Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
If you're looking for a skyrocketing growth industry, you need look no further than the third-party logistics service business. Over the course of a decade, the third-party contract logistics business has exploded from a not insignificant $30.8 billion industry to one that pulled in $85 billion last year. Put another way, the industry that once took in about 4 percent of every logistics dollar spent in the United States now rakes in about 8 percent.
That galloping growth was confirmed last month, when the results of the 10th annual third-party logistics study were released during the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' annual meeting. The study, conducted by John Langley of the Georgia Institute of Technology* and co-sponsored by Capgemini, SAP, and DHL, showed widespread use of 3PL services in North America, Western Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, South Africa, South Africa and the Middle East. In North America, for instance, fully 80 percent of the companies that responded to the survey said they made use of 3PL services (see Figure 1).
But perhaps more importantly, survey respondents report that the overall level of service from 3PLs is improving. Still, there appeared to be a significant shift in the way customers judge their 3PLs: while most say that collaboration between the customer and the 3PL is the key to improving the 3PL's performance, the responses also indicate that pricing has become the most important attribute in selecting a provider. And, interestingly, in a complete reversal of past survey findings, the respondents, who come from industries ranging from automotive and retail to food/beverage and high tech, now say they consider a 3PL's proficiency in delivering core services—like warehousing, transportation and forwardingservices—more important than its ability to deliver value-added services.
FIGURE 1
world domination
(percentage of respondents using 3PLs, by region*)
Percentage
North America
90
Western Europe
77
Asia-Pacific
83
Latin America
72
South Africa
74
*The researchers caution that while percentages are comparable year to year, 3PL users are more likely to respond to the survey than non-users and that this may be particularly true in the Asia-Pacific region.
SOURCE: 2005 THIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS, RESULTS AND FINDINGS OF THE 10TH ANNUAL STUDY, GEORGIA TECH, CAPGEMINI, SAP, DHL
AN OUTSOURCING EPIDEMIC: NO CONTINENT HAS BEEN LEFT UNTOUCHED BY THE OUTSOURCING TREND.
The core of the matter
That emphasis on core services took the researchers by surprise. "[I]n past surveys, a 3PL provider's delivery of core services was considered a 'given,'" the report says, noting that in prior years, respondents were more focused on the value-added services.
But for some, that news wasn't totally unexpected. Herb Shear, CEO and chairman of Genco, a third-party logistics provider, believes that shippers' growing reliance on 3PLs to provide the most basic of services may well reflect chronic and long-term understaffing of logistics departments. In his 35 years in the industry, Shear says, he's seen in-house logistics staffs trimmed through several waves of layoffs, leaving them no choice but to outsource.
Another reason may be the growing complexity of supply chains. Even the most sophisticated logistics and distribution operation cannot be everywhere, maintain DCs in every corner of its market, or keep up to date on trade rules for every country on the globe. The obvious solution? Hire a 3PL.
But that's not to say 3PL customers are solely focusing on the basics. Despite the emphasis on core services, shippers also report that they're asking their 3PLs to take over a variety of other tasks. They're asking them to handle reverse logistics and waste disposal, product assembly, rate negotiations, fleet and materials management, and freight bill auditing, to name a few. Some even want their partners to assist with product repairs and trade financing.
The newest study also reveals a nascent trend among companies to outsource more strategic services, such as inventory planning, says Gary Allen, who led the study for Capgemini in recent years. (Since September, Allen has been a vice president for Exel, a big international 3PL.) "There are still some companies using outsourcing for labor augmentation or asset shifting, but it's becoming much more strategic," he says. He notes, for example, that the latest survey of 3PL users shows that supply chain planning has risen to near the top of the list of what buyers are looking for from providers. "There are customers who say they would never do that," he says, "but we see that changing."
Tough customers
As for how well the 3PLs are meeting those varied demands, the news is generally good (see Figure 2). Across most regions, survey respondents reported that handing off tasks to a 3PL had led to a 10- to 11-percent reduction in logistics costs, as order fill rates improved, and order cycle and cash-to-cash cycle times shrank. Inventory turns increased for North American and Asia-Pacific users as well.
Yet 3PL-customer relationships are not without strain. For example, while customers are generally pleased with the immediate savings they realize when they contract with a 3PL, a large proportion report that they're bothered by what they see as a lack of continuous improvement. "The bar has been raised in terms of customer expectations," says Scott McWilliams, CEO of Ozburn-Hessey Logistics. "Their focus is on execution, the pressure to reduce inventories ... on [wringing out] that last 1 or 2 percent of costs [and productivity]."
Another source of dissatisfaction appears to be information technology. Customers consider a 3PL's information technology capabilities to be crucial to the relationship, yet less than half are satisfied with their providers' capabilities.
FIGURE 2
satisfied customers
(3PL customers who rate their relationship with 3PL providers as "very successful" or "extremely successful," by region)
Percentage
North America
90
Western Europe
88
Asia-Pacific
89
Latin America
77
South Africa
93
*The researchers caution that while percentages are comparable year to year, 3PL users are more likely to respond to the survey than non-users and that this may be particularly true in the Asia-Pacific region.
SOURCE: 2005 THIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS, RESULTS AND FINDINGS OF THE 10TH ANNUAL STUDY, GEORGIA TECH, CAPGEMINI, SAP, DHL
NOT QUITE SO HOT, HOT, HOT: LATIN AMERICA LAGS BEHIND OTHER REGIONS WHEN IT COMES TO CUSTOMERS' SATISFACTION WITH THEIR 3PLS.
That pressure has led many of the 3PLs that once relied on homegrown IT systems to consider some outsourcing of their own—that is, they're subcontracting some or all of their IT needs to supply chain software specialists. Tom Kozenski, a marketing executive for supply chain software provider RedPrairie, notes that his company's 3PL customers tend to have much more complex IT requirements than its shipper customers. What makes the 3PLs' job all the more challenging, he says, is that their requirements are constantly in a state of flux. Every time they add a new customer or expand their services, their systems are likely to need tweaking. "Their work is never done," Kozenski says. "And because they work with so many customers, [they have] a lot more integration to do."
That growing customer demand for IT expertise, strategic services or broader geographic coverage has altered the face of the industry. "There has been a convergence of companies," Allen says. Warehousing or transportation companies remain the dominant players, but others are jumping into the game. Today traditional consultancies or even contract manufacturing companies like Solectron are offering their customers logistics services. Allen reports that it's not unusual to see different types of players team up to offer the specialized mix of financial, IT and logistics services requested by their ever-more-demanding clients.
Keeping up with the customer
As they scramble to meet these customer demands, some 3PLs are overhauling their own operations. For example, Warehouse Specialists Inc., a Wisconsin-based third-party logistics provider with 13 million square feet of warehouse space in 40 locations around the country, has traded in its largely manual, labor-intensive inventory management system for a much more sophisticated process (it's using Microsoft's CE.NET, vehicle-mounted terminals from LXE, and wireless printers from Zebra)—in an attempt to boost both productivity and customer service.
But investing in technology isn't always enough. "What we've had to do is broaden and deepen our knowledge in each functional area," says Ozburn-Hessey's McWilliams. "The challenge is to come up with client solutions that we can replicate across industries or across the same verticals. It takes a lot of customization to wring out that last bit [of productivity]. It used to be that you could implement a solution that could run for a while. But if you're not out there constantly evaluating ways to improve, you're not going to keep the customer happy."
As Gary Kowalski, COO of Menlo Worldwide, sees it, the job will only become more challenging as foreign trade explodes. "As customers go more global, it's clearly a challenge to manage their supply chains. Take the data alone: As supply becomes more global, it becomes more complex and more difficult to manage." He says today's customers are putting more emphasis on integrated, cross-functional management of their supply chains than in the past. That means 3PLs must do the same.
If they hope to succeed, Kowalski says, 3PLs must become expert at designing supply chains, implementing supply chains and managing those supply chains on an ongoing basis. "Today," he says, "the pressure to do all three is greater than ever."
Shear would agree. "If you can do only one thing," he warns, "you might be left out in the cold."
the more you ask, the more you risk
Labor savings, lower truck or ocean rates, higher inventory turns, shorter order cycles ... it's easy to see the appeal of outsourcing to senior management. But in their zeal to slash logistics costs, senior managers sometimes are blind to the risks, warns David Bovet of Mercer Management.
Bovet, who advises clients on outsourcing strategy, worries that the trend toward outsourcing even the most strategic of tasks is leaving more and more shippers vulnerable to the following four types of risks:
Strategic risks. The main strategic risk companies face when outsourcing key logistics tasks is the potential loss of control, says Bovet. At the top management level, he says, there's sometimes a great temptation to put the outsourcing plan in motion and then walk away. But even heavy users of 3PL services still need in-house logistics expertise, he warns. "If you need to change providers or strategy—which is almost inevitable today—it's difficult to do [without professional guidance]." As a cautionary tale, Bovet cites the case of a manufacturer that set up a third-party logistics service contract written around specific transport lanes. "Shortly afterward, they had a major change in the manufacturing footprint," he says, "which made the whole deal worthless."
Bovet also points out that logistics expertise is essential to managing the third-party arrangements. "Strategic supplier management isn't something a lot of companies spend a lot of time on," he says. "But they should. Supplier performance can have a direct impact on both costs and customer satisfaction." For instance, someone knowledgeable about supply chain matters should be on hand when the 3PL agreement is drafted to make sure it includes clear rules on governance, on performance measures, and on details such as the frequency of meetings and incentives. Bovet, by the way, believes penalties have little value in a contract. "Once you're into the fine print," he says, "the relationship is over."
Operational risks. Ideally, outsourcing will result in service that's the same as—or better than—the service the company previously enjoyed. But that's not always the case. Bovet tells of one company that hired a third party to manage its transportation operations in hopes of cutting costs. Sure enough, its costs dropped. The problem was, service deteriorated. The financial arrangements made it hard for the third party to find carriers when a capacity shortage developed.
Financial risks. The most obvious financial risk, of course, is the potential for a third-party business failure (a risk that can be mitigated by a thorough investigation of a prospective partner's financials). But there are less obvious financial risks as well, such as unexpected transition costs or the 3PL's failure to pick up on cost-saving opportunities. "Most 3PLs focus on what the contract says," Bovet notes. Because they have little incentive to devote a lot of time to the shipper's problems, they just do what they're hired to do.
Hazard risks. The hazards a 3PL may confront—natural disasters, political instability, IT security breaches—are no different from the hazards a shipper might face on its own. What's important, Bovet says, is to make sure that a 3PL has policies and practices in place to protect against those risks.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.