John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
By the time his turn rolled around, Tom Shields had heard an earful about RFID. Almost none of the reports were favorable. It's costly and unreliable, warned those who had gone before him. The benefits to suppliers have been oversold, he was cautioned. And the return on investment? He'd better be patient. He'd probably find himself measuring the ROI not in months, but in years. bypass the first generation of RFID technology and go directly to the For the rest of the world, complying with Wal-Mart's RFID mandate was challenge enough. So why did TI raise the bar?
But those reports didn't discourage Shields, who is the RFID program manager for Texas Instruments' Educational & Productivity Solutions (E&PS) unit. Whenever the talk turned to RFID (radio-frequency identification) and its legendarily elusive ROI, he just smiled to himself. Shields had spent a lot of time thinking things through, and he was confident that his team's experience would be different. For one thing, his RFID project would be no slap- and-ship affair. Nor would it be aimed strictly at complying with Wal-Mart's mandate. Instead, the TI division would integrate RFID tags into its internal operations from the start. And it would use the data generated by the tags to solve business problems and streamline operations.
The TI division set a few other ambitious goals for itself as well. It would not just meet the January 2006 deadline for shipping RFID-tagged cases and pallets to Wal-Mart; it would beat it. It would also upstage everyone else where technology was concerned. Shields' group wouldn't waste its time with the tags everybody else was using. Their plan was to second generation (Gen 2).
This was at once a bold step and a calculated risk. Although Gen 2 technology offers significant advantages over the first generation (greater speed and improved accuracy, among them), no one had successfully used it yet on Wal- Mart-bound shipments. And there was no guarantee that the TI division, which makes high-end graphing, scientific and financial calculators, would be able to do it either.
Rocky start
In fact, the project got off to a less than auspicious start. In the early days, the RFID team faced the challenge of planning around a completely untried and untested technology. At the time, the only Gen 2 equipment available was still in the beta stage. No one knew exactly what the final product would look like or what its capabilities might be. Nor did they know exactly when it would be commercially available. Fortunately for the team, those questions were quickly resolved after the Gen 2 standards were ratified in late 2004.
Immature technology wasn't the only problem the E&PS division faced. Although RFID tags were already in use by the time TI began its tests, many of the tags' properties were still unknown. For example, nobody knew whether RFID tags could withstand the shrink-wrapping process, in which temperatures soar to nearly 300 degrees, says Shields. "No one in the industry could tell us for sure if an RFID tag would survive [a trip] through a shrink wrap machine."
A few tests provided the answer. Shields' research team discovered that despite their exposure to 300-degree heat, the tags never exceeded 150 degrees in temperature. Tests also confirmed that their trip through the shrink-wrap machine left them unharmed. Every one of the tags remained readable afterward.
It may have started out with some disadvantages, but the TI division also went into the project with some factors in its favor. For one thing, it could call on the expertise of its sister division, Texas Instruments RFid Systems, which manufactures RFID tags and inlays. For another, it had time on its side. As a second-tier Wal-Mart supplier, the E&PS unit escaped the January 2005 RFID compliance deadline. It would have until January 2006 to comply with the RFID mandate.
In the end, Shields' confidence proved to be justified. In late December, well ahead of Wal-Mart's deadline for its second-tier suppliers, TI shipped 12 different SKUs bearing Gen 2 tags from its distribution center in Alliance, Texas, to Wal-Mart DCs in Alabama, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Texas. With those shipments, it became the first consumer packaged goods (CPG) manufacturer to ship Gen 2- tagged cases and pallets to Wal-Mart, handily beating even the titans of the CPG industry like Procter & Gamble and Kimberly-Clark.
Out of the gate
This wasn't about being the first to use Gen 2 technology, of course. It was about using RFID technology intelligently and with an eye toward the future. Though slapping Gen 1 tags onto its cartons would have been far easier, the TI managers figured they'd be wasting their time. For one thing, Gen 2 technology is a global standard. TI, which has customers in Europe, would have to adopt it sooner or later. For another, TI believes that sometime in the next 12 months, retail heavyweights like Target, Best Buy, and, yes, Wal-Mart will ask suppliers to begin switching over to Gen 2 tags.
"We pretty much came out of the gate knowing we wanted to be Gen 2 compliant," says Shields. "We wanted to make investments that were flexible and agile, so we wouldn't have to re-invest in the technology down the road." TI, he reports, is now ready to replicate the system in place at the Alliance DC when its European and other domestic customers come on line.
Compliance issues aside, TI expects to benefit from RFID technology in its internal operations. For example, the E&PS division believes data generated by the tags will help prevent stock-outs, particularly during the busy back-to-school selling season, when demand for calculators peaks. "Back-toschool is our Christmas time for educational items," says Keith Hodnett, vice president at Texas Instruments and supply chain manager for the E&PS unit. Real-time sales data would alert the company if inventories began to dip, giving it time to rush replenishments to stores.
RFID technology will also enable TI to track the cardboard display units it ships to retail stores to stimulate sales. Starting this summer, those displays will arrive bearing RFID tags, allowing TI to monitor their whereabouts and gather valuable data on retail sales patterns. "We'll get the data points back on when they are stocking and disposing [of] those units, which is [information] we haven't had before," says Hodnett. "So we [will have] some new data that will help us better understand cycle times, from the time we build and ship that display, to the time [the retailers] actually use it on the floor."
A technology for all seasons
Those are just the supply chain-related benefits. TI has already identified several non supply chain-related applications for the RFID tags as well. "We recognize that this technology brings more to the table than just increased supply chain visibility," says Shields. "We have identified other pockets of opportunity where we can apply this technology ..."
For example, the company plans to use RFID tags to track the hundreds of laptops and PDAs issued to employees. Right now, the company conducts an audit of these electronic assets once a year, says Shields. Converting to RFID tags will eliminate the need to send employees out to catalog every piece of equipment, he notes. "It's a great benefit to be able to track them automatically with RFID."
Beyond that, the company believes RFID will improve security. TI plans to extend RFID tracking to include calculators in the pre-production phase and for controlling access to its facilities. TI already uses badges to monitor entries and exits, says Shields. Adding RFID chips would be a relatively simple matter.
The benefits seem clear enough, but what about the legendarily elusive ROI? In truth, the TI division doesn't expect to see a return on its RFID investment right away. "We did some analysis that showed it would take two or three years to get the return back," says Hodnett, "but that did- n't discourage us."
Hodnett's apparent lack of concern is easily explained. TI carried out its RFID project on a shoestring budget. The company set aside just $500,000 for its initial investment in hardware, software, consulting services and integration. That figure also includes the first 50,000 RFID tags that TI used in its project.
Even that modest sum turned out to be more than the division needed. Hodnett reports that the project came in under budget. He says he also expects that ongoing investments will be minimal.
What's ahead?
As for those ongoing investments, it appears that at least part of the money will go toward the purchase of mountains of tags. Hodnett estimates that TI will use 250,000 RFID tags this year, which will cover any new retail mandates the company receives. If Target and Best Buy begin asking suppliers to use Gen 2 tags, as TI expects, it will be ready. The TI division is also discussing RFID pilots with several European retailers.
Farther down the road, TI plans to use Gen 2 RFID technology on its products from cradle to grave. By embedding tags in individual items, it will be able to track products in the pre-production stage. Those same tags will help deter theft once the products hit store shelves (most of these calculators sell for $100 or more).
Eventually, RFID tags may continue to play a role long after the calculators leave the retail store. Tags would enable the manufacturer to monitor returns and assure the environmentally safe disposal of its calculators. "As we roll this down to the item level, we have the opportunity to see products from cradle to grave," says Hodnett. "We're not there yet, but we've got a clear vision for it."
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.