Outsourcing isn't just for the big guys anymore—or just the tiny ones, for that matter. With the explosion in global trade, companies of all sizes are looking for outside help managing their rapidly expanding supply chains.
For those new to outsourcing, the first challenge is choosing a partner. What should you look for in a logistics service provider (LSP)? Though one company's service needs will differ from another's, we think there are some basic criteria that every prospective outsourcer should consider. (See the accompanying sidebar for a sample checklist.) What follows are 14 factors to weigh when choosing a partner:
Financial stability. Though it might feel awkward to question a candidate about its financial stability, it's an essential part of the due diligence. For one thing, you want assurances that the provider will be around for the long term. For another, if you're signing a sizable contract (as is common today), you'll need to ascertain that the logistics service provider has adequate financial resources to provide the support you require.
Business experience. How much experience does the candidate have in providing logistics services in general? How about in your particular industry? Finding a partner that already knows something about your industry shortens the learning curve.
Management depth and strength. When you sign an outsourcing agreement, you're not just purchasing services; you're also purchasing expertise. Make it a point to check out the people at the top.
Reputation. Seek out some of the provider's clients and talk to them about their experience with the company. One question to ask: Does the provider simply do what it's told or does it constantly seek out ways to improve operations?
Strategic direction. Just as your company should have a business strategy, so should the provider. Surprisingly, many do not—and a large percentage of those that do seem to have a planning horizon of approximately one afternoon. You might argue that the provider's strategy should be the same as the client's, and that's true to a point. But a well-managed service firm should have its own goals and objectives as well. It should also have commitment and direction.
Operations. There's no substitute for a careful, in-depth evaluation of the provider's current operations. Assign a qualified person or team to assess the quality and efficiency of the candidate's services.
Global capability. Can the candidate meet all of your global needs either by itself or through existing alliances? Be careful on this one. It's not enough to be able to locate China on the map!
Information technology. Don't accept any excuses here. In any logistics operation, state-of-theart systems are critical. In specialized areas like international shipping, cross docking, order fulfillment, and freight bill payment, they are an absolute necessity. You also have to make sure that the provider's systems are compatible with any ERP (enterprise resource planning) or other systems you use.
Commitment to continuous improvement. Is the provider committed to ongoing performance enhancement? Does it have a formal procedure for continuous improvement?
Growth potential. If, like most companies, you anticipate growth in sales volumes, product lines or markets, you need a partner who will be able to keep up. Make sure the logistics service provider is in a position to support your growth.
Security. The events of Sept. 11, 2001, awoke Americans to the realization that terrorism is more than a theoretical threat. Today, it's essential to secure your supply chain against not only theft and pilferage but also against infiltration by terrorists. Make sure the candidate has sound security precautions in place.
CHemiätry and compatibility. CHemiätry isn't just a factor in picking a spouse. It's also something to consider when choosing a logistics partner. Follow your instincts and heed your intuition. If you have concerns about personal cHemiätry and compatibility at the
outset, think twice about going ahead with the deal. The situation is unlikely to improve over time.
Ethics. If we've learned one thing from the recent corporate accounting scandals, it's this: You need to be extremely careful about whom you deal with. Ask candidates about their codes of ethics. Though only the larger providers are likely to have formal ethics policies, even the smaller players should at least have some kind of code of ethics for their employees. But keep in mind that a written policy is no guarantee of ethical conduct. In the words of Mason Cooley, "Reading about ethics is about as likely to improve one's behavior as reading about sports is to make one into an athlete."
Cost. Though price need not necessarily be the least important of your selection criteria, neither should it be the foremost consideration. The manager who selects a provider based solely on cost has committed to an outsourcing strategy that has little chance of success. Ideally, cost should be a factor only in deciding among candidates that meet all the other criteria.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.