John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
Economic development executive Kathy Moellenberdt accepts that pitching Topeka, Kan., as a tourist mecca is a lost cause. "We can't talk about mountain views and oceans," she admits. But it's clear that she's ready to fight when it comes to bringing new business to the community.
Moellenberdt has set her sights on business in general, and distribution centers in particular. Topeka is ideally situated for distribution operations, she says. "[O]ur central location lends itself to a very strong network transportation system." She's also quick to point out that Topeka offers a large, welleducated labor force and that Kansas, which has spent more than a half billion dollars to improve its highways, now boasts some of the best roads in the country.
If Topeka strikes you as an unlikely source for a marketing pitch, welcome to the new world of site selection. The big industrial regions— Southern California's Inland Empire, Columbus, the Port of Houston, Indianapolis, Chicago, Memphis, the Greater Atlanta area—are no longer the only ones mounting aggressive marketing campaigns. They've been joined by a horde of lesser-known but nonetheless scrappy players—Topeka, Kan.; Anchorage, Alaska; Kalamazoo, Mich.; Scranton, Pa.; Little Rock, Ark.—all hungry for new business.
To appeal to a distribution audience, these newcomers typically promote themselves as logistics hubs, or logistics villages, as they're also known. They're emphasizing the features most likely to attract a logistics professional's eye—a central geographic location; easy access to rail, highway, ocean or air connections; cheap land; or a bountiful labor force. Some even offer ready-to-occupy space in multi-tenant complexes specifically designed for distribution, with on-site logistics services and, of course, easy access to multiple modes of transportation.
Their pitches may prove hard to resist. The smaller cities definitely have some selling points, says Cliff Lynch, principal of C.F. Lynch & Associates, a logistics consulting firm. "[S]maller cities often offer lower land and building prices, tax incentives, and better labor pools [than large metropolitan areas]. And carriers will respond to service requirements if there is enough volume involved."
the new hot spots
If you want to attract DC business to your area, it's no longer enough to be business friendly. Now, you have to be RFID friendly as well.
With the RFID revolution well under way, economic development agencies are actively pitching their regions' technological capabilities in hopes of attracting RFID-enabled DC operations. In fact, two of the more aggressive promoters—North Texas and North London (yes, in England)—took the unusual step of setting up exhibits at the RFID World conference and exhibition in Dallas earlier this year.
Officials from the North Texas region have branded the Dallas/Fort Worth area as an RFID Hub, and not without cause. The Dallas/Fort Worth region, where both Wal-Mart and Target carried out their initial RFID deployments, has become something of a hotbed for RFID activity. Today, the area is home to companies specializing in all facets of RFID, including chip makers, hardware companies, software developers, and consultants offering RFID implementation and integration services, according to the Metroplex Technology Business Council.
Meanwhile, the North England Inward Investment Agency (NEIIA) is out promoting the ready availability of RFID expertise in North London—an area that includes Manchester, Newcastle, Liverpool, Leeds and Sheffield. The region is home to the University of Hull's Logistics Institute, whose staff members have vast experience with RFID implementations, says David Allison, NEIIA's chairman. That resource alone, he says, makes North London the ideal base for RFID-enabled companies looking to penetrate the European market.
Not to be outdone, economic development officials from the Atlanta area are also promoting their region's RFID capabilities. While other parts of the nation are experiencing a shortage of RFID expertise, Atlanta has no such problems, they claim. Atlanta's hometown university, Georgia Tech, produces more RFID engineers than any other school in the country.
Won't you be my neighbor?
Ironically, it wasn't so long ago that communities actively worked to keep distribution centers out. The prevailing opinion was that DCs made bad neighbors, the kind that attracted big trucks that would clog local roads and foul the air. A DC might bring a few jobs to the area, but not enough to outweigh the inconveniences. "There was a time eight to 10 years ago that most ... regions ... did not want distribution because it took up a lot of land, and communities didn't feel like they got enough jobs to compensate for the lost land," says Gil Mayfield, vice president of distribution center services for real estate developer Carter and Burgess.
The tide of public opinion has turned, says Mayfield. Nowadays, instead of pulling up the welcome mats, many regions are actively courting DCs. No one brings up air quality issues anymore, he says. People have come to realize that DCs, which are typically situated near interstate highways, usually have little impact on local traffic. And for communities desperately seeking to replace lost manufacturing jobs, they represent new hope.
Take Midlink Business Park, for example. Located in Kalamazoo, Mich., this multi-tenant business park occupies a sprawling site that was once home to a General Motors stamping plant. In its heyday, the plant employed 4,500 workers. But in 1999, GM shuttered the facility.
The property was quickly snapped up by a real estate investment firm that recognized its potential as a distribution hub. What attracted the investor's attention were the site's existing rail lines and its strategic location. Kalamazoo is centrally located halfway between Chicago and Detroit, which makes it a more viable logistics hub than Chicago or St. Louis, according to Midland executives.
Before it opened the business park last year, the investment firm completely redeveloped and re-branded the property as a distribution complex. "Generations of families had worked here, so a lot of people had bad feelings about GM leaving," says David Smith, Midlink's president. "It became important to us to emphasize that this is not a GM facility anymore—it's a new day, with a new world business model—distribution." Today, four companies are using the site for distribution, and Midlink hopes to add more.
Let's make a deal
If Midlink's challenge has been to erase the site's associations with the old GM plant, Anchorage's struggle will be educating the public. "There are so many misconceptions about Anchorage," says Bob Poe, head of the Anchorage Economic Development Corp. "Geography teachers have always presented Alaska as being a little bigger than Hawaii and located in a box [on a map] off Baja California. But that's not the case. A lot of people don't realize you can get to London, Tokyo and New York from Anchorage in about the same amount of time."
In fact, Anchorage is nine hours away (by jet) from 95 percent of the industrialized world, making it an ideal gateway to international locations, says Poe. Air carriers have already discovered this. FedEx and Northwest Airlines have established sorting centers in Anchorage for processing Asia-bound cargo, and other carriers use it as a fueling and maintenance stop. Now the challenge will be to attract other types of distribution business.
To help draw that business, Anchorage is offering attractive incentive packages. And it's by no means alone. Virtually every economic development bureau—from Topeka and Kalamazoo to Alabama's Port of Huntsville and Seguin, Texas—stands ready to offer a variety of enticements if that's what it takes to seal the deal.
Some offer free land. Topeka, for example, gave Target 143 acres of land (valued at $1.6 million) as an inducement to build a 1.4 millionsquare-foot DC in the region.
Others offer hard cash. Officials in Seguin, Texas, a community located 35 miles east of San Antonio along I-10, will give $6,000 to new or expanding companies for each permanent job created. "Seguin officials take a direct cash-on-the-barrelhead approach to economic development," says Ramón Lozano, executive director of the Seguin Economic Development Corp. "If you can offer grants up front for hard costs, it makes it a lot easier to market your community."
Location, location, location
Though economic development agencies like to think otherwise, the reality is that companies rarely choose a specific region based on incentives. "We generally see incentives as being third or fourth on the [priority] list," says Mayfield. "First, the transportation, labor, and construction cost aspects have to be right."
It's more common for incentives to come into play after a company has settled on a region and is deciding among two or three finalists within that region. That was the case when recreation equipment retailer REI began searching for a site where it could build a new DC that would serve the East Coast. After looking at 80 sites in an area that stretched roughly from Tennessee to New Jersey, REI narrowed its search to 20 sites within a 200mile radius of Bedford, Pa.
At that point, the bidding wars began. "Within that Mid-Atlantic region, there was certainly some stiff competition," remarks Dave Presley, REI's vice president of distribution and logistics.
Among the bidders was Bedford County Business Park, which eventually emerged the winner. Bedford County offered REI both tax abatements and training allocations, though the retailer is quick to point out that other factors also entered into its decision. For example, Bedford County had already cleared the land, completed the environmental studies and taken care of infrastructure improvements like water support systems for the 39-acre parcel, which saved REI time and money.
And perhaps more to the point, the Bedford County Business Park lies in close proximity to the general transit corridor that REI had determined was best for its distribution needs. As appealing as the give-aways may be, says Presley, ultimately it's location that matters. "I can't stress enough the importance of considering your current customer and vendor base, and your plans for inbound logistics," he says. "All of that has to come together to define the region where your DC needs to be."
get ready for the pitch(es)
If you want to attract DC business to your area, it's no longer enough to be business friendly. Now, you have to be RFID friendly as well.
Starting a site search? It won't be long before economic development agencies are lining up to pitch you on their regions' attractions. Here are some of the locations you're likely to hear from:
Atlanta
Even road congestion hasn't stopped this region from booming. Atlanta, which aims to become the Silicon Valley of logistics, has benefited from the southward migration of the U.S. population, particularly to Florida, and the growing popularity of the Port of Savannah. DelMonte, PepsiCo, Solo Cup and Staples have all announced their intent to open DCs in Atlanta, which has become the nation's fourth largest center of transportation and logistics employment.
Columbus
Logistics has become big business for Columbus, employing nearly 40,000 people and contributing $2.6 billion to the local economy each year. And it's about to get bigger. The new Rickenbacker Intermodal Facility offers more than 20 million square feet of space for logistics operations, and a new 580,000-square-foot stateof-the-art DC is nearly complete. Columbus also stands to gain from the development of the Heartland Corridor, a series of intermodal projects stretching from Norfolk, Va., to Columbus.
Southern California (Inland Empire)
With its (relatively) affordable land and growing base of skilled workers, California's Inland Empire has become something of a distribution mecca. But its biggest asset is perhaps its location. The Inland Empire lies about 37 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean and east of Los Angeles. Every truck or rail shipment traveling from Southern California to points north or east (say, Las Vegas, Phoenix or Denver) passes through the area. Companies that have built DCs within the region include Target, Wal-Mart, Kohls, Home Depot and Walgreens.
Seguin, Texas
Situated 35 miles east of San Antonio along I-10 in central Texas, Seguin is banking on its strategic location to draw distribution business. Once construction of state highway 130 is completed, truckers will be able to avoid the congested I-35 by hopping onto 130 just north of Austin and heading south to Seguin, which serves as the interchange between 130 and I-10. But Seguin is not leaving anything to chance. It also offers a variety of incentives, from rent subsidies and tax abatements to loan assistance and grants.
Topeka, Kansas
Boasting a central location and proximity to major highways like I-70, I-470 and U.S. 75, Topeka hopes to become a major center for distribution. And because it's only an hour away from Kansas City, Topeka offers easy access to intermodal transportation as well. Retailers have begun to take notice. Payless ShoeSource and Ritz Camera/Boater's World have already opened national DCs here.
Anchorage, Alaska
Dubbed the "Crossroads of the World," Anchorage is second only to Memphis in the amount of landed cargo weight in the United States. Because Anchorage is just nine hours away (by jet) from most of the industrial world, boosters are touting it as the ideal location from which to distribute high-value and time-sensitive products or parts to Europe and Asia. In hopes of attracting more distribution and logistics business to the region, Anchorage has awarded a $150,000 grant to Commodity Forwarders Inc. for the development of a global logistics facility.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."