The federal government came under heavy fire for what was seen as a slow response to help victims of Hurricane Katrina, the worst natural disaster to occur on U.S. soil. Fortunately, the same can't be said of the corporate world, which rushed to deliver relief supplies to the devastated Gulf Coast region even as the contributors themselves faced losses. "This …hurricane has had such an overwhelming impact on just about the whole country," says David Ross, a supply chain specialist with Intentia Americas. "Across the board there are just all kinds of issues."
But none of those issues was big enough to deter logistics and distribution companies, which responded with a rush of cash and in-kind donations. "I'm not going to suggest that our members are any more patriotic or charitable than anyone else, but there has just been a massive private-sector outpouring from both corporations and individuals with respect to equipment and supplies needed in the relief effort," says Dirk Van Dongen, president of the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors.
After Katrina hit in late August, help came from far and wide and from companies both large and small. Donors ranged from billion dollar corporations like UPS, FedEx, DHL and Bridgestone-Firestone, to smaller independent firms like The Shippers Group Warehouse, a Dallas-based third-party logistics service company (3PL). As this issue went to press, Mark Strickland, president of Shippers Group Warehouse, was doing his best to fill requests from some of his New Orleans-area customers for pallets of emergency supplies even as he worried about other New Orleans clients. A full week after Katrina hit, Strickland had yet to hear from a number of his customers in the area.
3PLs answer the call
Shippers Group Warehouse wasn't the only 3PL to join the relief effort. Paul Verst, president of Verst Group Logistics, a third-party provider based in Walton, Ky., reports that two company trucks loaded with relief supplies left for the region within a week of the tragedy. Verst Group was transporting food, clothing, personal hygiene items, toys, water and other goods supplied by Kroger, Procter & Gamble, Chiquita Brands and others. Verst Group's drivers volunteered their time for the two-day-plus trip, and the company donated the fuel and equipment needed. It should be noted that Chiquita mobilized its resources to help other victims at a time when the company itself was coping with hurricane-related property damage. The importer reported that its DC in Gulfport, Miss., which handled about 25 percent of its banana imports to the United States last year, was too damaged to receive shipments.
"I'm amazed at how many local companies have sent truckload after truckload of goods," says Verst, who anticipated running more trucks on the 11-hour route to Louisiana. "I am so proud of the way our teammates responded to the urgent need."
The Verst Group story is typical of what may well be thousands of similar stories that unfolded at small businesses across the country in the days following Katrina's deadly strike. Another example is that of Brian Collins, president and CEO of Commonwealth Inc. Warehousing and Distribution, who assisted his local church by providing a truck, forklift, pallet jack, pallets, stretch wrap and tape for the loading of relief trucks going to Mississippi.
Commonwealth has also donated supplies via several of its customers. "It was amazing to watch car after car coming in. Everybody had cases of bottled water and people were going to the stores and buying the materials they need down there," says Collins. "It was heart warming."
In fact, Collins' contribution to the relief effort went much further than helping his church pack trucks with relief supplies. At press time, Collins and his family had agreed to house a displaced New Orleans family in one of their rental homes, which will be furnished and supplied by their church's congregation. Collins plans to provide a job for one family member at Commonwealth's Cincinnati distribution center.
Emergency services
Aside from the shortage of relief supplies, the biggest issue relief workers faced was actually finding ways to get food and bottled water into the hardest-hit areas. That's where carriers and some private companies came in. Bridgestone-Firestone, for example, offered its enormous private fleet of trucks to the relief effort, and employees filled trailers with essential supplies, not tires, for delivery to the area.
DHL donated up to $500,000 of in-kind shipping services toward immediate relief efforts for Katrina's victims in Alabama,Mississippi, Louisiana and the Florida panhandle. The transportation aid will include immediate air and ground logistics and transportation support for the American Red Cross and other organizations active in both relief efforts and long-term rebuilding activities. DHL was transporting urgently needed food, water, clothing, personal care supplies, communications equipment and other essential items.
DHL has also pledged to continue its philanthropic efforts as the aid effort shifts from immediate relief to reconstruction. "We will leverage our resources and logistics expertise in support of immediate disaster relief and long-term reconstruction efforts along the Gulf Coast," says John Mullen, joint chief executive officer for DHL Express. "By harnessing our logistics expertise, our local presence, and our transportation network, we can make a difference."
DHL rivals UPS and FedEx also implemented programs intended to ease the pain from Katrina. FedEx announced that it was limiting its standard fuel surcharge in order to benefit customers hit by extremely volatile fuel prices in Katrina's aftermath. The company's fuel surcharge, which is updated weekly, will not exceed the most current prehurricane levels until the first week of October."In our industry, the fuel surcharge is designed to manage normal supply and demand market [fluctuations], not temporary spikes caused by disasters," says Douglas G. Duncan, president and CEO of FedEx Freight.
UPS pledged personnel and the use of its transport services, and had helped move more than four million pounds, or 2,000 tons, of supplies for the relief effort just a week after the hurricane struck. In Louisiana, where Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco organized a team to help direct the state's emergency relief effort, UPS stepped in to support that team's distribution and logistics activities.
In consultation with Gov. Blanco and Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, UPS placed individual liaison officers at the command of the state governments. Two hurricane relief officers have been assigned to each of the two states and will remain accessible at all times to ensure that any emergency movement of food or supplies is handled as promptly as possible.
Filling the tanks
One of the keys to providing relief and restoring a severely snarled supply chain was getting fuel to the heavily hit areas along the Gulf Coast. Acting on a request from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the U.S. Department of Transportation and the U.S. Navy, Schneider National took on the task of creating a critical diesel supply chain needed to fuel emergency vehicles and generators being used for hurricane rescue and relief efforts in the greater New Orleans area.
Diesel is essential for running emergency vehicles, heavy-duty trucks and the generators that are providing power to command posts, hospitals and nursing homes. Three Schneider National bulk tanker trucks were part of a police-led caravan to the Port of New Orleans, where a U.S. tanker containing diesel fuel is docked. Crews are siphoning diesel fuel from the freighter, then transporting loads to nine to 12 base camps in and around the greater New Orleans area. The government asked Schneider to provide drivers, supervision and dispatch for this effort for 30 days, with possible extensions.
The operation is unique for Schneider, which doesn't typically transport fuel. According to company representative Janet Bonkowski, 75 percent of the company's bulk volume is classified as non-hazardous. "It's safe to say we have not done anything like this in recent memory, including some of the more recent (9-11, Hurricane Ivan) disaster efforts we've been involved in," she says. "The magnitude of this disaster and desire to do what we can to support rescue and relief efforts motivated our associates to figure out how we could logistically do this and then made it happen."
Six Schneider National bulk haulers from the hurricane-ravaged area are participating in the effort, along with several members of the company's Reserve, La., and Houston, Texas, Operating Center leadership teams.
"The donation of supplies has been huge," says Connie Harvey, a representative of the American Red Cross. "The outpouring of corporate donations has been extremely large and important to our ability to put food on tables and hand out water and other supplies to the people who need it. In-kind donations are a huge part of our operations." Harvey also noted that companies that donated employees to the cause—from truck drivers to executive logisticians—made a huge difference. "We're a largely volunteer-based organization," she says. "We do have logistics and transportation people on staff but we also have volunteers who play a critical role in assuring that our logistics and transportation operations are successful."
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."