John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
You open the front door and are delighted to find a package containing the lamp you ordered yesterday. But when you pick up the carton, you hear the telltale clink of broken glass. Before you can pick up the phone to complain, however, you look up and see the express carrier's driver sprinting across your lawn bearing a carton with a replacement lamp—this one, happily, fully intact.
Sounds too good to be true? That scenario may be closer than you think ... and it will likely be made possible by the magic of RFID. Among other projects, express delivery companies are busy running tests to see whether RFID tags can reliably detect damage to packages and automatically prompt the shipper to send a replacement. "There are just so many possibilities," says Bob Berg, an RFID specialist at DHL. "RFID could be used to track if a package was dropped from beyond its drop specifications, or [if it] got wet or was tipped on its side." With early notification of the mishap, he says, the carrier could ship a replacement while the first one was still in transit.
It's hard to imagine an industry where RFID holds out more potential than the overnight package delivery business. True, the major players already possess advanced systems to track packages, but it's clear that they see RFID playing a role some day. DHL, for instance, has pledged that it will tag every package it delivers by 2015. UPS, meanwhile, has invested in three RFID-related startup companies, including Impinj, a supplier of RFID chips and tags. FedEx, too, acknowledges that RFID is the way of the future. "RFID is going to play an important role in the future of shipment and package movement," says David Zanca, FedEx's senior vice president of information technology.
Beyond detecting damage to packages, RFID also offers great potential for tracking. Customers who ship high-value goods are already asking for tracking solutions that make use of active RFID tags—tags with their own power source.
Eventually, DHL hopes to use RFID to offer customers tracking data so detailed and accurate that they can dispense with costly inventory stockpiles."We're hoping that the increased visibility we'll have into shipments, and the information we'll be able to transfer to the customer in real time, will result in the customers' having a better opportunity to manage their freight while it's still in the DHL pipeline," says Berg. "By eliminating some of their inventory warehousing, RFID could help to fine-tune [clients' just-in-time operations]."
Recommended for internal use, too
In the end, however, RFID's greatest promise may lie not in the "extras" parcel carriers can offer their customers, but in its ability to streamline the carriers' internal operations. Carriers could use routing data collected via RFID, for example, to identify mis-sorts and get misdirected items back on track for on-time delivery.
Then there's RFID's well-documented ability to reduce paperwork and eliminate time-consuming data collection tasks. "The process of manually scanning bar codes at certain points could be replaced with tag readers,
so as you load a container, packages pass through a pOréal and you get a read on the tag," says Zanca. That's much faster than having a worker scan the bar code and manually place the package in the container.
It's not just faster; it's cheaper. "Having a person pulling a trigger on a bar-code scanner represents a considerable cost to us," notes DHL's Berg. "Internally, where we can replace manual bar-code scanning with RFID and automated scanning would be a big plus for us."
UPS already has a pilot under way to test the feasibility of using RFID tags to track containers moving within its processing centers. As part of the test, the carrier has affixed passive RFID tags—tags with no batteries or power source of their own—on reusable tote boxes used to convey small packages and irregularly shaped packages within its own facilities. The pilot's first phase was conducted at the carrier's state-of-the-art automation testing facility in Atlanta, which replicates most automation systems used in UPS's global operations. The pilot's second phase is currently under way at Worldport, the UPS international air hub located in Louisville, Ky., where 1,000 tote boxes have been tagged with RFID labels.
Active interest
Though UPS's pilot is a notable exception, most RFID applications in the parcel delivery world have involved active tags. "We've used active tags quite successfully for a number of years," says FedEx's Zanca. "We've deployed them in our operations in a number of places—on our trailers as they come into facilities with gate readers, and we've tagged containers and various other assets."
But as reliable and capable as they may be, those active tags have yet to transform the industry. What will finally ignite the RFID revolution, analysts say, will be their less capable brethren, the passive tags. The explanation lies in the tags' cost. Active tags are too expensive to use for tracking the millions of shipments the big parcel carriers move each day. But passive tags, which are much cheaper to manufacture, may someday make tagging feasible.
Problem is, that technology is not yet ready for prime time—at least where the overnight delivery business is concerned. "We think ... passive tag technology has a very important place in the future," says Zanca, "but as of today, all of our field work has shown there are still read rate problems and reliability issues. ...We continue to work with them in a lab environment in the field, but they are not reliable enough for us to run a sorting operation or to provide tracking information to our customers from those tags."
And even if the reliability issue could be resolved, the tags' costs are likely to inhibit their widespread adoption in the near term. "The 10-cent tag will not take RFID into mainstream supply chain applications," says UPS representative Donna Barrett. "Technology breakthroughs are required before tag costs drop to [the] point where RFID replaces bar codes." Even if tag prices were to drop precipitously, she adds, companies would still have to invest in tag readers and related equipment.
Still, most observers believe it's only a matter of time before the express industry goes over to RFID. DHL has already gone public with its plans to tag all of its shipments within the decade. And though he doesn't specify a timeline, it's clear FedEx's Zanca is thinking along the same lines. "It's safe to say this technology will evolve to the point where it will have a place on all of our shipments and packages and be an important part of our operations," he says. And UPS? Right now, the carrier says it has no immediate plans to tag individual packages. But that will undoubtedly change if one of its competitors takes the plunge. In the race to move packages smarter, faster and cheaper, no one wants to risk getting a slow start out of the gate.
RFID goes postal
Consumers beware: Postal services around the world have big plans to read your mail. But postal patrons need not worry about local letter carriers' scanning their private correspondence. The readers will be RFID pOréals that scan individual pieces of mail to expedite sorting and dispatching.
Though the U.S. Postal Service has been something of a laggard in this regard—it's just now looking at ways to use RFID—other countries are swiftly moving forward with the technology. Swedish Post, for example, is using RFID-enabled postal sorting equipment, RFID cards that monitor drivers' access to postal vehicles, and RFID systems to detect package tampering.
Korea is looking at using RFID to automate the entire process of mail delivery, from the time a package is accepted through classification and dispatching. And postal officials in India and Taiwan have already met with Microsoft to discuss using a new postal-related RFID package that Microsoft unveiled at the Taipei 2005—18th Asian International Stamp Exhibition last fall.
Microsoft's sudden interest in postal systems is easily explained by the market's growth projections. Analysts at London-based Research and Markets project that the global market for postal-related RFID systems (including tags) will be worth at least $3 billion by 2016—a number that could go much higher if item-level tagging gains acceptance earlier than expected. The study predicts over one trillion postal items will be tagged yearly, making the sector second only to the retail supply chain when it comes to the worldwide market for RFID.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."