Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
It's not a new concept, the idea that the ability to control assets, inventory and events depends on the ability to see them.
But capability has only recently begun to catch up with the concept. As a result, a broad range of technological tools designed to enhance "visibility and control" have become available in the last couple of years.
ARC Advisory Group, a research consultancy that closely follows supply chain developments, considers logistics visibility and control to be an offshoot of supply chain event management solutions.
In 2004, an ARC study reported that the visibility and control market had grown "briskly" since 2000
and now represented a significant growth opportunity.
ARC divides the technology into tools to control four categories of processes: supply side, demand
side, global trade visibility, and reverse and service logistics. Another category, mobile asset management, could be added to that list, and, in the case of tracking trailers or containers, is closely related
to tracking inventory. The range is wide enough that the term "visibility and control" can mean something as local as managing mobile assets in the distribution center or as far-reaching as access to inventory scattered among carriers and vendors across the globe.
Visibility enables control
Razat Gaurav, vice president of i2's Transportation and Distribution Group, uses the broader definition. "Visibility and control extends across the entire supply chain and all the different time horizons,"
he says. As he sees it, visibility is an essential part of order life-cycle management and becomes more
important as international supply chains become more complex. "Visibility is not an end in itself," he
explains. "It is not a silver bullet but it is important in enabling the management of risk and uncertainty that is inherent in supply chains."
Gaurav cites the example of a retailer sourcing in China and the risks associated with long international supply chains. "They create a replenishment plan, and there is a certain schedule around that," he says. "As they are executing, the supplier may have some delays in the production process, or there may be delays in delivery. Or worse yet, the products could get stuck during customs clearance. Maybe the carrier picking up the merchandise was late and missed a voyage. There are all kinds of possibilities, a lot of things that can go wrong beyond your physical control. Where you don't have direct control over the fulfillment cycle, visibility becomes a key enabler in managing that uncertainty." That is, knowing when things go awry allows you to take action to mitigate the effects of delays. That could include steps like notifying a DC about the status of an expected shipment or arranging for expedited delivery to avoid an out-of-stock.
That's not to suggest that implementing the technology will be easy. Obtaining visibility across the supply chain implies the use of systems and tools that can cut across enterprises. That can pose problems in organizations where the different functions don't communicate well with each other or with their trading partners. "You have to have an architecture that allows connectivity within the enterprise and among business partners," Gaurav says. Furthermore, he adds, visibility systems have to have a way to synchronize data across multiple enterprises no easy task in an environment where the same SKU can have several names or numbers and where some partners operate with purchase order (PO) numbers and others with bills of lading. "Different entities in the supply chain and groups in the organization need different kinds of information, depending on their position," he says. "The buying organization is worried about the PO; transportation cares about the container and shipment IDs. You need to be able to manage both and give visibility for both entities and give them information appropriate for their role."
Assets on the move
Gaurav says the same is true for managing mobile assets, like trailers and containers, both to follow the inventory they hold and for managing how those assets are utilized. "The whole concept of asset utilization can become very powerful," he says. "That requires visibility."
Mike Hammonds is CEO of Argo Tracker, a company that offers both cellular and satellite-based asset tracking devices for trailers and containers. He says logistics executives are looking to visibility tools for multiple reasons. First, they want to keep tabs on assets in transit in order to prevent loss and boost worker productivity. "The first reason for purchasing the service is short-term return on investment (ROI), addressing shrinkage caused by theft, damage or spoilage or to get a reduction in insurance premiums," he says. For carriers, especially those moving international shipments, tracking also helps them comply with government regulations.
Then there's the matter of the goods inside the containers. "Inventory accountability of commercial containers is a huge issue," Hammonds notes.
In addition, fleet managers often look to tracking technology to make better use of their assets. Having good visibility into how assets move can help enable better scheduling and route analysis, Hammond suggests.
Carriers that have made use of visibility tools agree. UniGroup, parent company of Mayflower Transit and United Van Lines, has begun deploying the Global Locating System offered by SkyBitz across its own fleet as well as its 850 agents' trailer fleets. The system, which allows the company to track trailer location even when trailers are not tethered to tractors, replaces a tractor-based system that UniGroup had been using for about 12 years. "We decided to try tracking where the clients' goods are in the trailer," says Gene Elkins, the company's vice president of operations support.
The company is still in the early stages of deploying the SkyBitz technology, with about 400 installations complete, but it's serious about getting it installed across all its managed fleets. It has mandated installation of the equipment in all trailers by the end of 2008, Elkins says. "We want complete visibility into our capacity and our ability to order capacity."
Getting the goods on inventory
Elkins adds that the tracking capability is becoming increasingly important to the carriers' high-value goods customers, whose shipments can be worth millions of dollars. Some demand location updates as often as every 15 minutes. Others, like the government (which recently hired the carrier to move sensitive goods), require realtime on-demand tracking capability, he says.
"Just in the 90 days since we started installation, we've had instances where clients [have become aware of] the technology and have asked us to do something special for them," he says. Those include such services as the 15-minute polling or tracking to assure shipments are meeting schedules. The latter application allows customers that are shipping equipment that needs installation support at destination to schedule technicians to meet the vehicle.
Elkins says he expects the technology to enable UniGroup and its agents to improve fleet utilization. "In household goods, May to September is when our capacity is stretched. We know we have latent availability within our capacity and this gets us to identify where the capacity is and where it's going, and we can match it with orders." That's especially important, he says, for the carriers' special products line of business, where customers often want to tender freight for same-day shipping. "Visibility allows us to respond to those client needs very quickly," he says.
As truckload carrier Texas Freight's operations supervisor, Frank Ngu says he has quickly seen benefits from the visibility system the carrier purchased from Argo Tracker.
The carrier, which has about 160 trailers and 70 drivers, is primarily a regional hauler, but does send trucks on longer hauls on occasion. He tells the story of one driver who was confused on California highways. "We could tell from here that he had passed his exit," Ngu says. Using the Argo Tracker system, dispatchers in Texas were able to direct the driver back on route.
"This [tracking technology] gives us advantages from an operations standpoint," he says. "It gives us some kind of grasp of where our equipment is. At the same time, it gives us a sense of security. If we see a tractor moving in the wrong direction, we are able to flag that and, if something does happen, notify law enforcement."
Central control
Asset tracking and management systems can also be used to keep tabs on wireless tools in the DC managing, updating and, if necessary, shutting down mobile assets such as handheld scanners from a remote location. For example, Saddle Creek, a third-party logistics company that specializes in contract and public warehousing and transportation, recently deployed software called Avalanche, developed by Wavelink, to manage its mobile assets. The company, which operates 20 warehouses around the country, makes extensive use of radio-frequency devices in about half those facilities.
Kathy Fulton, manager of technical services for Saddle Creek, says the company bought the software to reduce the amount of time the information systems people spent worrying about each piece of equipment. The company has some 200 mobile devices throughout its warehouses, including handhelds, vehicle-mounted units, and wrist-mounted computers. Fulton says the goal was to find a tool to manage all those centrally. "We wanted to get them to talk to our warehouse management system (WMS) and to keep them all synchronized with appropriate information. One way to do that is centrally so we don't have to train people in the field.When we need to do something, we can rapidly deploy it."
The software allows Saddle Creek managers at the Lakeland, Fla., headquarters to track the devices' whereabouts, send software updates directly to the equipment, and even shut down the devices if necessary. Previously, each piece of equipment had to be updated individually. "We would have to touch every device to configure it," Fulton says. That operation took 20 to 45 minutes per device.
The Wavelink technology, by contrast, allows quick configurations, keeping employees productive, says Trista Otto, manager of process improvement for Saddle Creek. Otto adds that another advantage of the software is that it can be used across all of the various WMS systems the company has in place.
Fulton adds, "One of the things we like is that it is agnostic from the WMS perspective and from a hardware perspective. We could switch devices tomorrow and it wouldn't matter."
Given the potential scale of visibility and control projects, any implementation has to begin with some fairly precise definition of what's needed and the setting of priorities. Gaurav says, "You have to take a phased, value-driven approach to a visibility initiative. You cannot attack all of it at once."
Gaurav believes the use of visibility and control tools for supply chain applications is still in its early stages, with some companies well ahead of others. Hammonds agrees, saying the business is in its infancy.
But more businesses are looking to such tools. "What is happening is that the need and awareness are getting compounded by supply chains' becoming more global," Gaurav says. "You are no longer working with a supplier in Kentucky, but a supplier in China. The need for synchronization becomes greater the more variable the lead times, the greater the uncertainly, and the more parties involved.
visibility and security
Visibility and control tools have gained traction in the supply chain management community, where they're being used to track assets and manage inventory as it moves around the globe. But some users are starting to deploy the technology for security applications as well. "If you can help operations and help give security, that's fantastic," says Matt Schor, director of homeland security solutions for WhereNet Corp. WhereNet provides logistics visibility and control tools for the wireless tracking and management of assets.
Schor cites as an example investment in RFID technology by the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. "They were looking for a solution to process third-party trucks and also meet Coast Guard requirements for a portwide security plan," he says. The technology adopted by the ports allows users to locate containers by the exact parking spot, he says.
Schor, a specialist in security issues, predicts that the next big push will be container security. "What people are worried about is the nuclear threat," he says. That is, the greatest fear is that terrorists will attempt to smuggle a nuclear device into the United States in an international shipping container. The deterrent would be some form of screening for radioactive material.
One of the technologies expected to emerge in the next year or two is what's known as "long dwell detection in transit," which will require radiation detectors on containers, rather than at screening points at ports. Those detectors, Schor says, would monitor for certain dosages of radioactivity, much like the badges worn by X-ray technicians to warn of an overdose. Schor says the detectors have an advantage over screening at ports because they have several days, rather than a few seconds, to pick up a signal. And though he admits that adding detectors to millions of containers would be costly, he argues that the expense should be viewed in the context of the billions of dollars already being spent on security.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."