The "perfect order," low-cost warehousing software from Asia, the impact of volatile oil prices on the supply chain ... name a topic and there was probably a workshop, lecture or panel discussion about it at this year's conference of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) in San Antonio, Texas. When they weren't out on facility tours or networking in the halls, conference goers could choose from a list of 160 educational sessions held during the four-day event. Here's a brief look at some of the highlights:
Yesterday, today and tomorrow
In a talk titled "Supply Chain Management—Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow," Dr. Donald Bowersox shared his thoughts on what's ahead for the supply chain. The future will see the emergence of many-to-many connections between trading partners in supply chain networks, resulting in a challenging environment for business, said Bowersox, who recently retired from his post as a professor at Michigan State University. (At the conference, Bowersox was honored for a lifetime of service to the group he helped found in 1962.)
As for technology, Bowersox predicted that the second generation of the Internet will bring about the creation of information models that will enable supply chain professionals to "see everything at one time." Companies will have to rethink their traditional notion of procurement in the demand-driven 21st century with its rapid product lifecycles.
Despite those impending changes, Bowersox urged industry organizations not to abandon their emphasis on what he called "the ABCs of logistics," which he termed critical to companies' efforts to meet those new demands. "Remember, logistics is not supply chain," he told his audience. "It's part of the supply chain."
Don't be afraid to fail
In his keynote address, Steven Levitt, co-author of the best-selling book Freakonomics, warned that corporate America's aversion to experimentation is hampering American business. "Corporations are reluctant to experiment even though it would show them how to be successful," Levitt told the more than 3,200 conference attendees.
A University of Chicago economics professor, Levitt gained prominence with the publication of his book (co-written with Stephen Dubnet). In that book, he argues that many apparent mysteries of contemporary America could be illuminated if people were only willing to ask the right questions and draw the connections.
Levitt told his CSCMP audience that corporations should pursue multiple paths and experiment to find the answers to business problems. He added that corporations are reluctant to follow his advice because that means that top executives "don't know the answers."
The wolf at the door
What more appropriate place than Texas to discuss the impact of oil prices on supply chains? In one of the more thought-provoking sessions, a prominent logistics executive warned that the end of the era of cheap oil will force companies to rethink their supply chains. "Today's supply chains run on cheap, available fossil fuels," asserted Charles L. "Chuck" Taylor, who now heads the consulting firm Awake in Smithville, Texas. But those supplies won't last forever. Based on a methodology developed by the late Shell Oil geologist M. King Hubbert, world oil production is projected to peak between now and 2015. In the '50s, Hubbert correctly predicted that U.S. oil production would peak in 1970.
During a panel discussion on the impact of rising energy costs on the supply chain, Lawrence Lapide, a research director at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Center for Transportation and Logistics, agreed with Taylor that cheap oil has supported such supply chain practices as Just-In-Time and offshore manufacturing. In all those cases, Lapide pointed out, companies use speedy shipments to meet customer demand while keeping inventories low. "There will be oil, but the question is at what price," he said. "Less energy-intense supply chains would be the right direction now."
In order to form a more perfect order ...
What passed for "perfect" yesterday may no longer qualify tomorrow, at least in the grocery distribution channel. Donald "Dee" Biggs, director of customer logistics at Welch Foods Inc., told his audience that a grocery industry committee has redefined the "perfect order," expanding the list of measures used to assess order fulfillment performance to seven from four. Representatives from Wegmans, Meijer, Pfizer, Land O' Lakes and Welch Foods participated on the committee, which was jointly sponsored by the Grocery Manufacturers of America and the Food Marketing Institute.
Biggs noted that the original metrics for the perfect order contained the following four elements: order shipped complete, ontime delivery, no damage, and accurate and timely invoice. "Those metrics were a narrow vision of the supply chain because they are not end to end," he said.
The new definition contains the following seven measures to characterize the "perfect order": case shipped vs. ordered (fill rate), on-time delivery, data synchronization, damage (unsalables), days of supply, order cycle time, and shelf-level service (out of stocks). Biggs noted that the committee decided that the "case shipped vs. ordered" metric served a more useful purpose than the "order shipped complete" metric used in the past. Although the group retained the "on-time delivery" metric, it has now defined that measure as a shipment arriving one hour prior to its expected arrival. Any shipment arriving after the appointment window will be deemed late. In the past, a delivery was considered "on time" if it arrived 30 minutes before or after its appointed time.
The "data synchronization" metric looks at whether both shipper and receiver have the same items and descriptions in their respective databases. Damage will now be measured as a percentage of unsalable items in relation to overall sales.
The new "days of supply" metric will track the days' worth of inventory at the retailer's warehouse and store. The new "order cycle time" metric will be defined as the amount of time elapsed from the time a manufacturer receives an order to the actual delivery of that order to a customer's warehouse.
Service at the shelf level is regarded as a key measure of supply chain effectiveness. If a product is not on the shelf – even if it's in the retailer's backroom – it will be judged out of stock.
Biggs said that the new measures were developed to help trading partners in the grocery distribution channel better define supply chain success.
Asian WMS-makers target U.S. markets First cars, then electronics, now this. Asian software suppliers will soon begin marketing low-cost warehouse management systems (WMS) in the United States. During a panel discussion on WMS, Stephen Mulaik, a partner in the consulting firm The Progress Group, predicted that Asian vendors will enter the U.S. market in the next one to two years, with the predictable effect on pricing. "You'll see new WMS vendors emerging in India and China," said Mulaik, who has been doing systems consulting work in Asia. "It will cause prices to drop in the lower end of the WMS market."
Mulaik added that Asian vendors will emphasize different features in their WMS packages compared to their U.S. counterparts. For instance, Asian WMS packages are apt to build in intelligence to handle piece receiving, instead of just focusing on cases and pallets. He also predicted that Asian WMS vendors will design their systems to support speedy implementation, a hugely important requirement in the Asian market.
Editor's note: CSCMP holds its next annual conference in Philadelphia from Oct. 21 to Oct. 24, 2007.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.