Steve Geary is adjunct faculty at the University of Tennessee's Haaslam College of Business and is a lecturer at The Gordon Institute at Tufts University. He is the President of the Supply Chain Visions family of companies, consultancies that work across the government sector. Steve is a contributing editor at DC Velocity, and editor-at-large for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Your company has just asked you to look at building a new DC. Never mind the reason— it could be a push to reduce overall transportation costs, boost inventory velocity, or accommodate business growth.
Before you stick a pin in the map and begin contacting the local chambers of commerce about available sites in industrial parks, you need to pause and reflect on the network implications. Today, supply chains span the globe. Third-party logistics companies are ubiquitous, customers are fluid, and markets can shift in the blink of an eye. You need a robust network, not a perfect site. Although the boss has told you to look into New Jersey, the optimal location from the standpoint of network transportation flows and customer service could require that the next DC be built in Pennsylvania, Maryland or Virginia—even as far away as Georgia. Put another way—you have to think about what works best for the network, not the node.
Think big picture
Nowadays site selection begins with network design. In the past, companies would choose a new warehouse location to serve a specific territory or even a single big customer, but that's just not our world anymore. Markets and customers shift rapidly. Business across the globe runs at a faster clock speed. And change has become constant.
Start the network design process by examining how existing facilities currently meet customer requirements. Does the existing warehouse (or group of warehouses) have the ability to ship to key customers within their delivery timetables at an economical cost? If you're constantly forced to make expedited shipments or if there are no other low-cost transportation options available, then take this opportunity to find a location that might lower your freight spending. Your warehouse location should take advantage of multiple modes of transportation to preserve flexibility in shipping and to promote carrier competition.
Next factor in how the business will be growing in the next five years. Take into account any long-term plans that might alter the mix of products and the concomitant impact on shipping method and delivery as well as storage requirements. For instance, if your company plans to market more products overseas or source more goods and components from international suppliers, then your new DC will require proximity to an international gateway like a seaport or major airport.
Don't just focus on your own operation, however. Be sure to give some thought to what your customers or suppliers are doing. You don't want to add a new warehouse to lower transportation costs only to find that your customers will be expecting deliveries in another region of the country or even the globe.
Keep in mind that the one-size-fits-all approach isn't the only approach when it comes to warehousing. If your company has a range of products and some call for specific storage requirements, say cold storage, then it might be worth designating the new warehouse to carry just this one product line for all customers nationwide. That way, special equipment could be limited to one facility and the training and resources to handle that equipment confined to one workforce.
In looking ahead, it's important to think about reverse logistics. Maybe the new warehouse should be the designated returns facility that handles all goods being sent back to the distribution center regardless of origin. Setting up a warehouse for special handling or, as discussed earlier, to hold special products may change the anticipated locale for the new warehouse and the network design.
Of course, all those considerations beg the question: Are your current warehouses in the right location? If outbound or inbound flows are imbalanced, causing strain on one facility or higher transportation spends from current locations, then the chance to construct a new warehouse may be your opportunity to correct design flaws in the network.
Finally, give some thought to what the competitors are doing. If the new warehouse will merely match a competitor's system, it might be worth assembling your solution in a way to make the value proposition of your distribution network more unique. Can the new warehouse be the place that handles special packaging requirements, for instance? Or can it be the site for light or final assembly?
Use software tools
Once you've drawn up a list of considerations, use modeling software to determine the optimal geographic location for the new warehouse. There are a number of easy-to-use software applications on the market for what-if scenarios and analysis. These packages allow supply chain professionals to approach site selection in the context of ongoing network design, rather than a one-time, one-off decision.
According to the Boston-based research firm AMR, some of the vendors that offer these types of applications are LogicTools, PeopleSoft, i2 Technologies, Insight, Logility, Manugistics, Optiant and SSA (the old CAPS product). There are also site selection consultants and warehouse facility design firms in the marketplace who bring the appropriate software to bear as a part of their service. Whether you buy the software yourself or utilize it from another party, solve the network problem, and then think about the specifics of site selection.
Once you've picked a locale for the warehouse, then it's time to employ all the traditional tenets of site selection. Conduct an initial screening of the targeted area and draw up a list of possible sites. Nothing beats first-hand reconnaissance. Do site visits, but maintain a low profile. Be sure to check out zoning and other legal requirements to ensure that the building can be constructed or retrofitted to meet your space and power needs. Investigate the local labor rates. Make sure the site offers the infrastructure to meet transportation requirements; if you want to make rail or intermodal shipments, the building must have a rail spur nearby. Don't forget to look at traffic flows and congestion, which is becoming a bigger impediment to shipping every year. Once the homework is done, narrow the list of possible sites. Finally, negotiate with local officials to gain incentives or tax breaks for a facility that will become an area employer.
Network design savings
When done properly, network design can yield significant savings and provide a competitive advantage for the company. Digital storage products maker Imation reconfigured its distribution network to meet its retail customers' increasing demands for unique packaging, promotional items and value packs. Today, Imation is reportedly offering more than 7,500 product options while achieving a 30-percent point increase in customer service and a 20-percent decrease in inventories. That shows the power of a network distribution approach.
Given the potential gains and savings from employing a network design approach to site selection, any company considering the addition of one or more distribution centers should undertake a thorough review of the distribution system implications with an eye toward savings and improvements. Bricks and mortar are just an anchor, so make sure that you're dropping anchor in the right place. Finally, a network design approach on your part shows senior management that you're a strategic thinker. Do it right, and you will be heard in the boardroom.
Women in supply chain tech don’t always have it easy. That’s particularly true when it comes to building a career in the male-dominated field, where they may face gender bias, limited advancement opportunities, and a lack of mentorship and support.
“Across many professional industries, women have made strides in breaking down barriers; however, supply chain and digital technology are two sectors that are often seen as being male-dominated,” Stephan de Barse, o9’s chief revenue officer, said in a release. “Through the o9 Minerva community, we aim to elevate the incredible knowledge, drive, and experiences of women working in the supply chain space.”
The new group will host networking events and panel discussions that feature expert guidance from “Minerva Ambassadors,” high-ranking professionals who will discuss their career paths and experiences within the supply chain and digital tech space. During the events, Minerva Ambassadors will also address key career advancement challenges, such as gender disparity, access to mentorship and sponsorship opportunities, and the opportunity for more diversity in leadership roles.
“As a supply chain risk management (SCRM) expert and Minerva Ambassador, I am excited to share my own professional journey alongside fellow supply chain leaders and speak to some of the unique challenges that women face as they advance their careers,” Lara Pedrini, global head of sales at risk-management tech company Exiger, said. “I am committed to the advancement of women in the workplace and digital tech, and look forward to discussing ways to close the gender gap for women in STEM fields and foster more inclusive corporate policies and work environments where women can thrive.”
Some of Americans’ favorite condiments include ketchup, salsa, barbecue sauce, and sriracha. Toppings like marinara and pizza sauce are popular as well. The common denominator here is the tomato, and food producers need many tons of them to make these and other tasty products.
One of those producers is Red Gold, an Elwood, Indiana, company whose brands include Red Gold, Redpack, Tuttorosso, Sacramento, Vine Ripe, and Huy Fong. The company works with more than 30 family-owned Midwestern farms to source sustainably managed crops.
In the 80 years since its founding, Red Gold has grown to become the largest privately held manufacturer of tomato products in the U.S., with 23 different product categories and nearly 400 combinations of flavors and cuts. Today, it serves both the grocery market and institutional customers like schools and hospitals.
But a food supply chain of this scale can be expensive to operate. So Red Gold recently launched an initiative to modernize its logistics processes with an eye toward boosting efficiency and increasing resilience while also cutting costs.
The timing was right for such a project. Freight rates in the trucking sector have been depressed for nearly two years, giving the company a rare opportunity to invest some of its savings into process improvements, the company said. “The current transportation market is extremely shipper-friendly and has been for the past 18 months,” James Posipanka, Red Gold’s supply chain manager–logistics, said in a press release. “Now is the time for us to plan and prepare for when it swings the other way and carriers can choose which customers they want to work with. When that happens, we want to be a ‘Shipper of Choice.’ By putting strategies and processes in place now, we’ll be successful when the market does flip.”
STEP-BY-STEP SAVINGS
For help streamlining its processes, the company turned to Loadsmart, a Chicago-based logistics technology developer that specializes in helping clients optimize freight spend, increase efficiency, and enhance service quality. Step by step, Red Gold began implementing three of Loadsmart’s technologies and digital services, moving to the next phase only after it had realized a return on its investment in the previous one.
First, Red Gold implemented Opendock, Loadsmart’s online dock-scheduling platform. That move alone saved thousands of hours of staff time by eliminating the need to make carrier pickup appointments via phone and email. Today, 100% of the carriers that do business at Red Gold’s facilities book their appointments through Opendock—which amounts to some 60,000 appointments annually. Among other benefits, the new platform has drastically reduced the amount of time it takes for a carrier to book an appointment—with Opendock, appointments are scheduled one to two days out instead of 10 or more.
Second, the company installed Loadsmart’s ShipperGuide TMS, a transportation management and request-for-proposal (RFP) management system. The platform helps Red Gold avoid spreadsheets and administrative work. For example, instead of individually emailing RFPs to a few carriers, the company can now send RFPs through the TMS to many more carriers than was feasible in the past and easily compare the rates carriers submit in response. In addition, Red Gold was able to automate some 70% of its load tenders, or about 25,000 shipments, which allowed the company to reduce headcount without any interruptions in workflow.
Third, Red Gold began working with Loadsmart’s digital freight brokerage team to convert some of its full truckload movements to partial truckloads. That move expanded both its carrier base and its freight mode options, saving it $200,000 annually.
All in all, since it began using Loadsmart’s technology and services, Red Gold has reduced appointment leadtimes by 90% and saved 17% on annual LTL freight costs, according to the two companies. Red Gold is so pleased with those results that its logistics team has already begun working with the technology vendor on additional opportunities for improvement.
With that money, qualified ports intend to buy over 1,500 units of cargo handling equipment, 1,000 drayage trucks, 10 locomotives, and 20 vessels, as well as shore power systems, battery-electric and hydrogen vehicle charging and fueling infrastructure, and solar power generation.
For example, funds going to the Port of Los Angeles include a $412 million grant to support its goal of achieving 100% zero-emission (ZE) terminal operations by 2030. And following the award, the Port and its private sector partners will match the EPA grant with an additional $236 million, bringing the total new investment in ZE programs at the Port of Los Angeles to $644 million. According to the Port of Los Angeles, the combined new funding will go toward purchasing nearly 425 pieces of battery electric, human-operated ZE cargo-handling equipment, installing 300 new ZE charging ports and other related infrastructure, and deploying 250 ZE drayage trucks. The grant will also provide for $50 million for a community-led ZE grant program, workforce development, and related engagement activities.
And the Port of Oakland received $322 million through the grant, which will generate a total of nearly $500 million when combined with port and local partner contributions. Altogether, that total will be the largest-ever amount of federal funding for a Bay Area program aimed at cutting emissions from seaport cargo operations. The grant will finance 663 pieces of zero-emissions equipment which includes 475 drayage trucks and 188 pieces of cargo handling equipment.
Likewise, the Port of Virginia said its $380 million in new funding will help to reach its goal of eliminating all greenhouse gas emissions by 2040. The grant money will be used to buy and install electric assets and equipment while retiring legacy equipment powered by engines that burn gasoline or diesel fuel.
According to AAPA, those awards will demonstrate to Congress that the Clean Ports Program should become permanent with annual appropriations. Otherwise, they would soon cease to be funded as backing from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) comes to a close, AAPA said. “From the earliest stages of legislative development in Congress, America’s ports have been ecstatic about and committed to the vision of implementing a novel grant program for the port industry that will complement and strengthen existing plans to diversify how we power our ports,” Cary Davis, AAPA’s president and CEO, said in a release. “These grant funding awards will usher in a cleaner and more resilient future for our ports and national transportation system. We thank our champions in Congress and the Biden-Harris Administration for committing to us and we look forward to working closely with our Federal Government partners to get these funds quickly deployed and put to work.”
The majority of American consumers (86%) plan to reduce their holiday shopping budgets this year, with nearly half (47%) expecting to cut spending by more than 50% compared to last year, according to consumer research from Relex Solutions.
The forecast runs against some other studies that predict the upcoming holiday shopping season will be a stronger than last year, with higher sales and earlier shopping than 2023.
But Finland-based Relex says its conclusion is based on the shorter holiday shopping period of 27 days in 2024 (five days shorter than 2023), combined with economic volatility and supply chain disruptions. The research includes survey responses from 1,000 U.S. consumers in October 2024.
According to Relex, those results reveal a complex landscape where price sensitivity and decreased brand loyalty are reshaping traditional retail dynamics. That means retailers and manufacturers must carefully balance promotional strategies with profitability while maintaining product availability, since consumers are actively seeking better value and may switch between brands more readily.
"Retailers are facing a highly challenging season, with consumers prioritizing value more than ever. To succeed, retailers must not only offer attractive promotions but also ensure those deals don’t erode their margins. At the same time, manufacturers need to optimize their operations and collaborate with retailers to deliver value without sacrificing profitability," Madhav Durbha, Relex’ group vice president of CPG and Manufacturing, said in a release. The company says it provides a supply chain and retail planning platform that optimizes demand, merchandising, supply chain, operations, and production planning.
"This holiday season represents a critical juncture for the retail industry," Durbha added. "With reduced brand loyalty and a shorter shopping window, there’s no room for error. Retailers and manufacturers need to work together closely, leveraging AI-powered tools to anticipate demand, manage inventory, and run effective promotions," Durbha said.
In additional findings, the survey found:
Brand loyalty is eroding: About 45% of consumers say they're less likely to remain loyal to brands without meaningful discounts, while 41% will switch brands if faced with both poor deals and out-of-stock products.
Digital channels dominate deal-seeking behavior: Store and brand apps (60%) and email promotions (60%) are the primary channels for finding deals, while only 32% of consumers primarily search for deals in physical stores.
Supply chain concerns remain significant: Nearly 85% of shoppers express concern about potential disruptions, with electronics (60%) and clothing/accessories (57%) being the categories of highest concern.
Age significantly impacts shopping behavior: Consumers from age 45-60 show the highest economic sensitivity, with 60% cutting budgets by more than 50%, while shoppers aged 18-29 prioritize product availability over price.
Electric yard truck provider Outrider plans to scale up its autonomous yard operations in 2025 thanks to $62 million in fresh venture capital funding, the Colorado-based firm said.
The expansion in 2025 will be focused on distribution center applications, but Outrider says its technology is also well-suited for use in intermodal rail and port terminals, paving the way for future applications across freight transportation.
“Outrider’s proprietary safety systems; consistent, predictable movement through complex and chaotic environments; and patented robotic-arm-based system for trailer air and electric line connections have allowed us to stay far ahead of any competition," Bob Hall, Chief Operating Officer at Outrider, said in a release.
The “series D” round was led by Koch Disruptive Technologies (KDT) and New Enterprise Associates (NEA), with additional investments from 8VC, ARK Invest, B37 Ventures, FM Capital, Interwoven Ventures, NVentures (NVIDIA’s venture capital arm), and Prologis Ventures. Other investors joining the Series D financing are Goose Capital; Lineage Ventures, the investment strategy of Lineage, Inc.; Presidio Ventures, the venture capital arm of Sumitomo Corporation; and Service Provider Capital. In total , the new backing brings the company to over $250 million in equity capital raised to date.