Accurate calculation of "dimensional weight" is carrying greater, well, weight in parcel shipping rates. That's leading to greater interest in tools that measure up to the demands of high-speed cubing and weighing.
George Weimer has been covering business and industry for almost four decades, beginning with Penton Publishing's Steel Magazine in 1968 where his first "beat" was the material handling industry. He remained with Steel for two years and stayed for two more when it became Industry Week in 1970. He subsequently joined Iron Age, where he spent a dozen years as its regional and international machine tool editor. He then re-joined Penton Publishing as chief editor of Automation Magazine and in 1993 returned to Industry Week as executive editor. He has been a contributing editor for several publications, including Material Handling Management, where his columns and feature articles regularly generated lively discussion in the industry. He has won various awards from major journalism organizations. He has covered numerous trade shows here and abroad and has spoken to various industrial and trade groups on the current issues and events of the day as they impinge on business. He remains convinced that material handling technology and logistics are two of the major sources of productivity improvement today and in the future for all industries.
How much does an inch weigh? That might sound like the kind of nonsensical question Lewis Carroll might pose, but in the world of small parcel shipping, the concept of "dimensional weight" is important—and becoming more so. In essence, it's the system developed by parcel carriers as a way to ensure that lightweight but bulky items pay for the space they take up in trucks and planes. To determine the correct rate for a parcel, the shipper must determine both the package's weight and its dimensions, and then check the carrier's rate schedule to figure out which to use as the basis for the charge.
The major air and air-express carriers have all invested millions of dollars to install complex, highspeed weighing and dimensioning systems in their hubs. They try to dimension and weigh every package to determine what the correct rate should be. If it's different from the customer's rating, the difference (and sometimes a penalty fee) shows up as a back charge on the customer's bill.
While dimensional weight charges have applied to air shippers for years, they're about to be introduced into the ground service business. UPS announced just a few weeks ago that, effective Jan. 1, 2007, "oversize" rates will be replaced by "a simpler rate calculation based on dimensional weight." As currently written, this new policy applies only to packages over three cubic feet (5,184 cubic inches). (Smaller-volume packages will continue to be billed by actual weight alone.) Under the new policy, says UPS, "[b]illable weight will be based on actual package weight or the dimensional weight, whichever is greater."
"Dimensional weight" or "DIM weight" as it is commonly called, is determined by dividing the volume of a package in cubic inches by a constant, typically 194 for domestic or 166 for international shipments. The greater of either the DIM weight or the scale weight must be used for rating the package. For large, light boxes, the DIM weight rate will almost always be higher.
Size matters?
That might not sound like a big change, but the implications for shippers are huge. As the volume of packages subject to DIM weight rates increases, so will shippers' need to obtain precise information on the weights and dimensions of packages leaving their DCs with parcel and express carriers.
If we're talking a package here or a package there, gathering the weight and cube information might not be a big deal. If you're talking thousands of boxes, though, it quickly becomes a complex—and costly—business challenge. All too often, warehouse and shipping workers make a rough stab at the package's dimensions or, more commonly, ignore the size altogether because they're in a hurry to get orders to the dock, and rely solely on weight taken from a scale.
Do that these days, however, and your bill is likely to include back charges, says Phil Metzler, strategic product group leader, shipping and mail business for Mettler-Toledo. Thus, all manner of new devices to measure and weigh with ever-increasing accuracy and speed are showing up in warehouses and logistics hubs throughout the supply chain.
Mettler-Toledo, for example, offers cubing systems that use a variety of technologies, including lasers, photo diodes and both static and dynamic scales. "The goal is to provide systems that are modular in nature, that allow easy integration into existing material handling systems, and that easily aggregate data for communication to a host computer system," says Mettler-Toledo's strategic accounts manager, Bob Pacotti.
No shortage of choices
One of the pioneers in this technology is Quantronix of Farmington, Utah, which markets the Cubiscan series of dimensioning machines. Cubiscan systems come in a variety of configurations—from ceiling-mounted devices that allow omni-directional access to the measuring area to portable systems that can easily be moved around the plant or warehouse. "Large static cubing systems are new in the past few years," reports Randy Neilson, director of sales and marketing for Quantronix.
Each type of model has its strengths. Small static systems, for example, are good for measuring small and irregular shaped items, but they usually aren't the right fit for large crated merchandise or palletized goods. Larger systems are suitable for those larger items but generally are incapable of handling smaller items, Neilson explains. He suggests customers take a look at using two or more systems to cover all of their needs.
Cubing or dimensioning systems use low-powered laser technology (similar to bar-code scanning) or infrared light or ultrasound to measure packages. The technologies vary, but the idea is the same in all cases—accurate, defendable measurements of volume.
And that's a concern whether you're a shipper or a carrier. "There's only so much space on a truck," says Gordon Cooper, vice president-marketing for ExpressCube, a division of Mississauga, Ontario-based Global Sensors. ExpressCube will soon enter the U.S. market with its dimensioning system, which uses photo diodes. Developed for Cardinal Couriers, a regional carrier in eastern Canada, the technology will be demonstrated at the ProMat show next month in Chicago.
What's ahead?
Suppliers of automatic scales and cubing systems say that the systems pay for themselves in months by eliminating the inaccuracies associated with hand weighing and measuring. "You can save maybe 10 percent on your backcharging bills by using automatic or semi-automatic weighing and cubing technology," says Joe Flaviani of Schneider Electric, which markets weighing devices and offers consulting expertise on cubing, weighing and other material handling applications. "The cost savings alone usually more than justify the investment in these new systems."
"One of our systems saved the user $155,000 per year in back charges. That's on a $15,000 investment in this kind of technology," adds Mettler-Toledo's Metzler.
As for what's ahead, it seems that for scales—particularly the huge scales used to weigh whole semis and train cars— the trend will be toward automation. "More and more we're building truck weighing systems that are unattended," says Larry Behrens, industrial products manager for Fairmont, Minn.-based Avery Weigh-Tronix. "We're also doing more and more with RFID," he adds.
As for cubing systems, Cooper foresees big "changes in this field in terms of price reductions due to increased volumes, and ease of operation and setup." He's also optimistic that those advances will lead to increased sales. In the near term, he says, "[w]herever you find a scale in business, you'll find a cubing machine as well."
"Automated dimensioning will continue to migrate from the carriers back through the supply chain. Today you see increased focus on parcels and packages, but soon, you'll see more focus on palletized goods. They have the same size and weight issues as individual packages," predicts Mettler- Toledo's Metzler. "You'll also begin to see more use of dimensioning technologies at retail and point-of-sale (POS) counters, such as at a UPS store or FedEx Kinko's." Adds Pacotti, "You may not see fundamentally different technology, but rather ways to better package all the data ... in ever-more simplified ways. The IT manager always wants more simplicity."
Weighing and measuring used to be two of the simplest tasks in the DC. Over the past few years, they have become more and more high tech. Every sign suggests that the trend will continue as shippers and carriers keep trying to balance—and dimension—the fees and costs of moving packages through the supply chain.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."