Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
In an industry teeming with specialists, Ken Miesemer stands apart. Unlike his peers in the consulting world, he's never cultivated an expertise in productivity optimization or supply chain strategy fulfillment. Instead, he's done a little bit of everything during his career—from ERP installations to distribution network design to international logistics. And he makes no apologies for that. In fact, he believes his wide-ranging experience will prove to be a big plus in his new consulting gig at St. Onge and Company.
Before joining St. Onge in January, Miesemer spent 14 years at Hershey Foods, most recently as director of distribution operations. In that post, he oversaw approximately 4 million square feet of DC space in the mainland United States, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Many might consider a position like that to be the capstone of their career. But for Miesemer, DC management was just another waystation along a journey that has included stints in material management, systems implementation, project management, transportation planning, network design and international operations.
A graduate of Millersville University in Millersville, Pa., Miesemer has continued his education through the American Production and Inventory Control Society (APICS) and Penn State's Logistics certificate programs. Today, he is both a speaker and an educator as well as the author of a book, Start Up of a World Class DC. He currently serves on the Warehousing Education and Research Council's board of directors.
Miesemer recently spoke with DC VELOCITY Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald about his unconventional career path, his secret for keeping his team interested in their work, and what to avoid when designing a DC network.
Q: Share with us a little bit about your career progression. Where did you begin and how did you end up where you are?
A: We are definitely talking about a tossed salad of jobs. I have been fortunate to have had experiences in areas like materials management, production planning, and transportation operations/planning. I spent years putting in MRP [materials requirements planning] and ERP [enterprise resource planning] systems, which were followed by supply chain planning and execution software implementations. I moved into distribution and warehousing and led several U.S. network redesigns. Recently, I had an opportunity to work in international logistics, exports, imports and customs. I guess I would say that having been moved around has really helped me to understand supply chain. It has been very positive for my career.
Q: It has certainly given you a broad view.
A: Absolutely. While I didn't get to focus as much on any one particular area as I might have liked, it certainly helps to understand the big picture. This is especially valuable when you drive change and must understand the impact on the organization. I have been very lucky to work in multiple areas and certainly recommend a broad scope to others.
Q: What prompted your decision to leave Hershey Foods?
A: That's a good question. I had a lot of fun there. It was a good run. But most of the tough work was completed, and I was starting to get a little bored. So now I'm back in the fray again. I can't talk about my clients, but I am involved in two very exciting network redesign projects. It is what I love doing.
Q: What do you see as the skills needed to succeed in the logistics profession?
A: I would say that you've got to be curious and want to continuously learn. You must be able to think strategically and not get caught up in the tactical stuff. If you find you're spending too much time on, let's call it the tactical piece, you try to refocus some energies back into where you need to be in three to five years. I think one of the best ways to do that is with your team. Spend some time doing strategy visioning. Talk about the near-term initiatives, but also talk about what the next big project will be. You can put a lot of energy into the business if you get people excited about where they are going.
Q: It's all about the journey, not the destination.
A: Right. I think people often focus only on what they've got on their plate right now, but you really have to look several projects down the road or several years out.
Q: Essentially, you've got to keep yourself and your people out of the trap of "I don't have any time to think today; I'm too busy doing my job."
A: Absolutely. If you focus solely on day-to-day tactics, you'll definitely fall behind and won't be leading your team.
Q: What do you consider the biggest accomplishment of your supply chain career to date?
A: The most exciting project—the one that really stretched me—was Hershey's Eastern Distribution Center III project. That project entailed building a 1.2 million-squarefoot DC—the largest distribution center Hershey had ever built—from the ground up and on a fast-track schedule.
Q: What made it so special for you personally?
A: Well, it was big. Certainly I had done warehousing and distribution work in the past, but nothing on this scale. I had responsibility for most of the projects to get the building up and running. The project also included selecting both a new WMS [warehouse management system] and a new 3PL [third-party logistics service provider]. On top of that, we were redesigning processes, metrics, and financials to be world class. In the past, every Hershey distribution center had been run independently. They had separate systems and nothing was standardized. The vision was to put up a world-class center that we could use as a model as we added more facilities.
Q: Turning to another topic, I know you have some strong views on the dangers of complacency. You argue that logisticians should aspire to something more than just a smooth-running logistics operation whose workings have become "transparent" or invisible to others.
A: You're absolutely right. I believe that as logisticians, we cannot be satisfied with transparency. Several years ago, one of my [initiatives focused on going beyond simply] delivering to customers' expectations. We implemented a program we called "Distribution Alliance" to actually reach out and build relationships with customers, and to create more of a competitive advantage in the marketplace. We didn't want to [be satisfied with just delivering orders on time]. We wanted sales people to be delighted with the service. As we progressed, the sales force commented that the services we were providing [allowed them to spend more of their time on] sales and less on discussing problems with customers. I think that we were wrong in the past to be satisfied with simply delivering goods on time, damage free, etc., etc.
Q: What is the next big thing in supply chain?
A: I'm going to give you two areas. First of all, we see more and more people jumping into low-cost, offshore sourcing. In my opinion, it's putting a strain on our distribution networks. The old network designs aren't optimal anymore. Everyone seems to be going to the same place, where the ports are. There is a huge strain on labor, carrier capacity, highway congestion, and so forth.
Q: It seems that companies are continuing to cluster around what we all know are bottlenecks.
A: Absolutely. That's really the point. We need to look at ways to spread out that volume. I have talked to some companies that are looking closely at bringing goods in through Mexican ports and then sending them into the United States via rail.
We really need to start looking at the big picture, not short-term issues like how to squeeze another nickel out of our manufacturing costs. The hidden costs of global supply chains are often overlooked. In some of the congested port areas, labor is in short supply. You see companies forced to lower their standards when hiring workers. Turnover is very high and productivity is dropping off rapidly.
Q: It sounds similar to the truck driver shortage, but we
don't hear much about it in terms of DC operations.
A: You're right and that gets me to the next point. I recently attended a large conference that featured a panel discussion on today's transportation issues—fuel costs, highway congestion, problems at ports, and so on. I got the impression the panelists were throwing their hands up and saying, "Fuel is going up, we need to pay drivers more, and there's not much we can do." But I didn't hear anyone talk about things that we can manage, like the amount of driver and equipment time wasted when we make a driver wait six to eight hours to offload. As an industry, we've got to start focusing on keeping the drivers and equipment moving.
The other thing that just amazes me is how much equipment is moving at partial capacity. The fact is, everyone is looking for more frequent replenishments—you know, smaller orders. We've got to work together to maximize this limited capacity.
Q: Who do you think should champion this cause—associations, elected officials, industry professionals, journalists?
A: It should start with industry leaders.
Q: Could the answer be these distribution alliances you keep referencing?
A: Possibly. It's a concept that I developed some years ago as we were rebuilding a U.S. distribution network. I wanted more out of our group than just another transparent back-end function. My feeling was that we had an opportunity to synchronize with customers. The process was started by making simple customer calls. It turned into a much more focused effort over time.
Q: Are you saying it's as simple as opening channels of communication?
A: In some ways, yes. You have to start somewhere. I generally recommend starting with a couple of strategic accounts. When you start meeting with them and sharing tours, you'll quickly learn whether they have any interest in working together to cut down on waste.
Q: As you know, logistics and supply chain professionals have long clamored for a seat at the boardroom table. Are we there yet?
A: I think a lot more companies understand the strategic importance of supply chain. However, a number of companies still are not there. They don't recognize the competitive nature of supply chain. They're just assuming that once it gets to a certain point of excellence, it will sustain itself. Focusing on cost and basic service alone will not drive competitive advantage.
Q: So they set it up the way they want it and then put it on autopilot. They're not asking themselves where they're going to be 18 months from now or what the next project will be.
A: Unfortunately, business change is so rapid that unless you have the best people driving and responding to change, you will fall behind. I do see companies failing to devote high-level expertise to their supply chain. The companies that recognize the value and have senior supply chain leadership positions will win.
Q: Any closing thoughts?
A: You hear about so many changes in the supply chain—rapid developments in systems, people and the processes that drive this industry. It is a time when we, as supply chain professionals, had better keep current if we are to stay in the business.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."