The "perfect order," low-cost warehousing software from Asia, the impact of volatile oil prices on the supply chain ... name a topic and there was probably a workshop, lecture or panel discussion about it at this year's conference of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) in San Antonio, Texas. When they weren't out on facility tours or networking in the halls, conference goers could choose from a list of 160 educational sessions held during the four-day event. Here's a brief look at some of the highlights:
Yesterday, today and tomorrow
In a talk titled "Supply Chain Management—Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow," Dr. Donald Bowersox shared his thoughts on what's ahead for the supply chain. The future will see the emergence of many-to-many connections between trading partners in supply chain networks, resulting in a challenging environment for business, said Bowersox, who recently retired from his post as a professor at Michigan State University. (At the conference, Bowersox was honored for a lifetime of service to the group he helped found in 1962.)
As for technology, Bowersox predicted that the second generation of the Internet will bring about the creation of information models that will enable supply chain professionals to "see everything at one time." Companies will have to rethink their traditional notion of procurement in the demand-driven 21st century with its rapid product lifecycles.
Despite those impending changes, Bowersox urged industry organizations not to abandon their emphasis on what he called "the ABCs of logistics," which he termed critical to companies' efforts to meet those new demands. "Remember, logistics is not supply chain," he told his audience. "It's part of the supply chain."
Don't be afraid to fail
In his keynote address, Steven Levitt, co-author of the best-selling book Freakonomics, warned that corporate America's aversion to experimentation is hampering American business. "Corporations are reluctant to experiment even though it would show them how to be successful," Levitt told the more than 3,200 conference attendees.
A University of Chicago economics professor, Levitt gained prominence with the publication of his book (co-written with Stephen Dubnet). In that book, he argues that many apparent mysteries of contemporary America could be illuminated if people were only willing to ask the right questions and draw the connections.
Levitt told his CSCMP audience that corporations should pursue multiple paths and experiment to find the answers to business problems. He added that corporations are reluctant to follow his advice because that means that top executives "don't know the answers."
The wolf at the door
What more appropriate place than Texas to discuss the impact of oil prices on supply chains? In one of the more thought-provoking sessions, a prominent logistics executive warned that the end of the era of cheap oil will force companies to rethink their supply chains. "Today's supply chains run on cheap, available fossil fuels," asserted Charles L. "Chuck" Taylor, who now heads the consulting firm Awake in Smithville, Texas. But those supplies won't last forever. Based on a methodology developed by the late Shell Oil geologist M. King Hubbert, world oil production is projected to peak between now and 2015. In the '50s, Hubbert correctly predicted that U.S. oil production would peak in 1970.
During a panel discussion on the impact of rising energy costs on the supply chain, Lawrence Lapide, a research director at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Center for Transportation and Logistics, agreed with Taylor that cheap oil has supported such supply chain practices as Just-In-Time and offshore manufacturing. In all those cases, Lapide pointed out, companies use speedy shipments to meet customer demand while keeping inventories low. "There will be oil, but the question is at what price," he said. "Less energy-intense supply chains would be the right direction now."
In order to form a more perfect order ...
What passed for "perfect" yesterday may no longer qualify tomorrow, at least in the grocery distribution channel. Donald "Dee" Biggs, director of customer logistics at Welch Foods Inc., told his audience that a grocery industry committee has redefined the "perfect order," expanding the list of measures used to assess order fulfillment performance to seven from four. Representatives from Wegmans, Meijer, Pfizer, Land O' Lakes and Welch Foods participated on the committee, which was jointly sponsored by the Grocery Manufacturers of America and the Food Marketing Institute.
Biggs noted that the original metrics for the perfect order contained the following four elements: order shipped complete, ontime delivery, no damage, and accurate and timely invoice. "Those metrics were a narrow vision of the supply chain because they are not end to end," he said.
The new definition contains the following seven measures to characterize the "perfect order": case shipped vs. ordered (fill rate), on-time delivery, data synchronization, damage (unsalables), days of supply, order cycle time, and shelf-level service (out of stocks). Biggs noted that the committee decided that the "case shipped vs. ordered" metric served a more useful purpose than the "order shipped complete" metric used in the past. Although the group retained the "on-time delivery" metric, it has now defined that measure as a shipment arriving one hour prior to its expected arrival. Any shipment arriving after the appointment window will be deemed late. In the past, a delivery was considered "on time" if it arrived 30 minutes before or after its appointed time.
The "data synchronization" metric looks at whether both shipper and receiver have the same items and descriptions in their respective databases. Damage will now be measured as a percentage of unsalable items in relation to overall sales.
The new "days of supply" metric will track the days' worth of inventory at the retailer's warehouse and store. The new "order cycle time" metric will be defined as the amount of time elapsed from the time a manufacturer receives an order to the actual delivery of that order to a customer's warehouse.
Service at the shelf level is regarded as a key measure of supply chain effectiveness. If a product is not on the shelf – even if it's in the retailer's backroom – it will be judged out of stock.
Biggs said that the new measures were developed to help trading partners in the grocery distribution channel better define supply chain success.
Asian WMS-makers target U.S. markets First cars, then electronics, now this. Asian software suppliers will soon begin marketing low-cost warehouse management systems (WMS) in the United States. During a panel discussion on WMS, Stephen Mulaik, a partner in the consulting firm The Progress Group, predicted that Asian vendors will enter the U.S. market in the next one to two years, with the predictable effect on pricing. "You'll see new WMS vendors emerging in India and China," said Mulaik, who has been doing systems consulting work in Asia. "It will cause prices to drop in the lower end of the WMS market."
Mulaik added that Asian vendors will emphasize different features in their WMS packages compared to their U.S. counterparts. For instance, Asian WMS packages are apt to build in intelligence to handle piece receiving, instead of just focusing on cases and pallets. He also predicted that Asian WMS vendors will design their systems to support speedy implementation, a hugely important requirement in the Asian market.
Editor's note: CSCMP holds its next annual conference in Philadelphia from Oct. 21 to Oct. 24, 2007.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."