It may not produce the adrenaline kick of Pac Man or Texas Hold 'Em poker, but simulation software can give you a flashy live-action 3D view of what proposed changes will really do to your DC operations.
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
If you had walked into Dave Zuern's office last fall, chances are you would have found Zuern and his team huddled around a computer screen. But this wasn't about a quick game of Everquest II or Texas Hold 'Em during lunch break. What the staffers at Briggs & Stratton were watching so intently was not doom-defying warriors, but tiny engine parts whizzing down virtual conveyor belts.
They may look like videogames with their 3D simulation and flashy graphics, but today's DC simulation software programs have nothing to do with entertainment. Like ERP or WMS systems, these programs are all business. The software Zuern used, for example, took the reams of data he entered and spit back highly detailed distribution profiles of some new product lines that will move through his company's new DC when it opens this fall, including their velocity, seasonality, expected order sizes and destinations. But perhaps more importantly, the program helped Zuern and his staff simulate the distribution center's operations under a variety of conditions and answer all the inevitable "what if" questions.
As for how all this came about, the story goes back to engine-maker Briggs & Stratton's decision to build a new 300,000-square-foot distribution center that will open this October. As the company's director of distribution operations, Zuern was put in charge of the project. Anxious for reassurance that the facility (and its rack and conveyor equipment) would be able to absorb the added volume, Zuern decided to run his data through FortnaDCmodeler, a simulation tool developed by Fortna, a consulting firm that offers design-integration services. "Your job is basically on the line here," says Zuern. When it comes to building or leasing a sizeable DC, he says, "it's good to have a tool like this to help you. I didn't want to build a brand new building and then figure out that it's full before it's even done."
In fact, that nearly happened. Within weeks of the time he started entering data into the program, Zuern had the results of the simulation in hand. And although they confirmed many of his assumptions about the new DC's operations, he also learned something that came as a distinct shock: he needed more building. To be precise, he learned that Briggs & Stratton would have to expand the facility's footprint by about 50,000 square feet if the company wanted to remain in the DC for at least 10 years as planned.
Those weren't exactly the results he was looking for, of course, but Zuern was grateful to have the simulation's findings all the same. For one thing, having hard data in hand made it that much easier to pitch the proposed expansion to management. "It's nice to be able to go back to our board and say we didn't just guess at this," says Zuern. "It may have cost us a few bucks, but we're confident that the amount we're asking the company to invest for this project is justified."
Quick fixes
It used to be that the typical simulation project ran pretty much along the lines of Briggs & Stratton's, but that's starting to change. Today, applications are no longer limited to large-scale projects like new DC design and construction. Falling prices and technological advances have made simulation affordable for smaller projects too—say, determining the best combination of material handling equipment, identifying potential bottlenecks in an expansion, or designing the optimal pick path.
"The software is definitely getting better," says Bob Silverman, president of Gross & Associates, a consultancy specializing in material handling logistics, "and [it's getting] easier to use." That's not to imply that the software has evolved to the stage where it runs itself. "There's still a significant training component," Silverman concedes, "but for people already trained in it, it's much faster to do the simulations."
In fact, Silverman reports that his firm is receiving more and more requests for quick-fix simulation projects that can suggest a solution to an individual problem within a couple of days. Gross & Associates, for example, recently conducted a "quick hit" simulation for a client that analyzed the transfer stations and interfaces between the manual and automated parts of its operation. The existing operation uses an automated guided vehicle (AGV) to feed and take pallets away from an automated storage/retrieval system (AS/RS). The AGV system is old and prone to breakdowns, so Gross & Associates designed a pallet conveyor-based replacement for the AGVs. The company then solicited quotes for the pallet conveyor system from three systems integrators, each of which came back with a different suggestion for modifications to the initial design.
To help it decide which approach to choose, the client asked Gross & Associates to run a simulation of each solution. That quick simulation of each of the proposed designs revealed that two of the three consistently achieved the required speeds based on different combinations of inputs. But the analysis also showed that the third was likely to fail with particular mixes. That was valuable information, says Silverman. "Without the simulation, we might have selected an option that would work fine on typical high-volume days, but not accommodate the required rate when out-of-the-ordinary conditions were experienced."
Endless opportunities
It may be best known for helping companies like Briggs & Stratton or Silverman's client avoid costly mistakes, but simulation software can also help uncover opportunities for savings. Take the case of Genesco, a retailer that specializes in footwear and accessories.
When Genesco designed its new DC several years ago, the original blueprint called for more than a half million square feet of space. But after running simulations of its operations at both current levels and with the higher volumes projected for the future, the company found it could cut back the square footage to 320,000 square feet, representing a substantial savings in real estate and capital equipment costs.
In addition, the simulation helped Genesco to consolidate three separate divisions (its retail store operations, its catalog operation and its direct delivery business) under one roof, while balancing the movement of highly seasonal goods and yearly growth of 20 percent. Aside from improving the center's ability to handle seasonal peaks, a new flow design for fast-moving stock-keeping units (SKUs) eliminated the need for replenishment for 50 percent of the company's product lines.
"Internet or direct-to-consumer orders are small one- or two-line orders and your operational costs can eat you alive because of the cost of picking those items," says David Farmer, vice president of sales at Fortna. "There are so many companies out there with multiple distribution channels, whether it's wholesale, retail or direct to consumer. Those orders alone all represent different businesses inside a DC, but simulation will allow you to create a virtual DC with each of those. We run the simulation model several times to capture exactly how the direct-to-consumer goods impact the DC layout, and the same for wholesale and retail. This helps to justify various storage media and layout options. The 'what if' games you can build with this are endless."
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.