High-tech forklifts come with sophisticated RFID readers. The ultra-high-tech models feature both readers and active RFID tags that tell manage ment where they are and where they've been.
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
Forklift drivers at Genco's McDonough, Ga., DC tempted to dash over to a remote aisle for a quick smoke or a short break from the action are out of luck. Their vehicles will give them away. Among other features, the trucks they pilot come outfitted with RFID readers and active RFID tags, which track their every move throughout the 208,000-square-foot DC.
Introduced as a lower-cost alternative to the RFID readers designed for dock doors, RFID-enabled forklifts appear to be gaining traction in America's DCs. It's not hard to see why. Though the investment is comparatively modest, the payoffs are big. Companies that are using the mobile systems, which can identify and track products onboard a forklift from loading to unloading, report improvements in picking and shipping accuracy, enhanced productivity and better vehicle utilization.
The prospect of improved vehicle utilization figured largely in Genco's decision to put five RFID-enabled trucks—a mix of Toyota sit-down trucks and Crown reach trucks—to work in the McDonough DC. Genco, which is a third-party service provider, has been using the trucks for over a year at the facility, a returns center that it runs for Sears. (It has five more in pilot mode at another facility.) And it hasn't been disappointed.
The active tags affixed to the forklifts allow Genco to track the X/Y coordinates of each truck, giving managers a better understanding of the travel times and distances required for various tasks. The tags also help them gauge how efficiently the trucks are being used. "We want to see how often our operator is driving with no product on the forks," says Cary Cameron, Genco's vice president of strategic technologies. "If I can maximize the use of my forklift, then we can minimize maintenance on the forklift."
Genco plans to use the data it captures to track operator productivity and to model daily workflows via the magic of computer simulation. It has hired a graphic artist for the project, which will translate the tracking data into animated forklift images. Once the project is completed, a manager who wants to check up on a forklift's movements anywhere in the DC will be able to call up an animated live-action image of that same truck on his computer screen.
Not only will Genco's managers be able to track a forklift's movements in real time, but they'll also be able to reconstruct the trucks' movements at a later date. A team called in to investigate a forklift collision or accident, for example, will be able to pinpoint a forklift operator's exact location at a specific time during his shift.
Don't go there
Beyond vehicle utilization, Genco reports that the RFID-enabled forklifts have pushed shipping accuracy to new levels. The RFID-enabled trucks alert drivers if they attempt to load an item onto the wrong truck, which has virtually eliminated the problem of shipping products to the wrong facility. Genco reports that shipping accuracy has jumped from 95.0 percent to 99.7 percent on the 45,000 pallets it has shipped since the company began using RFID-enabled trucks.
And Genco has achieved these savings without blowing the budget. Outfitting the McDonough facility with mobile RFID equipment will cost half what it would to set up RFID pOréals at dock doors, says Cameron. She estimates that it would cost Genco about $6,000 per door to install RFID readers at 160 dock doors—a total of $960,000. By contrast, equipping approximately 60 lift trucks at about $8,000 per truck will run about $480,000. Furthermore, Genco believes that RFID-related productivity improvements will cut the number of forklift trucks needed at each DC.
That's not to say that Genco hasn't hit a few rough patches in its transition to mobile RFID. Cameron says the biggest problem she faces right now is getting her hands on Gen 2 equipment. Though her suppliers have promised to get her the equipment, they have yet to give her a firm delivery date.
She's also working with her hardware vendors to solve an ongoing problem with unread tags. Signals emitted by the forklift-mounted readers aren't always strong enough to read through an entire pallet, which means tags on some of the cases go unread. That's not a problem with dock door pOréal readers, which provide enough coverage to ensure that none of the cases on a pallet (or to be precise, the tags on those cases) will be missed.
Spreading the word
Those startup difficulties notwithstanding, word about the savings offered by RFID-enabled forklifts is spreading fast. So it may come as little surprise that Wal-Mart is giving the technology a try. At its test lab in Bentonville, Ark., the mega-retailer is currently testing an RFID-enabled forklift that reads tags on pallets and transmits data through a wireless network to a warehouse management system, which sends data on inventory to other business applications.
Some of Wal-Mart's suppliers are experimenting with the technology as well. Michael Smith, business development manager at LXE Inc., says his company has pilots under way with several of Wal-Mart's 100 biggest suppliers. These clients, major consumer packaged goods manufacturers, believe RFID-enabled forklifts offer great potential to streamline their operations. For example, if the tests confirm that the RFID-equipped forklifts provide reliable data on the number of cases picked, the manufacturers will be able to eliminate some redundant quality control checks.
They're hoping for productivity enhancements as well, which shouldn't be much of a stretch. RFID-equipped trucks allow drivers to focus on driving, not scanning. It may only take 10 or 20 seconds to scan a bar code, Smith says, but if you eliminate that task, the savings accumulate quickly.
"It does add up when you consider the number of moves [forklift operators] are doing," Smith says. "You are really paying these guys to [move goods], not collect data. So the more moves you get out of these guys, the more work you can do. If you can do 100 moves with a bar-code scanner and 120 with a forklift, you can put 20 percent more product through the facility." For companies hard-pressed to show some returns on their RFID investments, that kind of opportunity will be hard to ignore.
just show them the money
Maybe they're trying to placate an ROI-obsessed CFO. Or maybe they're simply trying to add luster to their reputations. Whatever the reason, it appears that managers have engaged in some dubious accounting practices when reporting returns on their RFID investments. Steve Banker, a research analyst with ARC Advisory Group, says reports have surfaced of managers' padding their RFID returns with savings actually earned through automation and other cost-cutting initiatives.
"If the CFO becomes very concerned and [demands] an ROI, then some people will try to bundle in other things to the project," says Banker. "If they haven't implemented a warehouse management system yet, they'll see an opportunity to bundle RFID into the WMS project and then attribute any sort of ROI that emerges to RFID instead of the WMS."
It might appear to be a relatively minor type of malfeasance, but Banker warns that the practice could have serious consequences. For one thing, a company that submits falsified financial reports risks running afoul of Sarbanes-Oxley regulations. For another, the inflated ROI figures could encourage the company to move forward with RFID faster than caution would dictate, sending costs spiraling upward.
Finally, overstating ROI numbers could deprive the company of its best bargaining chip when a big customer issues its next RFID mandate. "The people [who] have piloted RFID [but have yet to see any] ROI have some good ammunition when Wal-Mart asks them to increase tagging from 10 SKUs to 100," says Banker. "They can go to Wal-Mart and say 'This is what we did, [this is] how much money we spent, and we haven't seen one penny of ROI yet.' It gives them a strong argument for continuing to go slow."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."