Steve Geary is adjunct faculty at the University of Tennessee's Haaslam College of Business and is a lecturer at The Gordon Institute at Tufts University. He is the President of the Supply Chain Visions family of companies, consultancies that work across the government sector. Steve is a contributing editor at DC Velocity, and editor-at-large for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Your company has just asked you to look at building a new DC. Never mind the reason— it could be a push to reduce overall transportation costs, boost inventory velocity, or accommodate business growth.
Before you stick a pin in the map and begin contacting the local chambers of commerce about available sites in industrial parks, you need to pause and reflect on the network implications. Today, supply chains span the globe. Third-party logistics companies are ubiquitous, customers are fluid, and markets can shift in the blink of an eye. You need a robust network, not a perfect site. Although the boss has told you to look into New Jersey, the optimal location from the standpoint of network transportation flows and customer service could require that the next DC be built in Pennsylvania, Maryland or Virginia—even as far away as Georgia. Put another way—you have to think about what works best for the network, not the node.
Think big picture
Nowadays site selection begins with network design. In the past, companies would choose a new warehouse location to serve a specific territory or even a single big customer, but that's just not our world anymore. Markets and customers shift rapidly. Business across the globe runs at a faster clock speed. And change has become constant.
Start the network design process by examining how existing facilities currently meet customer requirements. Does the existing warehouse (or group of warehouses) have the ability to ship to key customers within their delivery timetables at an economical cost? If you're constantly forced to make expedited shipments or if there are no other low-cost transportation options available, then take this opportunity to find a location that might lower your freight spending. Your warehouse location should take advantage of multiple modes of transportation to preserve flexibility in shipping and to promote carrier competition.
Next factor in how the business will be growing in the next five years. Take into account any long-term plans that might alter the mix of products and the concomitant impact on shipping method and delivery as well as storage requirements. For instance, if your company plans to market more products overseas or source more goods and components from international suppliers, then your new DC will require proximity to an international gateway like a seaport or major airport.
Don't just focus on your own operation, however. Be sure to give some thought to what your customers or suppliers are doing. You don't want to add a new warehouse to lower transportation costs only to find that your customers will be expecting deliveries in another region of the country or even the globe.
Keep in mind that the one-size-fits-all approach isn't the only approach when it comes to warehousing. If your company has a range of products and some call for specific storage requirements, say cold storage, then it might be worth designating the new warehouse to carry just this one product line for all customers nationwide. That way, special equipment could be limited to one facility and the training and resources to handle that equipment confined to one workforce.
In looking ahead, it's important to think about reverse logistics. Maybe the new warehouse should be the designated returns facility that handles all goods being sent back to the distribution center regardless of origin. Setting up a warehouse for special handling or, as discussed earlier, to hold special products may change the anticipated locale for the new warehouse and the network design.
Of course, all those considerations beg the question: Are your current warehouses in the right location? If outbound or inbound flows are imbalanced, causing strain on one facility or higher transportation spends from current locations, then the chance to construct a new warehouse may be your opportunity to correct design flaws in the network.
Finally, give some thought to what the competitors are doing. If the new warehouse will merely match a competitor's system, it might be worth assembling your solution in a way to make the value proposition of your distribution network more unique. Can the new warehouse be the place that handles special packaging requirements, for instance? Or can it be the site for light or final assembly?
Use software tools
Once you've drawn up a list of considerations, use modeling software to determine the optimal geographic location for the new warehouse. There are a number of easy-to-use software applications on the market for what-if scenarios and analysis. These packages allow supply chain professionals to approach site selection in the context of ongoing network design, rather than a one-time, one-off decision.
According to the Boston-based research firm AMR, some of the vendors that offer these types of applications are LogicTools, PeopleSoft, i2 Technologies, Insight, Logility, Manugistics, Optiant and SSA (the old CAPS product). There are also site selection consultants and warehouse facility design firms in the marketplace who bring the appropriate software to bear as a part of their service. Whether you buy the software yourself or utilize it from another party, solve the network problem, and then think about the specifics of site selection.
Once you've picked a locale for the warehouse, then it's time to employ all the traditional tenets of site selection. Conduct an initial screening of the targeted area and draw up a list of possible sites. Nothing beats first-hand reconnaissance. Do site visits, but maintain a low profile. Be sure to check out zoning and other legal requirements to ensure that the building can be constructed or retrofitted to meet your space and power needs. Investigate the local labor rates. Make sure the site offers the infrastructure to meet transportation requirements; if you want to make rail or intermodal shipments, the building must have a rail spur nearby. Don't forget to look at traffic flows and congestion, which is becoming a bigger impediment to shipping every year. Once the homework is done, narrow the list of possible sites. Finally, negotiate with local officials to gain incentives or tax breaks for a facility that will become an area employer.
Network design savings
When done properly, network design can yield significant savings and provide a competitive advantage for the company. Digital storage products maker Imation reconfigured its distribution network to meet its retail customers' increasing demands for unique packaging, promotional items and value packs. Today, Imation is reportedly offering more than 7,500 product options while achieving a 30-percent point increase in customer service and a 20-percent decrease in inventories. That shows the power of a network distribution approach.
Given the potential gains and savings from employing a network design approach to site selection, any company considering the addition of one or more distribution centers should undertake a thorough review of the distribution system implications with an eye toward savings and improvements. Bricks and mortar are just an anchor, so make sure that you're dropping anchor in the right place. Finally, a network design approach on your part shows senior management that you're a strategic thinker. Do it right, and you will be heard in the boardroom.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.