The story that unfolds around Tom Hanks' character in "Cast Away" may be an extreme example of a time-definite delivery gone wrong. And it is only a movie. But deliveries get snarled in real life too. Most of the time, the holdups are not the result of plane crashes or hurricanes (though Ted Scherck, president of the Atlanta-based consulting firm The Colography Group, says you can count on one major supply chain disrup tion a year). Instead, they arise from more mundane— and more preventable—causes, like paperwork errors, miscommunication and simple lack of follow-through.
Those minor errors can have major repercussions. For one, there's the risk of angering customers. The appeal of time-definite service lies in its predictability—the promise of delivery at a specified time or within a specific time window. (Though often confused with express service, time-definite service may also include deferred service.) A customer that has lined up a receiving crew for Thursday is bound to be unhappy if the shipment doesn't show up until Friday. For another, there's the risk of financial penalties. These might be fines or detention charges levied against shippers for unnecessary holdups or delays. They can also include overspending by shippers who make poor service choices (for example, using overnight service for a non-urgent shipment).
The good news is that most of the more common mistakes are also easily avoided—in most cases, it just takes some effort and a little common sense. Here are some tips:
1. Avoid overbuying. Paying for overnight service when you only need second-day seems an obvious waste of money. Yet shippers across the country continue to use premium service as a sort of default option. "A lot of premium freight goes premium less because it needed to be expedited than because someone didn't have the freight decision rules to make the right mode and carrier selection," says Randy Garber, a vice president at the consulting firm A.T. Kearney.
Determining the right mode and carrier starts with some basic information gathering, says Jon Petticrew of ODW Logistics Inc. in Columbus, Ohio. "I always want to know what the service requirement is," says Petticrew, who is the company's vice president of operations. At a minimum, that includes the shipment's size, its weight, its origin and destination, and when it's needed.
On that last point, it's worthwhile asking whether there's some flexibility in the delivery time. If there is, the carrier may be able to save you a lot of money, says Sean O'Neil, director of time-critical services for trucker Averitt Express. "We might say 'We can get it there at noon for $2,000, but if you can make it 5: 00, I can knock it down to $1,200.'"
For similar reasons, it's also worth checking to see if there's some leeway in the choice of equipment. Jeff Curry, vice president of corporate development for expedited trucking company Express-1 Inc. in Buchanan, Mich., says one of the most common errors he sees is shippers requesting a dock-high truck when the freight might easily have been hauled in a smaller, less costly truck.
2. Avoid underbuying. Many companies don't realize it, but underbuying—that is, settling for a lower service level than you actually need—can be just as costly as overbuying. Though shippers are often reluctant to use premium-priced time-critical service, it could actually save them money. Before you rule out time-critical service, says Phil Corwin, director of marketing for UPS Supply Chain Solutions, ask yourself this question: "What are the penalties to the customer—the one who's actually manifesting the shipment and the final one?" When you add up the penalties, he says, you may find they far outweigh the premium service's added cost. Corwin cites the example of an automaker that had received several truckloads of floormat fabric that proved to be substandard. For that automaker, he says, chartering an aircraft to deliver new materials proved cheaper than shutting down the production line.
Shippers are particularly likely to confront these kinds of dilemmas during peak shipping season, adds Chuck DeLutis, vice president of new business development and special services for Roadway Express Inc. That's when they're liable to run into delays caused by port congestion or capacity shortages, he explains, leaving them to weigh the cost of premium transportation against the risks of not having a hot-selling item in stores on time. "It's important that customers understand the tradeoffs," he says, "as well as the impact of those tradeoffs."
3. Keep an open mind when choosing a mode. A few decades ago, decisions involving time-sensitive freight were simple. If it was urgent, you used air. If it wasn't, you went with a truck.
But the old rules don't always apply today. Take expedited shipments, for example. "With the great improvements in LTL and the faster transit times, you don't always need [air freight]," says Petticrew of ODW Logistics. Over the years, carriers have been extending their next-day delivery areas, he explains. "It used to be 300, 400, 500 miles," he says. "Now it's 600 or 700 miles in some cases."
Nor can you safely assume that trucking is the cheaper way to go. There are times when air service beats truck on price, says Tim Hindes, director of ground expedited services for forwarder Eagle Global Logistics (EGL). Hindes explains that with a smaller shipment of, say, 100 pounds, sending the freight on the next flight out could be more economical than shipping ground expedited.
4. Resist the temptation to estimate. "Quite often a shipper won't take the time to get the exact dimensions [of the freight]," observes Curry of Express-1. "They'll round them or guess, and that can end up costing them money." There are a couple of reasons for that, he says. "They could get the wrong size truck—they'd be charged more for a larger truck. Or maybe [the carrier will] send in a truck that's too small and they'll be unable to [take] the shipment."
5. Pay attention to packaging. When you go to determine a load's dimensions, don't forget to take packaging into account—particularly if the shipment is going by air. Many airlines have size restrictions, warns Frank Perri, executive vice president at Pilot Airfreight. If you load a shipment on a 4- by 4- by 4-foot standard skid, for example, it probably won't fit in a narrow-body passenger plane, leaving all-cargo service as your only option. Cargo-only airlines use wide-body aircraft, so size won't be a problem, but you can expect a much higher bill. "[A shipment will go for] about a third the cost if it can move on a commercial airline vs. cargo-only," Perri explains. These restrictions apply primarily to flights in the continental United States, he notes. Most overseas flights are on widebody planes—although that's starting to change.
6. Coordinate with the people on the receiving end. It's not enough to get a time-definite shipment out the door on schedule; you also have to confirm the delivery arrangements with the people on the other end. Yet many times, shippers fail to follow through with this simple task. Curry of Express-1 says he sees it all the time: "[The shipper] hasn't really checked on the other end of the shipment— their address, when they're open, when they're closed, when they're really ready for the freight." That's a risky practice, he says. Sooner or later, something goes wrong, the trucker gets delayed and the shipper is hit with detention charges.
Even something as simple as obtaining the exact dock and gate number in advance can go a long way toward cutting down on delays, Curry adds. "Sometimes with larger plants there are multiple gates and even multiple buildings within the same town," he explains. "It's real important to get that truck exactly where it's going or you may get additional stop-off charges of $50 to $100 per stop."
Shippers should also be aware that customers occasionally drop the ball when it comes to notifying their own warehouses of an incoming shipment. "There continues to be a disconnect between the buyer, who might have a certain delivery requirement, and the warehouse—when it has slots available," says Sean Monahan, a vice president at A.T. Kearney. The customer might want the shipment there on Tuesday afternoon, but then when the shipper calls the warehouse, the warehouse will say "The first appointment is Wednesday morning." So the carrier will arrive on time for the appointment, but it's still late as far as the customer is concerned. "A lot of companies are wrestling with how they can close that gap," he says.
7. Get all the facts when you negotiate rates. After you've agreed on a per-mile rate, ask the carrier how it calculates mileage. If you don't, you could be in for a nasty surprise when you receive the final bill. "We get a lot of shippers that get excited about receiving what they think is a low rate, but … the carrier's mileage platform [software] may calculate a higher number of miles," explains Express1's Curry. Mileage platforms are updated constantly as roads are added, closed and renovated, so if the software's not up to date, it could be generating unnecessarily long routes.
8. Avoid squeezing carriers on price. Soaring fuel, insurance and equipment costs have taken a toll on truckers in recent years. At the same time, rampant industry consolidation has left trucks in short supply. In a climate where the truckers have the upper hand, shippers' attempts to drive a hard bargain could backfire. If you're only willing to pay $1.25 a mile and someone else is paying $2 a mile, warns Monahan, "your driver might not show up for your load."
9. Check your shipping documents; then check them again. Errors on shipping documents almost guarantee delays. To avoid costly holdups, prepare the shipment's paperwork in advance and make sure it's complete and accurate (particularly for international shipments and shipments for which you can't risk even an hour's delay). If there are several different documents, make sure the data are consistent. "We see a lot of problems with incorrect paperwork or [documents] that contradict each other— say, with different product codes," says Corwin of UPS Supply Chain Solutions.
10. Be open with your carriers. When it comes to communicating with carriers, there's no such thing as too much information. The more details about a shipper's business a carrier can get, the better it can serve that customer, says Pilot Airfreight's Perri. "It's always helpful for us to see how they package their materials [and find out] where they'll be picked up, what time things will be ready for pickup, and what time they'll call in [to notify us] that they're ready for pickup." Any reports or spreadsheets with historical data the shipper can provide will be helpful as well, he adds.
Perri notes that communications among the various players in the airfreight industry have improved in recent years. He credits the new security regulations, which have made collaboration between shippers and forwarders a necessity. "One of the nicest things that has come about is that shippers are working with us much more closely than they have in the past on things like packaging," notes Perri. "[Shippers have] a better understanding … of some of the challenges we face … [and] how to reduce costs in the supply chain and improve service at the same time." And that's the kind of understanding that can bring about a moviestyle happy ending for any shipment.
Editor's Note: Other sources who contributed to the development of this story, but were not mentioned in the text, include Chris Monica, Eagle Global Logistics; Virginia Albanese, FedEx Custom Critical; Steve Fisher, Kendall Jackson Wine Estates; Chris Caplice, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Peter Butler, Sky West; Richard Murphy, Murphy Warehousing; Rob Lively, Mach 1 Air Services; and Bill Villalon, APL Logistics.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."