Today's new wireless security devices can't guarantee thieves won't get their hands on your cargo. But they definitely raise the odds that you'll get your stuff back promptly.
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
You could say it was close ... but no cigars. To the thieves planning a big heist
last summer, it looked like a simple enough job. They'd move in over the weekend, break into the parked
truck carrying $50,000 worth of cigars and discreetly remove the stogies, leaving the rest of the LTL shipment intact. But their carefully laid plans went up in smoke when the cigars' owner, who was monitoring his goods from a remote location, detected tampering to the trailer and notified the FBI.
Things didn't go much better for two rings of thieves on the Eastern Seaboard last year. This past fall, a fencing ring was caught with $250,000 worth of stolen designer clothing when New Jersey State Police raided the
warehouse where they were handing off their plunder. Just months earlier, thieves loading their haul ($300,000
worth of high-end apparel) after breaking into a Windsor, Conn., warehouse were apprehended when state and
local police burst onto the scene.
In all three cases, what gave the thieves away were wireless cargo security devices—covert asset trackers
compact enough to be tucked into a pallet of laptops or carton of prescription drugs (or even an informant's pocket). In an emergency, they can be activated to
beam real-time location data from wherever they may be—on the open road, at a truck stop or even inside a building—via cellular tower triangulation and GPS (global positioning system) satellite technology. Law enforcement officials can track their whereabouts with pinpoint accuracy, significantly boosting prospects for the goods' prompt recovery.
Wireless cargo tracking systems are not new. Trucking companies have used satellite tracking to keep tabs on their fleet vehicles for years. But satellite signals cannot reach all locations, making the systems less than foolproof. The new tracking devices get around that problem by employing both cellular towers and GPS technology to transmit location data. And because the devices don't need to "see the sky" to determine location, they can operate in places that traditional GPS cannot.
The new asset trackers also have an advantage in that they're much less readily detectable than the tracking devices installed in trucks. Thieves have no way of knowing which pallets or cartons harbor the devices, and they're unlikely to spend time sifting through the packages to find them.
The technology is still in its infancy, however. It remains to be seen if wireless security solutions (also
known as location-based systems) will provide the long-
awaited breakthrough in deterring cargo theft—a problem estimated at anywhere from $10 billion to $50 billion in the United States alone. In the meantime, law enforcement officials say they're happy to have the high-tech help. "Some of the newer GPS type of tracking systems are definitely a boon to law enforcement," says special agent Steve Siegel, a spokesman for the FBI. "If you can put some kind of tracking device into a pallet of goods or in cargo containers that can be tracked from a distance, it's a definite benefit to law enforcement and a deterrent for criminals."
As Siegel sees it, the main benefit isn't so much theft prevention as asset recovery. Oftentimes, law enforcement officials don't hear about a theft until hours, days or weeks after it's occurred, forcing them to play a frustrating game of catchup. But with access to real-time location information, they can move right in. "Anytime you can recover something in a short ... time," says Siegel, "it's a benefit to law enforcement."
Spyware in a good sense
The market appears to be embracing the technology. The two major players, Bulldog Technologies of Richmond, British Columbia, and SC-integrity/KRI of Bothell, Wash., both report booming sales. In the past several months alone, Bulldog Technologies has signed contracts with pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, retailer Barnes & Noble, carrier Shadow Lines Transportation, and a Fortune 500 food manufacturer that won't discuss its plans because it believes using the covert tracking devices will give it a competitive advantage.
Bulldog Technologies' entry into the market is a system called MiniBOSS, which at 4 by 3 by 2 inches and weighing just 6 ounces, falls on the small end of the tracking device spectrum. The unit is designed to work in conjunction with the Bulldog Security Gateway, a proprietary automatic vehicle location software program that lets a user track his quarry's movement using a standard PC.
Bulldog's tracking service offers users more than disembodied geographic coordinates, however. Its application provides a link to Google Earth that lets customers see an actual satellite photograph of the tracker's exact location. The satellite photograph is overlaid onto a road map, allowing users to identify places and roads by name. Michael Olsen, Bulldog's vice president of sales, tells of a customer who pulled off the highway and called in to challenge the Bulldog staff to tell him where he was. "We located him with the MiniBOSS, and using Google Earth, we were able to tell him that he was at a truck stop, parked in the parking lot," Olsen reports. "We could actually see a picture of the trailers. Although [it was] a stored photograph and not real time, it gave us fantastic insight into the actual layout of the area."
Bulldog's competitor, SC-integrity/KRI, is also bullish on its growth prospects. The company expects business to increase exponentially in the next 24 months. It reports that its SC-tracker devices are currently in use throughout the United States with more than 30 member companies, including shippers and manufacturers, carriers, third-party logistics service providers, retailers, and law enforcement agencies. (SC-integrity/KRI refers to its customers as members because of their shared network agreements.) The company expects to triple its member base and increase the number of units deployed twelve-fold in 2006. It has even greater expectations for 2007; SC-integrity's projections call for a whopping 30-fold increase in the number of units in the field.
Both tracker makers like to point out that their devices have applications beyond just security. Bulldog, for example, notes that its tracker can perform other monitoring tasks, such as measuring temperatures for temperature-controlled deliveries.
In fact, those non-security related applications might someday eclipse security when it comes to driving sales. King Rogers, executive vice president at SC-integrity/KRI, reports that one of his company's clients, a national carrier, plans to use the trackers to help it hone its delivery time estimates. "Obviously, if the proof of concept plays out for predicting ETA times, and we think it will, the security aspect of the system becomes just an add-on feature because it pays for itself by virtue of being able to predict ETAs," says Rogers. "We are talking about an evolving technology that ... is probably going to be the hottest technology in the supply chain over the next couple of years, not only for security reasons but for supply chain management opportunities."
Of course, all this capability comes at a price. According to previously published reports, the SC-integrity systems cost about $1,500 per unit, not including a monthly fee for network airtime associated with tracking. Bulldog Technologies' tracker costs about $700. Monthly fees for the service, according to Olsen, can run up to $80 a month, depending on usage. Both companies say prices will drop as technology improves and more companies sign on. In the meantime, they note, lower insurance premiums can help offset the costs.
Not so fast
Not everyone is convinced that the covert asset tracking devices will revolutionize cargo security. Naysayers point out that criminals, too, keep up with technological advances, and are probably already at work figuring out ways to disable the trackers' signals. A motivated thief might also be able to subvert the device by breaking up a shipment into small lots.
The systems' cost may also hamper their adoption. "In the conversations I've had with clients about wireless cargo security, the products do not seem to be gaining a great deal of popularity at this point," says Barry Brandman, president of Danbee Investigations, a Midland Park, N.J., company that provides investigative, loss prevention and security consulting services to many of the top names in the logistics industry. "There still seem to be some serious reservations about cost, reliability, [and] electronic compatibility."
There may be technical difficulties as well. "Some people believe that there are still a lot of technical kinks that need to be worked out," Brandman adds, "and they haven't been able to convince their executive committees that the expense justified the gains." All that could change quickly if the manufacturers succeed in debugging the bugs, however. If they do, cargo thieves will be the first to feel the sting.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."