David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
There was a time when warehouses were, well, sort of like big old warehouses. They were places to store things until a customer needed them. But those days are long gone. Today's warehouses have evolved into modern distribution centers that have become the center of the supply chain universe.
Inside these high-tech buildings, there's a lot more than storage taking place. The facilities house activities like cross-docking, sequencing, postponement, value-added services and same-day processing,to name just a few."Instead of being a depository of inventory, the distribution center is now used as a service center," says Bob Shaunnessey, executive director of the Warehousing Education and Research Council (WERC). "This requires facilities to be more flexible to respond to the different needs of the supply chain."
That need to remain nimble—to adapt easily to changing circumstances, customer needs, order profiles and products handled—is reflected in the design of today's DCs. Many, for example, feature new bolted racking that's made to be quickly disassembled and erected elsewhere as needs dictate.
Like the equipment, the buildings themselves may be configured for flexibility. This is particularly true of very large DCs, says Mike Ogle, senior director of technical and engineering services for the Material Handling Industry of America (MHIA). Ogle explains that it's not unusual among today's super-sized DCs—those that occupy more than 500,000 square feet—to be set up as "warehouses within the warehouse." "All product is under one roof," says Ogle, "but you have certain products clustered together." These items are placed into separate pick and pack areas that are duplicated throughout the building, he says. Each area operates as its own mini warehouse and may even have separate shipping doors. They are built for flexibility and to be reconfigured easily, with product re-slotted frequently as various areas grow.
New jobs
It's not just their layout and equipment that distinguishes today's DCs from the warehouse of the past. It's also the activities taking place within their walls. For example, DCs have taken over many tasks once relegated to the manufacturing center.
In the past, most products arrived at the DC as finished goods. But these days, it's not unusual for suppliers to ship partially finished goods to the DC and have the DC associates carry out the final steps. For example, DC workers might handle tasks like installing plugs and transformers on refrigerators to accommodate electrical outlets in the country of final sale.
That practice of delaying final manufacturing until the last possible moment, known as postponement, is gaining traction in a variety of industries. For example, clothing company Gear For Sports receives most of its shirts, sweatshirts and other college apparel as "blanks," that is, without team imprints or logos. Once it determines its order demand, the company sends the items to special areas within its Lenexa, Kansas, DC where designs are stitched or screened onto them.
Likewise, Siemens brings in basic DSL modems to its DCs and holds them until it receives an order. At that point, associates flash specific software needed by the customer onto the modems.
Third-party logistics service provider Menlo Worldwide provides a similar service for a customer that sells copy machines under four different brand names. The supplier ships a single copier model to Menlo's facilities. When an order is received for a particular brand, DC associates insert a name plate onto the copier through a window in the carton.
In addition to light manufacturing, DCs are performing a variety of other value-added services. These range from pre-ticketing items for specific stores to placing garments onto hangers, special packaging and labeling, and building end-of-aisle store displays.
Workers at Del Monte Foods' Lathrop, Calif., DC, for example, label the incoming cans of fruit and package them into store-ready multi-packs. Del Monte found this to be the most cost-effective approach to labeling. Labeling equipment is expensive. By installing the equipment at a single DC, the company eliminated the need to equip all of its fruit processing plants.
Many DCs also offer sequencing service, in which products are picked in a particular order to facilitate subsequent operations. For example, distributors picking parts that will be used in automobile assembly might pick them to match the sequence in which they'll be needed on the line. Other items might be sequenced to speed up put-away at the store level, with workers picking items destined for a particular aisle or area of a retail store into the same carton or tote.
Just passing through!
In some facilities, a large volume of product never enters storage at all. These facilities serve merely as cross-docking centers, where workers receive shipments, break them down, reassemble them and then send them on their way. Cross-docking requires the facility to be both information rich and highly flexible. Sophisticated conveyors and sorters are often employed to accept a pallet load of cases and then sort them to a multitude of destinations, each representing a customer, location or process. These facilities must also have plenty of space available to accumulate products until they are ready to be shipped.
In many instances, cross-docking is made possible by suppliers who perform value-added services before the products are shipped. Customers often ask their distributors to pre-label cartons for individual stores or their own select customers so that when the products arrive as a full truckload, workers at the receiving docks can quickly unload individual cartons and send them through sortation systems that read the individual bar-coded labels and then sort each carton to its designated shipping dock. Once there, the cartons are gathered with products from other suppliers into a load destined for the retail outlet or customer.
The Virtual DC
Customers who have their suppliers perform these functions are bound to ask an obvious question: If I'm already getting my supplier to pre-label and organize my receipts for me so that they can be cross-docked upon arrival, why do I even need a distribution center? Couldn't I save money simply by having my supplier ship the product directly to the store?
That is where the concept of the Virtual DC comes into play. Best Buy currently uses 34 different suppliers for electronic and appliance repair parts. National Parts, a subsidiary of third-party service provider Fidelitone, coordinates the supply chain for these parts and acts as a clearinghouse on behalf of Best Buy. But National Parts does not warehouse these parts. Nor do they pass through a Best Buy DC. Instead, National Parts has a virtual warehouse with a paper inventory only. Its stock bypasses the traditional warehouse and is shipped directly from suppliers to service repair locations on a consistent, predictable basis.
"It is designed to bring standardization for all their repair parts," explains Tom Giovingo, executive vice president of Fidelitone. Giovingo explains that this direct-ship arrangement, which eliminates the need for a DC to handle the parts, saves time and money, reduces transportation requirements, and minimizes the potential for damage caused by handling.
"It sometimes comes down to an economic decision," explains Giovingo. "Is it better to stock products or to pay freight directly from the supplier to the customer?"
Of course, no virtual warehouse can function without accurate and current information on what inventory is in the pipeline and where it's going. "It is just as important for us to provide clients with information as it is to ship their items," says Giovingo.
It is this explosion of information in recent years that has created the biggest opportunities for the distribution center. With its strategic role at the center of the supply chain, the DC is poised to be the point where much of the information is received, channeled, captured and filtered. In addition to serving as the main hub for order fulfillment, the DC is also the place where critical data is captured and distributed, notes John Fontanella, senior vice president of research at Aberdeen Group, a research and consulting company.
Software that provides real-time visibility into inventories, processes and location of products plays a pivotal role in allowing the DC to be the nerve center of information. Suppliers and customers alike can share in this information to track demand and orders or improve their own processes. "Visibility is a major element of typical RFPs [requests for proposals] today," notes Tim Feemster, director of operations for Menlo Worldwide. "In fact, a lot of people are outsourcing just to get that event management capability."
What will the role of the DC be in the future? Well, that depends on how much it transforms itself into a service center.
"The traditional reasons of having storage are declining," says John Langley, professor of supply chain management at Georgia Tech. "DCs of the future are those that add value in other ways."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."