John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
Economic development executive Kathy Moellenberdt accepts that pitching Topeka, Kan., as a tourist mecca is a lost cause. "We can't talk about mountain views and oceans," she admits. But it's clear that she's ready to fight when it comes to bringing new business to the community.
Moellenberdt has set her sights on business in general, and distribution centers in particular. Topeka is ideally situated for distribution operations, she says. "[O]ur central location lends itself to a very strong network transportation system." She's also quick to point out that Topeka offers a large, welleducated labor force and that Kansas, which has spent more than a half billion dollars to improve its highways, now boasts some of the best roads in the country.
If Topeka strikes you as an unlikely source for a marketing pitch, welcome to the new world of site selection. The big industrial regions— Southern California's Inland Empire, Columbus, the Port of Houston, Indianapolis, Chicago, Memphis, the Greater Atlanta area—are no longer the only ones mounting aggressive marketing campaigns. They've been joined by a horde of lesser-known but nonetheless scrappy players—Topeka, Kan.; Anchorage, Alaska; Kalamazoo, Mich.; Scranton, Pa.; Little Rock, Ark.—all hungry for new business.
To appeal to a distribution audience, these newcomers typically promote themselves as logistics hubs, or logistics villages, as they're also known. They're emphasizing the features most likely to attract a logistics professional's eye—a central geographic location; easy access to rail, highway, ocean or air connections; cheap land; or a bountiful labor force. Some even offer ready-to-occupy space in multi-tenant complexes specifically designed for distribution, with on-site logistics services and, of course, easy access to multiple modes of transportation.
Their pitches may prove hard to resist. The smaller cities definitely have some selling points, says Cliff Lynch, principal of C.F. Lynch & Associates, a logistics consulting firm. "[S]maller cities often offer lower land and building prices, tax incentives, and better labor pools [than large metropolitan areas]. And carriers will respond to service requirements if there is enough volume involved."
the new hot spots
If you want to attract DC business to your area, it's no longer enough to be business friendly. Now, you have to be RFID friendly as well.
With the RFID revolution well under way, economic development agencies are actively pitching their regions' technological capabilities in hopes of attracting RFID-enabled DC operations. In fact, two of the more aggressive promoters—North Texas and North London (yes, in England)—took the unusual step of setting up exhibits at the RFID World conference and exhibition in Dallas earlier this year.
Officials from the North Texas region have branded the Dallas/Fort Worth area as an RFID Hub, and not without cause. The Dallas/Fort Worth region, where both Wal-Mart and Target carried out their initial RFID deployments, has become something of a hotbed for RFID activity. Today, the area is home to companies specializing in all facets of RFID, including chip makers, hardware companies, software developers, and consultants offering RFID implementation and integration services, according to the Metroplex Technology Business Council.
Meanwhile, the North England Inward Investment Agency (NEIIA) is out promoting the ready availability of RFID expertise in North London—an area that includes Manchester, Newcastle, Liverpool, Leeds and Sheffield. The region is home to the University of Hull's Logistics Institute, whose staff members have vast experience with RFID implementations, says David Allison, NEIIA's chairman. That resource alone, he says, makes North London the ideal base for RFID-enabled companies looking to penetrate the European market.
Not to be outdone, economic development officials from the Atlanta area are also promoting their region's RFID capabilities. While other parts of the nation are experiencing a shortage of RFID expertise, Atlanta has no such problems, they claim. Atlanta's hometown university, Georgia Tech, produces more RFID engineers than any other school in the country.
Won't you be my neighbor?
Ironically, it wasn't so long ago that communities actively worked to keep distribution centers out. The prevailing opinion was that DCs made bad neighbors, the kind that attracted big trucks that would clog local roads and foul the air. A DC might bring a few jobs to the area, but not enough to outweigh the inconveniences. "There was a time eight to 10 years ago that most ... regions ... did not want distribution because it took up a lot of land, and communities didn't feel like they got enough jobs to compensate for the lost land," says Gil Mayfield, vice president of distribution center services for real estate developer Carter and Burgess.
The tide of public opinion has turned, says Mayfield. Nowadays, instead of pulling up the welcome mats, many regions are actively courting DCs. No one brings up air quality issues anymore, he says. People have come to realize that DCs, which are typically situated near interstate highways, usually have little impact on local traffic. And for communities desperately seeking to replace lost manufacturing jobs, they represent new hope.
Take Midlink Business Park, for example. Located in Kalamazoo, Mich., this multi-tenant business park occupies a sprawling site that was once home to a General Motors stamping plant. In its heyday, the plant employed 4,500 workers. But in 1999, GM shuttered the facility.
The property was quickly snapped up by a real estate investment firm that recognized its potential as a distribution hub. What attracted the investor's attention were the site's existing rail lines and its strategic location. Kalamazoo is centrally located halfway between Chicago and Detroit, which makes it a more viable logistics hub than Chicago or St. Louis, according to Midland executives.
Before it opened the business park last year, the investment firm completely redeveloped and re-branded the property as a distribution complex. "Generations of families had worked here, so a lot of people had bad feelings about GM leaving," says David Smith, Midlink's president. "It became important to us to emphasize that this is not a GM facility anymore—it's a new day, with a new world business model—distribution." Today, four companies are using the site for distribution, and Midlink hopes to add more.
Let's make a deal
If Midlink's challenge has been to erase the site's associations with the old GM plant, Anchorage's struggle will be educating the public. "There are so many misconceptions about Anchorage," says Bob Poe, head of the Anchorage Economic Development Corp. "Geography teachers have always presented Alaska as being a little bigger than Hawaii and located in a box [on a map] off Baja California. But that's not the case. A lot of people don't realize you can get to London, Tokyo and New York from Anchorage in about the same amount of time."
In fact, Anchorage is nine hours away (by jet) from 95 percent of the industrialized world, making it an ideal gateway to international locations, says Poe. Air carriers have already discovered this. FedEx and Northwest Airlines have established sorting centers in Anchorage for processing Asia-bound cargo, and other carriers use it as a fueling and maintenance stop. Now the challenge will be to attract other types of distribution business.
To help draw that business, Anchorage is offering attractive incentive packages. And it's by no means alone. Virtually every economic development bureau—from Topeka and Kalamazoo to Alabama's Port of Huntsville and Seguin, Texas—stands ready to offer a variety of enticements if that's what it takes to seal the deal.
Some offer free land. Topeka, for example, gave Target 143 acres of land (valued at $1.6 million) as an inducement to build a 1.4 millionsquare-foot DC in the region.
Others offer hard cash. Officials in Seguin, Texas, a community located 35 miles east of San Antonio along I-10, will give $6,000 to new or expanding companies for each permanent job created. "Seguin officials take a direct cash-on-the-barrelhead approach to economic development," says Ramón Lozano, executive director of the Seguin Economic Development Corp. "If you can offer grants up front for hard costs, it makes it a lot easier to market your community."
Location, location, location
Though economic development agencies like to think otherwise, the reality is that companies rarely choose a specific region based on incentives. "We generally see incentives as being third or fourth on the [priority] list," says Mayfield. "First, the transportation, labor, and construction cost aspects have to be right."
It's more common for incentives to come into play after a company has settled on a region and is deciding among two or three finalists within that region. That was the case when recreation equipment retailer REI began searching for a site where it could build a new DC that would serve the East Coast. After looking at 80 sites in an area that stretched roughly from Tennessee to New Jersey, REI narrowed its search to 20 sites within a 200mile radius of Bedford, Pa.
At that point, the bidding wars began. "Within that Mid-Atlantic region, there was certainly some stiff competition," remarks Dave Presley, REI's vice president of distribution and logistics.
Among the bidders was Bedford County Business Park, which eventually emerged the winner. Bedford County offered REI both tax abatements and training allocations, though the retailer is quick to point out that other factors also entered into its decision. For example, Bedford County had already cleared the land, completed the environmental studies and taken care of infrastructure improvements like water support systems for the 39-acre parcel, which saved REI time and money.
And perhaps more to the point, the Bedford County Business Park lies in close proximity to the general transit corridor that REI had determined was best for its distribution needs. As appealing as the give-aways may be, says Presley, ultimately it's location that matters. "I can't stress enough the importance of considering your current customer and vendor base, and your plans for inbound logistics," he says. "All of that has to come together to define the region where your DC needs to be."
get ready for the pitch(es)
If you want to attract DC business to your area, it's no longer enough to be business friendly. Now, you have to be RFID friendly as well.
Starting a site search? It won't be long before economic development agencies are lining up to pitch you on their regions' attractions. Here are some of the locations you're likely to hear from:
Atlanta
Even road congestion hasn't stopped this region from booming. Atlanta, which aims to become the Silicon Valley of logistics, has benefited from the southward migration of the U.S. population, particularly to Florida, and the growing popularity of the Port of Savannah. DelMonte, PepsiCo, Solo Cup and Staples have all announced their intent to open DCs in Atlanta, which has become the nation's fourth largest center of transportation and logistics employment.
Columbus
Logistics has become big business for Columbus, employing nearly 40,000 people and contributing $2.6 billion to the local economy each year. And it's about to get bigger. The new Rickenbacker Intermodal Facility offers more than 20 million square feet of space for logistics operations, and a new 580,000-square-foot stateof-the-art DC is nearly complete. Columbus also stands to gain from the development of the Heartland Corridor, a series of intermodal projects stretching from Norfolk, Va., to Columbus.
Southern California (Inland Empire)
With its (relatively) affordable land and growing base of skilled workers, California's Inland Empire has become something of a distribution mecca. But its biggest asset is perhaps its location. The Inland Empire lies about 37 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean and east of Los Angeles. Every truck or rail shipment traveling from Southern California to points north or east (say, Las Vegas, Phoenix or Denver) passes through the area. Companies that have built DCs within the region include Target, Wal-Mart, Kohls, Home Depot and Walgreens.
Seguin, Texas
Situated 35 miles east of San Antonio along I-10 in central Texas, Seguin is banking on its strategic location to draw distribution business. Once construction of state highway 130 is completed, truckers will be able to avoid the congested I-35 by hopping onto 130 just north of Austin and heading south to Seguin, which serves as the interchange between 130 and I-10. But Seguin is not leaving anything to chance. It also offers a variety of incentives, from rent subsidies and tax abatements to loan assistance and grants.
Topeka, Kansas
Boasting a central location and proximity to major highways like I-70, I-470 and U.S. 75, Topeka hopes to become a major center for distribution. And because it's only an hour away from Kansas City, Topeka offers easy access to intermodal transportation as well. Retailers have begun to take notice. Payless ShoeSource and Ritz Camera/Boater's World have already opened national DCs here.
Anchorage, Alaska
Dubbed the "Crossroads of the World," Anchorage is second only to Memphis in the amount of landed cargo weight in the United States. Because Anchorage is just nine hours away (by jet) from most of the industrial world, boosters are touting it as the ideal location from which to distribute high-value and time-sensitive products or parts to Europe and Asia. In hopes of attracting more distribution and logistics business to the region, Anchorage has awarded a $150,000 grant to Commodity Forwarders Inc. for the development of a global logistics facility.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.