John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
The heady growth reports out of China just keep coming. One week, it's the steel industry reporting that the sector is expanding even more rapidly than analysts had predicted just months earlier. The next week, analysts are hailing the emergence of a Chinese middle class a middle class of more than 250 million with both disposable income and an appetite for American-made products. And all the while, Chinese factories continue to pump out low-cost consumer goods: clothing, shoes, toys, consumer electronics and even cars for export. Although some economists predict that China will find itself dealing with deflation within the next six months, the economy is not expected to cool much from its current 9-percent growth rate.
With all those goods to be moved between the two nations, it should come as no surprise that air freight between the United States and China is burgeoning. In fact, air freight from China to the United States is expected to grow at an average of 9.6 percent a year over the next 20 years (while
traffic to Europe is predicted to grow almost as quickly at 9.3 percent over the same period). "The output from the two major airports [Shanghai and Beijing] into the United States and Europe is tremendous," says Charles Kaufman, vice president and head of air freight, Asia-Pacific, for DHL's Danzas Air & Ocean division. "Airlines are increasing their flights out of China rapidly."
Kaufman isn't alone in his assessment. "China is growing tremendously and I think many of the people that play in this market have seen similar phenomenal growth, especially out of Shanghai," says Rick Whitaker, vice president of international services at BAX Global, a freight forwarder with a significant presence in Asia. "The good news is that there [are] significant [numbers] of new carriers coming into the market."
That's due partly to the fact that the General Administration of Civil Aviation of China recently granted foreign carriers "freedom rights," which means they can pick up cargo on the Chinese mainland en route to other destinations. Previously, an aircraft picking up freight in Shanghai, for example, was required to fly directly to its end destination without making stops in between. Whitaker says the move is expected to further develop the aircargo market between China and the United States, which had been stifled by a shortage of flight rights.
The China syndrome
While the airfreight carriers jockey for a share of the growing U.S.-China trade, the air express carriers are embroiled in a battle of their own. UPS, FedEx Express, DHL Express and even the U.S. Postal Service are making big investments in hopes of capturing market share in the China region.
"We see nothing but growth coming from China and going into China, too," says John Wheeler, a representative of UPS International."The biggest issue right now is that there is a lack of capacity in and out of China and everybody is feeling the pinch."
To help ease the crunch, UPS announced in August that it will add eight new Boeing 747-400 freighters to its fleet, starting in June 2007. The aircraft will be delivered to UPS through 2008, helping UPS increase capacity on its most important international "trunk" routes connecting Asia, Europe and North America.
UPS also has placed an order for an A380 freighter that will be able to fly non-stop from China to the UPS Worldport air hub in Louisville, Ky. UPS expects to take delivery of the plane in 2009. Its primary benefit would be faster transit time from Asia to the U.S. East Coast, while allowing UPS to handle more cargo and larger individual items. Today, all shipments headed to the United States must stop in Anchorage first.
Earlier this year, UPS won permission from the U.S. Department of Transportation to expand air operations in China and was granted three more air routes in China. In the last year, the company has expanded to 18 weekly jet flights to and from China. And in a major public relations coup, UPS has also been chosen as the official Logistics and Express Delivery Sponsor of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games.
But UPS isn't the only express carrier on the move. After an exhaustive series of feasibility studies that included projections for manufacturing and trading trends both within Asia and internationally for the next 30 years, FedEx announced this summer that it is building a new Asia Pacific hub at the Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport in Southern China. The facility, which represents a $150 million capital investment, will allow FedEx to double its capacity in China by sorting up to 24,000 packages per hour. It will employ 1,200 people when it opens in December 2008.
Although the new hub will undoubtedly rev up FedEx's operations, it's the Chinese economy that really stands to benefit. A joint study by China's Development Research Commission and the U.S.-based Campbell-Hill Aviation Group estimated the direct output impact of a FedEx hub on China's economy at $11 billion in 2010, increasing to $63 billion by 2020, with the majority of the gains resulting from industrial expansion.
Not to be outdone, DHL is investing $273 million in a five-year China expansion plan that calls for the company to develop and launch China Domestic, a door-to-door express delivery service in China; establish Express Logistics Centers (ELCs) in Shanghai, Guangzhou and Beijing; and establish 16 spare-parts centers across China. As part of its financial commitment, DHL will spend $12 million to double DHL Danzas Air & Ocean's presence from 20 cities to 37 by 2007, and will invest $3 million in two DHL Danzas Air & Ocean Logistics Centers in the Shanghai/Pudong region.
DHL cautions, however, that concentrating solely on China would be short-sighted. There are other "Asian tigers" out there with the potential to emerge as economic powerhouses. "We are investing a lot in China but we should not underestimate other countries," says DHL's Kaufman."The growth in China is still the strongest that we see, but there is still very excellent growth in Singapore, Japan and Malaysia, and what's coming up is India."
airfreight industry comes roaring back
Conventional wisdom holds that what goes up must come down. But in the topsy-turvy world of air freight, it seems the converse is true: what goes down must eventually come up. After slumping for several years, the U.S. international airfreight industry took off, posting a banner year in 2004. Air shipments measured by value to and from the United States showed double-digit gains over 2003 figures, according to The Colography Group Inc. The value of U.S. air export shipments rose 12.3 percent to $235.7 billion, while the value of U.S. air imports increased 12.7 percent to $346.5 billion. U.S. air export revenue surged 12.0 percent to $8.4 billion.
At the same time, air carriers managed to make some inroads into the international transport market in terms of tonnage. Measured as a percentage of total U.S. export tonnage, goods shipped by air rose 4.4 percent over 2003 figures last year. And although they lagged behind exports, air imports still showed strength: U.S. air import tonnage as a percentage of all-mode import tonnage rose 2.8 percent. Bidirectionally, the tonnage growth in air outpaced the tonnage growth for goods moving by ocean vessel.
"Our data confirm that 2004 was a stellar year for U.S. international air freight, certainly the best year since 2000," says Ted Scherck, president of the Colography Group. Scherck credits a number of external factors for the airfreight boom. "Air freight benefited from a robust replenishment of inventories due to improving demand and a shift in modal usage from vessel as shippers and consignees sought to avoid delays caused by ongoing congestion at U.S. West Coast ports," he says. "Air exports were further aided by the effect of the U.S. dollar's decline."
According to the Colography Group study, the Australia and Oceania regions were the fastest-growing markets for U.S. air exports, with a 34.1-percent gain in tonnage. However, Asia was the fastest-growing source of U.S. imports, with tonnage rising 16.5 percent. Those import gains were paced by China, whose U.S.-bound air imports (measured in tonnage) soared 31.1 percent.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."